Videoblogging John Aravosis‘ appearance on CNN, Trey Jackson writes:
Watch this and then ask yourself: Is the MSM giving this much help to Easongate or RatherBiased? Who knew CNN and the MSM were so helpful to bloggers attempting to break a story?
Check out Trey’s posting where you’ll need to click on “WATCH” to see the video.
UPDATE: Dennis the Peasant has an amusing take on this whole thing. Scroll down to the photos. Dennis asks:
Which is more obnoxious, offensive and juvenile? Me cracking the obvious joke about Helen Thomas’ sexual identity via a bit of insensitive gender stereotyping…OR [t]he Internet’s Leftist Crown Jewels savaging [someone’s] sexual identity via a bit of political stereotyping…in all seriousness?
Hat tip: Comment by Richard (#93) to Roger Simon‘s aforementioned post.
And then click, “READ MORE” to read some comments from a listserv to which I subscribe. (Reproduced with the permission of their author.)
This is the most idiotic controversy I’ve ever seen.
“Jeff Gannon” worked as a gay escort. Why does this matter, exactly?
“Jeff Gannon” is a pseudonym. Again, why does this matter?
“Jeff Gannon” asked silly, softball questions to the President. And this merits the politics of personal destruction exactly how? If, however unlikely, Sarah McClendon had a steamy unconventional sex life should that have been exposed because she always asked Presidents idiotic questions?
If it is fair game to for left-wing extremists to target gays who work for right-wing ideological outfits simply because they act out in ways that Middle America would find repulsive, then why isn’t it fair game for right-wingers to expose the sleazy sex lives of gay marriage activists? These guys really oughtn’t go down that road, even if they stupidly believe that they want to. A word to the wise is sufficient.
Jeff Gannon is a small potato. Wasn’t it a waste of energy to expose him when there are bigger right-wing fish to fry? Again, who is Jeff Gannon exactly and why should we care?