Check out Trey’s posting where you’ll need to click on “WATCH” to see the video.
Which is more obnoxious, offensive and juvenile? Me cracking the obvious joke about Helen Thomas’ sexual identity via a bit of insensitive gender stereotyping…OR [t]he Internet’s Leftist Crown Jewels savaging [someone’s] sexual identity via a bit of political stereotyping…in all seriousness?
And then click, “READ MORE” to read some comments from a listserv to which I subscribe. (Reproduced with the permission of their author.)
This is the most idiotic controversy I’ve ever seen.
“Jeff Gannon” worked as a gay escort. Why does this matter, exactly?
“Jeff Gannon” is a pseudonym. Again, why does this matter?
“Jeff Gannon” asked silly, softball questions to the President. And this merits the politics of personal destruction exactly how? If, however unlikely, Sarah McClendon had a steamy unconventional sex life should that have been exposed because she always asked Presidents idiotic questions?
If it is fair game to for left-wing extremists to target gays who work for right-wing ideological outfits simply because they act out in ways that Middle America would find repulsive, then why isn’t it fair game for right-wingers to expose the sleazy sex lives of gay marriage activists? These guys really oughtn’t go down that road, even if they stupidly believe that they want to. A word to the wise is sufficient.
Jeff Gannon is a small potato. Wasn’t it a waste of energy to expose him when there are bigger right-wing fish to fry? Again, who is Jeff Gannon exactly and why should we care?