<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Oscar Audience to Decline</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/02/27/oscar-audience-to-decline/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/02/27/oscar-audience-to-decline/</link>
	<description>The Internet home for American gay conservatives.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 11:15:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: King Kong</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/02/27/oscar-audience-to-decline/#comment-14180</link>
		<dc:creator>King Kong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Apr 2006 01:27:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=598#comment-14180</guid>
		<description>King Kong was an awesome film. If your love is for High Fantasy, Jungle folklore, sociocultural commentary, tart satirical thrust, or a tragic romance of lost souls, Peter Jacksons KING KONG is a whopper of a great tale. A telling narrative of desperate lives caught up in the desperate times of The Great Depression, this KING KONG showcases what desperation will drive one to do, and the price to be paid for such ventures. Those who thrilled to what Jackson, his co-writers, and his SFX team at WETA achieved in bring THE LORD OF THE RINGS to cinematic life will not be let down here. Those who swear by that classic RKO original starring Fay Wray and Robert Armstrong will have much reason to cheer. The basic innocence of that original has been enhanced by Jackson astutely depicting the corruptive period from which it sprang. The Depression -a cheery Al Jolson at the start of the film notwithstanding- was anything but a good time. Special notice must be paid to Jack Black (whose Carl Denham is less the film warrior of Robert Armstrong , and more the okeydoke peddler), Evan Parke (whose Hayes is a wary figure of tragic wisdom), Adrien Brody (whose Jack Driscoll is a brilliant commentary on the struggle of creative artists amidst commercial booshwah) and Naomi Watts (whose Ann Darrow does the renowned ingénue played by Fay Wray proud, while adding layers of wit and depth all her own) Too, Andy Serkis (who stunned us as Gollum in the RING trilogy) delivers a Chaplin-worthy tour de force of thespian body language as the Great Ape. Between the insightful pantomime of Serkis, and the equally inspired Broadway trouping of Watts, the story is centered not on lust misplaced, but haunted travelers striking a deep, ill-fated bond. Get the 2 disc special edition if you want a deeper look into the art of filmmaking. Whatever you choose, pick up this film, and enjoy its absorbing, enchanted tale.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>King Kong was an awesome film. If your love is for High Fantasy, Jungle folklore, sociocultural commentary, tart satirical thrust, or a tragic romance of lost souls, Peter Jacksons KING KONG is a whopper of a great tale. A telling narrative of desperate lives caught up in the desperate times of The Great Depression, this KING KONG showcases what desperation will drive one to do, and the price to be paid for such ventures. Those who thrilled to what Jackson, his co-writers, and his SFX team at WETA achieved in bring THE LORD OF THE RINGS to cinematic life will not be let down here. Those who swear by that classic RKO original starring Fay Wray and Robert Armstrong will have much reason to cheer. The basic innocence of that original has been enhanced by Jackson astutely depicting the corruptive period from which it sprang. The Depression -a cheery Al Jolson at the start of the film notwithstanding- was anything but a good time. Special notice must be paid to Jack Black (whose Carl Denham is less the film warrior of Robert Armstrong , and more the okeydoke peddler), Evan Parke (whose Hayes is a wary figure of tragic wisdom), Adrien Brody (whose Jack Driscoll is a brilliant commentary on the struggle of creative artists amidst commercial booshwah) and Naomi Watts (whose Ann Darrow does the renowned ingénue played by Fay Wray proud, while adding layers of wit and depth all her own) Too, Andy Serkis (who stunned us as Gollum in the RING trilogy) delivers a Chaplin-worthy tour de force of thespian body language as the Great Ape. Between the insightful pantomime of Serkis, and the equally inspired Broadway trouping of Watts, the story is centered not on lust misplaced, but haunted travelers striking a deep, ill-fated bond. Get the 2 disc special edition if you want a deeper look into the art of filmmaking. Whatever you choose, pick up this film, and enjoy its absorbing, enchanted tale.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Costume Makers</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/02/27/oscar-audience-to-decline/#comment-14179</link>
		<dc:creator>Costume Makers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Mar 2006 18:52:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=598#comment-14179</guid>
		<description>Hi I am Angelique, 16 years of age from France, and I make costumes for my hobby. I plan to make my own costume rental business someday. I like blogging as well, as I can tell everybody about my hobby. Bye everybody! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi I am Angelique, 16 years of age from France, and I make costumes for my hobby. I plan to make my own costume rental business someday. I like blogging as well, as I can tell everybody about my hobby. Bye everybody! <img src='http://www.gaypatriot.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Costume Makers</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/02/27/oscar-audience-to-decline/#comment-14178</link>
		<dc:creator>Costume Makers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Mar 2006 10:41:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=598#comment-14178</guid>
		<description>Hi, How about a hobby in Costume making? I love doing it! And, after a while, why not rent them out? Very rewarding indeed! Keep up the good work! Regards, Sheila. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, How about a hobby in Costume making? I love doing it! And, after a while, why not rent them out? Very rewarding indeed! Keep up the good work! Regards, Sheila. <img src='http://www.gaypatriot.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ralph</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/02/27/oscar-audience-to-decline/#comment-14177</link>
		<dc:creator>ralph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2006 03:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=598#comment-14177</guid>
		<description>oscars decline not a surprise, one reason that fails to get mentioned but is definitely in play from last year to this year...for the first time ever black people watched the oscars last year; this year not so much...

on the movies, i haven't seen one oscar nominated film, not because i hate causes, just that if i am going to leave my house to fight traffic to put up with a bunch of punks at a movie i need to come out happy.  i don't need a discussion of the latest trials and tribulations of the underclass, forgotten, and abused.  furthermore hollywood has proven that it is incapable of putting out a consistent product, as such, my ten dolla is better spent elsewhere.

yeah, and there is nothing worst then well paid people, who feel the need to honor themselves for public viewing.  it is like a 3 hour commercial remind you of movies you didn't see, should see, and maybe even rent if not buy.

call me when they start saluting the workingman.  please!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oscars decline not a surprise, one reason that fails to get mentioned but is definitely in play from last year to this year&#8230;for the first time ever black people watched the oscars last year; this year not so much&#8230;</p>
<p>on the movies, i haven&#8217;t seen one oscar nominated film, not because i hate causes, just that if i am going to leave my house to fight traffic to put up with a bunch of punks at a movie i need to come out happy.  i don&#8217;t need a discussion of the latest trials and tribulations of the underclass, forgotten, and abused.  furthermore hollywood has proven that it is incapable of putting out a consistent product, as such, my ten dolla is better spent elsewhere.</p>
<p>yeah, and there is nothing worst then well paid people, who feel the need to honor themselves for public viewing.  it is like a 3 hour commercial remind you of movies you didn&#8217;t see, should see, and maybe even rent if not buy.</p>
<p>call me when they start saluting the workingman.  please!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Decision '08</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/02/27/oscar-audience-to-decline/#comment-14176</link>
		<dc:creator>Decision '08</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Mar 2006 16:28:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=598#comment-14176</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The 1st Annual Decision &#8216;08 Academy Awards Spectacular&lt;/strong&gt;

	Yes, we all know finding a conservative at the Academy Awards is harder than playing Where&#8217;s Waldo, but hey, it&#8217;s the Oscars&#8230;
	In honor of the annual craptacular fiasco, I&#8217;m posting a never-ending Oscar thread that will simulat...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The 1st Annual Decision &#8216;08 Academy Awards Spectacular</strong></p>
<p>	Yes, we all know finding a conservative at the Academy Awards is harder than playing Where&#8217;s Waldo, but hey, it&#8217;s the Oscars&#8230;<br />
	In honor of the annual craptacular fiasco, I&#8217;m posting a never-ending Oscar thread that will simulat&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rightwingprof</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/02/27/oscar-audience-to-decline/#comment-14175</link>
		<dc:creator>rightwingprof</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 22:13:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=598#comment-14175</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;There is nothing even remotely amoral or “relativist” about the Sermon on the Mount.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

The Sermon on the Mount is not moral relativism, nor is it liberalism, unless you happen to subscribe to the Castro fan club that refers to itself as Christian, represented by so-called "mainline" protestants, such as Methodists, Episcopalians, etc., all of whom abandoned Christianity and any kind of Christian theology decades ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>There is nothing even remotely amoral or “relativist” about the Sermon on the Mount.</p></blockquote>
<p>The Sermon on the Mount is not moral relativism, nor is it liberalism, unless you happen to subscribe to the Castro fan club that refers to itself as Christian, represented by so-called &#8220;mainline&#8221; protestants, such as Methodists, Episcopalians, etc., all of whom abandoned Christianity and any kind of Christian theology decades ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/02/27/oscar-audience-to-decline/#comment-14174</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 18:44:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=598#comment-14174</guid>
		<description>"That is about as bluntly Christian a theme as you can get.

There is nothing Christian about moral relativism — which is, by definition, amoral. "

There is nothing even remotely amoral or "relativist" about the Sermon on the Mount. Don't presume to comment about other people's religions - you are obviously ignorant of Christianity - unless you bother to do at least some minimal study and make an attempt at understanding.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;That is about as bluntly Christian a theme as you can get.</p>
<p>There is nothing Christian about moral relativism — which is, by definition, amoral. &#8221;</p>
<p>There is nothing even remotely amoral or &#8220;relativist&#8221; about the Sermon on the Mount. Don&#8217;t presume to comment about other people&#8217;s religions - you are obviously ignorant of Christianity - unless you bother to do at least some minimal study and make an attempt at understanding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: raj</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/02/27/oscar-audience-to-decline/#comment-14173</link>
		<dc:creator>raj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 22:42:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=598#comment-14173</guid>
		<description>Regarding the post,

&lt;i&gt;So, today, barely a week before the telecast of the Oscars, I will make public my prediction that the Oscar audience will decline this year...&lt;/i&gt;

Nice prediction.  Do a graph for the ratings for the Oscars over the last 15 years or so and post it.  I would almost be willing to bet that the ratings have been on a downslide for a number of years.  Why?  Because they have usually been pretentious, over-produced and boring, regardless of who has been nominated.  They apparently have reined in the excesses that used to make the Oscar program go well into overtime, but that's about it.

And because there are other opportunities, particularly over the computer.  I would suspect that the Oscars chose Jon Stewart to host the program this year because he--as a comedian--does have something of a following among younger people, and they hope that he will be able to get some to watch.  His selection probably has nothing to do with whether he likes movies, or his politics.  It has everything to do with ratings and money.

We won't be watching the Oscars.  We didn't watch the Stupor Bowl.  We didn't watch any of the Torino Winter Olympics.  And we won't watch the Oscars.  We &lt;i&gt;will&lt;/i&gt; be watching a movie that we will have rented from Blockbuster.  And maybe &lt;i&gt;Desperate Housewives&lt;/i&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding the post,</p>
<p><i>So, today, barely a week before the telecast of the Oscars, I will make public my prediction that the Oscar audience will decline this year&#8230;</i></p>
<p>Nice prediction.  Do a graph for the ratings for the Oscars over the last 15 years or so and post it.  I would almost be willing to bet that the ratings have been on a downslide for a number of years.  Why?  Because they have usually been pretentious, over-produced and boring, regardless of who has been nominated.  They apparently have reined in the excesses that used to make the Oscar program go well into overtime, but that&#8217;s about it.</p>
<p>And because there are other opportunities, particularly over the computer.  I would suspect that the Oscars chose Jon Stewart to host the program this year because he&#8211;as a comedian&#8211;does have something of a following among younger people, and they hope that he will be able to get some to watch.  His selection probably has nothing to do with whether he likes movies, or his politics.  It has everything to do with ratings and money.</p>
<p>We won&#8217;t be watching the Oscars.  We didn&#8217;t watch the Stupor Bowl.  We didn&#8217;t watch any of the Torino Winter Olympics.  And we won&#8217;t watch the Oscars.  We <i>will</i> be watching a movie that we will have rented from Blockbuster.  And maybe <i>Desperate Housewives</i>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HollywoodNeoCon</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/02/27/oscar-audience-to-decline/#comment-14172</link>
		<dc:creator>HollywoodNeoCon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 17:12:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=598#comment-14172</guid>
		<description>Sonicfrog said...

&lt;i&gt;"I’ll take your Peart, and counter with either Stu Copeland, Jeff Porcaro or pre-solo career Phil Collins..."&lt;/i&gt;

And I'll counter with Tool's Danny Carey, and ANY DRUMMER who has marched with a Top 12 Drum Corps International drumline.

But to get back to the topic at hand, kudos to Jack for pointing out his mistake (and my lack of attention to detail) regarding domestic grosses and their relation to Oscar noms. With that in mind, I would reiterate something I've stated regarding this issue: That AMPAS has never nominated a film based exlcusively on either it's message or it's box office returns. You may say I'm smoking the company dope here, but I respect the Academy's decisions, especially when considering the fact that the Oscar's were NOT originally intended to become a PR event for the industry. The fact that they have become &lt;i&gt;just that&lt;/i&gt; notwithstanding, I admire both the Academy's and AFI's record of honoring &lt;b&gt;well made&lt;/b&gt; (NOT necessarily popular, mind you) films.

Yes, Virginia, I am a queer AND a corporate whore, but I'm glad to say I have the courage of my convictions, for whatever they're worth.

Eric in Hollywood</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sonicfrog said&#8230;</p>
<p><i>&#8220;I’ll take your Peart, and counter with either Stu Copeland, Jeff Porcaro or pre-solo career Phil Collins&#8230;&#8221;</i></p>
<p>And I&#8217;ll counter with Tool&#8217;s Danny Carey, and ANY DRUMMER who has marched with a Top 12 Drum Corps International drumline.</p>
<p>But to get back to the topic at hand, kudos to Jack for pointing out his mistake (and my lack of attention to detail) regarding domestic grosses and their relation to Oscar noms. With that in mind, I would reiterate something I&#8217;ve stated regarding this issue: That AMPAS has never nominated a film based exlcusively on either it&#8217;s message or it&#8217;s box office returns. You may say I&#8217;m smoking the company dope here, but I respect the Academy&#8217;s decisions, especially when considering the fact that the Oscar&#8217;s were NOT originally intended to become a PR event for the industry. The fact that they have become <i>just that</i> notwithstanding, I admire both the Academy&#8217;s and AFI&#8217;s record of honoring <b>well made</b> (NOT necessarily popular, mind you) films.</p>
<p>Yes, Virginia, I am a queer AND a corporate whore, but I&#8217;m glad to say I have the courage of my convictions, for whatever they&#8217;re worth.</p>
<p>Eric in Hollywood</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sonicfrog</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/02/27/oscar-audience-to-decline/#comment-14171</link>
		<dc:creator>sonicfrog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 16:40:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=598#comment-14171</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;... but Neil Peart is the best drummer ever.&lt;/i&gt;

I'll take your Peart, and counter with either Stu Copeland, Jeff Porcaro or pre-solo career Phil Collins (not that I don't like his solo work, but his best drumming was prior to that period).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8230; but Neil Peart is the best drummer ever.</i></p>
<p>I&#8217;ll take your Peart, and counter with either Stu Copeland, Jeff Porcaro or pre-solo career Phil Collins (not that I don&#8217;t like his solo work, but his best drumming was prior to that period).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rightwingprof</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/02/27/oscar-audience-to-decline/#comment-14170</link>
		<dc:creator>rightwingprof</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 14:35:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=598#comment-14170</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;That is about as bluntly Christian a theme as you can get.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

There is nothing Christian about moral relativism -- which is, by definition, amoral.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>That is about as bluntly Christian a theme as you can get.</p></blockquote>
<p>There is nothing Christian about moral relativism &#8212; which is, by definition, amoral.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Allen</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/02/27/oscar-audience-to-decline/#comment-14169</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 04:36:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=598#comment-14169</guid>
		<description>Eric in Hollywood, I'm surprised you didn't catch my error.

There WAS one film in 2005 that topped the "Passion's" domestic box office in '04.  It was "Star Wars III" which had a domestic gross of $380,270,577.  But "Star Wars III", the number one box office hit in '05, fell short of the top 2004 film, "Shrek 2" which had a domestic gross of $441,226,247.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eric in Hollywood, I&#8217;m surprised you didn&#8217;t catch my error.</p>
<p>There WAS one film in 2005 that topped the &#8220;Passion&#8217;s&#8221; domestic box office in &#8216;04.  It was &#8220;Star Wars III&#8221; which had a domestic gross of $380,270,577.  But &#8220;Star Wars III&#8221;, the number one box office hit in &#8216;05, fell short of the top 2004 film, &#8220;Shrek 2&#8243; which had a domestic gross of $441,226,247.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ThatGayConservative</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/02/27/oscar-audience-to-decline/#comment-14168</link>
		<dc:creator>ThatGayConservative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 03:14:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=598#comment-14168</guid>
		<description>#10
&lt;i&gt;I aways answered that you can’t really call one better than the other, because each is an individual artist, and brings different styles and techniques and styles to the table.&lt;/i&gt;

Yeah that's true, but Neil Peart is the best drummer ever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#10<br />
<i>I aways answered that you can’t really call one better than the other, because each is an individual artist, and brings different styles and techniques and styles to the table.</i></p>
<p>Yeah that&#8217;s true, but Neil Peart is the best drummer ever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eureka Iron Works</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/02/27/oscar-audience-to-decline/#comment-14167</link>
		<dc:creator>Eureka Iron Works</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 02:29:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=598#comment-14167</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Watch the Oscars?  NOT!&lt;/strong&gt;

As pointed out by Gay Patriot (Oscar Audience to Decline) there will most certainly be fewer folks watching this year's Academy Awards broadcast. I know for a fact there will be at least one person not watching. . . I'm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Watch the Oscars?  NOT!</strong></p>
<p>As pointed out by Gay Patriot (Oscar Audience to Decline) there will most certainly be fewer folks watching this year&#8217;s Academy Awards broadcast. I know for a fact there will be at least one person not watching. . . I&#8217;m</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/02/27/oscar-audience-to-decline/#comment-14166</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 02:19:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=598#comment-14166</guid>
		<description>GPW, I think the ratings probably will be low, but most of the awards show ratings are low now. The same goes for beauty pageants, and the Olympics. These used to be events that brought the country together. Now with cable and with all the polarization of America, people see no need to flock around one huge event. I know some people on the far right will try to blame any ratings declines on gays, but I think this has been happening for quite some time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GPW, I think the ratings probably will be low, but most of the awards show ratings are low now. The same goes for beauty pageants, and the Olympics. These used to be events that brought the country together. Now with cable and with all the polarization of America, people see no need to flock around one huge event. I know some people on the far right will try to blame any ratings declines on gays, but I think this has been happening for quite some time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GayPatriotWest</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/02/27/oscar-audience-to-decline/#comment-14165</link>
		<dc:creator>GayPatriotWest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 02:03:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=598#comment-14165</guid>
		<description>Carl, you raise a good point and we will soon see if my prediction is accurate  -- or if I'm going to be eating crow next week!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Carl, you raise a good point and we will soon see if my prediction is accurate  &#8212; or if I&#8217;m going to be eating crow next week!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/02/27/oscar-audience-to-decline/#comment-14164</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 01:39:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=598#comment-14164</guid>
		<description>GPW, do we know that when films with huge box office totals are lauded at the Oscars, the ratings go up? According to this, when Out of Africa won Best Picture, the Oscars had one of their all-time worst ratings.

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/03/24/oscar/main545821.shtml

I think that the ratings for the year Terms of Endearment won were also not the greatest.

Should the Oscars only award big box office films? I don't know if I want to see Big Momma's House 2 or Pink Panther winning Best Picture next year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GPW, do we know that when films with huge box office totals are lauded at the Oscars, the ratings go up? According to this, when Out of Africa won Best Picture, the Oscars had one of their all-time worst ratings.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/03/24/oscar/main545821.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/03/24/oscar/main545821.shtml</a></p>
<p>I think that the ratings for the year Terms of Endearment won were also not the greatest.</p>
<p>Should the Oscars only award big box office films? I don&#8217;t know if I want to see Big Momma&#8217;s House 2 or Pink Panther winning Best Picture next year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted B. (Charging Rhino)</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/02/27/oscar-audience-to-decline/#comment-14163</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted B. (Charging Rhino)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 01:32:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=598#comment-14163</guid>
		<description>Years ago, I had seen most of the Oscar-nominated movies; so I had a vested-interest in the outcome.  The last few years, I haven't seen ANY of the "important" nominated movies, so I really have no connection to "what" they are being awareded-for.  This year I've not seen any of the "best picture" movies yet...even BBM.  (...I'm afraid of those two shirts in the closet.)  And without consulting the list, I don't think I've seen any of the "acting" or "supporting" performances.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Years ago, I had seen most of the Oscar-nominated movies; so I had a vested-interest in the outcome.  The last few years, I haven&#8217;t seen ANY of the &#8220;important&#8221; nominated movies, so I really have no connection to &#8220;what&#8221; they are being awareded-for.  This year I&#8217;ve not seen any of the &#8220;best picture&#8221; movies yet&#8230;even BBM.  (&#8230;I&#8217;m afraid of those two shirts in the closet.)  And without consulting the list, I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;ve seen any of the &#8220;acting&#8221; or &#8220;supporting&#8221; performances.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: just me</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/02/27/oscar-audience-to-decline/#comment-14162</link>
		<dc:creator>just me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2006 22:08:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=598#comment-14162</guid>
		<description>Jim I mean overtly in the sense that the Christian theme isn't in doubt.  The Christian themes of good verses evil are more universal.  But take Narnia, it can certainly be appreciated for the fantasy aspect, while the overt Christianity is ignored, but it is overtly Christian, right down to the symbolism clearly correlating to stories in the Bible-a good example being the destruction of the stone table in the book/movie and the tearing of the veil in the temple.  My point is if you have to stretch to get it to the "Christian theme" point, then it probably isn't Christian themed enough to get ignored.

And there haven't been too many overtly Christian themed movies that get nominated-The Passion being a good example of a good film that was ignored in recent years.

The most recent one, with overt Christian themes that I remember I believe was The Mission, and that was from the early 90's.

But I saw Finding Neverland and while it was a good film (I didn't care much for it, but then I tend to like happy endings, which also in general don't fit the Academy's idea of what makes good film, since they tend to nominate films where at least one of the main characters dies), I don't think it was a better movie than The Passion.  But then I will admit film and what is good is in the eye of the beholder, and apparantly the Academy and I are in total disagreement, which is why I in general don't watch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim I mean overtly in the sense that the Christian theme isn&#8217;t in doubt.  The Christian themes of good verses evil are more universal.  But take Narnia, it can certainly be appreciated for the fantasy aspect, while the overt Christianity is ignored, but it is overtly Christian, right down to the symbolism clearly correlating to stories in the Bible-a good example being the destruction of the stone table in the book/movie and the tearing of the veil in the temple.  My point is if you have to stretch to get it to the &#8220;Christian theme&#8221; point, then it probably isn&#8217;t Christian themed enough to get ignored.</p>
<p>And there haven&#8217;t been too many overtly Christian themed movies that get nominated-The Passion being a good example of a good film that was ignored in recent years.</p>
<p>The most recent one, with overt Christian themes that I remember I believe was The Mission, and that was from the early 90&#8217;s.</p>
<p>But I saw Finding Neverland and while it was a good film (I didn&#8217;t care much for it, but then I tend to like happy endings, which also in general don&#8217;t fit the Academy&#8217;s idea of what makes good film, since they tend to nominate films where at least one of the main characters dies), I don&#8217;t think it was a better movie than The Passion.  But then I will admit film and what is good is in the eye of the beholder, and apparantly the Academy and I are in total disagreement, which is why I in general don&#8217;t watch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/02/27/oscar-audience-to-decline/#comment-14161</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2006 20:56:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=598#comment-14161</guid>
		<description>Why sit through it?  Anything memorable that night will be re-broadcast endlessly on every station not to mention every blog site.  I'm sure we'll a montage of Jon Stewart's mugging like a chimp for the camera.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why sit through it?  Anything memorable that night will be re-broadcast endlessly on every station not to mention every blog site.  I&#8217;m sure we&#8217;ll a montage of Jon Stewart&#8217;s mugging like a chimp for the camera.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
