GayPatriot

The Internet home for American gay conservatives.

Before Iraq War, Bush Critic Feared Osama Might “Boogie to Baghdad”

by

Since Byron York regrets that so few in the media have picked up on a catchy expression by one of the many people who mispresents his own statments in order to criticize President Bush and so gain media attention, I decided to post on that very expression.

You see, when Richard Clarke, the top White House counterterrorism official in the Clinton Administration, began to understand the level of Bush-hatred in the media, he wrote a book critical of the current Administration’s attitude toward the terrorist threat. He chnaged some of his past opinions and mispresented his views in order to better attack the president. Given this man’s lambasting of that much-reviled (in media circles) Administration, he got top billing on 60 Minutes and soon became the darling of the MSM and its preferred political party–the Democrats.

All were certain that his revelations would help bring down President Bush. After W’s defeat in the 2004 election, most assumed Clarke would get a top post in the Kerry Administraiton. Fortunately, that did not come to pass.

Will, despite Mr. Clarke’s frequent criticism of President Bush, his words prior to the liberation of Iraq help prove that the president made a strong case for war. Indeed, they help debunk the spurious charge that that good man lied in making that case. Well aware of the relationship between Al Qaeda and Saddam Hussein, Mr. Clarke “believed that if the United States made bin Laden’s situation too hot in Afghanistan, then, in Clarke’s non-famous words, ‘old wily Osama will likely boogie to Baghdad.’” Please read all of Mr. York’s piece which can be easily confirmed by checking out the 9/11 Commission Report (p. 134).

The more facts come out, the more apparent it becomes that not only did the president not lie, but that he made a very strong case for leading our nation to war against a bloodthirsty tyrant who, while in power, had been busy building relationships with terrorists bent on attacking America.

Thanks to President Bush, that dictator is no longer in power and can’t very well build relationships with terrorists from a prison cell.

(H/t: Instapundit)

Comments

  5. TGC, when I checked the blog this morning and noted how few comments this one attracted, I was going to say exactly what you said.

    I watched The Wizard of Oz the night before last. It seems that what water is to the Wicked Witch of the West, facts are to liberals, an “element” which makes them melt.

  8. facts are to liberals, an “element” which makes them melt.

    Isn’t it more like removing their comments, rather than facts? If you can keep liberal ideas out of the mainstream – POOF, all gone, no more liberal.

    [We’re just deleting some of your comments from this blog. We’re not removing liberal ideas from the blogoshere or anywhere else for that matter. –Ed.]

  10. LOL…..there’s two problems with that logic, Pussy.

    1) As vote returns show, the US armed forces are overwhelmingly Republican; thus, Republicans ARE doing the bulk of the fighting.

    2) You and your fellow Democrats aren’t running to enlist to fight in Afghanistan, which you allegedly support.