Fitzgerald appears to have left no stone unturned and found no crimes hidden under any of them.

So, let me summarize–Fitz proceeded as far as he did because he saw it as his job to do so. And found nothing. It’s only those on the Left who are convinced that the president committed a crime who continue to believe this no matter how much evidence has come out proven that these accusations (like those of Mr. Wilson) have little (if any) basis in fact.

Actually, wasn’t it Barr who licked whipped cream off a stripper a few years back? Anyway, I suspect Bob Barr is now considered a moonbat by the “conservatives” who post here.

As for the Bush’s verbal “declassification”, there are still some interesting questions to be asked. For example, if the President really declassified it, why all the cloak and dagger games in the disclosing it to Judith Miller? Why all the coy Bush statements about trying to find out who the leaker was when he could have just called a press conference and said he declassified it? And even though Bush appears to have the authority to declassify most things, there is a standard procedure to follow in doing so. Was it followed? A big question, of course, is just what was said – or left unsaid – in the President’s lengthy meeting with Fitzgerald. After all, it hardly seems likely that Fitz would have proceeded with his investigation as far as he did, if the President had simply stated to Fitz that he had authorized the declassification of any information in question. Anyway, the SCLM seems to have figured out that this is a big political story so let’s hope they keep asking the questions so we can watch all the Rubber Stamp Republicans dancing and twisting in their efforts to answer.

Translation: This guy may be a faggot. Do you want a faggot as president?

This from the party of “diversity” and “tolerance.”

Scribes, Pharisees and hypocrites!

Regards,
Peter H.

#3 – Thanks Eric

“You know when they first started trying to come up with a way to discredit me, which we now know started in March of 2003, they went through the old standbys. “He’s had 3 wives, he’s a womanizer, he’s done drugs.”…

It apparently didn’t bother Georgie’s dad or St. Reagan, both of whom appointed Wilson to foreign service posts.

Of course, we all know that Republicans are quite randy. Apart from Bob Barr and Bob Dull–uh, Dole–there really are quite a number of Republican perverts.

Idiotarians, you hereby have my permission to unload whatever diarrhetic drivel (sorry, Calarato) you feel best impersonates an intelligent thought.

However, I reserve the right to remind you that no matter how pathetic your lives may be, none of your lame-assed bullshit even comes close to reality. Hence, like it or not, you’re still gonna spend your lunch hour making my double-with-cheese value meal.

Incidentally, if you serve me cold french fries again, rest assured you’ll be spending spring break stocking shelves at the .99 cent store.

Moonbats, you’ve been duly warned. Proceed, therefore, accordingly.

Eric in Hollywood

Have any of you big libs noticed his recent gay-baiting?

Joe Wilson, via The Plank, via Right Side of the Rainbow:

“You know when they first started trying to come up with a way to discredit me, which we now know started in March of 2003, they went through the old standbys. “He’s had 3 wives, he’s a womanizer, he’s done drugs.” But then they realized they couldn’t use those because I’ve never actually denied them. I mean I’m the first to admit that, unlike Ken Mehlman and David Dreier, I really like women.”

OK libs… Let the rationalizing commence! (NOTE: I actually don’t care about the above; it’s his lying on Iraq that bugged me. But if you are honest and consistent about your victim status, YOU ought to care about the above.)