GayPatriot

The Internet home for American gay conservatives.

Comments

  6. These are the people lester says we should sit back and let the Democrats ‘make peace’ with, although, given his spelling skills, he might actually mean “make peas” with.

    Either way, he doesn’t think it’s worth fighting them.

  8. These are the people who VtK thinks we should be fighting with when they are in Iran, but who he likes just fine as long as they are in Pakistan or Saudi Arabia. After all, the anti-gay Islamofascists in Saudi Arabia and Pakistan are our ALLIES… so lets be nice to them and give THEM a pass! Who cares if they are sending money to Osama and telling the world that Osama can live there so long as he only attacks Americans? VtK certainly doesn’t care. He LIKES them!

  9. Here in Michigan, we used to have three prominent state senators who were well known un-outed gays –single men in their late 40’s and 50s– serving in the same Sessions over a period of 8 yrs. Sharkskin suits, dramatic floor protests, pompousness and preening practiced like princesses… they were –for the most part– a joke. They got things done to a certain extent, but they weren’t taken seriously within the Legislature and credibility escaped their grasp.

    They liked their staffers to be male, young, athletic and not necessarily talented or bright. They used their power of employment to surround themselves with people who would never ever pay attention to them in a smoke-filled bar at 2AM.

    In two separate campaigns, their opposition tried to use the gay issue against them in a smearing, leacherous fashion. It didn’t work. The politicians increased their base by a respectable margin each race.

    I really doubt the Foley “scandal” will translate into a Democrat landslide in November… each Congressional and Senatorial race is unique. We aren’t a parlimentary system… even if the MSM and Democrats and GayLeftBorg want to forget that distinction.

  10. Cute Anonie-mouse. For the life of me, I’ve never heard or read of VdaK “likes just fine” the islamofascists “as long as they are in Pakistan or Saudi Arabia”. I didn’t know the royal family in SA were islamofascists… nor the govt of Pakistan. In fact, I think both are working against those interests, no? Is that not what “allies” means?

    Care to prove that statement is true or are you just part of the Hit&Run/Cut&Run Crowd from the GayLeftBorg?

  13. Agreed.

    The simple answer is to point out that Anonymous and his ilk apparently have no problem with states that are anti-Bush and anti-American, like Iran and Palestine, treating gays like dirt, but blow hissy fits over the alleged misdeeds of countries that are US allies.

    The list of priorities for sane individuals in terms of our alliances:

    1. Countries that are not flagrantly anti-American

    2. Countries that do not openly support terrorism and defiance of the UN

    3. Countries that uniformly respect human rights

    The list of priorities for insane leftists like Anonymous:

    1. Anti-Bush countries. Nothing else matters.

  14. Matt:
    After under 10 seconds of searching I found these acts that I think you would classify as Islamofacist but this term is so vauge it could mean just about any Muslim:

    “UPI reported in September 1996 that at least one of the 200 people beheaded in Saudi Arabia in 1995 was being punished for homosexuality. This was based on a report in the Saudi newspaper Okaz (IB/4/96).

    The gaurdian:
    Dozens of Saudi men caught dancing and “behaving like women” at a party have been sentenced to a total of 14,200 lashes, after a trial held behind closed doors and without defence lawyers.”

  17. keogh, BZZZZT. Nice try.

    The focus is on the govts of SA and Pakistan. I don’t think anyone would pretend those govts are islamofascist… hell, they’re trying to quash and marginalize those elements because they are viewed as threats to power.

    Islamofascist govts to my mind are like the former Taliban in Afghanistan, Iran, etc.

    I’m thinking a term like jihadist gets the terrorists in better focus and is less vague.

    Sorry VdaK, didn’t mean to step inthe way –Anonie mouse has a penchant for Hit&Runs… Cut&Runs… et al. His ploy was intellectually dishonest and disingenious –he should run for House Democrat Leader now that JohnKickbacksMurtha is toast.

    For me, this week, the big winner in the Foley game is John Murtha… avoiding corruption, bribery, money laundering and graft charges by squealing on his indict-able co-conspirators.

    What a noble man. Move over Duke Cunningham.

  18. No need to apologize, Matt. I appreciate it. And you are so right about Murtha. What a complete sleaze. To dodge an investigation of his shady deals, he turns traitor against his country and becomes a darling of the Spittle-Flecked left.