And the UN was pretty quiet concerning Saddam’s just reward. Maybe they’re contemplating their own precarious situation in the world today.

As far as the former dictator of Iraq is concerned: say hi to Satan for me, you terrorist muthaf—a. Hope your 70 virgins look like Helen Thomas.

Regards,
Peter H.

As I said… Bush is, and always has been, way too diplomatic about all this. Way too willing to just sweep stuff under the rug. I fault him for it.

Ambassador Bolton tried to make some headway with these issues… but look where it got him.

WHY are we in the UN anyway????

Good question. The corruption at the UN makes anything the Republican Congress did look penny ante by comparison. Republican aides took a few thousand in payoffs from lobbyists… how does that compare with billions skimmed off the oil-for-foodpalaces program? Mark Foley sent a few tacky emails to a page, how does that compare with UN peacekeepers running child prostitution rings, and other UN bureaucrats caught with child pr0nography?

And yet the liberal-left doesn’t give a damn about UN corruption. Indeed, they think the UN has moral authority over everything and everyone.

Care to defend your party’s hypocrisy, lefties?

And lest we forget, they did not choose to do so for Ford.

Typical.

Remind me again – WHY are we in the UN anyway????

Regards,
Peter H.

But, at least now old George can say he’s gotten his revenge on the guy who tried to kill his dad.

1) Ignore liberal PC shrieking and vastly loosen the ROE. (keogh, that means Rules of Engagement) So that our troops can really FIGHT the terrorists, as the Ethiopians are now proving can be done in Somalia.

2) Give Iran and Syria 48 hours to stop sending IEDs, money and saboteurs / terrorists into Iraq, or else we are going to bomb their facilities, in progressive steps.

3) Continue, or intensify if possible (it can’t just be done by magic or wishing), efforts to train Iraqi military and police.

4) Then, if and only if U.S. ground commanders say it would help, increase our overall troop levels in Iraq.

Here is one of many points where Kerry shows how far out of touch with reality he is: He breezily declared at one point that we should “double our Special Forces” troops. Um… Mr. Kerry… That can’t happen unless you either (1) find and inspire the incredibly dedicated, tough and excellent people needed for Special Forces – something you as President couldn’t possibly hope to do, by the way; or else (2) stuff the SF ranks with morons – which you of course think the military is composed of anyway – but with a resulting giant drop in SF quality, making the SF increase worse than useless.

Kerry didn’t outline plans that “the right” later embraced as their own. Rather, Kerry outlined plans that Bush and the military had already been doing, mixed in with throw-in-the-towel calls for rapid withdrawal.

And that was back in 2005 and 2004.

And keogh, dear, sweet, silly keogh, again you need a big wake-up call. Dearie, it is your logical fallacies that are so continuously, richly on display and exposure on GayPatriot. (Thank you, by the way.)

In this instance, I challenged you to give us superior liberal ideas – meaning that even *ONE* would do – to HELP AMERICA WIN… other than Lieberman’s call to increase troop levels. And implicitly, other than what Bush and our military are already doing.

And you couldn’t even provide one.

You mumbled something about Biden’s and Kerry’s plans – but you couldn’t even name one idea or element of those.

Calarato 1 (or is that 19?) – keogh 0. LOL

Well keogh, I’m grateful you at least approve of Senator Lieberman’s ideas. I’m grateful you didn’t openly exhibit a desire, all too common on the Left, for actual American defeat.

And, whether this is better or worse, in the absence of serious ideas from any Democrats except Lieberman, the nation has no choice but to continue to take President Bush’s. Bye now!

Biden has proposed more troops and a solution to Iraq

Like this headline.

“Biden Opposes Iraq Troop Surge”

And what does keogh claim?

It must suck for you that I am here to point out your logical fallacies

Ironic.

—
Happy New Year! To you All

That’s two without even thinking about it…

His is typical of the comments made at the lefty blogs to which this post links. The left is incapable of commenting on whether or not the execution of Saddam is just, or helpful in the process of moving Iraq forward. Instead, they remained psychotically obssessed with what the right “neo-cons” or “wingnuts” think about the execution, whether it helps Bush or how it can be spun to hurt him. The left is incapable of thinking in terms of problem-solving, their sole fixation is “How do we hurt the right? How do we make sure nothing the right does ever succeeds? What can we bitch about today?”

The left are a sad and bitter people. I saw a bumper sticker today that summed it up: “Make a liberal miserable: Work hard and be happy.”

Or, translated, “I was for the war before I was against it.”

Get real, Richard.

Saddam Hussein had been in power for decades. You mean to tell us that someone who you were so “fiercely against” you allowed to be there for that long?

For God’s sake, your aversion to meaningful action against Saddam was so strong that you tried to elect as President and consider your party’s “conscience” two men who voted AGAINST military action against Saddam when he invaded another country and started figuratively (and literally) raping it. You demanded that we seek the approval of an international body and governments who we knew Saddam was bribing with cheap oil, weapons contracts, and outright cash payments. You and yours buried records of Saddam’s tortures and brutality in the name of “dealing peace” while hyping any mistakes made by US troops. And finally, if it needed to be any clearer, your party head called the removal of Saddam Hussein “unnecessary” and “unjustified”.

Put bluntly, you expect us to believe that you opposed a regime that the record shows you did everything in your power to protect?

The international community did not believe that Saddam had a fair trial. Saddam’s victims are glad, and well they should be. No one is mourning his loss, but the example of Iraqi Justice and due process under a new democracy has a lot more people in the Arab world shaking their heads in disbelief and disgust.

If the neocon idea of making America safer is to export democracy so that it takes root and have people rise up against their oppressive (islamist?) leaders, then this is another example of how badly the far right can botch things. Way to go!

You’re not only delusional, you’re condemning yourselves once again, to the dunce chair of history.

And once again, reading all of these posts above makes the same damn thing clear — you idiots hate liberals far more than you hate anyone who has harmed America – even Osama Bin Laden. How utterly brave of you!