<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nevada Goes for Romney, Clinton&#8230; SC Results tonight!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/01/19/nevada-goes-for-romney-clinton-sc-results-tonight/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/01/19/nevada-goes-for-romney-clinton-sc-results-tonight/</link>
	<description>The Internet home for American gay conservatives.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 23:30:38 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gene in Pennsylvania</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/01/19/nevada-goes-for-romney-clinton-sc-results-tonight/comment-page-1/#comment-73408</link>
		<dc:creator>Gene in Pennsylvania</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 02:10:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=2790#comment-73408</guid>
		<description>Let me get this straight. A union and it&#039;s union leadership endorses a candidate, Obama. And a majority of it&#039;s membership votes for Mrs. Clinton. In a caucuss situation where you take a public stand and are ripe for ridicule and retrubution. Are unions finished or what? Whatever happened to union thuggery?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me get this straight. A union and it&#8217;s union leadership endorses a candidate, Obama. And a majority of it&#8217;s membership votes for Mrs. Clinton. In a caucuss situation where you take a public stand and are ripe for ridicule and retrubution. Are unions finished or what? Whatever happened to union thuggery?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chase</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/01/19/nevada-goes-for-romney-clinton-sc-results-tonight/comment-page-1/#comment-73409</link>
		<dc:creator>Chase</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 00:02:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=2790#comment-73409</guid>
		<description>UPDATE: Under the weighting rules of the Nevada caucus system, Obama will actually receive a delegate victory over Hillary Clinton. Obama will receive 13 delegates to the national convention, Hillary will receive 12.

Thus, Obama has won the Nevada Caucus. Hillary&#039;s popular vote win, much like Mr. Gore&#039;s in 2000, is a vanity victory only. This is an election about &lt;i&gt;delegates.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>UPDATE: Under the weighting rules of the Nevada caucus system, Obama will actually receive a delegate victory over Hillary Clinton. Obama will receive 13 delegates to the national convention, Hillary will receive 12.</p>
<p>Thus, Obama has won the Nevada Caucus. Hillary&#8217;s popular vote win, much like Mr. Gore&#8217;s in 2000, is a vanity victory only. This is an election about <i>delegates.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chase</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/01/19/nevada-goes-for-romney-clinton-sc-results-tonight/comment-page-1/#comment-73410</link>
		<dc:creator>Chase</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 22:50:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=2790#comment-73410</guid>
		<description>Nevada&#039;s delegates are proportional, so I don&#039;t see 51-45% as a big loss for Mr. Obama.  Mrs. Clinton will likely get 1 or 2 more delegates.  Obama&#039;s weakness among latino&#039;s was not nearly as strong as Mrs. Clinton&#039;s weakness among blacks. 83% of the black vote went for Obama! If he continues to deliver numbers like that, he&#039;ll take most of the southern primaries where blacks account for much more of the democratic vote. The latino vote could be problematic in California for Mr. Obama.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nevada&#8217;s delegates are proportional, so I don&#8217;t see 51-45% as a big loss for Mr. Obama.  Mrs. Clinton will likely get 1 or 2 more delegates.  Obama&#8217;s weakness among latino&#8217;s was not nearly as strong as Mrs. Clinton&#8217;s weakness among blacks. 83% of the black vote went for Obama! If he continues to deliver numbers like that, he&#8217;ll take most of the southern primaries where blacks account for much more of the democratic vote. The latino vote could be problematic in California for Mr. Obama.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
