I just bought my copy of Michelle Malkin’s new book: Unhinged: Exposing Liberals Gone Wild. Sounds like a raucous good time, never mind the fact that the front cover is awesome.
It is too bad I declined to press charges against my run in with an Unhinged Liberal during the 2004 campaign. I found out later he worked for Philadelphia District Attorney Lynne Abraham (D). I just didn’t have the “bandwidth” to deal with the creep at the time. The police investigation lasted about a month, so I think he and his rich daddy in Virginia had a lot of sleepless nights wondering what I was going to do. Humprh! Throw a buttered biscuit at me, will ya!
Anyway, Michelle has the mugshots of some of her featured Unhinged Liberals today. She has always been a great supporter of this blog.
-Bruce (GayPatriot)
I still prefer Ann Coulter’s: Hypothermia: Why I Want All Liberals to Freeze to Death in an Icy Wasteland.
Link: http://kurlander.blogspot.com/2005/10/thursday-night-hot-chick.html
Did Pickles get a mugshot when she mowed down her boyfriend?
Did Cheney get a shot for his two DWI’s?
….. and how cute is Josh Miner…. WOOF!
Hi-larious! I wouldn’t be surprised if this turns into a multi-installment series, a la Harry Potter. Lord knows the libs have provided the world with more than enough material to fill any number of volumes on the subject. Maybe Michelle Malkin could break them down into categories for easy reference:
Vol. I: Hate, Rage, and Profanity
Vol. II: Violence and General Mayhem
Vol. III: Lies Told and Conspiracy Theories Advanced
Vol. IV: Celebrity Derangement in Words and Action
Vol. V: Demonstrations, Advanced Puppet Making, and Street Theater
Vol. VI: Elected Officials Out of Control
Vol. VII: the Cults of Che, Mumia, Ward, and Cindy
Vol. VIII: Lefty Bloggers Go Postal
Vol. IX: Liberal Guilt and American Self-Loathing
Vol. X: Free and Unfettered Use of the Hitler/Nazi Analogy.
Hell, that was easy! Truth is, with so much fodder for the grist mill these books could practically write themselves. Keep it up American Left…you’re doing the conservative movement a world of good. 🙂
Too bad they didn’t have Tom Delay’s Glamour Shots makeup artist. Or maybe Malkin could use the retoucher from USA Today for the shots.
And you wonder why people question the integrity of bloggers/personalities (in her case definitely not a journalist) who are out to make buck from inciting right-wing or left-wing hysteria against the other side.
Pa-the-tic.
It looks like the Hysterical Tantrum Party has just locked down the Senate as a publicity stunt.
VK, if Clinton WH did 1/5th of the crap that Bush WH has done with this, we would have dozens of congressional investigations going on simultaneously. I mean, if they’re willing to spend $30 million to investigate a BJ, imagine what kind of resources they’d apply towards actual matters pertaining to failures impacting national security.
Also, it looks like the partisan Democrat judge has been removed from DeLay’s case.
Yes VK, hopefully they will find some non-partisan Republican (isn’t that redudant anyway, only Democrats can be partisan) to ajudicate those proceedings. If only Republicans can preside over Republican trials, can we do the same when it’s the dirty Democrat’s turn in the legal hot seat? Sounds idiotic to me, but nothing new from the DeLay crew…
Yeah, nothing inspires confidence in the legal system like having a presiding judge who donates money to an organization that sells T-shirts with the defendant’s mugshot on them.
Unless it’s having a prosecutor who attends fundraisers for the defendant’s opponents and invites a film crew to follow him around as he pursues his investigation.
There were certainly groups putting out those t-shirts, but MoveOn.org wasn’t one of them. The money he did give to MoveOn.org was given to help the Kerry campaign. Is supporting or voting for Kerry in 2004 now grounds for dismissing the judge in this case for being biased? I wonder if the new judge will be a Ranger or some other high profile GOP fund raiser. No partisanship possible there, because again only Democrats can be partisan…
oh…and if the political affiliations of the prosecutor is a big issue for you, then I guess you really had sad faces on when Ken Starr was heading up the Clinton investigation.
OK, correction, Move-on wasn’t selling T-shirts with DeLay’s mugshot. All it did was raise $132,000 from its members to run anti-DeLay ads. Obviously, there’s nothing wrong with a judge donating money to an organization that bought ad time to attack a defendant in his court. I stand humbly corrected.
So if we find out the judge it Scooter’s case donated money to the organizations that ran anti-Kerry ads during the last election, you’ll be sure to jump all over that potential breech of justice as well, right? I mean, we can’t have such rank partisanship in the sitting judge who had such admiration for this guy’s boss and leader either. Oh wait, he’d be a Repubican, so of course he couldn’t be partisan.
It is clear the judge gave money to MoveOn.org in support of the Kerry campaign, not in the campaign against DeLay. It’s not like this judge ran ousttomdelay.net or had lawn signs saying “Vote out the ‘Bugman’ in 2004”.
To highlight what I stated in my previous post. As the AP story on the judge issue states, in 1994 Perkins recussed himself from Sen Hutchinson’s case because he had made a $300 contribution to her opponent. Perkin’s donations were not to an anti-DeLay campaign drive, which in fact MoveOn.org started after Perkin’s donations were put forth.
Lastly, DeLay’s lawyer made it clear what the problem was. He stated, ” The public perception of Judge Perkins’ activities shows him to be on opposite sides of the political fence than Tom DeLay.” So once again, the rationale is that a Democrat can’t prosecute a Republican, and hypothetically vice versa, in DeGuerin and DeLay’s mind. These are the people you are standing up for…
Move-On was already attacking DeLay in 2004 for his role in the Texas redistricting controversy. It is highly unlikely that Judge Perkins was unaware of this.
#4
Too bad they didn’t have Tom Delay’s Glamour Shots makeup artist.
Here’s your sign.
#2
Did Pickles get a mugshot when she mowed down her boyfriend?
You still feasting on that pile of debunked liberal BS?
A better question than yours would be to ask why there isn’t a pic of Teddy for murdering Mary Jo? Or how about Gary Condit? For that matter, let’s see pics of Algore III or Paul Dean. Of course who could forget John Wayne Gacey worked for the Dummocrats.
I’m guessing if Mr. Mod were a gay litigant in a child custody case, he’d be completely comfortable with a judge who had made donations to Focus on the Family and the Traditional Values Coalition.
You know, ThatGayConservative, you always have so much anger ….. small penis?
#17 — what do you mean “debunked liberal BS?” Just because Democrats don’t make a big deal of it doesn’t mean it didn’t happen. Check your facts.
And #19, cute — and definitely a possibility. Along with steroids, but then the two normally go together.
ThatGayConservative, I think you’ve won the debate today. I guess “small penis” has replaced “you’re ugly” on this playground.
Thanks 21, now we have a 3rd possibility that might explain it.
Tonight’s question:
What beliefs does a “moderate” hold?
#19
That coming from an a$$ clown who uses “Big Guy” as a handle to compensate. Not even the Gay.com crowd would buy into that one. Angry? Nah. One thing you libtards ARE good for is a laugh.
#20
I have checked into the facts. Turns out, it’s another liberal BS conspiracy based on hatred. If you can tear your lips away from Teddy’s cock, why don’t you ask him why he let Mary Jo die? See if Gary can tell you where Chandra is.
I thought Chandra lived in Hollywood…or Watts…or, oh, silly me! Got that name confused again! My bad.
#25
Huggie,
I was working in Watts that day, with an open period so I hit the computer lab.
I am so flattered that you actually are interested in my minutiae to actually post about it.
Why don’t you ask me why glisteny…glistens?
GayCon: Oh ye of little cock (and brains), you might want to go look up the facts of Laura’s 1963 accident before you try the typical right-wing position of certitude on this one.
You could go to USA Today — http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/e1698.htm
And read: “Mrs. Bush ran stop sign in fatal crash” — “AUSTIN, Texas (AP) – Details in a 1963 accident report say that Laura Bush, then 17, ran a stop sign in the Texas crash that killed a friend in another car. The report, adding information to previous reports of the crash, was released to The Associated Press on Wednesday. ”It was a very tragic accident that deeply affected the families and was very painful for all involved, including the community at large,” said Mrs. Bush’s spokesman, Andrew Malcolm. ”To this day, Mrs. Bush remains unable to talk about it.”
Or you could go to the CNN archives — http://www.cnn.com/CNN/Programs/people/shows/bush/timeline.html
And find this: “1963: Laura accidentally drove through a stop sign and hit a car driven by a high school friend. He was killed. No charges were filed in the accident.”
Or, you could go to Snopes.com and read all about it.
But, you didn’t. Instead you just flamed away with this, “I have checked into the facts. Turns out, it’s another liberal BS conspiracy based on hatred.” I leave you now, standing there, shaking that little head in disappointment, realizing you just peed all over yourself here in public. And knowing that I’ve given you yet another reason to…
Love Pussy
I thought Chandra was the midget on “The Amazing Race”
p.s. Don’t worry THATGAYCONSERVATIVE…. many guys like a stupid guy with a small penis….
Actually, Pussy, what you and your fellow liberals are putting on the net is to what TGC is referring. I doubt anyone denies Laura Bush’s involvement in the car accident.
I don’t care what the Cons think of “The Stunt” but it was effective.
The Dem’s got their investigative committee. End of story.
And now, have you read the Alito papers where he was in favor of Gay Rights in the 70’s and wrote that anti gay discrimination was wrong.
This is going to be delicious. 😛 🙂
The right will find they have a candidate that can’t be Bushwacked, and the left will have to entertain the possibility of the return to back alley abortions.
But as far as the abortion decision goes; if it returns to a States Rights issue, we all know the only people to suffer will be poor, minority women in red states who won’t be able to travel to a blue state for one.
And so it goes…
Actually, Chandler, whenever I hear abortion supporters cry about “poor minority women” and their healthcare, I just laugh.
You see, there’s an amazing correlation out there; black women, for example, have abortions at twice the rate of white women overall, with black women ages 18 – 24 being the most likely group to have one. You should consider it a triumph of abortion marketing that “poor minority” women are choosing abortion, which costs an average of $275, versus free condoms.
However, interestingly enough, do you know what the leading cause of death among black males AND females age 25 – 44 is? That would be HIV infection and AIDS.
It would stand to reason that promoting unrestricted sex is worse for poor minority womens’ health. However, anything that restricts sex, like carrying a child or having to actually think of the consequences of having a child, results in less money for the abortionists and the abortion clinics. The money wins, every time.
It would be highly interesting to know if the Lynn Abraham employee was one of the authors of the highly unhinged Grand Jury report criticizing the Archdiocese of Philadelphia.
However, anything that restricts sex, like carrying a child or having to actually think of the consequences of having a child, results in less money for the abortionists and the abortion clinics. The money wins, every time.
======================
If money won every time, then poor women would get FREE abortions which would lead to dramatic reductions in the costs of Medicaid.
Just as vaccines save ten dollars in future services not needed for every dollar spent, and abortion for poor women would save tens of thousands of dollars in medical expenditures.
If it were about the money, and not some fake religious argument cloaked in fake morality, they would indeed be free.
The money doesn’t always win.
“But as far as the abortion decision goes; if it returns to a States Rights issue, we all know the only people to suffer will be poor, minority women in red states who won’t be able to travel to a blue state for one.”
I believe its the ease of abortion in the blue communities (there are no blue states) that has led this nation right into the South’s lap. It helps explain why we pick the leader of this nation and the world every four years. No doubt this is the prime source for the bitter bigotry the Left feels towards millions of their fellow citizens south of the Mason-Dixon.
If money won every time, then poor women would get FREE abortions which would lead to dramatic reductions in the costs of Medicaid.
LOL….based on what I’ve already shown, what you would lose in children’s costs you would more than make up in STD treatment costs.
Nice try, Chandler, but why don’t we talk about your desire to promote behavior which increases STD infection rates among poor minorities?
abortion for poor women would save tens of thousands of dollars in medical expenditures.
How about we just abort every other fetus.
We could abolish the federal debt in just a few years.
LOL….based on what I’ve already shown, what you would lose in children’s costs you would more than make up in STD treatment costs.
Comment by North Dallas Thirty
=========================
Yep, it looks just as stupid the second time.