<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wondering Why AOL Highlights Article on 9/11 Conspiracy Theorists</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/06/05/wondering-why-aol-highlights-article-on-911-conspiracy-theorists/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/06/05/wondering-why-aol-highlights-article-on-911-conspiracy-theorists/</link>
	<description>The Internet home for American gay conservatives.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:00:25 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: raj</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/06/05/wondering-why-aol-highlights-article-on-911-conspiracy-theorists/comment-page-1/#comment-17139</link>
		<dc:creator>raj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2006 04:54:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=685#comment-17139</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Wondering Why AOL Highlights Article on 9/11 Conspiracy Theorists &lt;/i&gt;

You could email them and ask them.

I&#039;m always amused at so-called conservatives who post questions like this, but who invariably refused to go to the source.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Wondering Why AOL Highlights Article on 9/11 Conspiracy Theorists </i></p>
<p>You could email them and ask them.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m always amused at so-called conservatives who post questions like this, but who invariably refused to go to the source.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michigan-Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/06/05/wondering-why-aol-highlights-article-on-911-conspiracy-theorists/comment-page-1/#comment-17138</link>
		<dc:creator>Michigan-Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2006 03:45:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=685#comment-17138</guid>
		<description>Ian S, nice try but the dance card for just spinning on the floor is full right now.

The truth is that a significant majority of Americans do think Iraq under Saddam was involved in 9-11.  Just like many think the Russians helped to asassinate Pope JPII... another truth the Left tried to discredit for years until the Bulgarians said, &quot;OK, you caught us but the KGB made us do it&quot;.

Bush&#039;s approval rating has everything to do with a souring of MSM and American public opinion on the post-invasion experience in Iraq... not on anything remotely truthful.

Nice try at the spin fest, Ian S.  But it&#039;s off the dance floor for you and into the GayLeft pickle barrel.  Once again, you&#039;re caught in misdirection, lies and intellectual dishonesty.  Say hello to the other GayLefties while in that pickle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ian S, nice try but the dance card for just spinning on the floor is full right now.</p>
<p>The truth is that a significant majority of Americans do think Iraq under Saddam was involved in 9-11.  Just like many think the Russians helped to asassinate Pope JPII&#8230; another truth the Left tried to discredit for years until the Bulgarians said, &#8220;OK, you caught us but the KGB made us do it&#8221;.</p>
<p>Bush&#8217;s approval rating has everything to do with a souring of MSM and American public opinion on the post-invasion experience in Iraq&#8230; not on anything remotely truthful.</p>
<p>Nice try at the spin fest, Ian S.  But it&#8217;s off the dance floor for you and into the GayLeft pickle barrel.  Once again, you&#8217;re caught in misdirection, lies and intellectual dishonesty.  Say hello to the other GayLefties while in that pickle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian S</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/06/05/wondering-why-aol-highlights-article-on-911-conspiracy-theorists/comment-page-1/#comment-17137</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2006 03:24:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=685#comment-17137</guid>
		<description>#10: &quot;could that be because nearly 70% of Americans know it to be true?&quot;

But your Dear Leader himself has stated it&#039;s NOT true. Of course, the poll was in 2003. I think a lot of folks&#039; eyes have been opened since then. That&#039;s why Bush&#039;s approval is in the toilet these days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#10: &#8220;could that be because nearly 70% of Americans know it to be true?&#8221;</p>
<p>But your Dear Leader himself has stated it&#8217;s NOT true. Of course, the poll was in 2003. I think a lot of folks&#8217; eyes have been opened since then. That&#8217;s why Bush&#8217;s approval is in the toilet these days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick (Gryph)</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/06/05/wondering-why-aol-highlights-article-on-911-conspiracy-theorists/comment-page-1/#comment-17136</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick (Gryph)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2006 02:47:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=685#comment-17136</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;em&gt;Gryph, thanks for the tip. Which reminds me I still owe you a drink you know.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt; You don&#039;t want to get me drunk. Then I might &lt;em&gt;really&lt;/em&gt; tell you what I think of our President. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><em>Gryph, thanks for the tip. Which reminds me I still owe you a drink you know.</em></p></blockquote>
<p> You don&#8217;t want to get me drunk. Then I might <em>really</em> tell you what I think of our President. <img src='http://www.gaypatriot.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michigan-Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/06/05/wondering-why-aol-highlights-article-on-911-conspiracy-theorists/comment-page-1/#comment-17135</link>
		<dc:creator>Michigan-Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2006 02:42:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=685#comment-17135</guid>
		<description>Ian S, could that be because nearly 70% of Americans know it to be true?  Ghee, less than 30% of Americans think the Downing Street Memo was true.  Hmmmmmmmmm.

Nawh, I didn&#039;t think that little brain of yours could tolerate a fact entering without simultaneously imploding.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ian S, could that be because nearly 70% of Americans know it to be true?  Ghee, less than 30% of Americans think the Downing Street Memo was true.  Hmmmmmmmmm.</p>
<p>Nawh, I didn&#8217;t think that little brain of yours could tolerate a fact entering without simultaneously imploding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian S</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/06/05/wondering-why-aol-highlights-article-on-911-conspiracy-theorists/comment-page-1/#comment-17131</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2006 02:16:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=685#comment-17131</guid>
		<description>GPW: &quot;neither he nor any member of his Administration has said as much&quot;

November 14, 2001 60 Minutes http://tinyurl.com/e6enl :

GLORIA BORGER (CBS News contributor): Well, you know that Mohammed Atta, the ringleader of the hijackers, actually met with Iraqi intelligence.

CHENEY: I know this. In Prague, in April of this year, as well as earlier. And that information has been made public. The Czechs made that public. Obviously, that&#039;s an interesting piece of information.

December 9, 2001 on Meet the Press http://tinyurl.com/kcmss :

Tim Russert: &quot;Do you still believe there&#039;s no evidence that Iraq was involved in September 11?&quot;

Dick Cheney: &quot;Well, what we now have that&#039;s developed since you and I last talked, Tim, of course, was that report that--it&#039;s been pretty well confirmed that [Atta] did go to Prague and he did meet with a senior official of the Iraqi intelligence service in Czechoslovakia last April, several months before the attack.”

Atta, as we all know, was the ringleader of the 9/11 terrorists. By connecting Atta to Saddam&#039;s intelligence service, Cheney is specifically linking Iraq to 9/11. Of ocurse, the Prague story is never actually confirmed in spite of Cheney&#039;s claim that it had been. No wonder that in September 2003, nearly 7 in 10 Americans believed Saddam was likely involved in the 9/11 attacks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GPW: &#8220;neither he nor any member of his Administration has said as much&#8221;</p>
<p>November 14, 2001 60 Minutes <a href="http://tinyurl.com/e6enl" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/e6enl</a> :</p>
<p>GLORIA BORGER (CBS News contributor): Well, you know that Mohammed Atta, the ringleader of the hijackers, actually met with Iraqi intelligence.</p>
<p>CHENEY: I know this. In Prague, in April of this year, as well as earlier. And that information has been made public. The Czechs made that public. Obviously, that&#8217;s an interesting piece of information.</p>
<p>December 9, 2001 on Meet the Press <a href="http://tinyurl.com/kcmss" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/kcmss</a> :</p>
<p>Tim Russert: &#8220;Do you still believe there&#8217;s no evidence that Iraq was involved in September 11?&#8221;</p>
<p>Dick Cheney: &#8220;Well, what we now have that&#8217;s developed since you and I last talked, Tim, of course, was that report that&#8211;it&#8217;s been pretty well confirmed that [Atta] did go to Prague and he did meet with a senior official of the Iraqi intelligence service in Czechoslovakia last April, several months before the attack.”</p>
<p>Atta, as we all know, was the ringleader of the 9/11 terrorists. By connecting Atta to Saddam&#8217;s intelligence service, Cheney is specifically linking Iraq to 9/11. Of ocurse, the Prague story is never actually confirmed in spite of Cheney&#8217;s claim that it had been. No wonder that in September 2003, nearly 7 in 10 Americans believed Saddam was likely involved in the 9/11 attacks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Blog For All</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/06/05/wondering-why-aol-highlights-article-on-911-conspiracy-theorists/comment-page-1/#comment-17134</link>
		<dc:creator>A Blog For All</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2006 01:02:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=685#comment-17134</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Catering to the Fringe...&lt;/strong&gt;

Speaking of the loony left, the NYT is peddling the 9/11 conspiracy theorists once again. This time, they&#039;re providing coverage of 500 of the wackjobs gathering to peddle their theories......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Catering to the Fringe&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Speaking of the loony left, the NYT is peddling the 9/11 conspiracy theorists once again. This time, they&#8217;re providing coverage of 500 of the wackjobs gathering to peddle their theories&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GayPatriotWest</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/06/05/wondering-why-aol-highlights-article-on-911-conspiracy-theorists/comment-page-1/#comment-17133</link>
		<dc:creator>GayPatriotWest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2006 01:00:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=685#comment-17133</guid>
		<description>Gryph, thanks for the tip.   Which reminds me I still owe you a drink you know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gryph, thanks for the tip.   Which reminds me I still owe you a drink you know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kitty</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/06/05/wondering-why-aol-highlights-article-on-911-conspiracy-theorists/comment-page-1/#comment-17132</link>
		<dc:creator>Kitty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2006 00:53:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=685#comment-17132</guid>
		<description>Popular Mechanics is not known as a radical ideological site, but they have properly debunked every allegation of the deranged skeptics.  Snopes. too, dispatches this drivel.
AOL is pandering to some liberal constituency.  What it might be I have no idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Popular Mechanics is not known as a radical ideological site, but they have properly debunked every allegation of the deranged skeptics.  Snopes. too, dispatches this drivel.<br />
AOL is pandering to some liberal constituency.  What it might be I have no idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rachel</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/06/05/wondering-why-aol-highlights-article-on-911-conspiracy-theorists/comment-page-1/#comment-17130</link>
		<dc:creator>rachel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2006 23:27:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=685#comment-17130</guid>
		<description>AOL&#039;s imbecillic and offensive treatment of 9/11 immediately after the attacks - does anyone remember the supposed child&#039;s drawing of the weeping twin towers? - was one of the reasons, and the one that finally pushed to action, to cancel my AOL account and move on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AOL&#8217;s imbecillic and offensive treatment of 9/11 immediately after the attacks &#8211; does anyone remember the supposed child&#8217;s drawing of the weeping twin towers? &#8211; was one of the reasons, and the one that finally pushed to action, to cancel my AOL account and move on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick (Gryph)</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/06/05/wondering-why-aol-highlights-article-on-911-conspiracy-theorists/comment-page-1/#comment-17129</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick (Gryph)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2006 23:23:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=685#comment-17129</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m amazed actually that you still use AOL GPW, thats *so* last century. Eek! You even use their e-mail!

You should at least setup your domain e-mail so its GPW@gaypatriot.com.

I get all mail sent to gryphmon.com regardless of who its addressed to, but I don&#039;t think that would work on a commune-style blog like this one.

Incidentally, I&#039;m not too suprised that AOL has a story like that. You see, the Iranian President said the same thing in his recent letter to Bush.  I kept expecting someone in power, or even the MSM such as FoxNews to actually note that the Iranian President both wants nuclear weapons AND is out of his fucking skull crazy.  But so far, I haven&#039;t heard a peep.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m amazed actually that you still use AOL GPW, thats *so* last century. Eek! You even use their e-mail!</p>
<p>You should at least setup your domain e-mail so its <a href="mailto:GPW@gaypatriot.com">GPW@gaypatriot.com</a>.</p>
<p>I get all mail sent to gryphmon.com regardless of who its addressed to, but I don&#8217;t think that would work on a commune-style blog like this one.</p>
<p>Incidentally, I&#8217;m not too suprised that AOL has a story like that. You see, the Iranian President said the same thing in his recent letter to Bush.  I kept expecting someone in power, or even the MSM such as FoxNews to actually note that the Iranian President both wants nuclear weapons AND is out of his fucking skull crazy.  But so far, I haven&#8217;t heard a peep.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VinceTN</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/06/05/wondering-why-aol-highlights-article-on-911-conspiracy-theorists/comment-page-1/#comment-17128</link>
		<dc:creator>VinceTN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2006 21:55:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=685#comment-17128</guid>
		<description>At a boy Davy.  America likes her enemies bitter and off-topic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At a boy Davy.  America likes her enemies bitter and off-topic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VinceTN</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/06/05/wondering-why-aol-highlights-article-on-911-conspiracy-theorists/comment-page-1/#comment-17127</link>
		<dc:creator>VinceTN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2006 21:53:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=685#comment-17127</guid>
		<description>Most of their headlines are pretty silly and pointless.  Either the topic or the discussion is trivial.  Have you ever lowered yourself to go into the &quot;Discuss this topic&quot; area?  Just pitiful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most of their headlines are pretty silly and pointless.  Either the topic or the discussion is trivial.  Have you ever lowered yourself to go into the &#8220;Discuss this topic&#8221; area?  Just pitiful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/06/05/wondering-why-aol-highlights-article-on-911-conspiracy-theorists/comment-page-1/#comment-17126</link>
		<dc:creator>David Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2006 21:02:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=685#comment-17126</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;You mean like how Iraq had something to do with attacking America on 9/11?
&lt;/p&gt;[&lt;i&gt;Well, some conspiracy theorists do actually believe the president said Iraq was involved in 9/11 while neither he nor any member of his Administration has said as much.  --Ed.&lt;/i&gt;]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You mean like how Iraq had something to do with attacking America on 9/11?
</p>
<p>[<i>Well, some conspiracy theorists do actually believe the president said Iraq was involved in 9/11 while neither he nor any member of his Administration has said as much.  --Ed.</i>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

