<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GP Reader Wakes Me Up!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/05/19/gp-reader-wakes-me-up/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/05/19/gp-reader-wakes-me-up/</link>
	<description>The Internet home for American gay conservatives.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:15:21 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mr politeness</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/05/19/gp-reader-wakes-me-up/comment-page-1/#comment-52635</link>
		<dc:creator>mr politeness</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 May 2006 22:14:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=1951#comment-52635</guid>
		<description>This woman make me even more proud of my late mother.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This woman make me even more proud of my late mother.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vera Charles</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/05/19/gp-reader-wakes-me-up/comment-page-1/#comment-52634</link>
		<dc:creator>Vera Charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 May 2006 15:06:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=1951#comment-52634</guid>
		<description>“I am a 70-year-old straight white happily married woman–a former chemist, and a former public school teacher, and presently a writer of science fiction that I sell on the Internet”

And I bet she’s a good cook, too!

Something intrinsically strong, level headed and compassionate about her generation (born into a depression, came of age during a World War, raised the baby boom) that is missing from the younger generations that came after her.

Vera would be honored to buy Mrs. Wyoming a martini and drink to her health.

Cheers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“I am a 70-year-old straight white happily married woman–a former chemist, and a former public school teacher, and presently a writer of science fiction that I sell on the Internet”</p>
<p>And I bet she’s a good cook, too!</p>
<p>Something intrinsically strong, level headed and compassionate about her generation (born into a depression, came of age during a World War, raised the baby boom) that is missing from the younger generations that came after her.</p>
<p>Vera would be honored to buy Mrs. Wyoming a martini and drink to her health.</p>
<p>Cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/05/19/gp-reader-wakes-me-up/comment-page-1/#comment-52633</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 May 2006 14:56:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=1951#comment-52633</guid>
		<description>Well, I was just dealing with gay-specific politics. Sure, there are some gay people that are more left than others... but this website is living proof that there are some gay people more right-leaning than others. Being against socialized medicine is not being against a gay-left policy... it&#039;s being against a left policy. I just don&#039;t think the gay left should be singled out. They all deserve equal treatment, haha.

I do agree with the Republican party on a lot of issues. But we have to face the facts... most polls show that far more Democrats are supportive of gay marriage and/or civil rights (regardless of if you believe they should be law). Here in Ohio, every single bill introduced that is anti-gay is introduced by conservative Republicans. I&#039;m not marginalizing at all, and I know there are Rebuplicans that could give two sh*ts about gay rights. It is just very difficult not to recognize the voting trends. Democrats being wusses does not really make them look good, however. And I imagine Bill Clinton initiated anti-gay legislation simply because it was popular.

Case in point -- the Republicans aren&#039;t all that popular now. So what do they do? Introduce a vote on the FMA, set in June if I recall correctly. It seems like it will be an easy &quot;win&quot; for them... just in time for building momentum for November. I&#039;m curious as to see who supports what.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I was just dealing with gay-specific politics. Sure, there are some gay people that are more left than others&#8230; but this website is living proof that there are some gay people more right-leaning than others. Being against socialized medicine is not being against a gay-left policy&#8230; it&#8217;s being against a left policy. I just don&#8217;t think the gay left should be singled out. They all deserve equal treatment, haha.</p>
<p>I do agree with the Republican party on a lot of issues. But we have to face the facts&#8230; most polls show that far more Democrats are supportive of gay marriage and/or civil rights (regardless of if you believe they should be law). Here in Ohio, every single bill introduced that is anti-gay is introduced by conservative Republicans. I&#8217;m not marginalizing at all, and I know there are Rebuplicans that could give two sh*ts about gay rights. It is just very difficult not to recognize the voting trends. Democrats being wusses does not really make them look good, however. And I imagine Bill Clinton initiated anti-gay legislation simply because it was popular.</p>
<p>Case in point &#8212; the Republicans aren&#8217;t all that popular now. So what do they do? Introduce a vote on the FMA, set in June if I recall correctly. It seems like it will be an easy &#8220;win&#8221; for them&#8230; just in time for building momentum for November. I&#8217;m curious as to see who supports what.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Burt</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/05/19/gp-reader-wakes-me-up/comment-page-1/#comment-52632</link>
		<dc:creator>Burt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 May 2006 13:09:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=1951#comment-52632</guid>
		<description>M Shepard myths have got to stop . M Shepard was killed over a meth deal gone sour. He met these two losers in a seedy bar well known for DRUGS in that college town! He was not left strung up like JC. He was hanging over a cattle fence. These myths were manufactured and promoted by a Denver Gay activist group who saw a political opportunity and the Shepards. The Shepards apparently wanted there son to be remembered as a martyr rather than a dead meth head with poor judgement. I worked there every week so I heard the Real Facts !

As for gay marriage. The whoe thing was cooked by the Gay Left and the Dems for the 2000 elections . Oddly , they have forgottne to tell everyone that that BJ Clinton and a majority of Dems signed off on the first anti gay marriage act in the 90s. Queen Hillary campaigned for the Senate on a anti -gay marriage platfrom!  Where is the outraged about those FACTS from the left  wing gay activists ! Yep, there just poorly disguised DNC operatives.

By the way, the gay marriage business in Mass and Vermont is REAL SLOW . Apparently, everyone heard how hard it was to get divorced real quick !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>M Shepard myths have got to stop . M Shepard was killed over a meth deal gone sour. He met these two losers in a seedy bar well known for DRUGS in that college town! He was not left strung up like JC. He was hanging over a cattle fence. These myths were manufactured and promoted by a Denver Gay activist group who saw a political opportunity and the Shepards. The Shepards apparently wanted there son to be remembered as a martyr rather than a dead meth head with poor judgement. I worked there every week so I heard the Real Facts !</p>
<p>As for gay marriage. The whoe thing was cooked by the Gay Left and the Dems for the 2000 elections . Oddly , they have forgottne to tell everyone that that BJ Clinton and a majority of Dems signed off on the first anti gay marriage act in the 90s. Queen Hillary campaigned for the Senate on a anti -gay marriage platfrom!  Where is the outraged about those FACTS from the left  wing gay activists ! Yep, there just poorly disguised DNC operatives.</p>
<p>By the way, the gay marriage business in Mass and Vermont is REAL SLOW . Apparently, everyone heard how hard it was to get divorced real quick !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: syn</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/05/19/gp-reader-wakes-me-up/comment-page-1/#comment-52631</link>
		<dc:creator>syn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 May 2006 03:31:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=1951#comment-52631</guid>
		<description>I believe the Dred Scott case determined that no human being has the right to privacy in owernship of another human being. Of course , females within a period of nine moths is exempt  from this law but what does that matter to humanity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe the Dred Scott case determined that no human being has the right to privacy in owernship of another human being. Of course , females within a period of nine moths is exempt  from this law but what does that matter to humanity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: syn</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/05/19/gp-reader-wakes-me-up/comment-page-1/#comment-52630</link>
		<dc:creator>syn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 May 2006 03:27:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=1951#comment-52630</guid>
		<description>What intellectual power this women commands with her ability to distinguish between non-life at four months and life beginning after the fourth month and, a chemist to boot.  What intellectual inspiration is She to hold such devine ability to reason.  How noble is her mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What intellectual power this women commands with her ability to distinguish between non-life at four months and life beginning after the fourth month and, a chemist to boot.  What intellectual inspiration is She to hold such devine ability to reason.  How noble is her mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John in IL</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/05/19/gp-reader-wakes-me-up/comment-page-1/#comment-52629</link>
		<dc:creator>John in IL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 May 2006 02:16:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=1951#comment-52629</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;The second part of his proposed amendment says that nothing in the US Constitution is to be construed to mean that marriage is anything other than a union of a man and a woman&lt;/i&gt;

Unless we added a constitutional amendment that said otherwise.   Such an amendment would be part of the constitution.

I&#039;m confused.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The second part of his proposed amendment says that nothing in the US Constitution is to be construed to mean that marriage is anything other than a union of a man and a woman</i></p>
<p>Unless we added a constitutional amendment that said otherwise.   Such an amendment would be part of the constitution.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m confused.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John in IL</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/05/19/gp-reader-wakes-me-up/comment-page-1/#comment-52628</link>
		<dc:creator>John in IL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 May 2006 01:58:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=1951#comment-52628</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;In his version, civil marriage would be left up to the states&lt;/i&gt;

Isn&#039;t it already?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>In his version, civil marriage would be left up to the states</i></p>
<p>Isn&#8217;t it already?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott in CA</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/05/19/gp-reader-wakes-me-up/comment-page-1/#comment-52627</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott in CA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 May 2006 01:55:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=1951#comment-52627</guid>
		<description>Orrin Hatch has come up with a new marriage amendment. In his version, civil marriage would be left up to the states, meaning they could create gay marriage, civil unions, or other such unions for gays, or anyone, for that matter. The second part of his proposed amendment says that nothing in the US Constitution is to be construed to mean that marriage is anything other than a union of a man and a woman. What this means is that no federal judge could impose gay marriage by judicial fiat. I like it. I think it would satisfy all but the most rabid anti-gay conservatives, while allowing states to go their own way. It assures that no court will impose anything on states that don&#039;t want it. This was on a thread at RedState last night.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Orrin Hatch has come up with a new marriage amendment. In his version, civil marriage would be left up to the states, meaning they could create gay marriage, civil unions, or other such unions for gays, or anyone, for that matter. The second part of his proposed amendment says that nothing in the US Constitution is to be construed to mean that marriage is anything other than a union of a man and a woman. What this means is that no federal judge could impose gay marriage by judicial fiat. I like it. I think it would satisfy all but the most rabid anti-gay conservatives, while allowing states to go their own way. It assures that no court will impose anything on states that don&#8217;t want it. This was on a thread at RedState last night.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John in IL</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/05/19/gp-reader-wakes-me-up/comment-page-1/#comment-52626</link>
		<dc:creator>John in IL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 May 2006 01:35:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=1951#comment-52626</guid>
		<description>I have to disagree, Peter.  The amendment process worked quite well with the 19th amendment.  Why can&#039;t we have a pro-gay marriage amendment or a pro-abortion amendment  if the people want it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to disagree, Peter.  The amendment process worked quite well with the 19th amendment.  Why can&#8217;t we have a pro-gay marriage amendment or a pro-abortion amendment  if the people want it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Hughes</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/05/19/gp-reader-wakes-me-up/comment-page-1/#comment-52625</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Hughes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 May 2006 23:54:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=1951#comment-52625</guid>
		<description>Gay rights (marriage, wills et al) should be done as Federalist #77 advocates - through the Tenth Amendment (powers relegated to the states and to the people respectively), rather than as a Constitutional amendment.

The same can be said for abortion as well.  The Founding Fathers wanted the PEOPLE to have the final say in their respective states, NOT the federal government.

Regards,
Peter H.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gay rights (marriage, wills et al) should be done as Federalist #77 advocates &#8211; through the Tenth Amendment (powers relegated to the states and to the people respectively), rather than as a Constitutional amendment.</p>
<p>The same can be said for abortion as well.  The Founding Fathers wanted the PEOPLE to have the final say in their respective states, NOT the federal government.</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Peter H.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Calarato</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/05/19/gp-reader-wakes-me-up/comment-page-1/#comment-52624</link>
		<dc:creator>Calarato</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 May 2006 22:14:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=1951#comment-52624</guid>
		<description>#15 - I&#039;m on the same page, James.  Pro-gay-marriage here.  And in favor of abolishing all anti-discrimination laws on liberty grounds... but, if we must have them, they may as well mention sexual orientation in my opinion.

What I&#039;m against is:

(a) all the other crap that the Gay Left groups stand for having truly nothing to do with gays/lesbians, and/or that veer into thought control; see #12 / #13; and

(b) in addition, I&#039;m against gay-marriage-imposed-by-mere-judicial-fiat.  I think gay-marriage-imposed-by-mere-judicial-fiat is an unsustainable proposition that will backlash on us badly.  (In fact - It has.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#15 &#8211; I&#8217;m on the same page, James.  Pro-gay-marriage here.  And in favor of abolishing all anti-discrimination laws on liberty grounds&#8230; but, if we must have them, they may as well mention sexual orientation in my opinion.</p>
<p>What I&#8217;m against is:</p>
<p>(a) all the other crap that the Gay Left groups stand for having truly nothing to do with gays/lesbians, and/or that veer into thought control; see #12 / #13; and</p>
<p>(b) in addition, I&#8217;m against gay-marriage-imposed-by-mere-judicial-fiat.  I think gay-marriage-imposed-by-mere-judicial-fiat is an unsustainable proposition that will backlash on us badly.  (In fact &#8211; It has.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/05/19/gp-reader-wakes-me-up/comment-page-1/#comment-52623</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 May 2006 22:08:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=1951#comment-52623</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think gay marriage OR adding sexual orientation to the long list of &quot;do not discriminate against&quot; list should be made part of the law.

However, to be fair they must. Obviously I&#039;m libertarian-leaning, but i understand it&#039;s an idealistic political view. People will not let gays marry unless it&#039;s part of law... that is why many states (and even the federal gov&#039;t now) are making laws to restrict it, despite the fact that all those laws are obvious discrimination. No laws about any kind of marriage should be in the constitution and they shouldn&#039;t be sanctioned by the gov&#039;t at all. Marriage is a spritual, religious bond... and I don&#039;t need my gov&#039;t to acknowledge it.

Also, I don&#039;t think sexual orientation should be specifically mentioned in civil code in terms of not discriminating against gays. But I think that entire code should be abolished. I&#039;m not going to discriminate against old people, black people, dumb people, Mexican people, or Jewish people. Ideally, neither would anyone else -- but they do. People say, &quot;People &lt;i&gt;choose&lt;/i&gt; to be gay.&quot; Screw that! I choose my religion. I choose my US citizenship. Even if I wanted to cede that yes, people choose to be gay, then they also should not be discriminated for it.

None of this stuff should be in the law. I want the government out of my business. But the rest of the world doesn&#039;t think like I do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think gay marriage OR adding sexual orientation to the long list of &#8220;do not discriminate against&#8221; list should be made part of the law.</p>
<p>However, to be fair they must. Obviously I&#8217;m libertarian-leaning, but i understand it&#8217;s an idealistic political view. People will not let gays marry unless it&#8217;s part of law&#8230; that is why many states (and even the federal gov&#8217;t now) are making laws to restrict it, despite the fact that all those laws are obvious discrimination. No laws about any kind of marriage should be in the constitution and they shouldn&#8217;t be sanctioned by the gov&#8217;t at all. Marriage is a spritual, religious bond&#8230; and I don&#8217;t need my gov&#8217;t to acknowledge it.</p>
<p>Also, I don&#8217;t think sexual orientation should be specifically mentioned in civil code in terms of not discriminating against gays. But I think that entire code should be abolished. I&#8217;m not going to discriminate against old people, black people, dumb people, Mexican people, or Jewish people. Ideally, neither would anyone else &#8212; but they do. People say, &#8220;People <i>choose</i> to be gay.&#8221; Screw that! I choose my religion. I choose my US citizenship. Even if I wanted to cede that yes, people choose to be gay, then they also should not be discriminated for it.</p>
<p>None of this stuff should be in the law. I want the government out of my business. But the rest of the world doesn&#8217;t think like I do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jo macDougal</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/05/19/gp-reader-wakes-me-up/comment-page-1/#comment-52622</link>
		<dc:creator>Jo macDougal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 May 2006 21:37:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=1951#comment-52622</guid>
		<description>Touching</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Touching</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Calarato</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/05/19/gp-reader-wakes-me-up/comment-page-1/#comment-52621</link>
		<dc:creator>Calarato</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 May 2006 19:25:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=1951#comment-52621</guid>
		<description>P.S. In more prosaic terms (and, substantiating the above), the hard gay Left wants:

- imposition of gay marriage thoughout the country by judicial fiat;

- imposition of speech codes, hate crimes legislation, etc. throughout the country;

- An incredible amount of stuff that has absolutely nothing to do with being gay or lesbian - but is general left-wing stuff.  Unrestricted abortion,  tax increases, nationalized / socialized health care, nationalized / socialized industrial policy in the name of &quot;environmentalism&quot;, the defeat of U.S. foreign policy (as I mentioned), and much more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>P.S. In more prosaic terms (and, substantiating the above), the hard gay Left wants:</p>
<p>- imposition of gay marriage thoughout the country by judicial fiat;</p>
<p>- imposition of speech codes, hate crimes legislation, etc. throughout the country;</p>
<p>- An incredible amount of stuff that has absolutely nothing to do with being gay or lesbian &#8211; but is general left-wing stuff.  Unrestricted abortion,  tax increases, nationalized / socialized health care, nationalized / socialized industrial policy in the name of &#8220;environmentalism&#8221;, the defeat of U.S. foreign policy (as I mentioned), and much more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Calarato</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/05/19/gp-reader-wakes-me-up/comment-page-1/#comment-52620</link>
		<dc:creator>Calarato</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 May 2006 19:11:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=1951#comment-52620</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;What exactly does the ‘radical gay left’ want that is different than what you want?&lt;/i&gt;

What far-leftists in general want... namely:

- Socialism - a.k.a. the end of freedom; the enslavement of all-to-all.

- Thought control - e.g., speech codes and hate crimes legislation.  The supreme reign of political correctness.

- America&#039;s downfall or defeat in the War on Terror.

- &quot;Equality&quot; - meaning, the destruction or tearing down of anyone who is more successful, materially or personally, than them.

All 3 are easy to substantiate, but they can be summed up in one word: Power.  The hard Left (gay or otherwise) wants a world where all others - e.g., true individualists, capitalists, Christians, and so forth - are answerable to them, or their bureaucrats.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>What exactly does the ‘radical gay left’ want that is different than what you want?</i></p>
<p>What far-leftists in general want&#8230; namely:</p>
<p>- Socialism &#8211; a.k.a. the end of freedom; the enslavement of all-to-all.</p>
<p>- Thought control &#8211; e.g., speech codes and hate crimes legislation.  The supreme reign of political correctness.</p>
<p>- America&#8217;s downfall or defeat in the War on Terror.</p>
<p>- &#8220;Equality&#8221; &#8211; meaning, the destruction or tearing down of anyone who is more successful, materially or personally, than them.</p>
<p>All 3 are easy to substantiate, but they can be summed up in one word: Power.  The hard Left (gay or otherwise) wants a world where all others &#8211; e.g., true individualists, capitalists, Christians, and so forth &#8211; are answerable to them, or their bureaucrats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Calarato</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/05/19/gp-reader-wakes-me-up/comment-page-1/#comment-52619</link>
		<dc:creator>Calarato</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 May 2006 19:02:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=1951#comment-52619</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t get it.  Where&#039;s the GP post on Iran, that the above trackbacks are for?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t get it.  Where&#8217;s the GP post on Iran, that the above trackbacks are for?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: North Dallas Thirty</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/05/19/gp-reader-wakes-me-up/comment-page-1/#comment-52618</link>
		<dc:creator>North Dallas Thirty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 May 2006 19:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=1951#comment-52618</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;What exactly does the ‘radical gay left’ want that is different than what you want?&lt;/i&gt;

To use gay rights as a means of getting what they want, rather than as an end in itself.

&lt;i&gt;Also, saying that the ‘radical’ gay left employs too aggressive political tactics and comparing it to radical Islamists’ methods is kind of overboard.&lt;/i&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://northdallasthirty.blogspot.com/2006/03/go-away-kid-you-bother-us.html&quot;&gt;Not in the least&lt;/a&gt;.

Remember, this is someone who openly bragged that HRC, LCR, and Democratic Party staffers were &lt;i&gt;helping&lt;/i&gt; him do all of this. Indeed, this person has received numerous &lt;i&gt;honors&lt;/i&gt; from the &quot;gay community&quot; for his actions, and just last week was a guest at (ironically) the national dinner of SLDN, which supposedly is AGAINST harassing and outing gays.

The people you mention are, , like gay leftists, using the &quot;cause&quot; as a means to be hateful, not an end. However, they are not the majority of pro-life activists; the hatemongering leftists, though, ARE the majority of &quot;gay activists&quot;.

That&#039;s why the Islamic comparison is valid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>What exactly does the ‘radical gay left’ want that is different than what you want?</i></p>
<p>To use gay rights as a means of getting what they want, rather than as an end in itself.</p>
<p><i>Also, saying that the ‘radical’ gay left employs too aggressive political tactics and comparing it to radical Islamists’ methods is kind of overboard.</i></p>
<p><a href="http://northdallasthirty.blogspot.com/2006/03/go-away-kid-you-bother-us.html">Not in the least</a>.</p>
<p>Remember, this is someone who openly bragged that HRC, LCR, and Democratic Party staffers were <i>helping</i> him do all of this. Indeed, this person has received numerous <i>honors</i> from the &#8220;gay community&#8221; for his actions, and just last week was a guest at (ironically) the national dinner of SLDN, which supposedly is AGAINST harassing and outing gays.</p>
<p>The people you mention are, , like gay leftists, using the &#8220;cause&#8221; as a means to be hateful, not an end. However, they are not the majority of pro-life activists; the hatemongering leftists, though, ARE the majority of &#8220;gay activists&#8221;.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s why the Islamic comparison is valid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Environmental Republican</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/05/19/gp-reader-wakes-me-up/comment-page-1/#comment-52617</link>
		<dc:creator>Environmental Republican</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 May 2006 18:51:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=1951#comment-52617</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Iran 2006=Germany 1938?...&lt;/strong&gt;

Gay Patriot reminds us that the thugocracy in Iran is not just attacking those of other religions....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Iran 2006=Germany 1938?&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Gay Patriot reminds us that the thugocracy in Iran is not just attacking those of other religions&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Blog For All</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/05/19/gp-reader-wakes-me-up/comment-page-1/#comment-52616</link>
		<dc:creator>A Blog For All</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 May 2006 17:58:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=1951#comment-52616</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Ahmadinejad&#039;s The Real Deal...&lt;/strong&gt;

If you thought that comparisons between Ahmadinejad and Hiter were far fetched, think again. He&#039;s going down the same path that Hitler took Germany, and we know how well that ended up for everyone around the world....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Ahmadinejad&#8217;s The Real Deal&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>If you thought that comparisons between Ahmadinejad and Hiter were far fetched, think again. He&#8217;s going down the same path that Hitler took Germany, and we know how well that ended up for everyone around the world&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

