Right, you go to it short stuff. But get a new pic for the blog… the ol’ GeorgeClooney ceasar-toupee look is out of style… as are dark t-shirts and suit jackets. But you hang with it if it says “style” where you come from.

Guy, you are so far outside of reality I doubt you even remember leaving orbit.

And besides, how can the U.S.-backed puppet regime condemn Saddam for that which they backed him (a full-war against Iran and their coreligionist proxies in Iraq.

If this is the November Surprise, I’m sure not impressed. I never applaud political assassinations.

The Dems got the conviction moving.

BTW, what happened to all those wild-assed conspiracy claims from the Dems that Bush would personally wrestle and kill Osama bin Laden a day or two before Election Day?

Boy, do I miss the good ol days when presidents like Slick Willy wouldn’t hesitate to bomb an Arab aspirin factory if it would help shift the attention away from his incompetency over selecting blow job sites.

a) he was abused as a child;
b) he was on strong prescriptions when he did those bad, bad things;
c) his wife didn’t love him;
d) his sons and daughters were disrespectful to him;
e) he was gay.

Before you howl “Oh No!”… remember it’s early in the news cycle. If it doesn’t happen, Saddam will be the first major media celebrity in weeks caught in a scandal that didn’t use a combination of those “excuses”.

And there we see the Democrats’ sense of proportion; they whine over death penalty cases in the United States being “unfair” and make cracks like “hope it happens to your immediate family or you”.

These examples show just what Dems consider to be “fair” and how much they care about immediate families.

And of course one goes looking for a Democratic lawyer; they’ll argue that anyone, even Slobodan Milosevic and Saddam Hussein, aren’t guilty.

What I find incredibly amusing is that abortion-pushers like Anon1 are anti-death penalty; in other words, they don’t support executing guilty humans for crimes they commit, but they do support executing innocent babies for what their parents want.

There was a reason they weren’t, though; the Democrats and their puppets in the media don’t want Americans to know just how awful Saddam was.

No, for a very simple reason.

The death warrants that Bush signed were the direct result of a criminal trial by jury, with both sides allowed to present and argue evidence, and an appeals process designed to allow said trials and judgment to be thoroughly and exhaustingly reviewed.

Saddam just said, “Those men — go kill them”.

But thanks for demonstrating to us that Democrats see a complete moral equivalence between the two.

What an incredible snit. Who’s your role model? The common dog flea? Snit.

This guy sounds more like Otis the town drunk.

Hey Gomer, what a Pyle.

As the stories trickle in, the reactions are fairly varied, and predictable.

Amnesty International, of course, condemned it.
Iraq: Amnesty International deplores death sentences in Saddam Hussein trial
Amnesty International deplores the decision …

Regards,
Peter H.

The Dems used to be the Party of Rum, Romanism and Rebellion. Now they are the Party of Drugs, Atheism, and Treason.