When I announced my radio appearance last week, I promised to provide the link to the archive of the show. Click here if you’d like to listen. Also, when Lores interviewed me, I had mentioned a book by Byron York and spaced on the title. It’s
The Vast Left Wing Conspiracy : The Untold Story of the Democrats’ Desperate Fight to Reclaim Power and well worth a read. If you check out ThatGayConservative’s new space, you’ll see that our fellow blogger is reading the book right now.
The Internet home for American gay conservatives.
Oorah!
The “vast left-wing conspiracy?” Is it anything like Hilary’s “vast right-wing conspiracy,’ OR more hypocratic double standards? Preach to the choir, but whichignore the issues, is what wingnuts from both sides of these political exremities are proccupied with: Truth be told.
Given your own wingnut views, Stephen, I find your statement incredibly amusing.
Finally got the chance to listen, Dan. Good work!!!
stephen, you’re a complete tool, with apologies to tools everywhere.
Eric on the Left Coast
Unlike paranoid halfwits like yourself, pussy, Dan doesn’t need to defend his sexuality at EVERY FUCKING TURN.
Some of us don’t see ourselves as life-long victims.
Now shut the fuck up and go watch the news. You might learn something.
Eric in Hollywood
always willing to guide the ignorati into the light of truth
Dan, I just listened to the interview and thought you handled it very well. Her question about the movie as a propaganda tool to inject homosexuality into the mainstream of america was one of those “oh shit” moments for her. She clearly didn’t expect you to step into it and hit it out of the park like Barry Bonds putting one into the bay! Good shot.
David in Texas
I just want to hear my name again. 😉
FYI… I chose my points carefully to appeal to her audience — and you should note that I brought up the necessity of talking about monogamy when we talk about marriage because I wanted to make clear that this gay man at least believes that gay people not only are capable of monogamous relationships but can benefit from them.
You do, I have to acknowledge, beneath your rhetoric, raise a valid point. I do believe that whenever someone uses the term “homosexual lifestyle,” we should reply which one — ’cause from my experience there are so many — only a few of which accord with those imagined by social conservatives. If I failed to make such a statement, I regret having passed up the opportunity to do so.