Checkmate.

Regards,
Peter H.

“They advocate our military kill the forces in the world that would behead me.” - Yet they contine to advocate for laws in this country that dont give you the same rights/status as other Americans and advocate flawed death penalty laws which allow for the possibility of the innocent to die at the hands of the state.

“They tend to view the Consitutition as it was written, not as it is wished to be.” - Meanwhile, they have re-defined laws as they wish to fit their whims.

“They tend not view foreign law as revealing of our own law.” - This is clearly evident in their propensity to ignore/redefine international law and international treaties. For example, they’ve redefined “prisoner of war” to “enemy combatants” so they can skirt the Geneva Conventions (of which the US is a signaotry)

“They beleive in Freedom of Speech and they believe in the power of the individual.” - As long as that individual is of a certain financial and social status. They don’t want to hear from individuals who don’t agree with their point of view.

Sanchez never said a word about porn until people found out he was a porn star. Only then did he suddenly hate porn.

Very convenient.

They have a word for people who are passionate about everything: maniac.

Actually, what I asked was if they were anti-HIV campaigners before anyone found out that they had HIV. Sanchez didn’t care about the horrors of porn until after he was outed as a porn star.

Carl, if you were “anti-HIV” before you got it, you would have been using protection so you never got it in the first place. The way you get HIV is by having bareback sex, which makes your being “anti-HIV” hypocritical in the first place.

Go ahead, Carl, say that men who had bareback sex, caught HIV, and then spoke out against bareback sex after they got HIV are hypocrites.

-Bzzzzzzzzzzt! Wrong answer. I sure do.-

How many openly gay people have been given any award or acknowledgement by CPAC?

And it’s funny how many here who go on about the evils of gay liberals have not mentioned NGLTF’s statement supporting Sanchez.

Sort of like how many gay meth users have become antidrug, or gay alcoholics anti-alcohol abuse, or gay smokers anti-smoking, or — my personal favorite — gay orgy practitioners becoming anti-HIV after they get infected.

Are they all self-serving hypocrites too, Carl? Should anyone who’s HIV-positive never speak out against the damaging effects of bareback sex?

I was making a joke about your spelling skills, or lack thereof.

And frankly, I don’t care if you are Druid. YOU are the one taking everything personally. And it is not just me who is saying this. Look around, dear.

For all our “faults” of being conservatives, at least we’re tolerant enough to let you stay on here. If we were part of the GayLeftBorg and you were conservative, you would have been deleted eons ago.

Get a clue.

Regards,
Peter H.

Sanchez, for his part, told Joe.My.God. that “There’s something about the beleaguered gay psyche that wants to prove to the world that everyone is just as messed up as they are.

“So they start off with the term ‘hypocrite’ and work their way backwards looking for signs of deviant behavior in hopes of discovering some type of bastard kinship. That’s why I’ve had the term ’self-loathing’ thrown at me so often. The gay community eats its own in a frenzied hope of self-serving fulfillment.”

jimmy, you forgot to wave your hands wildly in the air while trying to divert attention to you… please see Ian’s “Debate Tips for Lower Case Clanners”, page 47.

And, hey, how about that Newt Gingrich’s affair during the Clinton persecution?

No, there is no theme here! Not at all!!

Didn’t Sanchez define himself by his sexuality for many years? This isn’t exactly his private life being invaded. He made money off of gay men because of his body and porn. Now he is an ardent follower of a party that believes homosexuality and pornography are both wrong. He thinks gays are “deviant” now that he isn’t making money off of them.

It’s self-serving and why this man is a martyr to some here makes no sene to me.

Koser? I’m not koser. I’m not even Jewish.

SNAP! You are dismissed.

Regards,
Peter H.

Again, it’s all very personal to you, isn’t it?

SNAP! You are dismissed.

Regards,
Peter H.

Does a single person on this page actually believe Matt Sanchez would have received that award from CPAC if the truth had been known before hand? Of course not. Therein lies the root of the issue. Hypocrisy. Not the hypocrisy of Matt Sanchez, which we would need more information to evaluate. But the hypocrisy of those who identify themselves as “conservatives” and “moralists.”

This is exactly my point as well.

Had David Horowitz had full disclosure of his background - none of it would have happened, the stint on O’Reilly, or on H&C.

When one believes that a gay lifestyle is impure and sinful as they believe it is and they believe it is referenced in the Bible as such, that is it. That is their belief, period. They believe that you cannot be a Christian and live such a lifestyle, therefore the camps to deprogram such as Exodus.

And frankly, I don’t care if you are Michelle Malkin’s personal toilet cleaner

The same to you Peter. You sound very mean spirited yourself. I obviously do not clean Michelle’s toilets, that is a bit of a atretch. It is hardly funny and what would me being her maid really add to the debate anyway? I mean if I was employed as her domestic help wouldn’t that be personal?

You sound like the koser.