<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cheney&#8217;s Hunting Mishap &amp; the Ongoing Decline of the MSM</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/02/14/the-vice-presidents-hunting-mishap-the-ongoing-decline-of-the-msm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/02/14/the-vice-presidents-hunting-mishap-the-ongoing-decline-of-the-msm/</link>
	<description>The Internet home for American gay conservatives.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:00:25 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: North Dallas Thirty</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/02/14/the-vice-presidents-hunting-mishap-the-ongoing-decline-of-the-msm/comment-page-4/#comment-13369</link>
		<dc:creator>North Dallas Thirty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2006 07:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=584#comment-13369</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;But stand by assertation that I never said that Cheney was drunk. And don’t expect me to refer to the totality of someone’s written commentary (O’Donnell) when you attack me for defending someone.&lt;/i&gt;

Excuse me, but I didn&#039;t see you say, &quot;O&#039;Donnell was right on some things&quot;. You distinctly said, &quot;O&#039;Donnell was right&quot;.

You see, Tom, YOU referred to the totality. It&#039;s not our fault you didn&#039;t read it first and ended up looking like a fool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>But stand by assertation that I never said that Cheney was drunk. And don’t expect me to refer to the totality of someone’s written commentary (O’Donnell) when you attack me for defending someone.</i></p>
<p>Excuse me, but I didn&#8217;t see you say, &#8220;O&#8217;Donnell was right on some things&#8221;. You distinctly said, &#8220;O&#8217;Donnell was right&#8221;.</p>
<p>You see, Tom, YOU referred to the totality. It&#8217;s not our fault you didn&#8217;t read it first and ended up looking like a fool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hank</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/02/14/the-vice-presidents-hunting-mishap-the-ongoing-decline-of-the-msm/comment-page-4/#comment-13368</link>
		<dc:creator>hank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 23:49:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=584#comment-13368</guid>
		<description>Hunting birds, not chasing them?:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hunting birds, not chasing them?:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: V the K</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/02/14/the-vice-presidents-hunting-mishap-the-ongoing-decline-of-the-msm/comment-page-4/#comment-13367</link>
		<dc:creator>V the K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 21:54:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=584#comment-13367</guid>
		<description>Should the VP never fly in helicopters? Should the VP never appear in public? Should high government officials be kept in secure vaults so that no harm should come to them while in office? Really, such foolishness. One of the aspects of our republic is that power lies with the office, not the man. In the highly unlikely event Cheney was killed while recreating, Bush would nominate a replacement, who would then be confirmed by the Senate (after a scorched Earth smear campaign by Move-On-dot-org and a threatened filibuster from Barbara Boxer.) I think Mr. Cheney is mature enough to accept the reality of his mortality.

At least Cheney was in the field hunting birds, not chasing interns around the Oval Office with his pants around his ankles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Should the VP never fly in helicopters? Should the VP never appear in public? Should high government officials be kept in secure vaults so that no harm should come to them while in office? Really, such foolishness. One of the aspects of our republic is that power lies with the office, not the man. In the highly unlikely event Cheney was killed while recreating, Bush would nominate a replacement, who would then be confirmed by the Senate (after a scorched Earth smear campaign by Move-On-dot-org and a threatened filibuster from Barbara Boxer.) I think Mr. Cheney is mature enough to accept the reality of his mortality.</p>
<p>At least Cheney was in the field hunting birds, not chasing interns around the Oval Office with his pants around his ankles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hank</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/02/14/the-vice-presidents-hunting-mishap-the-ongoing-decline-of-the-msm/comment-page-4/#comment-13366</link>
		<dc:creator>hank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 20:10:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=584#comment-13366</guid>
		<description>#154
um no.  The ambulance is ALWAYS on call for Cheney.
And don&#039;t you agree that it seems kind of foolish, given his age and health, to pursue a sport, which could cause him real harm? At least while in office.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#154<br />
um no.  The ambulance is ALWAYS on call for Cheney.<br />
And don&#8217;t you agree that it seems kind of foolish, given his age and health, to pursue a sport, which could cause him real harm? At least while in office.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HollywoodNeoCon</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/02/14/the-vice-presidents-hunting-mishap-the-ongoing-decline-of-the-msm/comment-page-4/#comment-13365</link>
		<dc:creator>HollywoodNeoCon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 19:41:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=584#comment-13365</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;And why would a man who requires an ambulance in attendance, risk his life to “hunt” tame little birds?&lt;/i&gt;

Because it&#039;s the Vice-President of the United States, and I&#039;m fairly certain that an ambulance is ALWAYS near by whenever there&#039;s the SLIGHTEST risk of injury.

&lt;i&gt;Even movie actors have to sign a contract stating that they won’t put themselves in harms way during filming.&lt;/i&gt;

I&#039;m sorry, Hank, but as I work in the industry, I can pretty much state with authority that I have NEVER seen such a contract. Many times an actor will carry his/her own insurance, but in those cases, whatever they sign is their business, NOT the production company&#039;s.

If they DO sign anything with us, it&#039;s a liability waiver that lets us off the hook if they fuck around and decide they want to pull a Jackie Chan.

Eric in Hollywood</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>And why would a man who requires an ambulance in attendance, risk his life to “hunt” tame little birds?</i></p>
<p>Because it&#8217;s the Vice-President of the United States, and I&#8217;m fairly certain that an ambulance is ALWAYS near by whenever there&#8217;s the SLIGHTEST risk of injury.</p>
<p><i>Even movie actors have to sign a contract stating that they won’t put themselves in harms way during filming.</i></p>
<p>I&#8217;m sorry, Hank, but as I work in the industry, I can pretty much state with authority that I have NEVER seen such a contract. Many times an actor will carry his/her own insurance, but in those cases, whatever they sign is their business, NOT the production company&#8217;s.</p>
<p>If they DO sign anything with us, it&#8217;s a liability waiver that lets us off the hook if they fuck around and decide they want to pull a Jackie Chan.</p>
<p>Eric in Hollywood</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hank</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/02/14/the-vice-presidents-hunting-mishap-the-ongoing-decline-of-the-msm/comment-page-4/#comment-13364</link>
		<dc:creator>hank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 18:36:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=584#comment-13364</guid>
		<description>When the Vice President of the United States shoots someone, (no matter the party) it&#039;s a big story which does matter.  And it&#039;s going to stick to Cheney forever.
And why would a man who requires an ambulance in attendance, risk his life to &quot;hunt&quot; tame little birds? What if he had been shot?
Even movie actors have to sign a contract stating that they won&#039;t put themselves in harms way during filming. Shouldn&#039;t our high government officials be held to the same accountability?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When the Vice President of the United States shoots someone, (no matter the party) it&#8217;s a big story which does matter.  And it&#8217;s going to stick to Cheney forever.<br />
And why would a man who requires an ambulance in attendance, risk his life to &#8220;hunt&#8221; tame little birds? What if he had been shot?<br />
Even movie actors have to sign a contract stating that they won&#8217;t put themselves in harms way during filming. Shouldn&#8217;t our high government officials be held to the same accountability?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Calarato</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/02/14/the-vice-presidents-hunting-mishap-the-ongoing-decline-of-the-msm/comment-page-4/#comment-13363</link>
		<dc:creator>Calarato</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 17:50:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=584#comment-13363</guid>
		<description>As for what word I would use beside &quot;negligence&quot; - don&#039;t &quot;mishap&quot; or &quot;accident&quot; spring to mind?

It was big of Cheney to say in his interview, &quot;I pulled the trigger, I&#039;m responsible&quot;.  Cheney choosing to be big about it does not erase the possibility (or likelihood) that Whittington may have walked into Cheney&#039;s without giving warnings that he (Whittington) was obligated to give.

We still don&#039;t know the real stories or details, except that, in very broad outlines, it&#039;s almost certainly a story that doesn&#039;t matter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As for what word I would use beside &#8220;negligence&#8221; &#8211; don&#8217;t &#8220;mishap&#8221; or &#8220;accident&#8221; spring to mind?</p>
<p>It was big of Cheney to say in his interview, &#8220;I pulled the trigger, I&#8217;m responsible&#8221;.  Cheney choosing to be big about it does not erase the possibility (or likelihood) that Whittington may have walked into Cheney&#8217;s without giving warnings that he (Whittington) was obligated to give.</p>
<p>We still don&#8217;t know the real stories or details, except that, in very broad outlines, it&#8217;s almost certainly a story that doesn&#8217;t matter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GayPatriotWest</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/02/14/the-vice-presidents-hunting-mishap-the-ongoing-decline-of-the-msm/comment-page-4/#comment-13362</link>
		<dc:creator>GayPatriotWest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 17:49:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=584#comment-13362</guid>
		<description>How many press conferences did Algore hold?

I don&#039;t think the Vice President need hold a press conference as he said all that needed be said yesterday in his interview with Brit Hume.  Like many others on the right, I believe he made a mistake in not contacting the press sooner, but this is not a matter of state.

Though it perhaps might be a stroke of media genius (something out of character for this Administration) for him to appear at a press conference with Harry Whittington as soon as he is released from the hospital.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How many press conferences did Algore hold?</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think the Vice President need hold a press conference as he said all that needed be said yesterday in his interview with Brit Hume.  Like many others on the right, I believe he made a mistake in not contacting the press sooner, but this is not a matter of state.</p>
<p>Though it perhaps might be a stroke of media genius (something out of character for this Administration) for him to appear at a press conference with Harry Whittington as soon as he is released from the hospital.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Calarato</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/02/14/the-vice-presidents-hunting-mishap-the-ongoing-decline-of-the-msm/comment-page-3/#comment-13361</link>
		<dc:creator>Calarato</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 17:38:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=584#comment-13361</guid>
		<description>#145 - Sorry Tom, I can see that you misunderstood my post (#143).

To agree with and promote O’Donnell’s spin, which is to illegitimately attempt to insinuate (or create the impression in the mind of the reader) that Cheney was probably drunk, wink wink....

&lt;i&gt;is to say, for all semantic or functional purposes, that Cheney was drunk&lt;/i&gt;.

Your efforts to get out on a technicality, &quot;I never said the literal words&quot;, are a childish game even (or especially) if true in the most narrow technical sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#145 &#8211; Sorry Tom, I can see that you misunderstood my post (#143).</p>
<p>To agree with and promote O’Donnell’s spin, which is to illegitimately attempt to insinuate (or create the impression in the mind of the reader) that Cheney was probably drunk, wink wink&#8230;.</p>
<p><i>is to say, for all semantic or functional purposes, that Cheney was drunk</i>.</p>
<p>Your efforts to get out on a technicality, &#8220;I never said the literal words&#8221;, are a childish game even (or especially) if true in the most narrow technical sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Calarato</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/02/14/the-vice-presidents-hunting-mishap-the-ongoing-decline-of-the-msm/comment-page-3/#comment-13360</link>
		<dc:creator>Calarato</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 17:34:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=584#comment-13360</guid>
		<description>#144 - NO no no.

THIS is what Cheney should have done, in order:

1) Get medical attention to the victim.
2) Cooperate with law enforcement in reporting the facts to them.
3) Comfort the victim&#039;s family.
4) Inform victim&#039;s local friends and media.
5) Latest and least important of all, inform Washington press corps and give interviews.

Ooops, he did!

And for the record, please show where Cheney ever &quot;blamed the victim&quot;??

And the chances of Cheney resigning over this, or ever deserving to morally, or of being the slightest liability to Bush over this (among swing voters of course; not committed Bush-haters) are all: zero.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#144 &#8211; NO no no.</p>
<p>THIS is what Cheney should have done, in order:</p>
<p>1) Get medical attention to the victim.<br />
2) Cooperate with law enforcement in reporting the facts to them.<br />
3) Comfort the victim&#8217;s family.<br />
4) Inform victim&#8217;s local friends and media.<br />
5) Latest and least important of all, inform Washington press corps and give interviews.</p>
<p>Ooops, he did!</p>
<p>And for the record, please show where Cheney ever &#8220;blamed the victim&#8221;??</p>
<p>And the chances of Cheney resigning over this, or ever deserving to morally, or of being the slightest liability to Bush over this (among swing voters of course; not committed Bush-haters) are all: zero.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rightwingprof</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/02/14/the-vice-presidents-hunting-mishap-the-ongoing-decline-of-the-msm/comment-page-3/#comment-13359</link>
		<dc:creator>rightwingprof</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 17:19:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=584#comment-13359</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;If Cheney had to resign&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Those are some bad drugs you&#039;re on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>If Cheney had to resign</p></blockquote>
<p>Those are some bad drugs you&#8217;re on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: V the K</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/02/14/the-vice-presidents-hunting-mishap-the-ongoing-decline-of-the-msm/comment-page-3/#comment-13358</link>
		<dc:creator>V the K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 17:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=584#comment-13358</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;That was inappropriate for me to say to V the K. I apologize for my lack of decorum in the last post. &lt;/i&gt;

Don&#039;t bother. I have to respect someone before I give a fart what they say about me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>That was inappropriate for me to say to V the K. I apologize for my lack of decorum in the last post. </i></p>
<p>Don&#8217;t bother. I have to respect someone before I give a fart what they say about me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: V the K</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/02/14/the-vice-presidents-hunting-mishap-the-ongoing-decline-of-the-msm/comment-page-3/#comment-13357</link>
		<dc:creator>V the K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 17:13:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=584#comment-13357</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Someone in the other thread just cheered on Dobson. Does this mean that that person supports everything Dobson does? &lt;/i&gt;

Tommy Tool, I don&#039;t believe anyone &quot;cheered on&quot; Dobson, but only remarked on one specific incident of agreement, just as your &quot;O&#039;Donnell was right&quot; statement refers to the specific incident of O&#039;Donnell&#039;s allegation that Cheney was &quot;drunk.&quot;

I guess when lying doesn&#039;t work for tools anymore, they weasel and dissemble.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Someone in the other thread just cheered on Dobson. Does this mean that that person supports everything Dobson does? </i></p>
<p>Tommy Tool, I don&#8217;t believe anyone &#8220;cheered on&#8221; Dobson, but only remarked on one specific incident of agreement, just as your &#8220;O&#8217;Donnell was right&#8221; statement refers to the specific incident of O&#8217;Donnell&#8217;s allegation that Cheney was &#8220;drunk.&#8221;</p>
<p>I guess when lying doesn&#8217;t work for tools anymore, they weasel and dissemble.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom in Utrecht</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/02/14/the-vice-presidents-hunting-mishap-the-ongoing-decline-of-the-msm/comment-page-3/#comment-13356</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom in Utrecht</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 16:59:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=584#comment-13356</guid>
		<description>Calarato at least can admit that I did not accuse Cheney of being drunk.  Albeit in a half assed way.  Anyone else?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Calarato at least can admit that I did not accuse Cheney of being drunk.  Albeit in a half assed way.  Anyone else?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom in Utrecht</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/02/14/the-vice-presidents-hunting-mishap-the-ongoing-decline-of-the-msm/comment-page-3/#comment-13355</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom in Utrecht</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 16:58:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=584#comment-13355</guid>
		<description>What word would you use besides negligance?

The talk show mantra this morning is precisely why Cheney screwed up by not handling this properly.  He had liabilities coming into this (very low poll ratings, a perception that he is regal and aloof, accusations of inappropriate (not criminal indictments) dealings while CEO of Halliburton, Plamegate, WMD, etc.).  And his behavior (not necessarily the shooting - but his response) plays into this.

The Dems weren&#039;t really trying to score points on Tuesday.  They are now.  This is what he should have done.

1) Notified the Press on Saturday night.
2) Held a Press Conference (yea - a real press conference) on Sunday.  Has he ever held a press conference?  Is the VP too good for that?
3) Apologized on Sunday (by Wednesday its too late - the frenzy has started now - the genie will now have to run its&#039; course)
4) Don&#039;t blame the victim - even if he was partially at fault - it looks bad - you shot him for crying out loud.
5) Don&#039;t treat the press as your enemy.  Even if you think they are the enemy, you shouldn&#039;t treat them as such.

And for the record, I don&#039;t want this to be some huge issue for Cheney (and it won&#039;t be in the end).  If Cheney had to resign, Bush could use this to &#039;clear the field&#039; for someone in the GOP primaries in 2008 by nominating them to be VP.  I don&#039;t want that.  I&#039;m looking forward to the Brownback vs Allen vs McCain primary season.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What word would you use besides negligance?</p>
<p>The talk show mantra this morning is precisely why Cheney screwed up by not handling this properly.  He had liabilities coming into this (very low poll ratings, a perception that he is regal and aloof, accusations of inappropriate (not criminal indictments) dealings while CEO of Halliburton, Plamegate, WMD, etc.).  And his behavior (not necessarily the shooting &#8211; but his response) plays into this.</p>
<p>The Dems weren&#8217;t really trying to score points on Tuesday.  They are now.  This is what he should have done.</p>
<p>1) Notified the Press on Saturday night.<br />
2) Held a Press Conference (yea &#8211; a real press conference) on Sunday.  Has he ever held a press conference?  Is the VP too good for that?<br />
3) Apologized on Sunday (by Wednesday its too late &#8211; the frenzy has started now &#8211; the genie will now have to run its&#8217; course)<br />
4) Don&#8217;t blame the victim &#8211; even if he was partially at fault &#8211; it looks bad &#8211; you shot him for crying out loud.<br />
5) Don&#8217;t treat the press as your enemy.  Even if you think they are the enemy, you shouldn&#8217;t treat them as such.</p>
<p>And for the record, I don&#8217;t want this to be some huge issue for Cheney (and it won&#8217;t be in the end).  If Cheney had to resign, Bush could use this to &#8216;clear the field&#8217; for someone in the GOP primaries in 2008 by nominating them to be VP.  I don&#8217;t want that.  I&#8217;m looking forward to the Brownback vs Allen vs McCain primary season.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Calarato</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/02/14/the-vice-presidents-hunting-mishap-the-ongoing-decline-of-the-msm/comment-page-3/#comment-13354</link>
		<dc:creator>Calarato</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 16:56:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=584#comment-13354</guid>
		<description>You never said the literal words &quot;Cheney was drunk&quot;.

You DID agree with and promote O&#039;Donnell&#039;s spin, which is to illegitimately attempt to insinuate (or create the impression in the mind of the reader) that Cheney was probably drunk, wink wink.

Sheesh.  Stop weaseling already.  Don&#039;t give us the insincere martyr-ish apologies for what you say; just halt the weaseling!  Don&#039;t dig the hole any further!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You never said the literal words &#8220;Cheney was drunk&#8221;.</p>
<p>You DID agree with and promote O&#8217;Donnell&#8217;s spin, which is to illegitimately attempt to insinuate (or create the impression in the mind of the reader) that Cheney was probably drunk, wink wink.</p>
<p>Sheesh.  Stop weaseling already.  Don&#8217;t give us the insincere martyr-ish apologies for what you say; just halt the weaseling!  Don&#8217;t dig the hole any further!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom in Utrecht</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/02/14/the-vice-presidents-hunting-mishap-the-ongoing-decline-of-the-msm/comment-page-3/#comment-13353</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom in Utrecht</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 16:39:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=584#comment-13353</guid>
		<description>But stand by assertation that I never said that Cheney was drunk.  And don&#039;t expect me to refer to the totality of someone&#039;s written commentary (O&#039;Donnell) when you attack me for defending someone.  Someone in the other thread just cheered on Dobson.  Does this mean that that person supports everything Dobson does?  Under some people&#039;s reasoning in here it might.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But stand by assertation that I never said that Cheney was drunk.  And don&#8217;t expect me to refer to the totality of someone&#8217;s written commentary (O&#8217;Donnell) when you attack me for defending someone.  Someone in the other thread just cheered on Dobson.  Does this mean that that person supports everything Dobson does?  Under some people&#8217;s reasoning in here it might.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michigan-Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/02/14/the-vice-presidents-hunting-mishap-the-ongoing-decline-of-the-msm/comment-page-3/#comment-13352</link>
		<dc:creator>Michigan-Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 16:37:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=584#comment-13352</guid>
		<description>Tom, come on... you learned in the DNC&#039;s class on &quot;Keeping Victimhood Alive and Fresh Whilst in Europe&quot; that you should apologize for saying Cheney was drunk, O Donnell was right to speculate or promote the smear, and Cheney was --let&#039;s see, not calling it criminally negligent but using the word negligent to imply a potential wrong doing.  Apologize; you&#039;ll feel better and isn&#039;t that what it&#039;s all about?  Your feelings?

Negligence, Tom, as you know, is something to be determined in a court of law.  By using &quot;negligent&quot; as a way to smear the Veep while not using the antecedent word most people connect with negligent, namely &quot;criminal&quot;, you kind of got the beenfit of raising a red flag without being acused of jetting to unsubstantiated conclusions.  Slick, snarky, and more like a political dirty trick than a valid debate tool.

Kind of like the Democrat pundits and press last night intoning that they hope Whittington is recovering and will pull through --insincere as that likely is-- and then they go on to suggest maybe this underscores a greater problem with this Veep --his failure to apprise the WH of what happened at the moment it occured is evidence he&#039;s been operating too freely and without good oversight for too long... he&#039;s lone, rogue elephant that needs to be tied up at the WH.  See, we get to feel good with our concern and then set it up for the slam.  A new charge: Cheney is out of control!  This morning on the talkshows, the hosts were piddling that very spin... good little Democrat lapdogs all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom, come on&#8230; you learned in the DNC&#8217;s class on &#8220;Keeping Victimhood Alive and Fresh Whilst in Europe&#8221; that you should apologize for saying Cheney was drunk, O Donnell was right to speculate or promote the smear, and Cheney was &#8211;let&#8217;s see, not calling it criminally negligent but using the word negligent to imply a potential wrong doing.  Apologize; you&#8217;ll feel better and isn&#8217;t that what it&#8217;s all about?  Your feelings?</p>
<p>Negligence, Tom, as you know, is something to be determined in a court of law.  By using &#8220;negligent&#8221; as a way to smear the Veep while not using the antecedent word most people connect with negligent, namely &#8220;criminal&#8221;, you kind of got the beenfit of raising a red flag without being acused of jetting to unsubstantiated conclusions.  Slick, snarky, and more like a political dirty trick than a valid debate tool.</p>
<p>Kind of like the Democrat pundits and press last night intoning that they hope Whittington is recovering and will pull through &#8211;insincere as that likely is&#8211; and then they go on to suggest maybe this underscores a greater problem with this Veep &#8211;his failure to apprise the WH of what happened at the moment it occured is evidence he&#8217;s been operating too freely and without good oversight for too long&#8230; he&#8217;s lone, rogue elephant that needs to be tied up at the WH.  See, we get to feel good with our concern and then set it up for the slam.  A new charge: Cheney is out of control!  This morning on the talkshows, the hosts were piddling that very spin&#8230; good little Democrat lapdogs all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom in Utrecht</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/02/14/the-vice-presidents-hunting-mishap-the-ongoing-decline-of-the-msm/comment-page-3/#comment-13351</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom in Utrecht</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 16:36:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=584#comment-13351</guid>
		<description>That was inappropriate for me to say to V the K.  I apologize for my lack of decorum in the last post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was inappropriate for me to say to V the K.  I apologize for my lack of decorum in the last post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom in Utrecht</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/02/14/the-vice-presidents-hunting-mishap-the-ongoing-decline-of-the-msm/comment-page-3/#comment-13350</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom in Utrecht</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 16:21:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=584#comment-13350</guid>
		<description>No..I never said that Cheney was drunk.  Period.

And if you look back at my postings in this thread you will find that I was referring to his allegations of alcohol at the camp.

Not buying it.  V the K is a liar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No..I never said that Cheney was drunk.  Period.</p>
<p>And if you look back at my postings in this thread you will find that I was referring to his allegations of alcohol at the camp.</p>
<p>Not buying it.  V the K is a liar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

