You would have to save Maher first since he’s already identified himself as a wuss. Yet because Ann is a strong conservative woman, she will already have kicked Islamic tail, overpowered the guard and converted him to Christianity.

Maher, on the other hand, would be trying to convince the guard to let him go and would have willingly converted to Islam.

See? There really ARE “two Americas” out there.

Regards,
Peter H.

Let’s save Maher, addict him to heroin, then withhold fixes.

Unfortunately, these same people have lives more shallow than a puddle.

Regards,
Peter H.

By Evan Sayet:

In my series of lectures entitled “Regurgitating the Apple: How Modern Liberals ‘Think’”, I summarize the dominant force in today’s Democratic Party’s philosophy by saying that “in order to eliminate discrimination, the Modern Liberal has opted to become utterly indiscriminate.”

The Modern Liberal is convinced that rational and moral thought is so contaminated by one’s predispositions and prejudices that the only way to eliminate the evils of discrimination from society is to eliminate all thought. It’s why the “think” in the title of my talks is in quotation marks. The reality is that Modern Liberals not only do not think, they consider thought to be an act of evil.

…

It is not a surprise, in fact it could be no other way, then, that in San Francisco — the most Liberal city in America — thousands of people marched down the street recently in favor of Hezbollah, the vicious terrorist organization seeking not only the destruction of the democracy of Israel, but an oppressive Caliphate the world over.

Nor is it surprising to see these same folks championing Tookie Williams, the founder of America’s most vicious and murderous terror gang. Nor is it surprising that in France — the de facto capitol of today’s Democrat party — Jews are murdered on streets named after cop killers and terrorists.

…

It’s why the Democrats adore the United Nations, where there is utter indiscriminateness of thought, with no special rewards for good and free and democratic nations like, say, Australia, nor any special punishments for the most murderous of terror states like The Sudan. Here, too, indiscriminateness of thought does not bring about indiscriminateness of policy, but rather an incessant attack upon one of the great states of the world, Israel.

lets face it, the republican party is a joke, an absolute joke. the republicans put profit over people and they have serious contempt for privacy…republicans want to tell women what they can and can’t do with their bodies; they want to tell people who they can and can’t marry; they want to tell people how and when they can die and they have no problem with warrantless spying on one another.

the bushco administration picked an illegal and immoral war with an enemy who did not attack us. this war has cost thousands of american lives and at over $2 BILLION a week that we’re adding to the national tab only hurts our future generations. of course the people on this forum can’t see the forest for the trees.

wake up before it’s too late.

Maher will probably volunteer for the next attempt on Cheney’s life.

(I will weigh in with my answer after everyone else has taken a shot.)

Regards,
Peter H.

Now THAT is funny, and oh-so-apt.

Murtha is lucky that his own platoon didn’t kill him in action and make it look like an “accident.” And yes that is my opinion. Deal with it.

Regards,
Peter H.

“Nevermind civility. I can handle uncivil persons. The worship of outrage is what I think we should do away with. It shuts down communication, vilifies the other, and ensures that no questions need be answered, no argument presented, and no case made.”

Certainly not by the standards set by right-wing radio and Fox News shows.

For instance….

God people.. give it a rest.

You may not agree the content of his statements but it’s not really what the right-wing noise machine is claiming he said. Read the whole transcript here:

http://www.safesearching.com/billmaher/transcripts/t_hbo_realtime_030207.html

In particular read what his guests have to say about the comments that appeared and which were removed at the Huffington Post (these are the comments which lamented the fact that Cheney was not killed in Afghanistan). Maher is clearly prodding the discussion by taking an extreme pro-free speech position but he is not saying that he himself wishes Cheney had been killed. In addition, he allows the guests (when they’re not talking over each other) to offer their sensible critiques of his questions and statments. As much as some people would clearly like to pretend, it’s simply not that outrageous or out of bounds. Certainly not by the standards set by right-wing radio and Fox News shows.

Can we forget Coulter’s jokes like: “We need somebody to put rat poisoning in Justice Stevens’ creme brulee,” or saying of John Murtha that he’s “the reason soldiers invented fragging?” These weren’t “devils advocate” positions in a high-spirited but reasonably intelligent discussion, these were just cheap, nasty and violent laugh lines.

I like this: “I have little stomach for either Ann Coulter of Bill Maher for they pose as pundits when more often than not, they make outrageous attention in order to get media attention. In that way, they’re not much different from the media-hungry denizens of Hollywood.”

Isn’t GPW a resident of LA? Doesn’t he run a blog? Didn’t the blog get covered in the Advocate? Isn’t GPW a media-hungry denizen?