Comments on: Going Anti-Green

By: Flu-Bird

Flu-Bird — Mon, 16 Nov 2009 04:26:23 +0000

Paul Watson is a enviromental extremists who runs the radical SEA SHEPARDS he is nothing but a radical that TIME has named as a HERO OF THE PLANET he should be ignored as the crazy insane green nutcase he truly is

By: Green Grounded » Blog Archive » Face of Sustainability

Green Grounded » Blog Archive » Face of Sustainability — Mon, 23 Mar 2009 20:34:24 +0000

[...] just humor blogs… and some, I frankly could not tell how serious they were. Â Just look here, here, here and here for a few examples of these [...]

By: Maria

Maria — Tue, 17 Feb 2009 16:48:21 +0000

Modern Movement has organised a demonstration against flight rationing:

Support Airport Expansion: Thursday 19 February, 17.30 -19.30 on Parliament Square, East Footway, London

For more details, see: http://www.modernmovement.org.uk/index.php

â€œThe extension of flying to millions of people has been a liberation. Most of us can now afford to go on holiday and welcome the cheapening of air travel allowing us to fly abroad. The development of aviation infrastructure is crucial to allow ever more people to fly.

Join us in front of Parliament to argue for guilt-free travel, for ever-cheaper flights and for freedom of movement.â€

Spread the word!

By: Matt

Matt — Sun, 19 Oct 2008 10:41:33 +0000

Hey, I like the blog! I really like this post too, because I’m the self-proclaimed leader of the anti-green movement. Take a look at my blog at http://www.GoAntiGreen.com. Keep up the good work!

By: Helena

Helena — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 23:28:22 +0000

Oh, how wonderfully refreshing to read that someone else in this insane world feels the same way as I do about the ecoMENTALists.

On the subject of toilet paper… I certainly use as much as possible at the office where I work. In fact, since they got rid of hand towels and tried to force us to use horrid ‘air’ dryers instead, I have found that extra toilet paper needs to be used to dry my hands…

Plus of course I always leave the light on after I’ve finished.

It’s the little things that give me a warm glow.

By: David B

David B — Sat, 19 May 2007 13:23:18 +0000

How is saying that only those who are who are “responsible and completely dedicated to the responsibility” should become parents “global genocide”. Has this guy got the right solution? I don’t know but he is at least facing up to the problem.

David

By: ILoveCapitalism

ILoveCapitalism — Fri, 18 May 2007 04:40:36 +0000

Oh, Vince Vince Vince… you missed a chance to say, “Ian, I really don’t care enough about YOU to do more of your research and thinking for you.”

By: Vince P

Vince P — Fri, 18 May 2007 03:42:28 +0000

ian: I really dont care enough about this to do more research on it..

By: Ian S

Ian S — Fri, 18 May 2007 03:39:43 +0000

#92: More phony quotes. Par for the course.

By: North Dallas Thirty

North Dallas Thirty — Thu, 17 May 2007 17:57:28 +0000

You can’t even present a rational argument; for example, for something to be unusual does not imply that it has never before happened.

Oh, so you mean the earth’s temperature might have increased or decreased before when there WASN’T what you claim is “human intervention” around?

Do tell.

By: Ian S

Ian S — Thu, 17 May 2007 04:14:13 +0000

#90: Vince, check out realclimate.org for plenty of info but I warn you the discussion gets a bit technical and anticipates a rudimentary understanding of physics and chemistry especially thermodynamics. The wind shear hypothesis (i.e. that climate change will increase the amount of vertical shear) may very well be true for some regions at some times but it’s still uncertain and I’d remind you that those proposing the hypothesis suggest that expected climate change will actually reduce the wind shear in some parts of the tropics. What we do know is that warmer air temperatures above water will increase the surface temperature of that water. Furthermore we know that higher surface water temperatures provide more thermal energy for the hurricanes passing over them. All other things equal, higher surface water temperatures will yield more powerful storms.

By: Vince P

Vince P — Thu, 17 May 2007 01:47:21 +0000

Ian: we already explained , if anything, the wind sheer will weaken the hurricanes that you say are getting stronger… and you have nothing to back up your view other than the phoney bs of “ITS HOTTER STUPID, OF COURSE TEH STORM WILL BE WORSE”

That might be how you Lefties talk to each other, but we require something more than that.

By: Ian S

Ian S — Thu, 17 May 2007 01:35:15 +0000

#87: You truly have an active imagination. You just make sh!t up like the “not scientific” quote you attribute to me. Do you have imaginary friends as well? You can’t even present a rational argument; for example, for something to be unusual does not imply that it has never before happened.

By: Peter Hughes

Peter Hughes — Wed, 16 May 2007 19:32:23 +0000

Boy, Ian spins more often than Lynda Carter did in four seasons of “Wonder Woman.”

Regards,
Peter H.

By: North Dallas Thirty

North Dallas Thirty — Wed, 16 May 2007 16:07:40 +0000

Not so, Ian. You claimed that what happened with Katrina was unusual — which makes the obvious argument that it had never happened before in the history of the world.

As for your claim of “not scientific”, you’re the one making the argument that ocean temperatures have never varied, increased, or decreased in the history of the world before you discovered “global warming”.

By: Vince P

Vince P — Wed, 16 May 2007 01:37:11 +0000

If that’s your theory then show us that the water + air temp was unusual. How would a hurricane know that “global warming” was going on .. do they have memory? Dont they just react to the current conditions at the time they exist? So were the conditions unusual?

By: Ian S

Ian S — Wed, 16 May 2007 01:23:17 +0000

#84: Two words: Heat Transfer. Look it up.

By: Vince P

Vince P — Wed, 16 May 2007 01:16:44 +0000

Um.. what does water tempature (the thing that was warm in the Gulf) have to do with Global Warming (the hypothesis that the air tempature is rising) ?

By: Ian S

Ian S — Wed, 16 May 2007 00:22:31 +0000

#82:

your argument was that it had never happened before in the history of the world.

My argument was no such thing. I used Katrina as an example of what happens to hurricane intensity when it passes over warmer water. In Katrina’s case, it went from cat 1 to cat 5 in very short order. It’s not magic, it’s simply a matter of the thermodynamics involved in hurricanes.

Speaking of hypotheses, I suspect that there’s a direct correlation between the intensity of denial of human-induced climate change and the intensity of belief in a god(s). Odd too, since there’s plenty of scientific evidence for global warming and none for god(s).

By: North Dallas Thirty

North Dallas Thirty — Tue, 15 May 2007 23:41:44 +0000

Even you can’t be so dense as to not understand the relationship between high ocean surface temperature and hurricane strength.

Read my quote again, Ian.

Yes, because we know THAT never happened before in all the history of the world.

I didn’t deny in the least that it happened.

I simply pointed out that your argument was that it had never happened before in the history of the world.

Leftists like yourself, you see, insist that hurricanes never strengthened moving over the Gulf of Mexico, or other warm-water areas, before you discovered “global warming”.