<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Muchos Gracias, Senatress Graham!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gaypatriot.net/2007/06/25/muchos-gracias-senatress-graham/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2007/06/25/muchos-gracias-senatress-graham/</link>
	<description>The Internet home for American gay conservatives.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:15:33 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Politics: 2008 HQ &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Muchos Gracias, Senatress Graham!</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2007/06/25/muchos-gracias-senatress-graham/comment-page-1/#comment-68314</link>
		<dc:creator>Politics: 2008 HQ &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Muchos Gracias, Senatress Graham!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 20:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=2563#comment-68314</guid>
		<description>[...] Original post by GayPatriot [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Original post by GayPatriot [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2007/06/25/muchos-gracias-senatress-graham/comment-page-1/#comment-68313</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 19:03:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=2563#comment-68313</guid>
		<description>I finally saw the video.  I agree that Graham&#039;s support for the current immigration bill should come into question for his re-election bid.  But, GP, could you explain &quot;senatress&quot; in the title.  Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I finally saw the video.  I agree that Graham&#8217;s support for the current immigration bill should come into question for his re-election bid.  But, GP, could you explain &#8220;senatress&#8221; in the title.  Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Hughes</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2007/06/25/muchos-gracias-senatress-graham/comment-page-1/#comment-68310</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Hughes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 14:33:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=2563#comment-68310</guid>
		<description>#2 - &quot;well, those illegal workers are on par with their law abiding American employers; they didn’t pay taxes either, so they’re all quite even, right?&quot;

First off, your argument is so devoid of intelligence that it is lamentable.  How can you possibly equate the two? It&#039;s like comparing apples to pineapples.

Second, the point is not that &quot;law-abiding American employers&quot; didn&#039;t pay taxes.  They did - to the extent that they could with illegal aliens on the payroll.

What you are conveniently forgetting is that the IRS can keep tabs on employers through their filings.  How do you keep tabs on someone here in this country illegally with forged (or non-existent) documents?

(Crickets chirping.)

I thought so.

Regards,
Peter H.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#2 &#8211; &#8220;well, those illegal workers are on par with their law abiding American employers; they didn’t pay taxes either, so they’re all quite even, right?&#8221;</p>
<p>First off, your argument is so devoid of intelligence that it is lamentable.  How can you possibly equate the two? It&#8217;s like comparing apples to pineapples.</p>
<p>Second, the point is not that &#8220;law-abiding American employers&#8221; didn&#8217;t pay taxes.  They did &#8211; to the extent that they could with illegal aliens on the payroll.</p>
<p>What you are conveniently forgetting is that the IRS can keep tabs on employers through their filings.  How do you keep tabs on someone here in this country illegally with forged (or non-existent) documents?</p>
<p>(Crickets chirping.)</p>
<p>I thought so.</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Peter H.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2007/06/25/muchos-gracias-senatress-graham/comment-page-1/#comment-68312</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 10:23:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=2563#comment-68312</guid>
		<description>Well, just let us knwo your plan for immigration so big business can employee immigrants at near slave wages and not pay real citizens a decent living wage.  A gangbanger will certainly take less money for a job than an American-born citizen.

And as far as not paying taxes:  well, those illegal workers are on par with their law abiding American employers; they didn&#039;t pay taxes either, so they&#039;re all quite even, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, just let us knwo your plan for immigration so big business can employee immigrants at near slave wages and not pay real citizens a decent living wage.  A gangbanger will certainly take less money for a job than an American-born citizen.</p>
<p>And as far as not paying taxes:  well, those illegal workers are on par with their law abiding American employers; they didn&#8217;t pay taxes either, so they&#8217;re all quite even, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2007/06/25/muchos-gracias-senatress-graham/comment-page-1/#comment-68311</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 20:28:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=2563#comment-68311</guid>
		<description>Yeah his disgraceful speech before La Raza does make him my #1 target among Republicans.  I want to see him tossed out of office along with McCain, Hagel, and some others.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah his disgraceful speech before La Raza does make him my #1 target among Republicans.  I want to see him tossed out of office along with McCain, Hagel, and some others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

