GayPatriot

The Internet home for American gay conservatives.

Another Sept. 10th Liberal Goes Crazy

by

Get a load of this crap.

On May 8, 1991, in a room in the hotel from where I now write – then called the Excelsior but since converted into a ducks-marching-through-the-lobby member of the Peabody chain – Mr. Clinton is alleged to have sexually harassed Paula Jones. His initial refusal to settle the case Ms. Jones brought against him led to depositions, and those depositions eventually led to a young intern in a beret.

And you know the rest: a blue dress, the ham-handed attempt to impeach, hanging chads in Florida, four hijacked airplanes, Afghanistan, “W” landing in his green flight suit, Abu Ghraib, and our continuing, intractable mess in Mesopotamia.

It’s a long way from a sleepy capital city on the banks of the Arkansas River to chaotic sectarian slaughter along the banks of the Euphrates River a mere 10 years later, and a trip that cannot be made with fishing trawler. But apparently, a well-financed political fishing expedition will get you there.

Oh read the whole thing.  It is priceless lunacy.  This dude is a political science professor at the University of Maryland, Baltimore County.  (I guess the main Maryland Campus was too good for him?)  Gee, I wonder if his students leave his classes hating America, hating the President and wishing Republicans and US military forces in Iraq were dead?  Nah, I’m sure he keeps his personal political beliefs to himself in the classroom.   (yeah, right)

I decided a response to Professor Schaller was in order.  So I emailed him.

Wow.   You have really drunk the Clinton Kool Aid.

How can you possibly weave your tale of the right-wing conspiracy to tie Mrs. Clinton’s land deal schemes in with the attacks of 9/11?

[GP Ed. Note – In my haste and astonishment, I failed to realize that in fact he never mentioned the land deals…. I guess I just assumed they were in his wild tale.  My bad.  But you get the point!]

You are one twisted soul, my friend.

Now if you were truly intellectually honest, you would admit that in 1997 we only THOUGHT things were honkey-dorey because the Clinton brigade was ignoring the threat posed by an organized, worldwide global Islamic terror movement.  Four years later, and after many warnings and failed action by Clinton and his cronies, 3,000 Americans would be killed (not by the Bush Administration) but by a team of warriors from a worldwide global movement to destroy Western democracies.

Clinton let all of us down.  So don’t kid yourself that 1997 was some great idyllic Garden of Eden.  It was merely a window-dressed time of false economic growth and false sense of security produced by a man-child as President.

Finally, get some real journalistic balls and start reporting on the threat to all of us by the worldwide Islamic terror organizations.

You as a journalist, and I as a gay man, would be the first people beheaded if the Islamists were given the chance.

[GP Ed. Note – Also in my haste, I either promoted or insulted him by labeling him a journalist, rather than columnist/professor.  Either way, a liberal professor would be high on bin Laden’s chopping block.]

Think about that while you take another sip of your Clinton Kool Aid.

‘Nuf said.

-Bruce (GayPatriot)

Comments

  3. I respect you for taking the fight to the man, speaking truth to power and all that. Frankly, I’ve lost the fire to debate with lefties. And I think part of the reason is the overwhelming sense of futility about it.

    And it’s not just the old style futility that comes from the place where conservatives argue with with facts and logic while lefties argue with slogans and feelings, and so end up talking past each other. It’s a new sense of futility in that, even if we (or I) win the argument, it doesn’t do any good, because there is no one, in either party, in power in Washington who is really going to do what it takes to win against Islamo-Fascism.

    Which gets back to my sense about the next election. Maybe Rudy is marginally better than Hillary on World War IV. But he still has nowhere near the necessary will to actually name the enemy and actually do what it takes to beat them. And Hilldog is a veritable hawk compared to the rest of the surrendercrats running.

  5. My favorite quote has to be this one:

    In the dark world of Republican skullduggery, no bad deed goes unrewarded.

    I just love the stale “vast right wing conspiracy [of doom, and evil and every other bad thing]” flavor of the statement.

    And what of this aside about the hotel:

    then called the Excelsior but since converted into a ducks-marching-through-the-lobby member of the Peabody chain

    Is that supposed to be some witty jibe at “vast [evil] corporations” and the way they “assimilate the little guy”? Can’t this guy stick to the already over-broad topic at hand?

  7. Meanwhile, back in the post-9/11 world, a senior al-Qaeda operative has been turned over by the CIA to US forces in Gitmo.

    Did I also happen to mention that he is an IRAQI who was caught trying to return to his native country to manage al-Qaida’s affairs and possibly focus on operations outside Iraq against Western targets?

    Or that he had also been caught talking to al-Qaeda in IRAN as well?

    Wonder if the Dhimmicrats will demand his release as an “innocent bystander?”

    Regards,
    Peter H.

  10. #4:

    Giuliani will save us all. Well, most of us.

    Yes, jimmy, Rudy is just another Republick flip-flopper down on his knees before NDT’s bff James Dobson. And after all the Rudy-worship on this blog! Now watch all the usual suspects go back to their mantra of “I don’t need anyone to validate my union, blah, blah, blah.” BTW, I’m still waiting for some evidence of Rudy’s brilliance in fighting terrorists. The only thing I can find he did – apart from making tons of money off his 9/11 publicity shots – was to situate the NYC Office of Emergency Management in WTC Building 7 – Doh! So come on all you Rudy-lovers, just what exactly did the guy do that makes him so well qualified to fight terrorists?

  11. LOL…..Ian, since you and your fellow Democrat gays are handing over money and endorsements to FMA supporters, exactly what are you yelling about?

    Furthermore, show me a Democrat candidate who favors requiring states to recognize civil unions from other states, or who supports mandating civil unions as equivalent to marriage. Their own party leader has made it clear that Democrats share the same values as Pat Robertson.

    And then I love your clueless statement here:

    BTW, I’m still waiting for some evidence of Rudy’s brilliance in fighting terrorists. The only thing I can find he did – apart from making tons of money off his 9/11 publicity shots – was to situate the NYC Office of Emergency Management in WTC Building 7 – Doh!

    And yet, New York City’s emergency response was lauded as an example of brilliance under fire and leadership making good decisions — even with their OEM being unusable.

    In contrast, when a Democrat mayor and governor’s emergency response center was destroyed by Hurricane Katrina, the entire system collapsed completely. Emergency services vanished, police began looting and intimidating the people they were supposed to protect, and the governor and mayor started blaming everyone but themselves for the city’s utter lack of preparation, collapsed infrastructure, and inability to function at all.

    Yet when the same happened to a Republican mayor and governor, not only did they adjust, the services performed brilliantly.

    The lesson is quite clear. Democrats are helpless to do anything but blame racism in an emergency. Republicans actually accomplish something.

  12. Hey Ian, a suggestion for you.

    Next time you intend your comments, like in #11, to be a parody of the nonsensical FarLeft dribble… you might want to let others know at the outset by indicating “sarcasm on” and at the end “sarcasm off”.

    Honest, there might be some wayward reader who ventures into your comments and misconstrues the humor and parody of it all as an actual opinion or something that’s informed by facts.

    I know, I know… little chance of that normally… but still.

  13. #12 – And ND30, that reminds me – when exactly is Shrillary going to talk publicly about her meeting with the HRC and her “ring-kissing” experience there? Or is she afraid it won’t play well in Iowa?

    Hypocrisy, thy name is liberalism.

    Regards,
    Peter H.

  14. ***Frankly, I’ve lost the fire to debate with lefties. And I think part of the reason is the overwhelming sense of futility about it.***

    (V The K – #3) It’s hard to debate someone who refuses the delivery of facts and complete info. Leftists only want 1/2 truths, if any truth at all. They manage to change the subject, from one talking point to another, when things don’t go exactly how they staged it in their little pea brains. I hate to repeat myself, but it’s yet ANOTHER example of leftists standing on their heads and telling the rest of us we’re upside down. Their reality is usually the opposite of what’s real.

  15. The article of this thread that GP lambastes because this guy is “living in a post 9-11 world”
    Yet of course, the emotional, fearfilled Bruce fails to point out the obvious truth: Iraq had nothing to do with 9-11!
    And that is what this guy was appears to be complaining about.
    He guesses that we would not be in Iraq if Gore would have won. Afghanistan, yes, but not the preemptive horribly planed, Iraq policing that we are currently doing. And how is he wrong for thinking that?

    And LNC – you are on record as advocating the nuking of Fallujah.
    So you are not in a good position to be talking about “reality”

  16. keogh — as usual, your reading comprehension skills are less than desireable.

    My post would suggest that the liberal professor lives in a “PRE” 9/11 world, not a “POST” 9/11 world. That… is… why… I … call… people… like …you… September 10thers. (I figured I should talk slow so he got it).

    Also, I am far from “fearfilled”. After all, I didn’t hide scared in my house when I was a child because I was gay which prevented me from getting a car….

  17. ***And LNC – you are on record as advocating the nuking of Fallujah.
    So you are not in a good position to be talking about “reality”***

    Coming from you, keogh, I take that as a compliment.

    Have a weekend.

  19. Meanwhile, keogh, while you and the other lower case clan here defend the Democrats’ plan to cut & run, can you admit that the Bush Administration had some success today in capturing the #4 or 5th guy in alQaeda… one of the leaders of the paramilitary groups operating in Afghanistan, one of the co-conspirators in 9-11, one of the elusive terrorists who probably knows where Osama bin Laden is and has been?

    Abd al-Hadi al-Iraqi, a Kurdish Iraqi.

    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18350966

    Thank God for the Patriot Act. Thank God Bush isn’t treating these terrorists as “law enforcement problem”. Thank God for our willing and supportive allies in Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Iraq and Afghanistan who worked with us and then turned this scum over to us for some serious interrogation at Gitmo.

    Now, if we can just keep him out of the hands of those well-meaning Democrats and ACLU types.

    Eh, keogh?

  21. I know it’s heresy, but I’m actually starting to like Hilldog just a little bit. I’m sure it’s more a measure of my disgust with Republicans than anything else, but she’s by far the least radical of the Democrats currently running. Barack Obama actually votes left of Kucinich, and managed to babble his way through a “how would you respond to a terrorist attack” answer in the recent debate without ever once mentioning a military response.

  22. Where was the conspiracy theory in that article? All the professor was pointing out was the domino effect of history, how one event leads to another. If the Paula Jones case had never happened, there would have likely been no Monica, no impeachment, no President Bush and no invasion of Iraq.

    It’s like one of those sci-fi movies. You go back in time long enough, killing a mere butterfly changes the entire course of history.

    And of course, you’re welcome to believe that President Bush has been a more effective leader than President Clinton, but that’s a minority position. By 2-1, most Americans believe otherwise.

    http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/05/12/bush.clinton.poll/index.html

  23. In #11, Ian has pointed out something interesting. It appears that Rudy missed the memo that the rest of us in the VRWC got about the planned 9/11 attacks.

    If he’d received the memo, he would have move the EOC.

    Of course, he may have received the memo and decided to sacrifice the EOC so as to not raise suspicion.

    Note to lefties: this is satire (maybe not very good, but satire nonetheless). It is not fact so don’t get your boxers in a bunch!

    #22 makes a point, too. Let’s revise and extend his remarks to say that if Bill had remained faithful to Hilldog and not harassed his employees, there would have been no Monica and no impeachement. If he’d been paying attention to Al-Queda in the 90s, Al Gore may have been prez and there may have been no need to invade Afghanistan and Iraq.

  24. h my, and let’s not forget that 9-11 happened cuz condi was inept (an still is) and that ashcroft had is nose burried so deep in new orleans porn that his fundamentalist mind couldn’t see straight.

  25. #23:

    If he’d received the memo, he would have move the EOC.

    Actually, Rudy himself established the EOM center in the WTC after the first attack on the WTC. Well, one might say anyone could have been dumb enough to put such a facility in a known target but Rudy is not just anyone, he’s running for President based on his vaunted anti-terrorism skills. Which as far as I can see aren’t exactly brilliant. Now NDT believes that Rudy’s skills were in evidence on 9/11 but aside from showing up on TV and looking good, I’m not exactly sure what else was particularly impressive. Of course we found out later that there was lousy communication between the police and firemen and that probably contributed to the high number of fatalities among the firemen.

    Again I will ask all those Rudy supporters, what specific things did he do prior to 9/11 that make him so superior in the area of anti-terrorism?

  26. Ok so I’m watching the debate last night and the Democrat party represents about half the country. And these 8 people are the best choices that party has, to possibly lead the country during this crutial time in our history. There’s no way that’s possible.
    Dennis Kucinich who is kookier than Dukakis but less attractive. Joe “the plagerist” Biden. Sen Chris Dodd who is famous for making waitress sandwiches with Sen Kennedy and being on Imus. Sen Barry Hussien Obama who has two, that’s 2 years experience in the US Senate. But I guess as Sen Biden said he is “clean and articulate.” Code words for what? The only thing Biden didn’t call Obama was a good athlete. And oh, this guy former Sen Gravel of Alaska at least he has the onions to say what most Dems believe, “retreat from Iraq now, run as fast as we can, but run.” Gov Richardson of Arizona or New Mexico or Nevada…one of those. These are the best Democrats out of our country of 300 million people? I don’t believe it. Is Hillary basically being given a pass?

  27. Speaking of Barack Hussien Obama, a suggestion for a future thread. Could we list the members of the Senate who have 2 years of experience or less and all their accomplishments? We could see why they might also be thought of as top tier candidates for President.

  28. #20:

    Thank God for the Patriot Act.

    I don’t see anything to suggest that the Patriot [sic] Act had anything to do with the capture of al-Iraqi. Nor do I see anything to suggest he was a 9/11 co-conspirator. That said, it’s great that they got him but I suspect it was some of that police work that you hold in such contempt that enabled us to nail him.

  29. #27:

    Gov Richardson of Arizona or New Mexico or Nevada…one of those.

    Typical smug Easterner. But hey, thanks for all those Congressional seats you’re sending out west!

  30. Is that supposed to be some witty jibe at “vast [evil] corporations” and the way they “assimilate the little guy”?

    No. It’s a slam of a southern icon.

    was to situate the NYC Office of Emergency Management in WTC Building 7

    Oh. So not only are you a lawyer and scientician, but you also play a Emergency Manager online. I’ll bite. As a fellow EM professional, I’d love to know where you’d have put it. Perhaps The Meadowlands?

    Of course we found out later that there was lousy communication between the police and firemen and that probably contributed to the high number of fatalities among the firemen.

    As a fellow EM professional, I’d love to see you explain how that comment makes sense to you.

    By 2-1, most Americans believe otherwise.

    Just given the wide margins, it’s clear that the poll is heavily weighted toward liberals. Example:

    on taxes, it was 51 percent to 35 percent for Clinton;

    Only a liberal would think that the highest tax rates ever would be a good thing.

    and on handling natural disasters, it was 51 percent to 30 percent, also favoring Clinton.

    Forgetting, of course, that it took James Lee Witt 3 WEEKS to respond to the destruction of Hurricane Floyd. Which, at that time, was the most destructive storm in history. Nevermind that it took lord BJ 4 DAYS to get around to visiting N. Carolina.

    Further, how about the fact that BJ couldn’t have been bothered with the first WTC attack?

    The same was true for a question on handling national security: 46 percent said Clinton performed better; 42 percent picked Bush.

    And Clinton did what, exactly, for national security? Frankly, I don’t think gutting the military to the point they can’t afford bullets qualifies. However, libs would think so.

    Shall I go on?

  32. Just given the wide margins, it’s clear that the poll is heavily weighted toward liberals.

    Well, yes. Reality is known to have a strong liberal bias.

    At this point in President Clinton’s second term, his approval rating was double President Bush’s current approval rating. President Clinton was popular. President Bush… not so much.

    Hence, why the 2-1 ratio is not very surprising. Most Republicans like yourself still support the President. Independents and Democrats do not. Each bloc comprises about a third of the country.

    That’s why Bush’s approval rating is stuck around 33% and why President Clinton is favored over Bush by a 2-1 margin.

    When it comes to opinion of President Bush, it’s the Independents and Democrats VS. the Republicans.

    There’s your 2-1.

  34. Could we list the members of the Senate who have 2 years of experience or less and all their accomplishments?

    If B.O. had the exact same experience, the exact same accomplishments, and the exact same positions but was white, would he be treated as anything but a joke?

    Racism is alive and well in the Democrat party.

  37. On another political note. Carl Bernstein is coming out with a new Biography of Hillary Rodman Clinton. 640 pages. Yes 640 pages. How many pages is a typical biography of say, FDR, Reagan, Lincoln? Save you some trouble, it ain’t 640 pages. This bio is suppose to be fairly negative and dwells on Hillary’s “untruthfullness”, which as you know disqualifies anyone from serving as President in the future. So it appears as though the Democrat field will be wittled down fairly quickly to Richardson, Kucinich, Gavel and Edwards, you know Edwards, the “green” candidate in the field. hehe

  38. Gene, only if Bernstein treats Shrillary as if she were a Republican. If he treats her like the typical Dhimmicrat, it will be a Whitewater – er, I mean whitewash.

    Freudian slip, y’know? 😉

    Regards,
    Peter H.

  40. Missed the November elections, did you?

    You mean the elections where the liberals won a meaningless majority? Nope. But I’d be willing to bet that folks missed Queen Nan and gReid in the two weeks leading up to the election. Even more, everybody missed any mention by the liberals of what they stand for.

  41. The libs didn’t win the November elections, the Republicans lost it through their arrogance and greed. Their motto for 2006 might as well have been, “Sure, we’re arrogant and greedy, but thanks to our Get Out the Vote operation, we think we’ll win anyway.”

    They also show no signs of having learned anything from their loss.

  42. #33 is it the objective and purpose of President to get elected then leave office with a high approval rating? Is that why they get elected? If so President Clinton hit a home run. Most thoughtful people want the chance to be President to accomplish great things. Clinton did not. He spent the whole second term trying not to alienate anyone. To keep those approval ratings high. His advisor at the time Dick Morris has said as much. They attempted nothing hard or challenging that would make any constituent mad. So list the accomplishmnets of the 8 year Clinton Administration.
    Most Dems can give you 3 maybe 4 before they get to Family Leave Act.
    Included are Welfare Reform which most leftists hated. And the old standby great economy. But they won’t give Bush credit for the same.
    But that’s it folks. 8 years. No S Securty reform, no medicare reform, no pension reform, no tax cuts, not tort reform, no energy policy etc etc.
    Bush and the brave American soldier has freed 45 million souls from tyranny. And has set worldwide terrorism back on its heals. We will get attacked again. I pray we have a President who isn’t worried about his/her opinion polls of the day and rains down hell on the terrorists heads and ends this. It will require a united American people. Not one fractured by partisian politics. With one party who’s goal is the sheer acquisition of power for power’s sake.