Dan Rather Sues CBS for $70 million
Looks like we were right to award Rather the James Earl Carter Bitter Old Man Award. Only someone following in Carter’s footsteps would file such a suit, faulting CBS for its “‘intentional mishandling” of the aftermath of a discredited story about President George W. Bush’s time in the Texas Air National Guard” (Emphasis added).
Um, Mr. Rather, if anyone intentionally mishandled that story, it was you. It seems, just like Mr. Carter, you (to paraphrase something I wrote in awarding you the Carter award) are attacking your former employers to deflect attention from your own failings. Or that you just can’t admit that your bias caused you to blow this story.
Powerline’s Paul Mirengoff puts it best when he writes that the “suit, for as long as it survives, should serve to reinforce Rather’s status as a laughingstock.“
24 Comments »
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI



















Maybe this is a good thing, maybe these frivolous lawsuits are finally “jumping the shark”.
I’m not a lawyer, but what is the legal basis of this lawsuit?
Comment by Leah — September 19, 2007 @ 6:56 pm - September 19, 2007
Oh Danny boy, the gripes, the gripes are apalling
From now and then and down the sweaty backside
The summer’s gone, and all the flowers are dying
‘Tis you, ’tis you must go and we who must abide.
Come ye not back when summer’s in the meadow
Or when your mouth is rushed and white with foam
‘Tis well be here in sunshine or in shadow
Oh Danny boy, oh Danny boy, you really have to go.
Comment by Heliotrope — September 19, 2007 @ 6:58 pm - September 19, 2007
[...] Original post by GayPatriotWest [...]
Pingback by Politics: 2008 HQ » Blog Archive » Dan Rather Sues CBS for $70 million — September 19, 2007 @ 7:40 pm - September 19, 2007
Well it all depends if CBS gets pissed by this ingratitude and decides to fight/expose Rather… or to cave. A settlement as little as $500K, I should think, will be touted as a significant victory by the moonbat Left.
Comment by ILoveCapitalism — September 19, 2007 @ 8:03 pm - September 19, 2007
I wonder if the lawsuit was typed on Dan’s mysterious IBM Selectric using Microsoft Word?
Dan vs CBS – pity they can’t both lose.
Vera’s favorite ‘Danism’: “This race is tight like a too-small bathing suit on a too-long ride home from the beach.”
Comment by Vera Charles — September 19, 2007 @ 8:36 pm - September 19, 2007
That’s my big worry – CBS settles for an “undisclosed amount” and agrees with Dan that the documents were “not proven to be false” or some usch nonsense.
Comment by Siergen — September 19, 2007 @ 10:33 pm - September 19, 2007
Heliotrope – Danny Boy is one of my favorite songs. I especially love your version.
John W
Comment by John W — September 20, 2007 @ 1:19 am - September 20, 2007
Meanwhile:
Now who, exactly, would those crusaders be? The NYT? Keith Olberman? MSNBC-BS? Harry Reid? Nancy Pelosi? CNN-BS? Turban Durbin? Jack Murtha? John F.uck You Kerry?
How about all of the above including our own Ian, Gillie, Kevin, Chase etc. Who else would al-Qaeda be praising but our own America “loving”, troop “supporting” liberal left????
It still astounds me that the liberal left and al-Qaeda are virtually indistinguishable, but the libs lack what it takes to be embarrassed and appalled by it. I mean, when the enemy of our country has you picked as the electoral favorite, you should feel at least a gas cramp in your gut.
Don’t know whether it’s sad or funny. I guess it’s tragically funny.
Comment by ThatGayConservative — September 20, 2007 @ 6:10 am - September 20, 2007
The Washington Post, via LGF, via Ace, adds more color. “Nobody’s proved the [2004 Rather-Mapes] documents were forgeries”, says Rather’s lawyer.
Comment by ILoveCapitalism — September 20, 2007 @ 1:24 pm - September 20, 2007
Sorry, but some of Wapo’s details are too rich not to quote:
It gets worse from there. ROFL
Comment by ILoveCapitalism — September 20, 2007 @ 1:42 pm - September 20, 2007
#10
If you have a firm set of stones and a spine, how can one be coerced into apologizing for anything?
Comment by ThatGayConservative — September 20, 2007 @ 4:14 pm - September 20, 2007
It’s come full circle: George W Bush’ combat service during the Vietnam war consisted of watching “Gomer Pyle USMC” on CBS
Comment by james — September 20, 2007 @ 4:46 pm - September 20, 2007
Somebody needs a few reminders!
1) Bush served in the reserves 6 years, flying a particularly dangerous type of plane – a plane with a bad safety record, known for killing its pilots.
2) That’s way, way, way more than Clinton ever did.
3) Bush joined his fully expecting to be sent to Vietnam. Reserve and National Guard units fought then, as today. National policy projected an increase in U.S. forces from the 500,000s to the 700,000s, at the time he joined.
4) Then the American people elected Nixon, who reversed all that. And no; not because he knew Bush. Deal with it.
Comment by ILoveCapitalism — September 20, 2007 @ 5:31 pm - September 20, 2007
And Dick & Lon Cheney sat out the war watching “Dark Shadows” as part of their charm offensive?? Which is less then Gore & Kerry did!!
Bush’s attendance record has more holes then you find in Swiss cheese.
Not all of us were born with a silver spoon in our nose…
Comment by james — September 20, 2007 @ 5:44 pm - September 20, 2007
#14 james requires “honorable” wartime service for his presidents. Scratch Carter. Scratch Clinton. Scratch Kerry. Scratch Gore. Scratch Hillary. (Kerry got hoodwinked by a change in plans for Swiftboat service, but he worked the system and got out of harm’s way in record time. Gore carried a heavy camera and reported from bars all over Saigon.)
Just how many left wingers are there in this volunteer service? Maybe a Jim Webb or two who will wax conservative for years and then jump on the liberal band wagon when desperate democrats and personal advancement call.
The last democrat candidate who had anything to talk about in terms of war experience was old George McGovern. And do you remember when Bob Dole ran? The democrats tried to sell the story that his twisted arms and crippled paw were all part of his own retarded actions as an inept soldier. You guys are an embarassment. You rely on patriotic conservative Americans to keep you free and then attack them as a bunch of hayseed, extra chromosone religious zealots who are in dire need of elitist guidance. Ask me about Max Cleland.
Comment by Heliotrope — September 20, 2007 @ 7:25 pm - September 20, 2007
Now you’re really reaching, james. I love all that subject-changing. It’s like watching a dancer pirouette.
The subject is: Dan Rather’s absurd lawsuit to reverse his earlier apology for the absurd forgeries that he, allegedly a fine journalist, absurdly yet dangerously (if you love democracy) peddled to a nation in the throes of a *Presidential* election.
You can’t possibly win on that ground, so you change the subject to: Bush. And not anything current, but an ancient debate on his military service record.
I show how you can’t win on that ground either. So you change the subject to: Dick Cheney, of all people. (I mean: huh?) What’ll your next move be: Bob Dole? Britney Spears? Plan 9 From Outer Space?
ROFL
Comment by ILoveCapitalism — September 20, 2007 @ 7:32 pm - September 20, 2007
That’s just it, H. Only it’s not just military: it’s police, fire, charity volunteers, business people, line workers, inventors… Anyone who is responsible, productive, brave, useful, grownup, etc. is supposed to just shut up and take Hillary’s or Ted’s orders. Just keep producing, keep doing the grownup work that makes the world go, while lefties alternately spit on them and run things into the ground.
How DARE military people, business people, line workers (the good ones), etc. organize – under the “conservative” label, or whatever – and rebel against the MSM/Soros/Kennedy/academia/Hollywood elites!!!
Comment by ILoveCapitalism — September 20, 2007 @ 7:44 pm - September 20, 2007
God bless you ILC! I mean it!.
“All the world’s a stage, And all the men and women merely players”….: except for elite liberals who sit back and fill the role of critics.
And, damn, there sure are a lot of them and seem to love to suck on the government tit.
Comment by Heliotrope — September 20, 2007 @ 8:52 pm - September 20, 2007
Poor Dan. Apparently his lawsuit isn’t/wasn’t the only empty suit at CBS.
If he claims honestly that his former title of ‘Managing Editor’ (ahem!) was more than simply being a mouthpiece, he admits his suit is baseless and that he spent his career conning everyone into thinking he was a journalist rather than an opinionist.
If he claims he was the victim of staff error, he betrays the con and proves he managed nothing other than good eye-lip coordination.
Comment by HardHobbit — September 20, 2007 @ 8:56 pm - September 20, 2007
You got to hand it to leftists and the MSM. When there isn’t proof of one of their hair brained theories….they just make it up and forge some papers. When called on it, they swear the underlying story is correct. When moved aside, Rather has the stones to sue, like he’s the victim. We are truely through the looking glass here Alice.
Comment by Gene in Pennsylvania — September 20, 2007 @ 9:49 pm - September 20, 2007
And that’s what I think was funny about this.
I mean, Mary Mapes was caught red-handed calling the Kerry campaign and coordinating media activity with them. This was a planned assault using CBS News to help throw a Presidential race with forged documents.
And they came within a whisker of doing it.
Comment by North Dallas Thirty — September 20, 2007 @ 11:50 pm - September 20, 2007
Thanks, Heliotrope
Comment by ILoveCapitalism — September 21, 2007 @ 10:32 am - September 21, 2007
I’m still mad about this. The story was true. One document was forged. And that f***-up neutralized the story. Everyone connected to the Texas National Guard in the 60s will tell you that Bush rarely showed up for duty, and some of those people who will tell you voted for him.
Comment by Houndentenor — September 27, 2007 @ 12:38 pm - September 27, 2007
Last year I worked on a project for several months for
Dan Rather’s company.
He has never paid me one penny.
They said they would send a check, and never
sent it.
I FEDEXED Rather personally, and told him what
happened. He never responded.
Before this, I thought that he had been treated badly.
Now, I think that he is unscrupulous.
I think that he knew the document was bogus.
I personally believe that CBS had things on him that
they could not air in public.
Comment by george sand — September 30, 2008 @ 12:14 pm - September 30, 2008