Many of Scott Beauchamp?s (and TNR?s) defenders are attempting to discredit Matt Sanchez?s reports by using his pre-Marine past against him and that past is a doozy: Sanchez admitted months ago that he used to be a gay porn star….

That being said, I figured someone as mean-spirited and as superficial as you would enjoy employing an epithet to those with whom you fear and loathe. So go enjoy your mean little existence and stew in your own self-pity and hate.

Regards,
Peter H.

Massachusetts.

-No, they are not; they still will gladly turn down people with a history of psychotic behavior,-

Wow. So they will take anyone as long as they aren’t psychotic? That’s reassuring.

-And again, what would you call someone who set out to maliciously harm a person professionally and personally-

Pointing out that Matt Sanchez made gay porn for years was not “malicious”. That was his life, and the choices he made. I would say “malicious” is more like what happened in New Hampshire recently, where a Republican made a claim that a gay man who was about to become the head of the state Democratic Party had once possessed child pornography. The attorney general (also a Republican) said that was absolutely no proof of this claim, and exonerated the Democrat, but now this man is always going to be suspected of having child porn.

-Tell me Carl – do you use the word “breeder”-

No. My question is why do you use it? The fact that you have nothing more to say about the matter, and instead need to try to put down gay people (oh, they must think they’re better than straights), suggests you don’t have much to say about Sanchez at this point. No wonder.

Tell me Carl – do you use the word “breeder” and if so, why?

Regards,
Peter H.

No, they are not; they still will gladly turn down people with a history of psychotic behavior, such as you and your fellow leftist gays are displaying in your attempts to destroy another person personally and professionally over them having their picture taken with someone you don’t like.

And anyone can marry a person of the opposite sex

Gays like you would be a danger in the military, Carl; you’ve demonstrated that you will stop at nothing, absolutely nothing, to harm another person over the most trivial things, and you expect us to give you a rifle and hand grenades? You’d be fragging other soldiers for going to a Republican political rally.

One group of people is actively working to take away the rights of gays and lesbians

Really? When was Same-Sex marrage established that you can say that it is being actively taken away?

The point is that they wouldn’t, not that they could. One group of people is actively working to take away the rights of gays and lesbians. One, for all the talk here of how evil and awful they are, is not.

-In short, Carl, military service, marriage, and adoption require that you be of sound mind -

Actually, it doesn’t. The military is desperate to get just about anyone these days. And anyone can marry a person of the opposite sex. That’s the joke of all this. Straight people can basically do what they want even if they are deeply flawed and made a lot of mistakes. Gays, even if they are perfect, cannot come out and serve in the military, or marry the partner they love. And all this on and on about poor Matt Sanchez and how dare anyone point out that he did gay porn for years doesn’t change that.

http://www.heritage.org/Press/Events/ev030507a.cfm

Evan Sayet has been a top Hollywood writer and producer for more than 20 years. His credits range from “The Arsenio Hall Show” to “Politically Incorrect.” After the Sept. 11 attacks, Sayet decided to step from behind the camera and speak out in his own voice – that of one of the nation’s top political satirists. At Heritage, his entertaining yet quite serious lecture will examine the modern liberal “mindset” and how it can lead to siding with evil over good and behaviors that produce failure rather than success

here is a summary about it:

Liberals Have the Mentality of Kindergarteners, Comedian Says
By Monisha Bansal
CNSNews.com Staff Writer
March 06, 2007

(CNSNews.com) – Liberals are wrong about everything and have the mentality of kindergarteners, in the view of conservative comedian and commentator Evan Sayet.

“The Democrats are wrong on quite literally every issue,” Sayet said at the Heritage Foundation in Washington, D.C., on Monday. “They are not just wrong. They are as wrong as wrong can be.

“It’s not just domestic policy. It’s foreign policy. It’s every policy,” he said, adding that liberals are “diametrically opposed to that which is good, right and successful.”

“The modern liberal will invariably side with evil over good, wrong over right, and the behaviors that lead to failure over those that lead to success,” Sayet said.

“How could you possibly live in the freest nation in the history of the world and only see oppression? How could you live in the least imperialist power in human history and see us as the ultimate in imperialism? How can you live in the least bigoted nation in human history … and see racism lurking in every dark shadow?” he asked.

The comedian attributed the trend to a “rejection of all fact, reason, evidence, logic, truth, morality, and decency.”

Sayet also argued that liberals “have the mentality of five-year-olds.”

He said the 1986 Robert Fulghum book, “All I Really Need to Know I Learned in Kindergarten,” “reads like the bible of modern liberalism and the playbook of Democratic Party policy.”

“‘Don’t hit’ has just become ‘War is not the answer,’” Sayet said.

“If we’re going to save America, we must take back the schools, the universities, the media, [and] the entertainment industry,” he said.

http://www.townhall.com/Columnists/KevinMcCullough/2007/03/11/why_christians_embrace_gay_porn_stars?page=full&comments=true

Why Christians Embrace ‘Gay’ Porn Stars
By Kevin McCullough
Sunday, March 11, 2007

Diabolical liberals are once again showing their disdain for homosexuals, and their lack of love for those who struggle with sexual sin. They are adverse to truth about sexual behavior. And when a sexual sinner is brave enough to say so, liberals become the most homophobic mouth foamers the universe has ever seen.

Take the case of Marine Cpl Matt Sanchez. (Also affectionately known as ‘the other CPAC scandal’.)

Following his acceptance of the Jeanne Kirkpatrick Academic Freedom award he was “outed” by homosexual bloggers (bloggers who write about and engage in homosexual behavior) as being a “Gay Porn Star.”

The reason so many of these homosexual bloggers knew this is simple. They are rabid consumers of homosexual pornography and have spent days, months, possibly years in front of their television screens acting out on the urges within them. They have been enslaved by the unforgiving voices that have told them since birth to act upon every sexual urge they have. The thought of personal sexual restraint is foreign to these bloggers. Thus they have near cataclysmic system failure when someone they believed was homosexual turns a corner in his life and leaves that filth behind.

Click here to read the rest.

Do you really think [psychologically] normal people set out to destroy someone personally and professionally because this person had a picture taken with someone they don’t like?

LOL That says it all.

I don’t see how they could; they’re too busy digging through peoples’ pasts, publishing smear to the Internets and other places, and calling up peoples’ bosses, trying to get them fired from their jobs.

Or telling conservative gays to commit suicide.

With your obsessive hatred of Sanchez over a picture, Carl, you and yours make a good case for homosexuality being linked to mental illness. Do you really think normal people set out to destroy someone personally and professionally because this person had a picture taken with someone they don’t like? Do you think that normal people go digging obsessively through other peoples’ pasts, publishing and publicizing anything that could be remotely salacious, to get even? Do you believe that it’s “normal” to call up the boss of a person you don’t like and harass and harangue them, trying to get them fired, like JoeMyGod, Andy Towle, and others are doing – or telling them to commit suicide?

Obviously, there are some of us out here whose sexual orientation does not make them think these actions are normal. But unfortunately, there are far fewer of us than there are of you, Carl; that is why many people have serious reservations about allowing a population like gays, who regularly demonstrate this sort of behavior and claim their homosexuality makes them do it, to have access to children or to legal benefits and protections.

In short, Carl, military service, marriage, and adoption require that you be of sound mind — and the vast majority of gay Democrats and liberals who endorse the sort of behavior we’ve seen used on Sanchez fail on that count.

Carl, give me a break. You can characterize Robbie however you wish, I really don’t care. He’s a big boy and far more capable of defending himself than I can do for him. The Malcontent is one of the blogs besides this one that I regularly read and I know exactly what you are referring to. He was pointing out the hypocrisy of the Left and without being as dramatic as you claim, that liberal gays do indeed treat conservative gays as badly if not worse than the extreme Right at times.

It isn’t gays that pass laws against domestic partnerships, or adopting children, or who want to restore sodomy laws, or reclassify homosexuality as a mental illness, etc.

Too true, hence why such folks are in the extreme Right. If you do read Robbie’s comments than you’ll see he takes them to task a number of times as well. Such does not make him a liberal anymore than critiquing the professionally queer makes him self-hating. What the “homerati” do do is treat those gays who refuse to hew some absurd liberal political line as being traitors, or self-hating, or whatever other assinine thing they care to come up with. If someone is gay they are expected to be part of the declared “groupthink” upon pain of being cast out as not being gay enough.

The military is investigating whether Sanchez violated any of their codes:

Not surprised. There’s a good chance he may lose. It’s hard to say. If you expect me to be happy about that, wrong. I lived under DADT and before anything else for gays want to see this discrminatory policy revoked.

I don’t think that someone taking offense to everything makes them “deviant”. That’s a very loaded word and yet he threw it out there anyway.

Yep, just knowing that people like you would take the bait. Frankly your comments sustain his criticism.

The military is investigating whether Sanchez violated any of their codes:

http://joemygod.blogspot.com/2007/03/it-begins.html

-This wasn’t a generalized condemnation of gays as you claim, but a criticism of what I call the ‘professionally queer’ who seem to enjoy taking offense to everything. -

I don’t think that someone taking offense to everything makes them “deviant”. That’s a very loaded word and yet he threw it out there anyway.

“Martyr”? Please, cut the drama. This snippet is what you are referring to? Give me a break. Perhaps context isn’t your forte or you sensitivity quotient is set on hyper. This wasn’t a generalized condemnation of gays as you claim, but a criticism of what I call the ‘professionally queer’ who seem to enjoy taking offense to everything. Frankly, Robbie over on The Malcontent nailed this one right when he wrote:

This is about enforcing ideological conformity in the gay community with an almost Stalinist zeal. It has nothing to do with hypocrisy. I’m afraid Sanchez has it exactly right. It’s difficult to watch the reaction to him on the lefty queerosphere without the keen sense of “See! He’s just as fucked up as we are!” This is not a good face for us to present to the outside world. We’re here, we’re queer, we’re outrageously insecure about who we are. The notion of pride is just a little bit flimsier when these reactions take hold.

Why are you suddenly supporting DADT?

Look up “Tim McVeigh” and “AOL”.

And go tell Tim that he deserved to be discharged because he posted his sexual orientation on AOL.

And as for your quote, the “they” he is referring to are gay people. GAYS are looking for signs of behavior THEY deem “deviant”.

Yes, I would, NDT. He knew the rules of DADT and he violated them. He deserved to be thrown out if he posted on an AOL profile that he was gay.

-Did Joe forget to post this supposed comment by Sanchez, because try as I might I just cannot find it in the interview found on his blog.-

It’s right here:

http://joemygod.blogspot.com/2007/03/matt-sanchez-responds-sort-of.html

“So, they start off with the term hypocrite and work their way backwards looking for signs of deviant behavior in hopes of discovering some type of bastard kinship.”

Why are gay men here trying to make a martyr out of a man who thinks you are deviant?