Gay Patriot Header Image

George Michael: Gay Role Model? Ugh.

Gee, I wonder why straight America thinks gays are a bunch of sex-crazed fiends who shouldn’t have the right to marry?

After all, our GayLeft Fundamentalists praise a corrupt Governor for blaming his gay-ness and using the community to leave office.  And of course there’s George Michael.  Again.  (Hat tip: GayOrbit)

 

woods12.jpg

 

MEGA-RICH pop superstar George Michael this week sank to new levels of depravity—trawling for illegal gay sex thrills in a London park.

News of the World investigators caught the singer red-handed and red-faced as he emerged from the bushes after cavorting with a pot-bellied, 58-year-old, jobless van driver.

When confronted by our team, a shaken George desperately tried to justify his sordid secret quest for cheap, risky thrills, which friends fear is spiralling out of control and threatening his destruction.

In a sweat, the ashen-faced singer declared: “Are you gay? No? Then f*** off! This is my culture!”

I’m not even sure what to say after that enthusiastic support of the gay culture while he emerged from the bushes.

-Bruce (GayPatriot)

First Islamist Riots, Then Soccer, Now Biking

Posted by GayPatriot at 3:56 pm - July 23, 2006.
Filed under: American History,General,Sports,World History

Have the French figured out how much they suck yet?  The rest of the world has.

Congrats to Floyd Landis for keeping the Tour de France throne in American hands.

 

landis.jpg

 

And a big fat “ptoooey” to those uppity, rude enablers of Islamism in Europe.  At least the French do seem to do their best at one thing throughout history……

-Bruce (GayPatriot)

Gays Lead The Way Again…. To Divorce

I’ve been searching all weekend for a posting in which I wrote (with sarcasm, of coursre) that the only ones that would benefit from gay marriage would be the smart lawyers to set up same-sex divorce practices.  Once again, like Rush Limbaugh, nearly everything GayPatriot says eventually happens…..

Lesbian Couple in Marriage Lawsuit Splits – AOL.com

The lesbian couple whose lawsuit led to legal same-sex marriage in Massachusetts have announced they have separated.

“Julie and Hillary Goodridge are amicably living apart,” Mary Breslauer, a local political consultant, said Thursday night on their behalf. Breslauer declined to comment on how long they had been separated or whether the couple planned to divorce.

The Goodridges were among seven gay couples whose lawsuit helped thrust Massachusetts into the center of a nationwide debate on gay marriage. The state’s Supreme Judicial Court issued its narrow 4-3 ruling in November 2003 in their favor — saying gays and lesbians had a right under the state constitution to wed.

Wow, the Gay Fundamentalists can’t even bring themselves to use words to accurately describe a separation.  Oh, we always have to be just this much different, don’t we?

I fear this news means that somewhere Pat Robertson and Jerry Falwell are enjoying a hot tub champagne toast together.

*trying….to….get….that….vision….out….of….my….memory*

-Bruce (GayPatriot)

PajamasMedia Leads Coverage of Mideast Theater in WOT

Posted by GayPatriot at 7:00 am - July 22, 2006.
Filed under: Blogging,War On Terror

I know I speak for Dan, Nick & John in saying we are proud to be one of the only gay blogs that were invited to be original members of PajamasMedia.  Once again, Roger, Charles and the gang are leading the way!

Blogger Media At Forefront of the Middle East Coverage War – Yahoo.com

Pajamas Media (PJM) is providing special extended coverage of the Middle East War in conjunction with its new initiative called Politics Central. Within the PJM Network of 90 bloggers are several in theater commenting on the war between Hamas, Hezbolla and Israel from a first hand perspective. Pajamas has also been providing a real time and continuous chronology of news events via its global editors and contributors. Within PJM’s new Politics Central initiative, PJM is distributing exclusive podcast interviews that are longer and more in depth than typical cable news organizations are able to provide.

A literal living chronology of the ongoing Israel-Hezbollah War has been created and made available on the Pajamas Media front page (http://www.pajamasmedia.com). “This chronology’s intention is to give the public moment-to-moment access to the vicissitudes of the war and ultimately to provide historians with a record of the evolving struggle,” says Pajamas’ CEO Roger L. Simon.

Bravo to our PJM colleagues and especially those brave enough to be blogging from Israel and Lebanon in the new Theater in the War on Terror/World War III.

-Bruce (GayPatriot)

Gay In-Tolerance Exposed Again

Dan (GayPatriotWest) and I have a shared experience in that we are treated great and also accepted among Republican and conservative crowds.  Hell, I was at a dude ranch in Western Canada (read: “Red Province”) for vacation and John and I were the only gays there.  And we were just part of the family for the week.

But go into a crowd of left-leaning gays and they will say the most rabid, personal nasty and evil things when they find out you differ with them on political issues.

Devoted GP reader VtheK has noticed the same thing…

You know what I’ve noticed? Gay peeps who hang out on conservative blogs can talk about being attracted to guys and are perfectly accepted. Frank IBC and Throbert McGee (occasional commenters on GP) have even started threads at a conservative blog specifically about being attracted to guys and no one bats an eye. Little Green Footballs has gay commenters like Baldy, Kevin Shook, and Scott in East Bay, and no one ever gives them grief.

But let a guy make conservative statements on a gay blog, and, whoa… the flying monkeys are unleashed.

It sure puts the truth to the lie that the gay community is tolerant and accepts diversity.  I think Dateline NBC would have seen more anger and possibly violence at a GayPride event where folks wore Bush-Cheney shirts than at a NASCAR event with folks looking “Middle Eastern.”

Finally, John and I have been widely and openly embraced in Charlotte (even and especially in our small development) since our move from the supposedly tolerant Washington DC metro area.  It has been a marked improvement in tolerance toward us since moving into the deepest Red of America.  

I’m not surprised.

**UPDATE**More evidence of Gay Intolerance from our friend Chandler In Trollywood.  Imagine “Polish”, “black”, “retard” or “Jew” being used instead of “gay Republican.”  How diverse-accepting, how tolerant!

Chandler in Hollywood said… The other night I was introduced to a guy who first off told me he was a gay Republican. Because I am sensitive to all PC issues, I immediately spoke a little louder and a little slower out of my inability to determine if he was just slow or actually brain damaged. I call that Compassionate Liberalism.

I’d also point out that the big-time conservative blogs (too numerous to name) have no problem linking to GayPatriot, but we were blacklisted from the Gay BlogAds group in our pre-Pajamas Media days.  Things that make you go…hmmm.

Is the Gay Left actually afraid of diverse opinions?

-Bruce (GayPatriot)

Over Troubled Water

Posted by GayPatriot at 6:32 pm - July 21, 2006.
Filed under: American History,Liberals

I love this snarky post at OpinionJournal’s Best of the Web today:

From a statement by Sen. Ted Kennedy on President Bush’s veto of the bill to subsidize embryonic stem-cell research:

We will be back again and again and again until we end the cruel restrictions on lifesaving research that are denying hope to millions of American patients and their families.

And nobody is more of an expert when it comes to cruel restrictions on lifesaving.

And how did you commemorate the anniversary this past week of the first (known) reported Kennedy murder

-Bruce (GayPatriot)

Looking Toward 2008 – An Eye For Newt?

I’m glad I’m not the only one thinking “Newt for President” for 2008.  Rich Lowry makes the case today over at NRO

Gingrich is partly benefiting from a beneath-the-surface conservative exasperation with President Bush. In 2000, Bush represented a break from Gingrich’s brainy, hyperpartisan, government-cutting conservatism, for something more personable, more bipartisan and more comfortable with government. After six years of Bush, many conservatives are ready for a no-holds-barred, limited-government brainiac again.

I’m with Rich, everytime I see Newt Gingrich on television, he impresses me more.  And while I don’t think I ever considered myself a “Newt fan” when he was Speaker (Rich is right, his tenure was erratic at best!), I do think he is one of the few visionaries of the Republican Party.  He is a great communicator, excellent big picture thinker, and true American patriot.

I know, I know… he rubs people the wrong way.  Well, so does Hillary.  But unlike Hillary, the tone I hear from Newt makes me trust him more each time, and believe he’s matured as an American leader, not as a professional politician.

So while my personal vote is still with Rudy or Condi, I am also excited about the idea of Newt Gingrich running for President.  He would bring a level of intelligence and vision to the Republican Primary race that wouldn’t be there otherwise.

But as Rich points out,

Whatever happens, Gingrich stands to be the party’s most important intellectual table-setter. “Whoever wins,” says [former RNC Chairman Ed] Gillespie, “is going to have spent a lot of time talking about what Newt was talking about.” There are worse places for the party to look for a renewed agenda.

-Bruce (GayPatriot)

Open Thread on the Meaning of Gay Marriage

Posted by GayPatriotWest at 8:05 pm - July 20, 2006.
Filed under: Civil Discourse,Gay America,Gay Marriage

I wonder sometimes if advocates of gay marriage realize what a huge social change state recognition of gay marriage would bring. The very discussion itself has already caused many in our own community, particularly gay men, to reevaluate their attitudes toward relationships.

Given that the consciousness of our community first developed during the Sexual Revolution, with many understanding freedom for gays not only as the freedom to live openly, but also as mandating that gay people free themselves from the sexual mores, including lifelong relationships, commonplace in American society up until that time.

I wonder sometimes if all gay activists are comfortable with a community that increasingly celebrates its couples and promotes a lifestyle different only from our straight peers in the gender of our life-partners.

Just a thought on this busy day.

Good News from Iraq

Posted by GayPatriot at 10:02 pm - July 19, 2006.
Filed under: General

Here’s some news you won’t see on CNNBCBSABC since they are too busy justifying the cause of Hezbollah 24/7.

Via US Central Command email:

July 13, 2006 BAGHDAD – Iraq witnessed a historic event today with the transfer of security responsibility in Muthanna Province from the Multi-National Force – Iraq (MNF-I) to the Provincial Governor and civilian-controlled Iraqi Security Forces.  The handover represents a milestone in the successful development of Iraq’s capability to govern and protect itself as a sovereign and democratic nation.  Muthanna is the first of Iraq’s 18 provinces to be designated for such a transition.

-Bruce (GayPatriot)

Slow Blogging, Gay Marriage, Civil Discourse

Because I am busy at work on a paper, I will unfortunately not be able to blog as regularly as I would like for the next couple of days. And this while I have a number of thoughts about several issues of the day. Wall Street rallies as the Federal Reserve Chairman says that while economic growth is slowing, the economy remains strong. Hezbollah continues to fire rockets indiscriminately at Israel while Israel attacks the terrorist’s infrastructure in Lebanon. (Keep your eyes on Pajamas for regular updates on the situation in the Middle East.)

So preoccupied was I with my paper (and other obligations) as well as the news from the Middle East that I almost missed the defeat in the House of Representatives of a constitutional amendment defining marriage as the union of one man and one woman.

While I was delighted that this pernicious proposal was once again defeated, I was saddened (once again) at the shallowness of the debate — on both sides. While most of the releases I read from the gay groups were filled with the same angry rhetoric, there were two notable exceptions this time.

Log Cabin’s latest release was far less angry than the organization’s statement at the time of the Senate debate. Indeed, while I have a few minor quibbles with the release*, it pretty much sets the right tone. I particularly liked Patrick Guerriero’s line that “The House spoke very clearly and again said that marriage is an issue the states are perfectly capable of handling.” A small step in the right direction.

The other interesting exception this time was the one from the National Stonewall Democrats (NSD) which was half-brilliant, half-angry partisan. NSD Executive Director Jo Wyrick said:

Marriage is an institution that strengthens the American family, and it should be legally extended to all couples. . . . Americans should be allowed the freedom to discuss this issue at their dinner tables and in their houses of worship. Instead, Republicans would rather use this debate to divide the public through poor policy that attacks the Constitution. House Republicans have twice failed to force through this discriminatory amendment, just as they continue to fail the American public through their misguided priorities.

Wyrick was right to note that marriage strengthens the family and to welcome a discussion of the topic. Yet, I just don’t see how anyone can see putting a topic on the calender of an elected, deliberative assembly as an attempt to “force” it through. The House Republicans debated an important issue, then voted on it — and saw it defeated.

By putting the topic up for a vote, House Republicans encouraged debate. That they achieved a majority indicates that there is still strong support for this gratuitous (and potentially dangerous) amendment and that we still need to keep the conversation going — in order to change the minds of those who support it. That they failed to achieve the two-thirds majority necessary to amend the constitution should make us grateful for the wisdom of its framers, particularly James Madison, who made it difficult to amend this august charter.

That those — on both sides — did not see this debate as an occasion to better understand their adversaries’ ideas suggests that some minds remind perpetually closed to those with whom they disagree. For as much as I’ve blogged on civil discourse, it doesn’t seem to make any difference to our most ardent critics. They will continue to see us not as we are, but as the narrow-minded demons of their imaginations.

While I have been delighted to reply to e-mails from liberal readers, eager to better understand gay conservatives, some (in e-mails and in the comments) persist in insulting us. One writer even accused me of being “all flustered” that I get hate mail. Yet, in the very post to which he attached his comment, I noted that the latest batch of hate mail “brought a smile to my face.” A smile suggests that someone is happy and/or amused and not upset as someone would be if flustered.

It is unfortunate that those who who write on controversial blogs are subject to this kind of abuse. But, I’ve learned to expect that nowadays. In an ideal world, we would receive honest and civil criticism, rather than mean-spirited barbs. Alas that all too many would rather insult than debate. And such behavior is not limited to my ideological adversaries.

-Dan (AKA GayPatriotWest): GayPatriotWest@aol.com

* I would have just deleted a few words and tweaked one sentence.

Back from the Ranch

Posted by GayPatriot at 9:53 pm - July 18, 2006.
Filed under: Travel,Vacation Blogging

We have returned from Canada, and I’m slowly easing back into the blog as work has piled up since I’ve been gone.

We had a great time and I’m happy to now plug the ranch that John and I stayed at.  It was the Three Bars Ranch in Cranbrook, British Columbia.  The Beckley family couldn’t have been nicer and our fellow guests (from the USA, Peru, Canada and the UK) were outstanding ranchmates for the week.  Hopefully we will see some of them again sometime.

If you ever had an interest in a dude ranch or cowboy vacation… I strongly recommend Three Bars!  We took a lot of photos and once I catch up on life, I will post many of them.

I hope everyone is enjoying their summer and I look forward to catching up in my blog-duties over the next few days.

-Bruce (GayPatriot)

Bunker Blogging in Israel

Posted by GayPatriot at 9:42 pm - July 18, 2006.
Filed under: War On Terror

As Dan mentioned earlier today, excellent Mideast Crisis coverage can be found at our blogging “network” — PajamasMedia.

Adding to their extensive coverage is this bunker-blog interview by Roger Simon with Israeli teenager Eugene.   It is featured on Pajamas’ new addition to the blogfamily – Politics Central.

Opposed to sound-bite politics, POLITICSCENTRAL aims to promote a deeper level of discourse, and seeks to introduce a consistent tone of civility in our coverage and discussions.

In addition, POLITICSCENTRAL will address the environment, which has allowed our discourse to become often crass and frequently thoughtless — that is the environment of knee-jerk polarization and hardened partisanship.

More on the Mideast Crisis as events warrant, of course.-Bruce (GayPatriot)

Oh Really?

Posted by ColoradoPatriot at 8:00 pm - July 18, 2006.
Filed under: General

Not sure if you’ve seen Hillary’s tough-sounding words in support of Isreal in their current fight for security. Something struck me as I read it; specifically (emphasis mine):

America will support Israel in her efforts to send a message to Hamas, Hezbollah, to the Syrians, to the Iranians – to all who seek death and domination instead of life and freedom – that we will not permit this to happen and we will take whatever steps are necessary.

Not only that, but her Senate website has this to say (again, emphasis added):

Israel’s right to exist, and exist in safety, must never be put in question.

Really?

HillaryAndSuha

The New Dynamic in the Middle East

Posted by GayPatriotWest at 4:40 pm - July 18, 2006.
Filed under: Blogging,Politics abroad,War On Terror

Given how busy I have been these past few days, juggling a number of different projects and obligations, I have not had the chance to blog as much as I would have liked, particularly on the situation in the Middle East.

That said, one of the great, good things about the blogosphere is that it provides a forum for a variety of different views on the topics of the day. And others have said many of the things I would like to have said. It seems that every time I have (what I believe to be) an original thought on the situation in the Middle East, another blogger (or pundit) has already expressed it.

In the past week, I have found that the best source for news on — and serious insights into — the situation in the Middle East has been a media outlet of which we are a proud member — Pajamas. So, to follow what’s going on in the Middle East, just bookmark their web-site and check it regularly.

One of the things which has struck me about the coverage of this crisis — compared to Israel’s last serious military offensive in Lebanon (in the 1980s) is that whereas back then, conservatives were not united behind Israel, today, nearly all serious conservatives support the Jewish State in its campaign against terrorism.

I don’t think it’s just 9/11 which reminded us that we are on the same side as Israel in the war against global Islamist terrorism. The conservative shift towards Israel intensified in the Reagan years.

As conservatives have become increasingly pro-Israel, this time, Arab nations have not united behind Israel’s adversary as they had in the past. A number of Arab nations, including Saudi Arabia “chastised Hezbollah for ‘unexpected, inappropriate and irresponsible acts’.” Except for France, even the Europeans seem to understand that Hezbollah and its Iranian patrons are responsible for the current crisis.

When I was growing up, the chief opposition to Israel in America came from the Right. Today, it is coming from the Let.

Not only do we see a new dynamic in American politics, but we are also seeing a new dynamic in the world, with Arab nations joining the free world in opposition to a terrorist organization. If this continues, victory in the War on Terror may not be as elusive as some fear.

-Dan (AKA GayPatriotWest): GayPatriotWest@aol.com

Violence & Murder Unprovoked–It’s What Terrorists Do

Posted by GayPatriotWest at 7:20 pm - July 17, 2006.
Filed under: Media Bias,War On Terror

Last Tuesday, AOL briefly had as one of its rotating headlines, “Group Claims GIs Killed Over Rape, Murders.” By clicking on the link, we learned that the group referenced was an “Al-Qaida Group.” It stunned me that, on its Welcome Page, this news source identified a terrorist group merely as a “group” without any further descriptor.

Perhaps, AOL’s news editors did so because they accepted the group’s rationale — that terrorist groups commit their atrocities as a means for oppressed third world groups to retaliate against “imperialist” Western forces, against whom they only have violent options. These editors — as many others in the news media — seem to have difficulty believing in the evil nature of some of our terrorist adversaries. For them, brought up in the 1960s, the U.S — and other Western nations — are responsible for much of the evil in the world.

In this case, Al-Qaeda claimed it brutally murdered two American soldiers in revenge for the alleged rape of an Iraqi woman and murder of her and her family by other U.S. troops. While Al Qaeda claimed it was killing these soldiers as revenge for the actions of others, the U.S. Army had launched an investigation into the rape and had indicted those who allegedly committed the crime in question.

Despite the headline, it’s clear that Al-Qaeda did not know American soldiers were accused of the rape when they butchered the two American soldiers, which they later claimed was to avenge this terrible crime. From the very text of the article, we learn that the uncle of the women raped said “that the family didn’t think the Americans were involved until the Army announced its investigation June 30.” Ten days after the bodies of the murdered soldiers were found.

Al-Qaeda was just explaining away its latest act of murder in a way which they believed the Western media would just lap up as it supported their theory that U.S. actions only serves to inspire more terrorism. Such after-the-fact explanations notwithstanding, unprovoked murder is what Al Qaeda and other terrorist outfits do.

We see this yet again with the actions these past few weeks of Hamas and Hezbollah, Al Qaeda’s allies in evil. In 2000, Israel withdrew its troops from southern Lebanon, satisfying the United Nations. Last year, Israel withdrew from the Gaza Strip, forcibly evacuating Jewish settlers from homes where some had lived for decades.

Despite these overtures, Hamas and Hezbollah showed little inclination to live in peace with a neighbor which had made concessions to those for whom these groups ostensibly fight. Hamas has been regularly firing rockets into Israel, targeting not just military installations, but primarily civilian populations. Hezbollah has been doing the same from its bases in southern Lebanon.

Hamas fires its rockets from residential neighborhoods while Hezbollah hides its rockets in private homes, sometimes designating special rooms as launching pads. They assume their missiles are relatively safe as Israel is loath to attack civilian targets. But, they also know that, if need be — and that need has arisen given the hundreds of rockets Hezbollah has launched on civilian Israeli targets — Israel will act to take out those rockets, even if to promote their own citizens’ security, they risk incurring civilian casualties.

Terrorist organizations delight in such casualties as they can use them as props in their propaganda offensive.

The Western media may still believe that terrorists are just frustrated freedom fighters, using the only means they have to strike against Western imperialism. But, events of the past week have shown that even when a nation offers concessions, terrorists will not relent in their attacks. Indeed, in some cases, concessions spur them on to ever greater violence.

Israel responds to international pressure and withdraws from territorities (which some believed) it needed as buffer zones to protect its civilians. Hamas and Hezbollah reply by crossing recognized intnernational borders into Israel’s sovereign territory and murdering and kidnapping soldiers. They continue to target civilians with repeat rocket attacks.

It’s not Western imperialism which prompts their violence. It’s just what these terorrist organizations do. It’s time we understand this and react accordingly. That’s exactly what Israel is doing in Gaza and in Lebanon. All friends of freedom and the security of peace-loving peoples should support them now — and in the difficult days ahead.

-Dan (AKA GayPatriotWest): GayPatriotWest@aol.com

How Some on the Left Criticize Conservatives Not as We Are, but as They Imagine Us to Be

As I read (yet again) a post critical of the president on Instapundit, one of my favorite blogs, I noted how frequently conservative and right-leaning blogs — as well as the leading conservatives newsmagazines — have criticized the president. And yet in the comments section to this blog — as I’m sure on many left-wing web-pages — every time we criticize a disingenuous (or downright dishonest) Administration critic, our own critics contend, in the words of one such critic, that in our “worship of Bush,” we engage in “rabid attacks on anyone who questions Bush Administration actions.”

Now, if there’s any Republican president (since Lincoln) whom I come close to “worshipping,” that would not be the incumbent, but the late, great Ronald Wilson Reagan. And great as that good man was, I would only say I honor him, not worship him. That said, given that I have noted on at a variety of occasions (e.g., here and here) that decent as a man as is the current President Bush, he is no Ronald Reagan, it is clear that I neither worship President Bush nor engage in rabid attacks on anyone who questions his Administration’s actions. If I did that, I would be engaging in rabid attacks on myself from time to time.

Given the variety of opinions, including criticism of the president (such as Glenn’s today), on conservative blogs (and editorial pages) many of which generally support the President, it seems that the way the Administration’s critics (and our own) wishes to understand the nature conservatives is not by studying our ideas, our writings and public statements, but by taking issue with a conservative demon of their imagination. I know I’ve said this before, but it bears repetition.

It is an interesting irony that our critics on the left contend we attack anyone who criticizes the Administration when it is they who criticize anything the Administration does — or blames it for any ill which has afflicted the world since George W. Bush took office on January 20, 2001.

-Dan (AKA GayPatriotWest): GayPatriotWest@aol.com

Hate E-mail Which Proves My Point

Shortly after I created an e-mail address for my blog identity, I started receiving regular hate mails. After a time, they slowed a bit, but I still receive occasional hate mail, usually receiving more when a post attracts attention in the gay blogosphere.

And that happened this week when the Washington Blade‘s Blogwatch linked my piece on the Persistence of Bias Against Gay Conservatives. Not only did we get a few more nasty comments than usual, but I got a few more hate mails than I normally receive.

While the writers surely hoped to upset me, instead, they brought a smile to my face. Given the topic of the post, they merely proved my point, that many in our community have a knee-jerk reaction to any gay conservative voice. Here’s the full text of one such hate-filled missive:

How stupid can one be? A gay republican is an ignorant democrat who wants to be rich. People like you make it difficult for the rest of us to maintain/secure rights afforded to the rest of the country. Wake up before it’s too late.

At no point does this individual substantiate any of his points — nor does he address any that I made in my post. It’s just bile, pure and simple.

This seems to be learned behavior because these writers merely parrot the same slogans of the angry gay left and respond to us as if we conform to the inaccurate image of a self-hating gay conservative portrayed in the gay media — and sometimes the gay press.

It is fascinating to me that gay people who have been marginalized from mainstream society, would seek to marginalize gay people with different political views than their own. It would seem to me that our experience dealing with being different would make us more tolerant of others who differ from the norm.

While we as gay people differ from society’s heterosexual norm, we as gay conservatives differ from the gay community’s political norm. And gay conservatives constitute a far greater percentage of the gay population than gay people constitute of the general population.

Despite the bile coming from a certain unhappy segment of our community, I am pleased by the number of gay liberals who have commented in a civil manner to our posts — or written to me personally — either taking issue with our arguments or asking serious (and very often thoughtful) questions about the challenges of being a gay conservative. It is unfortunate alas, that all too often those thoughtful gay voices on the left are drowned out by their angrier and more hate-filled counterparts.

Perhaps, I’m naive, but I remain ever hopeful that through civil discourse, while we may not be able to change minds, we will at least succeed in making others appreciate the sincerity of our views. In so doing, we help create an environment in the gay community where diverse political viewpoints are not only welcomed, but celebrated as well.

-Dan (AKA GayPatriotWest): GayPatriotWest@aol.com

Hamas & Hezbollah Responsible for Destruction in Gaza & Lebanon

Posted by GayPatriotWest at 8:00 pm - July 14, 2006.
Filed under: War On Terror

Eleven years ago as the city of Dresden, Germany commemorated the fiftieth anniversary of one of the most controversial Allied actions of World War II — the firebombing of that city, posters were plastered across the onetime Florence on Elbe, showing a picture of the city in ruins with the caption, “Dank Hitler,” thanks to Hitler. While the British dropped the bombs which leveled the city, it was Adolf Hitler who was ultimately responsible for the city’s ruin. And for the deaths of the 35,000 civilians killed in that raid.

Similarly, while Israel may be dropping the bombs on Lebanon this week, it is Hezbollah which is responsible for the destruction of Lebanese infrastructure and the deaths of Lebanese civilians as well as the terrorists whom Hezbollah houses in residential neighborhoods. By crossing an international border and murdering and kidnapping Israeli soldiers, Hezbollah started this war, just as Hitler started World War Ii by sending troops across an international border.

Given Israel’s response to Hamas’ kidnapping of an Israeli soldier in sovereign Israeli territory near the Gaza Strip, Hezbollah’s leaders should have known how Israel would respond. Israel has every right to defend itself. And as long as Hezbollah uses Lebanese airports, roads and bridges to transport munitions to attack the Jewish State, they become legitimate targets.

That Hezbollah would station its terrorist followers and their military equipment near civilians shows what little regard they have for human life. Indeed, by demanding hundreds of prisoners for a handful of Israeli soldiers, they show that they recognize that Israel, like other nations of the West, places a higher premium on human life than do they.

By violating international boundaries and kidnapping Israeli soldiers stationed in Israeli territory, Hezbollah and Hamas have declared war on Israel and they alone are responsible for the consequences. Let us hope that fifty years hence, citizens of a democratic Lebanon and Gaza will post pictures of the current destruction with the Arabic equivalent of “Dank Hezbollah and Hamas.”

UPDATE: Best of the Web ‘s James Taranto agrees with me: “Every civilian death, on either side of the border, is regrettable, but the ultimate blame for them falls on the aggressors, namely Hezbollah and its patrons.

Joe Wilson, like Paul Cameron, a Hero to his Ideological Allies, a Laughingstock to Everyone Else

As people across the world become nervous about a possible escalation of the crisis in the Middle East, we should be grateful to Valerie Plame and Joe Wilson for providing us some much needed “comic relief.” While much evidence has come out about the White House’s clumsy attempt to discredit Mr. WIlson, no evidence has yet surfaced to buttress Mr. Wilson’s contention that White House officials used “their official positions to exact personal revenge.”

All they were doing was trying to show, what a bipartisan Senate Intelligence Report later confirmed, that Wilson was playing fast and loose with the facts, even misrepresenting the findings of his own mission to Niger.

While I think this suit will be dismissed even before it enters the discovery phase, it is amusing to contemplate how it might proceed. To rebut statements in the initial filing, the defense will quote extensively from the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence’s Report on the U.S. Intelligence Community’s Prewar Intelligence Assessments on Iraq. Plus, they may gain access to the results of Fitzgerald’s investigation and will get to depose Joe Wilson under oath.

With a good litigator handling that deposition, Wilson would finally have to handle tough questions and would likely break under pressure. The transcript might get leaked to conservative bloggers who would have a field day pointing out Wilson’s contradictions and doublespeak. Those contradictions would almost certainly force him and his wife to withdraw their lawsuit.

(more…)

Gay Conservatives: Definitely NOT Victims

While it is clear that there is a bias in our community, particularly among our leaders, against gay conservatives, I do not think for one moment that we are victims in the sense that we require some kind of collective restitution or institutional protection. I just think that well-meaning individuals need to speak out and challenge the biases of our community. I know that I have not done enough, given that for several years, I refused to publicly identify myself as a Repubilcan.

That is one (of the many) reason(s) I am grateful to Bruce for inviting me to this blog. He has givne me a forum to express my views, an opportunity to challenge the negative stereotyping of gay conservatives.

While I have lost dates and even had men who approached me because they found me attractive walk away upon learning my politics, I have also encountered many gay liberals of good will. Indeed, it is in my interactions with these fine people that I have come to appreciate one of the advantages of being a gay conservative. It makes it easier for us to measure the caliber of our peers.

A gay leftist may never know if someone’s affection for him is based on similar political sentiments. When we come out politically, we can see if an individual evaluates us on our character or our politics. If that person rejects us because we are conservative, then we know that he would likely not be a very relible friend.

(more…)