Kevin, you don’t see any GOPers on your list because you have to get off the Democrat Plantation –go ahead, stand up, loosen those chains, walk down the lane toward the gate, open it up and take a step onto Political Freedom Trail and learn.

But it won’t come until you take the first step of a long journey. Lay down the VictimHood Card and leave the Democrat Plantation… and bring along those other GayLefties who can’t remember what Political Freedom Trail looks like… it’ll be ok. You won’t turn into a pillar of salt.

(I dare you to try to claim he’s anti-gay. In fact, please do it so I or somebody else can demolish you.)

The whole idea of marriage, for me, is completely semantic. Frankly, I don’t think most same sex couples would care about marriage if the law didn’t give people a whole host of benefits that go along with a government issued marriage certificate. At least Kerry supports civil unions to to give same sex couples these benefits. Do you see any Republicans supporting this? I sure don’t.

” I don’t participate in the charade of representative democracy…” No, you just go on blogs and bitch about about people who do. That’s so much more worthwhile.

Hey 5e’s and a z, when you post a cogent, rational policy statement… we can respond. Until then, I think you need to wake up raj and get some lessons in debating critical issues.

Nixon once said: I don’t get angry with those I don’t respect. I don’t think you’ll be chumming the waters here again.

I always wondered what self-loathing wannabe Ann Coulter homosexuals did in their spare time.

Would you like to try again for a grammatical sentence and the booby prize?

You see, they must LIKE being told off here. Why else would they keep coming here and knowingly doing things that so richly deserve being told off about? It adds to their sense of martyrdom and being special.

As we see hank do over and over and over: come here; provoke and be snide; get suitably “snided to” in return, or told off; then go for the big Martyr card play. Even to notice and comment on it (as I am doing right here) is, in hank’s mind, an act of persecution, further boosting his martyrdom and specialness.

Right hank? So, you’re lapping this up. But, if I happen to be around and to be feeling perky, I really don’t mind obliging you.

Or “racists”, or “asshole” (both from the other thread I referenced where he threw them at NDT), etc.

But I agree with you Matt – It isn’t hank’s name-calling per se that I mind; it’s his whimpering hypocrisy in then turning around and whining about the (usually not-as-severe) names he may get back.

And, if any of us dares to notice or comment on the obvious, it’s “baiting and baiting him” – LOL

hank – This is a forum for commenting – People notice and comment on stuff – and if you didn’t like it, you wouldn’t be here – so cut the empty posturing, that everyone with sense is able to see through.

And please, by all means, write that one down in your little file of notes and quote it in the future

hank, this is only a discussion, right? Your words there, sport. And how dare you suggest that I don’t like you just because you lie, distort and smear people? I don’t dislike you; that requires some demonstrable action on your part. Granted, I gather you don’t like me and you’ve preferred to make a personal attack in response to my policy rebuttals, but I expect that from liberals, gaylefties, etc. It’s ok; your approval isn’t critical to my self esteem.

No, hank. It’s a not a question of like or dislike or allowing someone to remain unaccountable –as you’ve tried to be for too long now. It’s only a discussion and you’ve chosen to smear, lie, distort, and spin without credulity… if you want to keep your comments on just policy matters, that’s fine. I’d welcome that concession from you –for a nice change of pace.

But when you elect to call people Christofascists who don’t march in sync with your hatefilled speech framework, well, that requires someone holding you accountable. I know, it’s tough for liberals to accept but accountability is important.