Here is what I am trying to get at:

No matter who was on watch in the Oval Office, NOBODY was going to do anything in the Middle East that would have gotten us any REAL info about 9/11 or WMDs in Iraq because the policies of both Bushes and Clinton was to leave the Islamic world, ESPECIALLY Saudi Arabia, alone and hope that Bin Laden and the rest of the lunatics in that part of the world would just go away and leave our precious oil alone. But it didn’t happen. And now, BOTH parties are blaming the other for mistakes that were made that BOTH of them committed because they were more concerned with winning political races, than stopping terrorists.

PLEASE, stop trying to paint me as some “liberal”!

Pot, meet kettle.

Regards,
Peter H.

Classic rightist tactic….If you were bush your next step would be to send me to Syria, utilize torture and then force me to sign something everyone knows is not true.

No wonder you guys are ruining Iraq and looseing the war on Terror….you refuse to deal with reality

Oh wait, you tried that already. Sorry, missed your ‘explanation”.

I didn’t expect keogh to acknowledge he stole the words and ideas of others and presented as his own… to do that would require character.

Hey keogh, but for you we’re running a two-for-one special… just admit you were wrong in presenting #43 as your words, ideas… we’ll be cool.

You can do it, keogh. Find the character in yourself or learn how to use “attribution”.

Personally, I think that leftiswrong is part of the lester401ksybil sockpuppet nation. But that’s just my opinion.

Regards,
Peter H.

Further, your partern is amazingly consistent, instead of dealing with the fact that you tried to play fast and loose with facts, you attack the messenger.
This is a classic symptom of hackiness and you better stop before you become a full scale hack.

Its no wonder that you do however, because the facts consitantly show that you are wrong.

Further:
I have a non political question for you:
My Gophers play your Wolverinese on Sat. they play for something called “the little brown jug”
Do people in Michigan even care about that or do only people in MN?
(considering our team historically stinks)

http://www.galluppoll.com/content/?ci=24733

I’m betting they will be more like the raj/Ian/blah/Bukko soxpuppet where the truth is ignored, the dance step is changed and the evasion reaches fevered pitch until the little liars leave for a bit and hope “da peeples” forget.

Libtards, this is what is known as “proportionate response.” Take a lesson.

Regards,
Peter H.

You stole those words from a July 92 WaPo article by Steve Coll. It was republished in the format you plagarized from WhatReallyHappened.com –a far LeftLiberal blog dedicated to undermining American resolve in the WOT.

keogh, you now need to do some ‘xplaining and an apology or two.

But to do that at the same time, in the same comment, in the same thread where you offer:

“Matt, you are adept at leaving out key facts(Like all good rightists)… You should stop trying to lean on your manipulated facts, it always makes you look so foolish.”

Hmmm, the color of your face should be bright red now… unless, like a lot of the lower-case-clan here, you have no shame.

1. Bill Clinton throwing a tantrum like a two-year-old at Kmart,

2. Bill’s sycophantic personality cult praising said tantrum as great leadership,

3. Bill’s sycophantic personality cult being unable to spell, punctuate, or provide any argument that was not spoon-fed to them by the left-wing nutroots?

And besides…I think they broke gas, too. It always smells when they post, you know?

Regards,
Peter H.

In March 1985, President Reagan signed National Security Decision Directive 166,…[which] authorize[d] covert military aid to the mujahideen, and it made clear that the secret Afghan war had a new goal: to defeat Soviet troops in Afghanistan through covert action and encourage a Soviet withdrawal. The new covert U.S. assistance began with a dramatic increase in arms supplies — a steady rise to 65,000 tons annually by 1987, … as well as a “ceaseless stream” of CIA and Pentagon specialists who traveled to the secret headquarters of Pakistan’s ISI on the main road near Rawalpindi, Pakistan. There the CIA specialists met with Pakistani intelligence officers to help plan operations for the Afghan rebels.

You should stop trying to lean on your manipulated facts, it always makes you look so foolish.

Regards,
Peter H.

Forgot that point, completely. Thanks for the reminder and insight.

From the BBC today:

“Omar Faruq was shot dead while resisting arrest during a raid by about 200 British troops in Iraq’s second biggest city, Basra, British military spokesman Major Charlie Burbridge said.

US leaders have described Faruq as the top al-Qaeda operative in South-East Asia. He was caught in Indonesia in 2002 and held at a high-security detention centre at Bagram airbase, north of the Afghani capital Kabul, until his escape last year.

“The individual had been tracked across Iraq and was in hiding in Basra,” Major Burbridge said, calling him a “very, very significant man”.

Let’s see, Clinton killed how many al Qaeda terrorists while President?

lester/keogh???

BZZZZZZZZZT. Wrong-o. The number would be Zero, 0, nada, none, zilch. The same number of American hostages brought home from Iran while JimmineyCricketCarter was President… go figure; seems fitting, eh?