<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rudy &amp; the Right</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/11/17/rudy-the-right/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/11/17/rudy-the-right/</link>
	<description>The Internet home for American gay conservatives.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:15:21 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scooter</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/11/17/rudy-the-right/comment-page-2/#comment-24792</link>
		<dc:creator>Scooter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 00:17:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=895#comment-24792</guid>
		<description>There may be a base of the GOP that will vote GOP no matter what, but it would be a mistake for the Right to think that there isn&#039;t a greater majority of people who are somewhere in the middle of the bell curve and will see someone of Rudy&#039;s position a good one to support.

This should be obvious to the GOP by these latest elections.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There may be a base of the GOP that will vote GOP no matter what, but it would be a mistake for the Right to think that there isn&#8217;t a greater majority of people who are somewhere in the middle of the bell curve and will see someone of Rudy&#8217;s position a good one to support.</p>
<p>This should be obvious to the GOP by these latest elections.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gary kitching</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/11/17/rudy-the-right/comment-page-2/#comment-24791</link>
		<dc:creator>gary kitching</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 22:49:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=895#comment-24791</guid>
		<description>he is a leader that can get us through the tough times ahead and is a lot brighter than the other choices.  I voted for Barry Goldwater and I don&#039;t think the social issues are that important to most voters including some polls I have seen coming from the evangelical community.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>he is a leader that can get us through the tough times ahead and is a lot brighter than the other choices.  I voted for Barry Goldwater and I don&#8217;t think the social issues are that important to most voters including some polls I have seen coming from the evangelical community.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Synova</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/11/17/rudy-the-right/comment-page-2/#comment-24790</link>
		<dc:creator>Synova</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 05:46:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=895#comment-24790</guid>
		<description>Probably it&#039;s mostly about bravado... do you *dare* ask that question?  What a shocking thing to do.

I asked a similar question (won&#039;t give details) during a question and answer at a school presentation and assembly... but that was in Junior High.    I don&#039;t know if I would have in college or not, but I know the same sort of dynamic of asserting one&#039;s self in the world is still there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Probably it&#8217;s mostly about bravado&#8230; do you *dare* ask that question?  What a shocking thing to do.</p>
<p>I asked a similar question (won&#8217;t give details) during a question and answer at a school presentation and assembly&#8230; but that was in Junior High.    I don&#8217;t know if I would have in college or not, but I know the same sort of dynamic of asserting one&#8217;s self in the world is still there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gene in Pennsylvania</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/11/17/rudy-the-right/comment-page-2/#comment-24789</link>
		<dc:creator>Gene in Pennsylvania</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 03:27:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=895#comment-24789</guid>
		<description>Underwear...I would hope lessons learned ....any candidate asked what kind of underwear he or she wears would simply reply,
&quot;You know I hope to be the President of the United States, and the Commander and Chief of the Armed Forces, I&#039;d rather not answer a personal question like that.&quot; He or she may lose support of those 12-17 year olds who might get a laugh out of a different answer, but the candidate might gain VOTES of serious adults looking for a classey, calm, leader seeking the Presidency.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Underwear&#8230;I would hope lessons learned &#8230;.any candidate asked what kind of underwear he or she wears would simply reply,<br />
&#8220;You know I hope to be the President of the United States, and the Commander and Chief of the Armed Forces, I&#8217;d rather not answer a personal question like that.&#8221; He or she may lose support of those 12-17 year olds who might get a laugh out of a different answer, but the candidate might gain VOTES of serious adults looking for a classey, calm, leader seeking the Presidency.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gene in Pennsylvania</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/11/17/rudy-the-right/comment-page-1/#comment-24748</link>
		<dc:creator>Gene in Pennsylvania</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 03:22:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=895#comment-24748</guid>
		<description>Theres a lot of debate in here about Rudy and what did he do to engender such love around the country. What did he do prior to 9/11. Didn&#039;t he just nurture NYC after the attack.  In truth what we saw of Rudy immediately after the attack was an executive who took charge, calmed the city and the nation. He administered an amazing search and rescue, then clean up of a war zone. His leadership calmed a nation not just a city. Contrast that with Pres Clintons ignoring of the terrorist threats during his term. Don&#039;t think it&#039;s a flippant shot a Pres Clinton. He just didn&#039;t lead. If it doesn&#039;t come natural it&#039;s hard to manufacture it during a crisis. Rudy had it and showed it off. Pres Clinton was more comfortable at a photo opp turning over a shovel of dirt for a new office building. It&#039;s displays a difference in style and substance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Theres a lot of debate in here about Rudy and what did he do to engender such love around the country. What did he do prior to 9/11. Didn&#8217;t he just nurture NYC after the attack.  In truth what we saw of Rudy immediately after the attack was an executive who took charge, calmed the city and the nation. He administered an amazing search and rescue, then clean up of a war zone. His leadership calmed a nation not just a city. Contrast that with Pres Clintons ignoring of the terrorist threats during his term. Don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s a flippant shot a Pres Clinton. He just didn&#8217;t lead. If it doesn&#8217;t come natural it&#8217;s hard to manufacture it during a crisis. Rudy had it and showed it off. Pres Clinton was more comfortable at a photo opp turning over a shovel of dirt for a new office building. It&#8217;s displays a difference in style and substance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gene in Pennsylvania</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/11/17/rudy-the-right/comment-page-1/#comment-24788</link>
		<dc:creator>Gene in Pennsylvania</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 03:13:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=895#comment-24788</guid>
		<description>I think the truth is, all the apparent candidates on the left and right have significant baggage. The country may be tired of Bushes and Clintons if as the MSM says they are tired of a polarized electorate. My faves continue to be Gingrich of who I know a lot. Romney, I wish i knew more. And Jeb Bush...but I&#039;m tired of the hysterical anti Bush lying that would go on. Gingrich is brilliant and pro life, pro gun, pro liberty and pro freedom. Hillary has her own baggage, which is everyone knows her and her negatives are 45%. How does she overcome that when there are no &quot;undecideds&quot; in her case? Obama...how do you get elected President after 2 years in the Senate with virtually no record? I know we all want a woman or African American to be elected in our lifetime, but can&#039;t we vote for an executive who&#039;s served longer than an apprenticeship? Truth be told I think the cupboards are pretty bare on the left and the right. The Bushes and Clintons have so dominated the poitical landscape the past 20 years that no one seems prepared to emerge. When some light weight floats to the top...like Carter in &#039;76...the country will suffer. John Edwards is a light weight. And Sen McCain...an admirable life, but I&#039;m not voting for anyone over 70 years old in times like these.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the truth is, all the apparent candidates on the left and right have significant baggage. The country may be tired of Bushes and Clintons if as the MSM says they are tired of a polarized electorate. My faves continue to be Gingrich of who I know a lot. Romney, I wish i knew more. And Jeb Bush&#8230;but I&#8217;m tired of the hysterical anti Bush lying that would go on. Gingrich is brilliant and pro life, pro gun, pro liberty and pro freedom. Hillary has her own baggage, which is everyone knows her and her negatives are 45%. How does she overcome that when there are no &#8220;undecideds&#8221; in her case? Obama&#8230;how do you get elected President after 2 years in the Senate with virtually no record? I know we all want a woman or African American to be elected in our lifetime, but can&#8217;t we vote for an executive who&#8217;s served longer than an apprenticeship? Truth be told I think the cupboards are pretty bare on the left and the right. The Bushes and Clintons have so dominated the poitical landscape the past 20 years that no one seems prepared to emerge. When some light weight floats to the top&#8230;like Carter in &#8217;76&#8230;the country will suffer. John Edwards is a light weight. And Sen McCain&#8230;an admirable life, but I&#8217;m not voting for anyone over 70 years old in times like these.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HollywoodNeoCon</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/11/17/rudy-the-right/comment-page-1/#comment-24787</link>
		<dc:creator>HollywoodNeoCon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2006 17:54:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=895#comment-24787</guid>
		<description>keogh said...

&lt;i&gt;&quot;I better review my company&#039;s hiring policy.... &quot;&lt;/i&gt;

At least you may want to ask them how many continents there are, or perhaps how to balance a checkbook.

Try asking a UCLA student those questions, and you may be dismayed by the responses you receive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>keogh said&#8230;</p>
<p><i>&#8220;I better review my company&#8217;s hiring policy&#8230;. &#8220;</i></p>
<p>At least you may want to ask them how many continents there are, or perhaps how to balance a checkbook.</p>
<p>Try asking a UCLA student those questions, and you may be dismayed by the responses you receive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: keogh</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/11/17/rudy-the-right/comment-page-1/#comment-24786</link>
		<dc:creator>keogh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2006 17:41:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=895#comment-24786</guid>
		<description>&quot;No wonder most American college students are regarded as nothing more than spoiled fools&quot;

They are?  - I better review my company&#039;s hiring policy....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;No wonder most American college students are regarded as nothing more than spoiled fools&#8221;</p>
<p>They are?  &#8211; I better review my company&#8217;s hiring policy&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HollywoodNeoCon</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/11/17/rudy-the-right/comment-page-1/#comment-24785</link>
		<dc:creator>HollywoodNeoCon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2006 17:06:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=895#comment-24785</guid>
		<description>Ian said...

&lt;i&gt;&quot;Clinton was asked about his underwear.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

Yes, he was, and it was among the most blatant examples of insipid ignorance I&#039;ve ever seen. No wonder most American college students are regarded as nothing more than spoiled fools.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ian said&#8230;</p>
<p><i>&#8220;Clinton was asked about his underwear.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>Yes, he was, and it was among the most blatant examples of insipid ignorance I&#8217;ve ever seen. No wonder most American college students are regarded as nothing more than spoiled fools.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/11/17/rudy-the-right/comment-page-1/#comment-24784</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2006 16:58:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=895#comment-24784</guid>
		<description>#44:&lt;blockquote&gt;I think Romney would be much better than Giuliani &lt;/blockquote&gt;
Clinton was asked about his underwear. I wonder if they&#039;ll ask the same question of Romney. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#44:<br />
<blockquote>I think Romney would be much better than Giuliani </p></blockquote>
<p>Clinton was asked about his underwear. I wonder if they&#8217;ll ask the same question of Romney. <img src='http://www.gaypatriot.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sean</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/11/17/rudy-the-right/comment-page-1/#comment-24747</link>
		<dc:creator>sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2006 15:52:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=895#comment-24747</guid>
		<description>I think Romney would be much better than Giuliani and hope that the GOP nominates him.  However, the commercials and interviews with Giuliani&#039;s ex-wife might make for great television.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Romney would be much better than Giuliani and hope that the GOP nominates him.  However, the commercials and interviews with Giuliani&#8217;s ex-wife might make for great television.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sean</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/11/17/rudy-the-right/comment-page-1/#comment-24783</link>
		<dc:creator>sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2006 15:49:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=895#comment-24783</guid>
		<description>#19.  Criminal profiling is common sense; racial profiling is not.  I think it was Patricia Williams who talked about racial profiling on September 11, 2001:  While airport security was busy racially profiling young black and latino men, 19 terrorists boarded planes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#19.  Criminal profiling is common sense; racial profiling is not.  I think it was Patricia Williams who talked about racial profiling on September 11, 2001:  While airport security was busy racially profiling young black and latino men, 19 terrorists boarded planes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FormerRepublican</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/11/17/rudy-the-right/comment-page-1/#comment-24782</link>
		<dc:creator>FormerRepublican</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Nov 2006 14:27:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=895#comment-24782</guid>
		<description>The only part of Guiliani I don&#039;t like is the expansive view of executive power that he shares with the Bush Administration.  Barring a swing to court religious right voters I don&#039;t think that will be enough for me not to vote for him.  Meanwhile McCain has hired a debate darling from Falwell.  His move to the right (such as this, doing an add for the draconian Arizona Marriage Amendment, and actively courting other top name religious right leaders) and Bush butt-kissing has turned my favorite 2000 candidate into someone I almost can&#039;t consider voting for (unless the other team puts up Hillary).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only part of Guiliani I don&#8217;t like is the expansive view of executive power that he shares with the Bush Administration.  Barring a swing to court religious right voters I don&#8217;t think that will be enough for me not to vote for him.  Meanwhile McCain has hired a debate darling from Falwell.  His move to the right (such as this, doing an add for the draconian Arizona Marriage Amendment, and actively courting other top name religious right leaders) and Bush butt-kissing has turned my favorite 2000 candidate into someone I almost can&#8217;t consider voting for (unless the other team puts up Hillary).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/11/17/rudy-the-right/comment-page-1/#comment-24781</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Nov 2006 04:35:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=895#comment-24781</guid>
		<description>#39: How am I being deceptive? I don&#039;t pretend to support Bush or the GOP. I do find a pro-gay, pro-choice, pro-gun control, drag-friendly candidate for the GOP Presidential nomination rather intriguing. With those attributes, he&#039;d be running to the left of most potential Dem candidates. Yet he appeals to conservative commenters here who seem to accept his liberal views because he is so strong on national security. Yet when I try to learn why he is thought so strong on national security, no one seems able to provide concrete reasons. You may not appreciate that line of questioning but rest assured, his primary opponents will make the most of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#39: How am I being deceptive? I don&#8217;t pretend to support Bush or the GOP. I do find a pro-gay, pro-choice, pro-gun control, drag-friendly candidate for the GOP Presidential nomination rather intriguing. With those attributes, he&#8217;d be running to the left of most potential Dem candidates. Yet he appeals to conservative commenters here who seem to accept his liberal views because he is so strong on national security. Yet when I try to learn why he is thought so strong on national security, no one seems able to provide concrete reasons. You may not appreciate that line of questioning but rest assured, his primary opponents will make the most of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ashley Hunter</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/11/17/rudy-the-right/comment-page-1/#comment-24746</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashley Hunter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Nov 2006 04:25:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=895#comment-24746</guid>
		<description>North Dallas 30, I don&#039;t know if you&#039;re still around at this hour, but I wanted to add to your comments about Offutt Air Force Base in Nebraska.

Some good friends of mine at HQ Strategic Command, which occupies the building that once housed HQ Strategic Air Command, said Bush went to Offutt on 9/11 not so much for geographic security as for the redundancy of the communications lines.  No one was sure if the terrorist attacks ended with the crash of Flight 92 and once Bush was inside STRATCOM&#039;s underground command post he was assured of communications with Washington and/or military commanders no matter what because of the redundant systems serving Offfutt.

After General Curt LeMay established SAC Headquarters at Offutt he insisted on communications that could survive almost anything.  The old Northwestern Bell Telephone Company (which later became US West and is now Qwest) built systems and back-up systems second to none.  (That&#039;s one of the reasons Omaha is a major hotel reservations center and a hub for telemarketing.)

A year or two before SAC was deactivated, the phone company had to do some work on underground lines just north of Offutt.  There were so many armed military police at that hole in the ground it was as secure as Fort Knox.

When New York and other large cities complained about the cuts they took in Homeland Security funds and chided Omaha for getting a large increase, Vice President Cheney cited the obvious:  the communications grid centered in Omaha is vital to the country.

By the way, North Dallas 30, I want to correct an error you made about Offutt air Force Base.  It is not IN Omaha.  Omaha is eight or nine miles away.  Offutt sits right in the middle of Bellevue, Nebraska, less than a mile from the high school that graduated me, my good buddy Jack Allen, who sometimes comments here, and Virginia&#039;s U.S. Senator-elect Jim Webb (also Bob Hayes of &quot;Airplane&quot; fame).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>North Dallas 30, I don&#8217;t know if you&#8217;re still around at this hour, but I wanted to add to your comments about Offutt Air Force Base in Nebraska.</p>
<p>Some good friends of mine at HQ Strategic Command, which occupies the building that once housed HQ Strategic Air Command, said Bush went to Offutt on 9/11 not so much for geographic security as for the redundancy of the communications lines.  No one was sure if the terrorist attacks ended with the crash of Flight 92 and once Bush was inside STRATCOM&#8217;s underground command post he was assured of communications with Washington and/or military commanders no matter what because of the redundant systems serving Offfutt.</p>
<p>After General Curt LeMay established SAC Headquarters at Offutt he insisted on communications that could survive almost anything.  The old Northwestern Bell Telephone Company (which later became US West and is now Qwest) built systems and back-up systems second to none.  (That&#8217;s one of the reasons Omaha is a major hotel reservations center and a hub for telemarketing.)</p>
<p>A year or two before SAC was deactivated, the phone company had to do some work on underground lines just north of Offutt.  There were so many armed military police at that hole in the ground it was as secure as Fort Knox.</p>
<p>When New York and other large cities complained about the cuts they took in Homeland Security funds and chided Omaha for getting a large increase, Vice President Cheney cited the obvious:  the communications grid centered in Omaha is vital to the country.</p>
<p>By the way, North Dallas 30, I want to correct an error you made about Offutt air Force Base.  It is not IN Omaha.  Omaha is eight or nine miles away.  Offutt sits right in the middle of Bellevue, Nebraska, less than a mile from the high school that graduated me, my good buddy Jack Allen, who sometimes comments here, and Virginia&#8217;s U.S. Senator-elect Jim Webb (also Bob Hayes of &#8220;Airplane&#8221; fame).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HollywoodNeoCon</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/11/17/rudy-the-right/comment-page-1/#comment-24780</link>
		<dc:creator>HollywoodNeoCon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Nov 2006 04:04:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=895#comment-24780</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&quot;Last I checked you weren&#039;t listed as in a position of authority here.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

Wasn&#039;t my point, ian. Simply stating how completely deceptive you continue to be in trying to argue the merits of a Republican candidate. If you wish to debate THAT, then by all means please do so. Otherwise, quite trying to skirt the issue.

As for trying to have you banned, yes I would disagree with that decision, primarily because it&#039;s ever so much fun watching you work. I&#039;ve followed your comments closely here for the better part of a year now, and can safely say I know your strategy like the back of my hand. Why would I wish to deny myself that entertainment?

Although, I do admit I&#039;d really love to read something from you that came from your intellect, rather than your emotions.

Would be refreshing, indeed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8220;Last I checked you weren&#8217;t listed as in a position of authority here.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>Wasn&#8217;t my point, ian. Simply stating how completely deceptive you continue to be in trying to argue the merits of a Republican candidate. If you wish to debate THAT, then by all means please do so. Otherwise, quite trying to skirt the issue.</p>
<p>As for trying to have you banned, yes I would disagree with that decision, primarily because it&#8217;s ever so much fun watching you work. I&#8217;ve followed your comments closely here for the better part of a year now, and can safely say I know your strategy like the back of my hand. Why would I wish to deny myself that entertainment?</p>
<p>Although, I do admit I&#8217;d really love to read something from you that came from your intellect, rather than your emotions.</p>
<p>Would be refreshing, indeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/11/17/rudy-the-right/comment-page-1/#comment-24745</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Nov 2006 03:27:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=895#comment-24745</guid>
		<description>I also have my misgivings about Rudy, but I like and respect the man.  That gives him a shot for my vote, unlike Hillary whom I despise.  I have no idea whether he could get the nomination or not but perhaps his candidacy could help take the edge off the Right and moderate the GOP on social issues somewhat.  Even if he won he would only be able to do so much on those issues since he&#039;d face opponents in his own party to radical change.  Eh, we&#039;ll see but I will keep my eye on his campaign.  If he does get the nomination and Hillary is his opponent, there&#039;s no question I&#039;ll vote for him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also have my misgivings about Rudy, but I like and respect the man.  That gives him a shot for my vote, unlike Hillary whom I despise.  I have no idea whether he could get the nomination or not but perhaps his candidacy could help take the edge off the Right and moderate the GOP on social issues somewhat.  Even if he won he would only be able to do so much on those issues since he&#8217;d face opponents in his own party to radical change.  Eh, we&#8217;ll see but I will keep my eye on his campaign.  If he does get the nomination and Hillary is his opponent, there&#8217;s no question I&#8217;ll vote for him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/11/17/rudy-the-right/comment-page-1/#comment-24779</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Nov 2006 02:37:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=895#comment-24779</guid>
		<description>#34:&lt;blockquote&gt;I used to be a Republican&lt;/blockquote&gt; Actually, I was a registered Republican for several years in order to vote in the GOP primaries and try to help moderate repubs. Unfortunately, today, there are virtually no moderate Repubs here in Arizona.

#35:&lt;blockquote&gt;I&#039;m trying to stifle free speech.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Really? Last I checked you weren&#039;t listed as in a position of authority here. Even if you were, I suspect there&#039;s still enough of a glimmer of the libertarian in you that you&#039;d feel guilty banning someone you disagreed with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#34:<br />
<blockquote>I used to be a Republican</p></blockquote>
<p> Actually, I was a registered Republican for several years in order to vote in the GOP primaries and try to help moderate repubs. Unfortunately, today, there are virtually no moderate Repubs here in Arizona.</p>
<p>#35:<br />
<blockquote>I&#8217;m trying to stifle free speech.</p></blockquote>
<p>Really? Last I checked you weren&#8217;t listed as in a position of authority here. Even if you were, I suspect there&#8217;s still enough of a glimmer of the libertarian in you that you&#8217;d feel guilty banning someone you disagreed with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/11/17/rudy-the-right/comment-page-1/#comment-24744</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Nov 2006 01:11:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=895#comment-24744</guid>
		<description>Rudy is on the wrong side of a major issue that will cause him to loose the GOP nomination to Romney.  IMMIGRATION.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rudy is on the wrong side of a major issue that will cause him to loose the GOP nomination to Romney.  IMMIGRATION.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HollywoodNeoCon</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2006/11/17/rudy-the-right/comment-page-1/#comment-24778</link>
		<dc:creator>HollywoodNeoCon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Nov 2006 01:05:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=895#comment-24778</guid>
		<description>Thank you, Matt, for that response at #33.

However, for myself, having been born &amp; raised in Chicago, more often than not, I ended up having to vote Democrat for city- and county-wide offices, as the GOP seldom, if ever, ran a candidate.

But more to the point, like ian, I have never voted outside my party line in state or national elections. Hence, you will NEVER find me engaged in discussion about Democrat candidates in terms of how they may best represent me and my family in Washington, Springfield or Sacramento. The DNC platform has never (at least so far) reflected my views nor represented my interests, nor have they shown any inclination to do so in the future. Consequently, I try to restrict me discussion of candidates to those in the GOP who may (or may not) best represent conservative thought and practice.

Ergo, for ian to (in the immortal words of the late John Houseman) &quot;stand and fill this room with [his] intelligence&quot; regarding Republican candidates, under the guise of determining their viability as candidates is folly at best, and sheer deceit at worst.

However, I admit to freely and gleefully engaging in ankle-biting punditry of ANY candidate, but at least I make it clear where my allegiances lay.

By the way, I bet dollars to donuts that the next response I get from the American Castrati here is some lame-assed attempt to convince us all that I&#039;m trying to stifle free speech. Take it and run with it darlings, because everyone here knows that to the Fellowship Of Perpetual Victims &amp; Guardians Of What&#039;s Best For The World, having am &quot;R&quot; next to your name is tantamount to have the SS Death&#039;s Head Skull firmly pinned to your chest.

Eric in Hollywood</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, Matt, for that response at #33.</p>
<p>However, for myself, having been born &amp; raised in Chicago, more often than not, I ended up having to vote Democrat for city- and county-wide offices, as the GOP seldom, if ever, ran a candidate.</p>
<p>But more to the point, like ian, I have never voted outside my party line in state or national elections. Hence, you will NEVER find me engaged in discussion about Democrat candidates in terms of how they may best represent me and my family in Washington, Springfield or Sacramento. The DNC platform has never (at least so far) reflected my views nor represented my interests, nor have they shown any inclination to do so in the future. Consequently, I try to restrict me discussion of candidates to those in the GOP who may (or may not) best represent conservative thought and practice.</p>
<p>Ergo, for ian to (in the immortal words of the late John Houseman) &#8220;stand and fill this room with [his] intelligence&#8221; regarding Republican candidates, under the guise of determining their viability as candidates is folly at best, and sheer deceit at worst.</p>
<p>However, I admit to freely and gleefully engaging in ankle-biting punditry of ANY candidate, but at least I make it clear where my allegiances lay.</p>
<p>By the way, I bet dollars to donuts that the next response I get from the American Castrati here is some lame-assed attempt to convince us all that I&#8217;m trying to stifle free speech. Take it and run with it darlings, because everyone here knows that to the Fellowship Of Perpetual Victims &amp; Guardians Of What&#8217;s Best For The World, having am &#8220;R&#8221; next to your name is tantamount to have the SS Death&#8217;s Head Skull firmly pinned to your chest.</p>
<p>Eric in Hollywood</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

