Gay Patriot Header Image

Senator Tom Coburn — an Interesting Dilemma for Gay Republicans

Posted by GayPatriotWest at 6:54 pm - January 29, 2006.
Filed under: Gay Politics,National Politics

While generally supporting the president, I disagree with him on a number of issues. I have criticized him for his support of the Federal Marriage Amendment and for failing to follow the Gipper’s vision of federalism. I have not, however, devoted as much time as I should to his apparent inability to veto pork-laden and otherwise bloated budget bills. But, thankfully, a number of House and Senate Republicans, particularly three Senators elected in 2004, North Carolina’s Richard Burr, South Carolina’s Jim DeMint and especially Oklahoma’s Tom Coburn, have stood up for fiscal discipline.

Taking the lead in the fight for fiscal responsibility, along with his Arizona colleague, John McCain, Senator Coburn is challenging “special projects that senators insert into spending bills until the practice stops.” Together with another Arizona Republican, Representative Jeff Flake, Coburn has proposed requiring “that every earmark be specifically included in the text of the legislation Congress is voting on” (via Instapundit), thus preventing legislators from slipping in expensive projects at the last minute.

Yet, this Republican who is spearheading an effort near and dear to the hearts of Reagan Republicans, including this blogger, has also made some unusual comments about gays. In his 2004 campaign, he warned of lesbians lurking in the lavatories in schools in southeast Oklahoma. Almost two years ago, he claimed that some kind of gay “agenda” threatens our freedom:

the gay community has infiltrated the very centers of power in every area across this country and they wield extreme power. That agenda is the greatest threat to our freedom we face today. Why do you think we see the rationalization for abortion and multiple sexual partners? That’s a gay agenda.

Despite this strange views on gay issues, when he served in the U.S. House of Representatives, he was, according to The Advocatea vocal supporter of AIDS funding.” He met with a Log Cabin group and told them, “We have a common enemy. It is called HIV.” At that meeting, he noted “the great strides being made in the battle against AIDS, adding that no one should allow his or her own prejudices or feelings of persecution keep him or her from doing the right thing.

Given his leadership on AIDS funding and his commitment to containing the growth of federal spending, Coburn would be my favorite U.S. Senator were it not for his attitudes toward the gay community.


Do Minority Conservative Bloggers Attract More “Moonbats”?

Posted by GayPatriotWest at 2:33 am - January 29, 2006.
Filed under: Blogging,Conservative Discrimination,Liberals

Just over four months ago, when Instapundit linked a piece where I asked “If Iraq is like Vietnam, how come the rallies keep getting smaller?, we received a record number of comments — and not just from those who agreed with the post. We attracted a number of critics, many of whom expressed their disagreement in less-than-civil tones. And I saw an uptick in the amount of hate mail I received. The same thing happened again last week when Glenn linked my post on the Canadian elections. We got a lot more comments and I got a little more hate mail.

Yet, whenever, Glenn links Gateway Pundit whom he seems to link at least once a week (and for good reason), that apparently straight blogger never seems to attract the number of comments we do. And he gets approximately six times as many daily visits as do we. In a post where Instapundit linked both of us, we received three times as many comments as did Gateway. From his most recent Insta-link, Gateway (at the time of this writing) received only three comments.

And that got me thinking. Earlier this month, I had read Michelle Malkin‘s book, Unhinged: Exposing Liberals Gone Wild wherein this woman (who happens to be Asian) shared some of the nasty e-mails she has received from her critics on the far left. A number made derogatory references to her ethnicity, calling her a “yellow woman” and “gook” who “ought to be shot between those Viet Cong eyes!”

I wondered if this reason that we attract more nasty comments (than does Gateway) is the same that Michelle seems to attract so much hate-mail — that “moonbats” get particularly agitated by “minority” conservatives, that it upsets their view of the world when gay people and Asians refuse to join some “coalition of the oppressed” in speaking out against conservatives. They would rather all conservatives be white Christian men so they could more easily dismiss our ideas.