Let’s see how fast the GayLibLeft starts to squeal THEN.

Regards,
Peter H.

’nuff said

As for St. Patrick’s Day parades, the people who run New York’s parade also does not gay Irish groups march under a banner. I don’t know how far the justice system the suits went, but it was always ruled that the homophobic jerk that runs the parade can disallow whatever groups he wants. I guess that’s fine, but I also wonder if the city could also deny the permit. Anyway, as long as the parade disallows gay persons, then I’ll continue to do what Rudy Giuliani did and boycott the parade.

The permit issue I don’t get either. It’s always been granted to the papist Ancient Order of Hibernians. Why couldn’t it be granted to the United Loyal Orange Lodge in New York instead? It would be nice to see orange instead of green on St. Patrick for a change. Or has the order monopolized on the permits over a century ago?

Seriously though, the city should have a more neutral organization to run the parade. Heck, even the gay Irish organizations should try acquiring it. As for the Hibernians, I wish them the same fate that struck the Know Nothings.

The suit sounds like it is more of an attempt to smack eharmony than any real desire for their services.

Then again, she might just be some self-loathing gay person with too much time on her hands. Or a young lawyer’s wet dream.

But this isn’t the first, and won’t be the last frivolous lawsuit. The real problem is that the justice system allows these lawsuits to happen.

Pat, I agree.

Anyway, as long as the parade disallows gay persons, then I’ll continue to do what Rudy Giuliani did and boycott the parade.

Another example of personal freedom, or “the market at work”. Again I agree.

Word.

As for St. Patrick’s Day parades, the people who run New York’s parade also does not gay Irish groups march under a banner. I don’t know how far the justice system the suits went, but it was always ruled that the homophobic jerk that runs the parade can disallow whatever groups he wants. I guess that’s fine, but I also wonder if the city could also deny the permit. Anyway, as long as the parade disallows gay persons, then I’ll continue to do what Rudy Giuliani did and boycott the parade.

A better title would have been Suit Against eHarmony Threatens Common Sense and Intelligence

Had it been me, I would have realized that there’s no man seeking a man option and moved on. However, I don’t consider myself the consumate victim. At the same time, CVS Pharmacy doesn’t carry Blue Bell Ice Cream. I know I can get it at Publix, up the road at Walgreens or down the road at WalMart. It would never occur to me to sue CVS just because I can’t get my Mint Chocolate Chip there.

But considering today’s society, thanks to the liberals and their Tort Law buddies, I can sue WalMart for not carrying Newcastle Brown Ale or Shiner Bock. Long story short, I believe this woman revels in victimhood or she’s a spoiled brat, or both.

Frankly, I’m thinking about suing Bruce and Dan for not providing enough liberal tampons, like Keogh, to run off.

But the swipe–seemingly required for posts on here–at “gay activists” is gratuitious. “While gay activists were gnashing their teeth over their defeat at the nation’s highest court, I think they were short-sighted in their dismay. Had they won, then ex-gays and anti-gay groups would have had the right to march in Gay Pride parades.” Gay Irish people were gnashing their teeth… Gay and straight are ‘opposite’ categories. Irish and gay are not.