Colorado & jimmy –you gys are a certifiable crack-up’ed team. Like the well-intentioned but hopelessly clueless and single-issue Gryph, you guys are going to have to find something else now to focus your deep seated anger toward and my hunch is the last place for that anger will be when the House and Sen Dem leadership backpedal from your extremist, anti-troop, anti-American focus… cut & run will never be soon enough for your peculiar “taste”, taxes will never be high enough for your bitter anti-capitalism “sentiments” and finding reproach with Bush will never be enough until it results in a 100-0 Senate “conviction” on impeachment charges.

You’ll be the bane of the Party… God Bless ‘Em, cause they deserve you. Not us.

“You’ll rant about how Midwesterners mock and vilify gays…”

Further proof of your own inability to have an honest conversation without resorting to LIES and DISTORTION. I have NEVER said anything of the sort (in fact, I’ve said the exact opposite…I even put it in bold letters since I know you have problems with reading comprehension) and your constant drumbeat otherwise only further exposes your feeble logic and desperate attempts to evade the question of your repeated LIES. Please, Please, Please try to not resort to SLANDER and LIES in the future. Again, please come forward with proof of your claim that people claimed pre-war Iraq was a “paradise” (your words, not mine).

So, in other words, even though he insists gays are hated and vilified constantly, he himself, who is gay, never was.

The second rather contradicts the first.

Now, to you, RCC:

In the second quote I was asking for ANY veracity to your claim with an honest account of how gays are treated in the midwest (because you have shown absolutely no ability at even basic reading comprehension I’ll restate it here, MIDWESTERNERS ARE GOOD PEOPLE WITH NO INHERENT HOMOPHOBIA).

Which was why I was mystified by your claims that they were all evil homophobes who vilified and mocked gays — because that certainly wasn’t my experience.

Really, RCC, you make this too easy. All I have to do is say the opposite of what you do, and you’ll turn around and contradict yourself. You’ll rant about how Midwesterners mock and vilify gays, but then, when I question that based on my own experience, you’ll try to claim they don’t — which is exactly what I was saying.

Now, since I said that, I have no doubt that you’ll reverse and say that they’re all vicious homophobes, because you can’t stand to agree with me. Or your head will explode. Either way, it will be amusing.

The Borg are a fictional race of cyborgs in the Star Trek universe. They are known within and beyond Star Trek fandom for their relentless pursuit of what they want to assimilate, their rapid adaptability to almost any defense, and their ability to continue functioning after what may seem a devastating or even fatal blow seemingly unaffected. As such, the Borg have become a powerful symbol in popular culture for any juggernaut against which “resistance is futile”.

More on The Borg

I’d like to see you get upset about groups like “Queers for Palestine”. You want to see some real Uncle Toms? How about a gay group that supports a viciously anti-gay (and anti-Jewish) Muslim make-believe country against a relatively pro-gay, real country. “Palestinian” gays try to escape into Israel regularly for their very lives. You think there’ll ever be a pride parade in the Gaza Strip?

No, I do not support the anti-gay marriage initiatives. But if those who did thought all gay people were like “jimmy” I can understand why they voted for them.

People like the trolls here are part of the reason I will never, ever vote Democrat again. If I don’t like the Republican on the ballot, I’ll vote libertarian. If there isn’t one, I’ll write-in a candidate.

“Christianist” mirrors “Islamist”. “Borg” mirrors what?

#79. More “borg”-talk. And some pseudo-anthropology: lower-case-clan. What are you talking about? What is a “lower-case-clan”? The insularity of your language speaks, but I have no idea what the words mean.

The point of my comment was that you people aren’t taken seriously by anyone. Your party hates you–they GOTV on your backs. The gay community that you despise disowns you. And yet you soldier on, even making up your own language since you are disconnected from substantial anchors of reality.

And, by the way, I did get out my vote. What gay person couldn’t vote when Rick Santorum was on the ballot?

Now, please, for my enjoyment, tell me all about Little Ricky and how he isn’t anti-gay. But, please, put it in language that I can understand. This blog ran ads for the man for months. If that isn’t the definition of “unhinged” (from reality), I don’t know what is.

But, hey, you guys DO have something to be happy about: all the anti-gay marriage initiatives that passed!! YAYYYY!!!! (Right?) I mean, all those stupid gay people demanding equality really sets you homosexuals off, no? And aren’t you happy at what they brought upon themselves? In fact, aren’t you of the mind that gay people themselves wrote those anti-gay marriage initiatives?

#81. There are really two RealColoradoConservatives: RealColoradoConservative and “RealColoragoConservative.” The former is you, RCC. The latter is a figment of his imagination, how he imagines you to be, projected onto you. He has no use for facts. There is only his ideology. He is truly a postmodern in practice, whatever his political ideology is.

#80. True, true, true.

#92. I’m guessing this will be NDT’s next slot. Could be wrong on the number though. Anyway, I agree with you NDT: Clinton and Kerry and Gore hate gay people and the new Democrats have a plan to not only push an anti-gay amendment to the federal constitution, but to advocate for the return of sodomy laws in the US. We need the GOP to save homosexuals from the gay people, or borg(?). (Did I use “borg” correctly in that sentence?)

I grew up in Kansas and have lived in Denver for the last 10 years. I don’t think I need to really break the news to you that here in the MidWest gays are villified and mocked openly by our Republican cohorts.

Of course, then we contrast:

I’ve been out since I was in High School in a small town in southern Kansas and the only abuse I’ve had personally directed at me was from Mr. Fred Phelps (who is positively reasaonable compared to you ND30).

So first he whines about how everyone abuses him, then he tries to argue that only one person abused him.

Right-o.

More blatant lies from ND30…Don’t you see how spreading lies hurts your credibility? Care to point out when and where I said such a thing (or any of the other claims you’ve made against me)? I’ve been out since I was in High School in a small town in southern Kansas and the only abuse I’ve had personally directed at me was from Mr. Fred Phelps (who is positively reasaonable compared to you ND30). Seriously ND30, get some credible sources and then we can talk. There was no “wild spinning” on my part, that’s your job (and you are not very good at it).

OK, now you’re all alone on that fantasy trip jimmy –taken by so many on the anti-war Left to attribute all sorts of things to the results of the election. You just can’t help yourself… but this is a no wire, no nets leap even for you —and you’ve had some dooseys.

First, jimmy voters at the polls on election day probably haven’t heard used or are aware of a term like “GayLeftBorg”… that’s the shorthand we use within our gay community to describe the guys like you and RCC and Gryph and others here who march lockstep with the GayLeft and drink from the radical Democrat koolaid trough. Example would be seeing Pride Flags (ugh) at a World Bank Protest or at a rally in favor of PETA or at a GOTV effort at an abortion clinic.

No one here –or anywhere else except in your fantasy land jimmy– can argue that most gay activists aren’t willingly in bed with most of the radical Democrat groups. It’s a fact as real as the election results on Tuesday.

I think you probably appreciate now how silly your comment was/is –I doubt if more than a few gays voting on Tuesday (and my guess is you didn’t even get out and vote) were voting against the GOP because some here use “GayLeftBorg” to aptly and precisely describe the political alliance and manipulation of radical Left gays by the Democrats and our community’s more outspoken “leaders”.

Sorry jimmy, but like a lot of things written about the election day results, your opinion is just plain ol’ wrong.

I think you must have missed this statement from my previous post:

I think the pattern is clear to everyone; you demand sources, then claim that the sources aren’t good enough when they prove you wrong.

And you just did exactly that.

You claimed that I offered no facts, only a link to my own blog.

I outlined the numerous other factual links I had already provided.

When confronted with the clear fact that I had provided additional sources, you wildly tried to spin your way out of that by claiming that my sources were somehow false.

Since I grew up in the Midwest and Texas, I was mystified by your claim that everyone there hates and vilifies gays.

However, after seeing your behavior, I understand why — especially if you were the only gay they had ever met.

Did you ever think that people voted Democrat because people like you make up silly terms like GayLeftBorg and can’t take you seriously? And here’s chuckling at you and your loss: cheers!

*cough*Christianist*cough*

Democrats not only gloat, but they spout ad hominem attacks and make spurious accusations against anyone who calls them out on their caca del toro.

The gay left is indeed a borg, or rather a sub-borg of the “straight” left. Submit or we will troll your blogs.

It was never a question that attrocities were committed in Iraq. You were the one who said people called it a “paradise.” I’m still awaiting proof that ANYONE other then the liberals that live in your deluded brain said such a thinkg.

2. The NLPC website, which outlines Nancy Pelosi’s campaign finance fraud

The NLPC also says that she PAID HER FIND AND DISBANDED THE PAC IN QUESTION.

3. NRO, which outlines Pelosi’s current and continuing corrupt behavior
Please, those arguments are specious and not rising to the level of anything illegal let alone unethical…further derangment from your fevered brain.

4. Wikipedia, which outlines Democratic Party shill Scott Ritter’s documentary, paid for by Saddam’s government, showing prewar Iraq as a paradise.
Really? I don’t see anything of the sort on the wikipedia page…maybe you were thinking about something else? Please let me know what I’m supposed to see on Ritter’s Wiki entry that paints Iraq as a paradise because all I can find is a question about financing, nothing of substance there (just like your pointless arguments here).

5. Fahrenheit 9/11, by Democrat Michael Moore, which portrays pre-war Iraq as a kite-flying paradise of happiness.

Care to point to any specifics? No? I didn’t think so…but I am really impressed that you brought up Moore again, congratulations you idiot.

6. Instapundit, which, with its link, demonstrates that Democrats like Scott Ritter were deliberately covering up Saddam Hussein’s abuses.

He was covering up nothing. In fact he was stating that Iraq under Saddam was a horrible place. Again, I implore you, please give me some proof of the charges that you have levied here. So far you have given us nothing, just like the GOP for the last ten years.

So ND30, you’ve proven yourself again to be a duplicitous LIAR who has NOTHING of substance save your own deluded conspiracy theories. So, please, learn how to lodge complaints backed up by FACTS before you post more astroturf.