Senate’s Drive To Amnesty Creates Wedge With America
Nothing has troubled me more since the Illegal Amnesty debate (or lack thereof) began in the Senate, than the “we know best” attitude taken by Sens. Reid, Lott, Graham, McCain, et. al.
Why for example, Senator Reid, do you claim the high ground on Iraq because public opinion polls show frustration with the war…. yet you tell us meaningless peons outside the Empire walls to hush-up when public opinion is dramatically opposed to the Senate Amnesty bill? Are public opinion polls only useful when they are on your side of an issue?
Stanley Kurtz at The Corner expresses my disgust with the Elitist Disconnect Syndrome more eloquently than I can.
For all the bitterness of our political battles, there’s at least the sense that the government responds to the drift of public opinion. The Republicans in Congress turned into big spenders and the war in Iraq went poorly. As a result the Democrats prospered in 2006, if narrowly. That’s how democracy works. Our politics are often angry and ugly (and that’s a problem), but this is because the public is deeply divided on issues of great importance. Deep down, we understand that our political problems reflect our own divisions.
Somehow this immigration battle feels different. The bill is wildly unpopular, yet it’s close to passing. The contrast with the high-school textbook version of democracy is not only glaring and maddening, it’s downright embarrassing. Usually, even when we’re at each others’ throats, there’s still an underlying pride in the democratic process. This immigration battle strips us of even that pride.
Supporters of this bill sell it as a compromise that will heal America’s divisions. I fear it’s quite the reverse. This bill is infuriating the public and undermining faith in government itself. You can see it in the polling on confidence in Congress and the President. If this bill passes, it’s going to aggravate and embitter politics for years to come. Passing a measure over such overwhelming opposition is like slapping the public in the face.
Precisely. I’d recommend we all take a moment and reflect on the wise of our Founding Fathers as they stared down an oppressive Empire in our now distant past. It is almost eerie how these words from our own Declaration of Independence seem to have a renewed meaning in today’s fractured American Republic.
When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.
<…..>
That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.
<…..>
But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.
In this case, the political bonds have been broken by our very own elected representatives in Washington, DC. From campaign finance reform infringing on our First Amendment rights…. to out-of-control and unaccountable earmark spending…. to undermining our troops during wartime…. to rewarding illegal immigrants by selling American citizenship… and by threatening our national security through misguided policies, neglect and incompetence. They have broken the bonds with us through their arrogance and disrespect of us.
We, The People need to take our Government back. It is that serious.
-Bruce (GayPatriot)
UPDATE (from GPW): I may have more to say on this later as I have scribbled a number of thoughts on the issue. Before bed last, I read a post on Powerline, reproducing the justification Senator Norm Coleman (R-MN) offered for his vote for cloture. Commenting on that statement, John Hinderaker wrote, “This bill should be broken up into its component parts, there should be hearings on each, and there should be an open amendment process as to every individual bill.” Which pretty much sums up my view — as I expressed in a post after it seemed the bill was defeated.
Agreeing with the Stanley Kurtz (whom Bruce quote above), Mark Steyn (via Instapundit) writes:
There’s something creepy about a political class so determined to impose a vast transformative bill cooked up backstage in metaphorically smoke-filled rooms on a nation that doesn’t want it. It’s an affront to republican government and quasi-European in its disdain for the citizenry.
12 Comments »
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI
Trackbacked by The Thunder Run – Web Reconnaissance for 06/27/2007
A short recon of what’s out there that might draw your attention, updated throughout the day…so check back often.
Comment by David M — June 27, 2007 @ 10:58 am - June 27, 2007
Amen.
Comment by Miss O'Hara — June 27, 2007 @ 11:04 am - June 27, 2007
“We, The People need to take our Government back. It is that serious.”
Are you advocating revolution, overthrow of the government? Which is something I’d agree with, as it’s been blatantly unconstitutional for a very long time and therefore illegitimate.
Comment by Crow — June 27, 2007 @ 1:04 pm - June 27, 2007
Keep an eye on today’s floor action in the Senate. According to a memo sent to NRO’s Kathryn Lopez, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid’s staff is now rewriting the Clay Pigeon amendment behind closed doors. It is the intent of the Majority Leader to bring this new unread Amendment up without the Republicans seeing the language.
If Reid gets this bill pushed through, the GOP is officially lacking stones.
Fortunately, the House GOP is much more inclined to push back when the legislation hits that chamber.
Regards,
Peter H.
Comment by Peter Hughes — June 27, 2007 @ 1:04 pm - June 27, 2007
It is pollyannish of President Bush to think that by his supporting amnesty will add numbers to the Republican Party. In 1
Comment by Roberto — June 27, 2007 @ 3:37 pm - June 27, 2007
It is pollyannish of President Bush to think that by his supporting amnesty will add numbers to the Republican Party. In 1986, Ronald Reagan signed an amnesty bill and the Democrats reaped the harvest.
When I served on the County Committee, the popukar notion was that they´ll become Republicans when the realize we´re the party of family values. The illegals are not interested in familoy values, nor is pro-life a big thing for them, nor is entrepreneurship an issue. All of these things many subscribe to. but all of them have grown up with PRI (Partido Revolucionario Institucional) which is very socialist. They´re used to the dole. As Pat Buchanan noted in his book State of Emergency that if the border isn´t secured and amnesty is given “the Republican Party will go the way of the Whigs. “
Comment by Roberto — June 27, 2007 @ 3:56 pm - June 27, 2007
For more information on the Immigration Reform Act of 2007, please visit: Project Vote Smart’s summary of the Immigration bill
For more information on the Immigration bill and the positions of Senators Reid, Lott, Graham, and McCain on immigration please visit Project Vote Smart or call our hotline at 1-888-VOTE-SMART.
Comment by Project Vote Smart — June 27, 2007 @ 4:47 pm - June 27, 2007
I say repeal the 17th Amendment. Let the election of Senators stay with the state legislatures. That way, none of these nimrods will be so beholden to special interests and perched up there in their ivory towers without a clue.
Plus, by repealing the 17th Amendment, voters in each states can decide whether to implement term limits for these US Senators by amending their state constitutions. That way, you don’t have incompetent boobs glued to their Senate seats until the cockroaches drag them through the keyhole. (See examples Byrd, Kennedy et al.)
Regards,
Peter H.
Comment by Peter Hughes — June 27, 2007 @ 5:01 pm - June 27, 2007
Crow (#3) -
There can be major changes to our government short of revolution. We, The People do have legitimate tools at our disposal to restore the political bonds with our elected leaders.
I will be working on such a project and have an announcement soon.
Meantime, I would argue that our Executive and Legislative branches have been acting “extra-Constitutional”, rather than “un-Constitutional”. Although the result is probably no different for We, The People.
Comment by GayPatriot — June 27, 2007 @ 6:19 pm - June 27, 2007
Good idea, Peter and while were at it let´s repeal the 14th Amendment. It is really outdated. It was drafted after the Civil War in order to define the children of former slaves. Slavery has been abolished. It is being used now for anchor babies. By repealing the 14th children of illegal alien mothers can´t claim residency through their children. That will reduce the influx somewhat.
Comment by Roberto — June 27, 2007 @ 7:16 pm - June 27, 2007
We need a different slogan. The “Lets Take Back America / Government” is already well worn meme of the Airhead America crowd. Of coarse normally I’d be able to rattle off five or six pop right off the top of my head, but since I’ve put myself under pressure, at the moment I’m drawing a complete blank.
Comment by sonicfrog — June 28, 2007 @ 1:12 am - June 28, 2007
[...] 11:03AM Via Gay Patriot, we hear from Stanley Kurtz, who really does put a fine point on things: For all the bitterness of [...]
Pingback by Keep Your Dukes Up! We Can Do It Again! — Shining City — June 13, 2008 @ 12:26 pm - June 13, 2008