Comments on: CA Court Decision Suggests (once again) New Direction Needed in Gay Marriage Debate http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/10/06/ca-court-decision-suggests-once-again-new-direction-needed-in-gay-marriage-debate/ The Internet home for American gay conservatives. Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:12:13 -0700 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1 By: Chase http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/10/06/ca-court-decision-suggests-once-again-new-direction-needed-in-gay-marriage-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-21788 Chase Fri, 06 Oct 2006 23:11:50 +0000 http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=828#comment-21788 Which is why it's good news New Yorkers are set to elect a <b>Democrat</b> as Governor who has unashamedly advocated for complete marriage rights for homosexuals <i>and</i> will push to legalze gay marriage through the state legislature. If we are lucky, the voters will also deliver Elliot Spitzer a Democratically controlled State Senate as well, as the current Republican majority there would play obstrunctionist in any attempt by Mr. Spitzer to push through such a bill. But should Mr. Spitzer get his majority, will will get our bill. Which is why it’s good news New Yorkers are set to elect a Democrat as Governor who has unashamedly advocated for complete marriage rights for homosexuals and will push to legalze gay marriage through the state legislature. If we are lucky, the voters will also deliver Elliot Spitzer a Democratically controlled State Senate as well, as the current Republican majority there would play obstrunctionist in any attempt by Mr. Spitzer to push through such a bill. But should Mr. Spitzer get his majority, will will get our bill.

]]> By: rightwingprof http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/10/06/ca-court-decision-suggests-once-again-new-direction-needed-in-gay-marriage-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-21789 rightwingprof Fri, 06 Oct 2006 19:48:42 +0000 http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=828#comment-21789 You're quite incorrect. See the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The SCOTUS has more often than not been on the wrong side of the issue, and courts change. What will you do when we get another Dred Scott court? You’re quite incorrect. See the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

The SCOTUS has more often than not been on the wrong side of the issue, and courts change. What will you do when we get another Dred Scott court?

]]> By: Anonymous http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/10/06/ca-court-decision-suggests-once-again-new-direction-needed-in-gay-marriage-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-21790 Anonymous Fri, 06 Oct 2006 18:15:19 +0000 http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=828#comment-21790 <em>[Comment deleted.  This commenter has been repeatedly banned under a variety of names.  His IP address remains the same.]</em> [Comment deleted.  This commenter has been repeatedly banned under a variety of names.  His IP address remains the same.]

]]> By: rightwingprof http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/10/06/ca-court-decision-suggests-once-again-new-direction-needed-in-gay-marriage-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-21791 rightwingprof Fri, 06 Oct 2006 18:06:18 +0000 http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=828#comment-21791 What these activists need to understand is that it is their attempts to monarchially impose this though the courts that creates the support for gay marriage bans. What these activists need to understand is that it is their attempts to monarchially impose this though the courts that creates the support for gay marriage bans.

]]>