<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ann Coulter:  Extreme Right Nutjob</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/06/07/ann-coulter-extreme-right-nutjob/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/06/07/ann-coulter-extreme-right-nutjob/</link>
	<description>The Internet home for American gay conservatives.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 21:53:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Free Speech for all, except for Conservatives &#187; Conservative Blog: Urban Conservative 2.0</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/06/07/ann-coulter-extreme-right-nutjob/#comment-917</link>
		<dc:creator>Free Speech for all, except for Conservatives &#187; Conservative Blog: Urban Conservative 2.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 06:17:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=41#comment-917</guid>
		<description>[...] months back - and where was the outrage?). Yes indeed, seems like Anneâ€™s comments are a tad bit extreme but let&#8217;s go back to all the things that liberals have said that the media hardly ever [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] months back - and where was the outrage?). Yes indeed, seems like Anneâ€™s comments are a tad bit extreme but let&#8217;s go back to all the things that liberals have said that the media hardly ever [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Les</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/06/07/ann-coulter-extreme-right-nutjob/#comment-914</link>
		<dc:creator>Les</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2006 09:54:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=41#comment-914</guid>
		<description>Ann Coulter is sick so dont listen to her! She has a one track mind and I will debate her on any republican issue she has to bring up!
Ann, what about Iran??? What is your plan Ann?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ann Coulter is sick so dont listen to her! She has a one track mind and I will debate her on any republican issue she has to bring up!<br />
Ann, what about Iran??? What is your plan Ann?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Les</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/06/07/ann-coulter-extreme-right-nutjob/#comment-913</link>
		<dc:creator>Les</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2006 09:50:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=41#comment-913</guid>
		<description>Excuse me Ann Coulter, you are a bigot and a hater as well.
You are cutting on 911 families which to me is a crime and you have your nerve to say Bush is a Godsend! Where is Bush a Godsend? Now Ann if you want to debate lets go! I will win and unfortunately for you, you will lose guaranteed!
Ann, do you not understand that you cannot change the mindset in most of the middle east or are you in dreamland???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excuse me Ann Coulter, you are a bigot and a hater as well.<br />
You are cutting on 911 families which to me is a crime and you have your nerve to say Bush is a Godsend! Where is Bush a Godsend? Now Ann if you want to debate lets go! I will win and unfortunately for you, you will lose guaranteed!<br />
Ann, do you not understand that you cannot change the mindset in most of the middle east or are you in dreamland???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dale in L.A.</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/06/07/ann-coulter-extreme-right-nutjob/#comment-912</link>
		<dc:creator>Dale in L.A.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jun 2006 19:01:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=41#comment-912</guid>
		<description>Raj, he was only drawing attention to the one quality that you chose to point out (incorrectly),  that Fred Phelps is a conservative. You ASSUMED he was conservative because he's an evangelical and hates gay people. That's called "prejudice". About 2/3 of Evangelical Christians are Republican. Guess what most of the rest are? And not all Evangelical Christians think homosexuality is a sin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Raj, he was only drawing attention to the one quality that you chose to point out (incorrectly),  that Fred Phelps is a conservative. You ASSUMED he was conservative because he&#8217;s an evangelical and hates gay people. That&#8217;s called &#8220;prejudice&#8221;. About 2/3 of Evangelical Christians are Republican. Guess what most of the rest are? And not all Evangelical Christians think homosexuality is a sin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Hughes</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/06/07/ann-coulter-extreme-right-nutjob/#comment-911</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Hughes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jun 2006 16:50:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=41#comment-911</guid>
		<description>#60 - Actually, Herr raj, I have...and something that may have escaped your snotty little kopf is that the US Constitution does not mention political parties at all.  And as far as Phelps being a Baptist minister, I could care less.  He's more of a Pharisee than anything else.

PS - I can send you a copy of the Bible so that you can look up "Pharisee."  I don't suspect that you have that book in your collection of German literature, like "Mein Kampf" and "Communist Manifesto."

Regards,
Peter H.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#60 - Actually, Herr raj, I have&#8230;and something that may have escaped your snotty little kopf is that the US Constitution does not mention political parties at all.  And as far as Phelps being a Baptist minister, I could care less.  He&#8217;s more of a Pharisee than anything else.</p>
<p>PS - I can send you a copy of the Bible so that you can look up &#8220;Pharisee.&#8221;  I don&#8217;t suspect that you have that book in your collection of German literature, like &#8220;Mein Kampf&#8221; and &#8220;Communist Manifesto.&#8221;</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Peter H.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: raj</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/06/07/ann-coulter-extreme-right-nutjob/#comment-910</link>
		<dc:creator>raj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jun 2006 05:28:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=41#comment-910</guid>
		<description>#59 Peter Hughes &#8212; June 9, 2006 @ 7:13 pm - June 9, 2006

Fred Phelps is also a Baptist minister and a lawyer.  I notice that you don't mention any of that.

It appears to have escaped your notice that anyone can register him- or her-self with any political party he or she wants.

BTW, have you read the US Constitution yet regarding amendments?  Didn't expect that you had.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#59 Peter Hughes &#8212; June 9, 2006 @ 7:13 pm - June 9, 2006</p>
<p>Fred Phelps is also a Baptist minister and a lawyer.  I notice that you don&#8217;t mention any of that.</p>
<p>It appears to have escaped your notice that anyone can register him- or her-self with any political party he or she wants.</p>
<p>BTW, have you read the US Constitution yet regarding amendments?  Didn&#8217;t expect that you had.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Hughes</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/06/07/ann-coulter-extreme-right-nutjob/#comment-909</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Hughes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2006 23:13:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=41#comment-909</guid>
		<description>#58 - That nutjob is Fred Phelps, a registered demoncRAT.

Regards,
Peter H.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#58 - That nutjob is Fred Phelps, a registered demoncRAT.</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Peter H.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ralph</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/06/07/ann-coulter-extreme-right-nutjob/#comment-908</link>
		<dc:creator>ralph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2006 22:45:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=41#comment-908</guid>
		<description>actually, TGC, I, the son of a vet, am on the on the left and most people I know are on the left (I like to keep a diverse group of friends ranging from the extreme left to the middle of the road types and GP). none of us think that any of the 9/11 and war deaths were deserved.  I have heard that there is some nutjob conservative showing up at military funerals saying that these deaths are some sort of payback.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>actually, TGC, I, the son of a vet, am on the on the left and most people I know are on the left (I like to keep a diverse group of friends ranging from the extreme left to the middle of the road types and GP). none of us think that any of the 9/11 and war deaths were deserved.  I have heard that there is some nutjob conservative showing up at military funerals saying that these deaths are some sort of payback.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Hughes</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/06/07/ann-coulter-extreme-right-nutjob/#comment-907</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Hughes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2006 19:17:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=41#comment-907</guid>
		<description>Right on, Dale.  Another reason why I like Ann Coulter.

Maybe it's because she reminds me of a lot of gay men - we're definitely the ones who kiss-and-tell, who say the snide and coarse remarks through a smile, and who are the first to point out hypocrisy.

I mean, admit it...we can all be a bunch of whiny bitches at times.  Just look at some of these posters on this board! I rest my case.

Regards,
Peter H.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right on, Dale.  Another reason why I like Ann Coulter.</p>
<p>Maybe it&#8217;s because she reminds me of a lot of gay men - we&#8217;re definitely the ones who kiss-and-tell, who say the snide and coarse remarks through a smile, and who are the first to point out hypocrisy.</p>
<p>I mean, admit it&#8230;we can all be a bunch of whiny bitches at times.  Just look at some of these posters on this board! I rest my case.</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Peter H.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dale in L.A.</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/06/07/ann-coulter-extreme-right-nutjob/#comment-906</link>
		<dc:creator>Dale in L.A.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2006 16:01:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=41#comment-906</guid>
		<description>I just ready the article David linked to. I found it fascinating how much the liberal audience completely missed her point. She was mocking them, i.e. she was implying that liberals think "liberal brown boys" can't handle Democracy. She clearly is accusing liberals of being racist for their condescending attitude about Iraqis. She clearly disagrees with them.

Typical. I experienced the exact same thing in a debate when I was using Native Americans as an example of a culture that had exhibited the excellent quality of managing their resources well and the liberals in the audience gasped. It was an analogy about not strangling the businesses we rely on for goods and severices with taxation and regulation. Afterward a lady came up and started chastising me about how it was the white man that killed off the buffalo. I started to say that was exactly my point when several conservatives nearby said it for me. THEY understood me perfectly, presumably because they were actually listening to what I was saying instead of immediately jumping to the conclusion that I was racist and tuning out my words.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just ready the article David linked to. I found it fascinating how much the liberal audience completely missed her point. She was mocking them, i.e. she was implying that liberals think &#8220;liberal brown boys&#8221; can&#8217;t handle Democracy. She clearly is accusing liberals of being racist for their condescending attitude about Iraqis. She clearly disagrees with them.</p>
<p>Typical. I experienced the exact same thing in a debate when I was using Native Americans as an example of a culture that had exhibited the excellent quality of managing their resources well and the liberals in the audience gasped. It was an analogy about not strangling the businesses we rely on for goods and severices with taxation and regulation. Afterward a lady came up and started chastising me about how it was the white man that killed off the buffalo. I started to say that was exactly my point when several conservatives nearby said it for me. THEY understood me perfectly, presumably because they were actually listening to what I was saying instead of immediately jumping to the conclusion that I was racist and tuning out my words.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dale in L.A.</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/06/07/ann-coulter-extreme-right-nutjob/#comment-905</link>
		<dc:creator>Dale in L.A.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2006 15:06:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=41#comment-905</guid>
		<description>Ann is tactless and downright mean and definately goes too far sometimes. She is getting criticised by many on the right. Larry Elder was discussing her comment on the widows yesterday and I agree with him. What she said was true but she should have found a better way to say it. To say she hasn't seen ppl enjoy their husbands deaths so much doesn't mean they're glad they're dead or that they wouldn't have their husbands back if they could. It's just a very rude way of saying they're exploting their deaths for politics. They're certainly entitled to do so. It just seems distasteful. Although I think the blame is more on the media for exploiting their victim status. The left lost the debate against the war. Now all they can do is resort to their standard emotional tactics- drawing as much attention to possible to losses, failures, deaths, mistakes, and selectively avoiding and downplaying any successes or gains.

There's no comparing her to Michael Moore. He's an outright liar. The NRA article picking apart his tactics on Bowling for Columbine was an eye-opener. What she says is true, though tactlessly presented.

Ann has her purpose. She calls the left out on their bullshit. I'm glad someone is saying the things she's saying and is then willing to take the heat for it. She deserves all the criticism she's getting, but meanwhile, now the truth is out there and has to be dealt with. There is a running theme in her books and articles about leftist tactics- villianizing and discrediting their oponents, revising history, repititive soundbites, emotional rather than logical arguments - all sorts of tactics to avoid an actual debate on a subject because they'd soundly lose. I think pissing ppl off is her way of getting their goat so that they can prove her point in a very visible way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ann is tactless and downright mean and definately goes too far sometimes. She is getting criticised by many on the right. Larry Elder was discussing her comment on the widows yesterday and I agree with him. What she said was true but she should have found a better way to say it. To say she hasn&#8217;t seen ppl enjoy their husbands deaths so much doesn&#8217;t mean they&#8217;re glad they&#8217;re dead or that they wouldn&#8217;t have their husbands back if they could. It&#8217;s just a very rude way of saying they&#8217;re exploting their deaths for politics. They&#8217;re certainly entitled to do so. It just seems distasteful. Although I think the blame is more on the media for exploiting their victim status. The left lost the debate against the war. Now all they can do is resort to their standard emotional tactics- drawing as much attention to possible to losses, failures, deaths, mistakes, and selectively avoiding and downplaying any successes or gains.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s no comparing her to Michael Moore. He&#8217;s an outright liar. The NRA article picking apart his tactics on Bowling for Columbine was an eye-opener. What she says is true, though tactlessly presented.</p>
<p>Ann has her purpose. She calls the left out on their bullshit. I&#8217;m glad someone is saying the things she&#8217;s saying and is then willing to take the heat for it. She deserves all the criticism she&#8217;s getting, but meanwhile, now the truth is out there and has to be dealt with. There is a running theme in her books and articles about leftist tactics- villianizing and discrediting their oponents, revising history, repititive soundbites, emotional rather than logical arguments - all sorts of tactics to avoid an actual debate on a subject because they&#8217;d soundly lose. I think pissing ppl off is her way of getting their goat so that they can prove her point in a very visible way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: raj</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/06/07/ann-coulter-extreme-right-nutjob/#comment-904</link>
		<dc:creator>raj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2006 06:40:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=41#comment-904</guid>
		<description>I didn't see Coulter's performance on NBC's (the government contractor General Electric's) Today Show, but I have seen her on the Faux News Channel (whose slogan is "We Report, You Deride").  The main thing that I found interesting about her appearances on the Faux News Channel was that she was always sitting, wearing a very short skirt, on a stool that was sufficiently high up that her legs were prominently displayed for the camera.  Something of a RuPaul experience.

It made me wonder whether her success--such as it is--at book selling was due more to her exposed legs than to her supposed erudition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t see Coulter&#8217;s performance on NBC&#8217;s (the government contractor General Electric&#8217;s) Today Show, but I have seen her on the Faux News Channel (whose slogan is &#8220;We Report, You Deride&#8221;).  The main thing that I found interesting about her appearances on the Faux News Channel was that she was always sitting, wearing a very short skirt, on a stool that was sufficiently high up that her legs were prominently displayed for the camera.  Something of a RuPaul experience.</p>
<p>It made me wonder whether her success&#8211;such as it is&#8211;at book selling was due more to her exposed legs than to her supposed erudition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Thornton</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/06/07/ann-coulter-extreme-right-nutjob/#comment-903</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Thornton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2006 22:37:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=41#comment-903</guid>
		<description>Ann Coulter is an exciting breathe of fresh air.  For years all you could hear were the left wing on radio and tv.  Then along came Rush and soon we had more like Ann and Sean and Laura.  I have read some of her books and she can be very scholarly in her writings and has facts and as has been mentioned before statistics in them.  i personally do not like statistics cause like polls they are useless except to estimate things.  it is entertaining to see her go head to head with someone and yes I do believe most of it is done for publicity and to get under the skin of confirmed liberals.  Sort of some payback for their years of calling us john birchers and neo cons and let us not forget the great right wing conspiracy. Liberals try to make out that all we want is our way all the time but anyone with any brains knows that the exchange of ideas is neccesary for significent acheivement.  Being 54 years old, as I am, I realize that sometimes people need a little shake up to get their attention and if it gets someone to read and think of what she has to say in her books.  But if you really want to see what is going on with Ann check out the attack on her by hillary or any of the left wing blogs.  And as far as the today show they always try to put non liberals in a bad light.  mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ann Coulter is an exciting breathe of fresh air.  For years all you could hear were the left wing on radio and tv.  Then along came Rush and soon we had more like Ann and Sean and Laura.  I have read some of her books and she can be very scholarly in her writings and has facts and as has been mentioned before statistics in them.  i personally do not like statistics cause like polls they are useless except to estimate things.  it is entertaining to see her go head to head with someone and yes I do believe most of it is done for publicity and to get under the skin of confirmed liberals.  Sort of some payback for their years of calling us john birchers and neo cons and let us not forget the great right wing conspiracy. Liberals try to make out that all we want is our way all the time but anyone with any brains knows that the exchange of ideas is neccesary for significent acheivement.  Being 54 years old, as I am, I realize that sometimes people need a little shake up to get their attention and if it gets someone to read and think of what she has to say in her books.  But if you really want to see what is going on with Ann check out the attack on her by hillary or any of the left wing blogs.  And as far as the today show they always try to put non liberals in a bad light.  mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lester</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/06/07/ann-coulter-extreme-right-nutjob/#comment-902</link>
		<dc:creator>lester</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2006 18:39:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=41#comment-902</guid>
		<description>was anoyone talking about the 9/11 widows last week?  or the week before? or last year?  So now they are being dragged up apropos of nothing for being a part of the 9/11 commision 2 years ago.  what is going on</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>was anoyone talking about the 9/11 widows last week?  or the week before? or last year?  So now they are being dragged up apropos of nothing for being a part of the 9/11 commision 2 years ago.  what is going on</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Calarato</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/06/07/ann-coulter-extreme-right-nutjob/#comment-901</link>
		<dc:creator>Calarato</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2006 17:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=41#comment-901</guid>
		<description>olaskym, are you familiar with the Ward Churchill case?  He is the far lefty who tried to call the 9-11 victims "little Eichmanns".  Now, I've personally had conversations with liberals where they defended him, so I know his viewpoint is hardly small / isolated.

As for the far lefties who put down the military or slam it every chance they get - often with false information - there are too many cases for me to count.  Discussing it would make this post too long.

Finally, are you aware that Fred Phelps, the originator of "God Hates Fags" who tries to disrupt military funerals, is a Democrat?  (Look up his Wikipedia entry.)  Trying to pin him on the Right doesn't work.

olaskym, I also typed in an answer to #30 last night, but the comment system didn't take it for some reason.  I will make another try.

You said, "it truly is my impression that any Democrat interested in winning elections stays as far away from Moore as possible..."  Consider this:

- Moore had a prominent seat of honor at the 2004 Democratic Convention, next to Jimmy Carter.

- John Kerry was recently - perhaps still is?? - a contributor at Daily Kos.

- Howard Dean gave his imprimatur to some of the most twisted and hateful 9-11 speculation out there - and he is now chair of the DNC.

So no, I don't think you can argue that the Dems keep their nutjobs at arms' length.

Coulter, on the other hand, is being roundly slammed by a great many conservatives as we speak.  Even I - although I don't really count as a conservative, except on foreign policy maybe - DON'T support her and acknowledge her language went too far.  Peace!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>olaskym, are you familiar with the Ward Churchill case?  He is the far lefty who tried to call the 9-11 victims &#8220;little Eichmanns&#8221;.  Now, I&#8217;ve personally had conversations with liberals where they defended him, so I know his viewpoint is hardly small / isolated.</p>
<p>As for the far lefties who put down the military or slam it every chance they get - often with false information - there are too many cases for me to count.  Discussing it would make this post too long.</p>
<p>Finally, are you aware that Fred Phelps, the originator of &#8220;God Hates Fags&#8221; who tries to disrupt military funerals, is a Democrat?  (Look up his Wikipedia entry.)  Trying to pin him on the Right doesn&#8217;t work.</p>
<p>olaskym, I also typed in an answer to #30 last night, but the comment system didn&#8217;t take it for some reason.  I will make another try.</p>
<p>You said, &#8220;it truly is my impression that any Democrat interested in winning elections stays as far away from Moore as possible&#8230;&#8221;  Consider this:</p>
<p>- Moore had a prominent seat of honor at the 2004 Democratic Convention, next to Jimmy Carter.</p>
<p>- John Kerry was recently - perhaps still is?? - a contributor at Daily Kos.</p>
<p>- Howard Dean gave his imprimatur to some of the most twisted and hateful 9-11 speculation out there - and he is now chair of the DNC.</p>
<p>So no, I don&#8217;t think you can argue that the Dems keep their nutjobs at arms&#8217; length.</p>
<p>Coulter, on the other hand, is being roundly slammed by a great many conservatives as we speak.  Even I - although I don&#8217;t really count as a conservative, except on foreign policy maybe - DON&#8217;T support her and acknowledge her language went too far.  Peace!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: olaskym</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/06/07/ann-coulter-extreme-right-nutjob/#comment-900</link>
		<dc:creator>olaskym</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2006 16:49:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=41#comment-900</guid>
		<description>I can only hope some of you (who defend Coulter) listen for a moment to what you are saying before it is too late. Case in point:

&lt;em&gt;That would be just about anybody on the left. Do you suppose that the Jersey GALS believed their husbands were “little Eichmans”? Do they think that we “deserved it”? We see the liberal left slander and smear the military every chance they get. Do they lose any sleep?&lt;/em&gt;

in this one sentence you imply "just about anybody on the left" believes 9/11 victims were “little Eichmanns” who “deserved it”.  So every person (or "just about") in the US that doesn't vote Republican believes these things? That's news to me.

Ok ... then I hereby declare that "just about anybody" on the right believes that "God hates Fags". I dare you to find a flaw with that blanket accusation (I preemptively declare that all who do are atheist traitors).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can only hope some of you (who defend Coulter) listen for a moment to what you are saying before it is too late. Case in point:</p>
<p><em>That would be just about anybody on the left. Do you suppose that the Jersey GALS believed their husbands were “little Eichmans”? Do they think that we “deserved it”? We see the liberal left slander and smear the military every chance they get. Do they lose any sleep?</em></p>
<p>in this one sentence you imply &#8220;just about anybody on the left&#8221; believes 9/11 victims were “little Eichmanns” who “deserved it”.  So every person (or &#8220;just about&#8221;) in the US that doesn&#8217;t vote Republican believes these things? That&#8217;s news to me.</p>
<p>Ok &#8230; then I hereby declare that &#8220;just about anybody&#8221; on the right believes that &#8220;God hates Fags&#8221;. I dare you to find a flaw with that blanket accusation (I preemptively declare that all who do are atheist traitors).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Calarato</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/06/07/ann-coulter-extreme-right-nutjob/#comment-899</link>
		<dc:creator>Calarato</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2006 16:26:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=41#comment-899</guid>
		<description>#40 - As I said Ian, the posted transcript states the "You are getting testy with me" quote out-of-context.  Let me guess: You haven't actually watched the interview?

On video, the context is:

(1) Coulter trying to explain her pet peeve of "liberal infallibility" where, in her view (right or wrong), conservatives are not socially 'permitted' to respond to certain liberal speakers or points.

(2) Lauer talking over Coulter, more and more insistently, before she can get it out.

(3) Coulter saying in effect (and a reasonably good-humored way), 'Isn't my theory illustrated by the fact that you are getting a little upset with me this minute, as we speak?'</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#40 - As I said Ian, the posted transcript states the &#8220;You are getting testy with me&#8221; quote out-of-context.  Let me guess: You haven&#8217;t actually watched the interview?</p>
<p>On video, the context is:</p>
<p>(1) Coulter trying to explain her pet peeve of &#8220;liberal infallibility&#8221; where, in her view (right or wrong), conservatives are not socially &#8216;permitted&#8217; to respond to certain liberal speakers or points.</p>
<p>(2) Lauer talking over Coulter, more and more insistently, before she can get it out.</p>
<p>(3) Coulter saying in effect (and a reasonably good-humored way), &#8216;Isn&#8217;t my theory illustrated by the fact that you are getting a little upset with me this minute, as we speak?&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Hughes</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/06/07/ann-coulter-extreme-right-nutjob/#comment-898</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Hughes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2006 16:07:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=41#comment-898</guid>
		<description>#47 - jimbo, it will probably be with a creme-filled pie, like the last time nutjobs on the left side of the aisle went after her, Pat Buchanan and other conservatives who tell the truth.  And like last time, it will miss the target.  Libs throw like girls.

Regards,
Peter H.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#47 - jimbo, it will probably be with a creme-filled pie, like the last time nutjobs on the left side of the aisle went after her, Pat Buchanan and other conservatives who tell the truth.  And like last time, it will miss the target.  Libs throw like girls.</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Peter H.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jimbo</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/06/07/ann-coulter-extreme-right-nutjob/#comment-897</link>
		<dc:creator>jimbo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2006 15:26:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=41#comment-897</guid>
		<description>Ann Coulter. Groan. She always seems to just halfway believe what she says &#38; is simply trying to get under people's skin. I consider her to be the female counterpart to Michael Savage. The loony left has plenty of nutjobs, the right has just 2-Ms. Coulter &#38; Mr. Savage. What Ann said about the 9/11 widows was partly true; but puhleeze! She always has to be over the top &#38; arrogant. I just hope that during her book tour nobody physically attacks her.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ann Coulter. Groan. She always seems to just halfway believe what she says &amp; is simply trying to get under people&#8217;s skin. I consider her to be the female counterpart to Michael Savage. The loony left has plenty of nutjobs, the right has just 2-Ms. Coulter &amp; Mr. Savage. What Ann said about the 9/11 widows was partly true; but puhleeze! She always has to be over the top &amp; arrogant. I just hope that during her book tour nobody physically attacks her.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Hughes</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/06/07/ann-coulter-extreme-right-nutjob/#comment-896</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Hughes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2006 14:53:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=41#comment-896</guid>
		<description>In my above post, I misidentified the 9/11 victim as being the sister of the United 93 pilot.  She is actually Debra Burlingame--lifelong Democrat, sister of Charles F. "Chic" Burlingame III, captain of American Airlines flight 77, which crashed into the Pentagon on Sept. 11.  I regret the error.

Also, just as FYI - Burlingame did manage to land an interview after Condollezza Rice's appearance with the Jersey Girls on an ABC interview. When she had finished airing her views critical of the accusatory tone and tactics of the Jersey Girls, her interviewer, ABC congressional reporter Linda Douglass marveled, "This is the first time I've heard this point of view."

And they say there is no bias in the drive-by media.  Scribes, Pharisees and Hypocrites all!

Regards,
Peter H.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my above post, I misidentified the 9/11 victim as being the sister of the United 93 pilot.  She is actually Debra Burlingame&#8211;lifelong Democrat, sister of Charles F. &#8220;Chic&#8221; Burlingame III, captain of American Airlines flight 77, which crashed into the Pentagon on Sept. 11.  I regret the error.</p>
<p>Also, just as FYI - Burlingame did manage to land an interview after Condollezza Rice&#8217;s appearance with the Jersey Girls on an ABC interview. When she had finished airing her views critical of the accusatory tone and tactics of the Jersey Girls, her interviewer, ABC congressional reporter Linda Douglass marveled, &#8220;This is the first time I&#8217;ve heard this point of view.&#8221;</p>
<p>And they say there is no bias in the drive-by media.  Scribes, Pharisees and Hypocrites all!</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Peter H.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
