<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: In the Wake of Katrina, Rudy&#8217;s Looking Pretty Good</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gaypatriot.net/2005/09/27/in-the-wake-of-katrina-rudys-looking-pretty-good/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2005/09/27/in-the-wake-of-katrina-rudys-looking-pretty-good/</link>
	<description>The Internet home for American gay conservatives.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:53:49 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: regret</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2005/09/27/in-the-wake-of-katrina-rudys-looking-pretty-good/comment-page-1/#comment-7093</link>
		<dc:creator>regret</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2005 14:21:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=435#comment-7093</guid>
		<description>http://www.majorclick.com/home/members/stocks/hotss/incestpics/480047/young-incest-girls.html abruptlytangibletwinkles</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.majorclick.com/home/members/stocks/hotss/incestpics/480047/young-incest-girls.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.majorclick.com/home/members/stocks/hotss/incestpics/480047/young-incest-girls.html</a> abruptlytangibletwinkles</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mattered</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2005/09/27/in-the-wake-of-katrina-rudys-looking-pretty-good/comment-page-1/#comment-7092</link>
		<dc:creator>mattered</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2005 19:10:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=435#comment-7092</guid>
		<description>http://freepages.kconline.com/posik/police/college.html basicsunbuttonedwalls</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://freepages.kconline.com/posik/police/college.html" rel="nofollow">http://freepages.kconline.com/posik/police/college.html</a> basicsunbuttonedwalls</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2005/09/27/in-the-wake-of-katrina-rudys-looking-pretty-good/comment-page-1/#comment-7091</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2005 15:03:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=435#comment-7091</guid>
		<description>Well, like you, TGC, Santorum is a conservative. And like GP and ND30 (I don’t think GPW has weighed in on this issue), he&#039;s quite protective of unborn babies (except in the case of incest or rape of course). And like the NRO crowd that so warmly received GPW at their fundraiser, he appears not to be personally homophobic.

And GP can tell you why gave him money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, like you, TGC, Santorum is a conservative. And like GP and ND30 (I don’t think GPW has weighed in on this issue), he&#8217;s quite protective of unborn babies (except in the case of incest or rape of course). And like the NRO crowd that so warmly received GPW at their fundraiser, he appears not to be personally homophobic.</p>
<p>And GP can tell you why gave him money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ThatGayConservative</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2005/09/27/in-the-wake-of-katrina-rudys-looking-pretty-good/comment-page-1/#comment-7090</link>
		<dc:creator>ThatGayConservative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2005 08:24:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=435#comment-7090</guid>
		<description>#39

All I know is that dog comment, but that was spun way out there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#39</p>
<p>All I know is that dog comment, but that was spun way out there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2005/09/27/in-the-wake-of-katrina-rudys-looking-pretty-good/comment-page-1/#comment-7089</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2005 22:32:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=435#comment-7089</guid>
		<description>#38: I don’t know much about Santorum to say either way though.

Really?

Perhaps GP could bring you up to speed. Or maybe he just gave him money because he thought he was cute too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#38: I don’t know much about Santorum to say either way though.</p>
<p>Really?</p>
<p>Perhaps GP could bring you up to speed. Or maybe he just gave him money because he thought he was cute too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ThatGayConservative</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2005/09/27/in-the-wake-of-katrina-rudys-looking-pretty-good/comment-page-1/#comment-7088</link>
		<dc:creator>ThatGayConservative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2005 21:23:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=435#comment-7088</guid>
		<description>#33

Just because somebody&#039;s cute doesn&#039;t mean they&#039;re worth voting for. I don&#039;t know much about Santorum to say either way though.

Ex. I thought Wes Clarke was sorta handsome in an Ashley Wilkes sorta way, but I wouldn&#039;t vote for a DNC tool like that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#33</p>
<p>Just because somebody&#8217;s cute doesn&#8217;t mean they&#8217;re worth voting for. I don&#8217;t know much about Santorum to say either way though.</p>
<p>Ex. I thought Wes Clarke was sorta handsome in an Ashley Wilkes sorta way, but I wouldn&#8217;t vote for a DNC tool like that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: North Dallas Thirty</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2005/09/27/in-the-wake-of-katrina-rudys-looking-pretty-good/comment-page-1/#comment-7087</link>
		<dc:creator>North Dallas Thirty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2005 20:26:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=435#comment-7087</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Thirty, No. 32, why is a Santorum candidacy a “bad idea”?&lt;/i&gt;

Why was a Dennis Kucinich candidacy a bad idea?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Thirty, No. 32, why is a Santorum candidacy a “bad idea”?</i></p>
<p>Why was a Dennis Kucinich candidacy a bad idea?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: monty</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2005/09/27/in-the-wake-of-katrina-rudys-looking-pretty-good/comment-page-1/#comment-7086</link>
		<dc:creator>monty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2005 19:50:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=435#comment-7086</guid>
		<description>VtheK,

According to your post, I don&#039;t know whether to bring a shovel or innertube to the proceedings. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>VtheK,</p>
<p>According to your post, I don&#8217;t know whether to bring a shovel or innertube to the proceedings. <img src='http://www.gaypatriot.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: V the K</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2005/09/27/in-the-wake-of-katrina-rudys-looking-pretty-good/comment-page-1/#comment-7085</link>
		<dc:creator>V the K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2005 19:41:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=435#comment-7085</guid>
		<description>The indictment looks weak (it doesn&#039;t even allege any specific act of wrongdoing on DeLay&#039;s part) and it seems odd to see a conspiracy indictment with no indictment for the crime the conspirators were allegedly conspiring to commit.

But, having said that, I think DeLay is in trouble. And it will be interesting watching the left work themselves into new depths of derangement over this. (I see from the top thread, it&#039;s already begun.) If the Dems follow their previous pattern, they&#039;ll go overboard with the accusations and theatrics and it should be pretty entertaining.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The indictment looks weak (it doesn&#8217;t even allege any specific act of wrongdoing on DeLay&#8217;s part) and it seems odd to see a conspiracy indictment with no indictment for the crime the conspirators were allegedly conspiring to commit.</p>
<p>But, having said that, I think DeLay is in trouble. And it will be interesting watching the left work themselves into new depths of derangement over this. (I see from the top thread, it&#8217;s already begun.) If the Dems follow their previous pattern, they&#8217;ll go overboard with the accusations and theatrics and it should be pretty entertaining.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Queer Patriot</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2005/09/27/in-the-wake-of-katrina-rudys-looking-pretty-good/comment-page-1/#comment-7084</link>
		<dc:creator>Queer Patriot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2005 19:04:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=435#comment-7084</guid>
		<description>Anon, No. 33, people here give Santorum money?  That&#039;s shocking, well...maybe not.

Thirty, No. 32, why is a Santorum candidacy a &quot;bad idea&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anon, No. 33, people here give Santorum money?  That&#8217;s shocking, well&#8230;maybe not.</p>
<p>Thirty, No. 32, why is a Santorum candidacy a &#8220;bad idea&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2005/09/27/in-the-wake-of-katrina-rudys-looking-pretty-good/comment-page-1/#comment-7083</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2005 17:44:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=435#comment-7083</guid>
		<description>ThatGayConservative thinks Santorum&#039;s cute. GP gives him money. Go through the issues--he&#039;s &lt;i&gt;your&lt;/i&gt; perfect candidate. What&#039;s not to like?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ThatGayConservative thinks Santorum&#8217;s cute. GP gives him money. Go through the issues&#8211;he&#8217;s <i>your</i> perfect candidate. What&#8217;s not to like?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: North Dallas Thirty</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2005/09/27/in-the-wake-of-katrina-rudys-looking-pretty-good/comment-page-1/#comment-7082</link>
		<dc:creator>North Dallas Thirty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2005 17:31:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=435#comment-7082</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Mr. Thirty is so protective of Republicans that he won’t even talk about a Santorum candidacy. That’s party discipline.&lt;/i&gt;

Oh, I&#039;m more than happy to talk about it. I think it&#039;s a bad idea and I think it&#039;s dead in the water.

However, my point was that the latter would not be true if &quot;Christian conservatives&quot; were in complete control of the Republican Party, as you assert they are -- Santorum would be the favored candidate.

&lt;i&gt;Speaking of party discipline, what’s the DeLay Defense being cranked out of RNC headquarters this afternoon?&lt;/i&gt;

DeLay just stepped aside, which is exactly the right thing to do in this situation. It now goes into the court system, which will weigh the evidence and make the determination of whether or not he is guilty. Finally, if he is found guilty, persuant to any particular laws that may govern his eligibility for office, the voters of his district will make the determination as to whether he should be re-elected and his colleagues in the House will determine whether he should hold a leadership position.

From my personal standpoint, Ronnie Earle still hasn&#039;t convicted the people he&#039;s already indicted. This is also the last day of the grand jury in question, meaning that Ronnie would have to re-prove his case to a new set of people. However, as has already been shown in his vendetta against Kay Bailey Hutchinson, Ronnie can indict any Republican in Democratic-moonbat-controlled Travis County; the problem comes when he actually has to prove their guilt.

Grand juries that sit for ethical judgements against statewide officials should be composed of statewide representation. The Democrats have fought that for years because they know Ronnie would be helpless in front of a jury that wasn&#039;t completely from Travis County.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Mr. Thirty is so protective of Republicans that he won’t even talk about a Santorum candidacy. That’s party discipline.</i></p>
<p>Oh, I&#8217;m more than happy to talk about it. I think it&#8217;s a bad idea and I think it&#8217;s dead in the water.</p>
<p>However, my point was that the latter would not be true if &#8220;Christian conservatives&#8221; were in complete control of the Republican Party, as you assert they are &#8212; Santorum would be the favored candidate.</p>
<p><i>Speaking of party discipline, what’s the DeLay Defense being cranked out of RNC headquarters this afternoon?</i></p>
<p>DeLay just stepped aside, which is exactly the right thing to do in this situation. It now goes into the court system, which will weigh the evidence and make the determination of whether or not he is guilty. Finally, if he is found guilty, persuant to any particular laws that may govern his eligibility for office, the voters of his district will make the determination as to whether he should be re-elected and his colleagues in the House will determine whether he should hold a leadership position.</p>
<p>From my personal standpoint, Ronnie Earle still hasn&#8217;t convicted the people he&#8217;s already indicted. This is also the last day of the grand jury in question, meaning that Ronnie would have to re-prove his case to a new set of people. However, as has already been shown in his vendetta against Kay Bailey Hutchinson, Ronnie can indict any Republican in Democratic-moonbat-controlled Travis County; the problem comes when he actually has to prove their guilt.</p>
<p>Grand juries that sit for ethical judgements against statewide officials should be composed of statewide representation. The Democrats have fought that for years because they know Ronnie would be helpless in front of a jury that wasn&#8217;t completely from Travis County.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Synova</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2005/09/27/in-the-wake-of-katrina-rudys-looking-pretty-good/comment-page-1/#comment-7081</link>
		<dc:creator>Synova</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2005 17:26:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=435#comment-7081</guid>
		<description>How it it party discipline not to talk about Santorum?

Saw the funniest website just before the last election.  (On second thought, the Goths for Bush was the funniest.)   It was, honest to God, warning about mind control rays urging people to vote for Bush... the lady had felt them herself and speculated that the Bush campaign had aquired a person with power to work on their side.  There were instructions on how to filter and sheild against it that power.

It would explain how Republicans all know what the message is supposed to be.  :-)

( My daughter and I would crack each other up for months by saying &quot;Filter and Sheild&quot; in a spooky voice complete with hand actions.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How it it party discipline not to talk about Santorum?</p>
<p>Saw the funniest website just before the last election.  (On second thought, the Goths for Bush was the funniest.)   It was, honest to God, warning about mind control rays urging people to vote for Bush&#8230; the lady had felt them herself and speculated that the Bush campaign had aquired a person with power to work on their side.  There were instructions on how to filter and sheild against it that power.</p>
<p>It would explain how Republicans all know what the message is supposed to be.  <img src='http://www.gaypatriot.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>( My daughter and I would crack each other up for months by saying &#8220;Filter and Sheild&#8221; in a spooky voice complete with hand actions.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Queer Patriot</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2005/09/27/in-the-wake-of-katrina-rudys-looking-pretty-good/comment-page-1/#comment-7080</link>
		<dc:creator>Queer Patriot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2005 16:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=435#comment-7080</guid>
		<description>Mr. Thirty is so protective of Republicans that he won&#039;t even talk about a Santorum candidacy.  That&#039;s party discipline.

Speaking of party discipline, what&#039;s the DeLay Defense being cranked out of RNC headquarters this afternoon?

Let&#039;s see, in the course of about one month, we have the prospect of seeing indictments of the Republican Majority Leader in the House, the Republican Majority Leader in the Senate, and the President&#039;s top advisor.  Now THAT, Mr. Bush, is a real &quot;trifecta&quot;!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Thirty is so protective of Republicans that he won&#8217;t even talk about a Santorum candidacy.  That&#8217;s party discipline.</p>
<p>Speaking of party discipline, what&#8217;s the DeLay Defense being cranked out of RNC headquarters this afternoon?</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s see, in the course of about one month, we have the prospect of seeing indictments of the Republican Majority Leader in the House, the Republican Majority Leader in the Senate, and the President&#8217;s top advisor.  Now THAT, Mr. Bush, is a real &#8220;trifecta&#8221;!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: V the K</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2005/09/27/in-the-wake-of-katrina-rudys-looking-pretty-good/comment-page-1/#comment-7079</link>
		<dc:creator>V the K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2005 16:08:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=435#comment-7079</guid>
		<description>I had not heard that Romney was anti-Second Amendment, although I was aware that Rudy and John (spit) McCain were. I have also heard that Condi is squishy on social con issues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had not heard that Romney was anti-Second Amendment, although I was aware that Rudy and John (spit) McCain were. I have also heard that Condi is squishy on social con issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: North Dallas Thirty</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2005/09/27/in-the-wake-of-katrina-rudys-looking-pretty-good/comment-page-1/#comment-7078</link>
		<dc:creator>North Dallas Thirty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2005 15:08:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=435#comment-7078</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;In No. 17, Anon raises a good question: what about Santorum? Why no groundswell for him?&lt;/i&gt;

Don&#039;t ask a question where the answer will make you look like an idiot.

I&#039;ll give you a hint; Santorum would be the most likely candidate for the &quot;Christian conservatives&quot; that you claim dominate the GOP, completely control the party, and would never for one minute support a candidate who was off their message.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>In No. 17, Anon raises a good question: what about Santorum? Why no groundswell for him?</i></p>
<p>Don&#8217;t ask a question where the answer will make you look like an idiot.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll give you a hint; Santorum would be the most likely candidate for the &#8220;Christian conservatives&#8221; that you claim dominate the GOP, completely control the party, and would never for one minute support a candidate who was off their message.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rightwingprof</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2005/09/27/in-the-wake-of-katrina-rudys-looking-pretty-good/comment-page-1/#comment-7077</link>
		<dc:creator>rightwingprof</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2005 14:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=435#comment-7077</guid>
		<description>Well, from my red state conservative perspective, shared by the other red state conservatives I know, Rudy doesn&#039;t have a chance. It&#039;s not that we don&#039;t like or admire him. But we don&#039;t trust him. He&#039;s a metrocon, like Romney and we don&#039;t trust him either. They&#039;re gun grabbers. And don&#039;t forget, he was the mayor of NYC. I suppose an ex-mayor of San Francisco would have less chance of getting any votes from us, but not by much.

I wouldn&#039;t vote for him. Run Condi. We&#039;ll line up to vote for her.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, from my red state conservative perspective, shared by the other red state conservatives I know, Rudy doesn&#8217;t have a chance. It&#8217;s not that we don&#8217;t like or admire him. But we don&#8217;t trust him. He&#8217;s a metrocon, like Romney and we don&#8217;t trust him either. They&#8217;re gun grabbers. And don&#8217;t forget, he was the mayor of NYC. I suppose an ex-mayor of San Francisco would have less chance of getting any votes from us, but not by much.</p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t vote for him. Run Condi. We&#8217;ll line up to vote for her.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: V the K</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2005/09/27/in-the-wake-of-katrina-rudys-looking-pretty-good/comment-page-1/#comment-7076</link>
		<dc:creator>V the K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2005 12:45:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=435#comment-7076</guid>
		<description>#18 -- &lt;i&gt;But I don’t think Clark can win because he comes across as a whiner. *pout* it’s so unfair I lost my command *pout*. &lt;/i&gt;

And then there&#039;s that whole tried-to-start-World-War-III thing.

I voted for Mitt. He&#039;s the &#039;guy who&#039;d probably be the best president out of anyone but who will get clobbered in the primaries&#039; candidate of this election cycle. Like Steve Forbes or Joe Lieberman.

#12 -- &lt;i&gt;I’m resigned to four or eight years of St. Hillarybeast &lt;/i&gt;

I&#039;m not convinced that a Hillary presidency would be a completely bad thing. It might make the Republicans start acting like Republicans again... you know, smaller government, fiscal responsibility. And they might just be able to trick her into doing something good on border security the way they got Bill to sign welfare reform; despite her &#039;Hurray forvoter fraud&#039; comments last week.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#18 &#8212; <i>But I don’t think Clark can win because he comes across as a whiner. *pout* it’s so unfair I lost my command *pout*. </i></p>
<p>And then there&#8217;s that whole tried-to-start-World-War-III thing.</p>
<p>I voted for Mitt. He&#8217;s the &#8216;guy who&#8217;d probably be the best president out of anyone but who will get clobbered in the primaries&#8217; candidate of this election cycle. Like Steve Forbes or Joe Lieberman.</p>
<p>#12 &#8212; <i>I’m resigned to four or eight years of St. Hillarybeast </i></p>
<p>I&#8217;m not convinced that a Hillary presidency would be a completely bad thing. It might make the Republicans start acting like Republicans again&#8230; you know, smaller government, fiscal responsibility. And they might just be able to trick her into doing something good on border security the way they got Bill to sign welfare reform; despite her &#8216;Hurray forvoter fraud&#8217; comments last week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Queer Patriot</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2005/09/27/in-the-wake-of-katrina-rudys-looking-pretty-good/comment-page-1/#comment-7075</link>
		<dc:creator>Queer Patriot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2005 11:51:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=435#comment-7075</guid>
		<description>In No. 17, Anon raises a good question: what about Santorum?  Why no groundswell for him?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In No. 17, Anon raises a good question: what about Santorum?  Why no groundswell for him?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: North Dallas Thirty</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2005/09/27/in-the-wake-of-katrina-rudys-looking-pretty-good/comment-page-1/#comment-7074</link>
		<dc:creator>North Dallas Thirty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2005 05:51:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=435#comment-7074</guid>
		<description>Agreed, Synova. &quot;Christian conservatives&quot; is the latest excuse that the left has come up with to explain why their &lt;a href=&quot;http://gaypatriot.net/?comments_popup=595#comment-5156&quot;&gt; moonbat views&lt;/a&gt; don&#039;t fly with Americans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed, Synova. &#8220;Christian conservatives&#8221; is the latest excuse that the left has come up with to explain why their <a href="http://gaypatriot.net/?comments_popup=595#comment-5156"> moonbat views</a> don&#8217;t fly with Americans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

