<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Hillary is Silent on Spitzer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/03/11/why-hillary-is-silent-on-spitzer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/03/11/why-hillary-is-silent-on-spitzer/</link>
	<description>The Internet home for American gay conservatives.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 07:15:50 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/03/11/why-hillary-is-silent-on-spitzer/comment-page-1/#comment-105102</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 01:57:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/03/11/why-hillary-is-silent-on-spitzer/#comment-105102</guid>
		<description>#19: My only point (in #10) was that GOP sniping at Spitzer will simply hand the media a new target.  When a lib is self-destructing, the best move is to stand back and watch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#19: My only point (in #10) was that GOP sniping at Spitzer will simply hand the media a new target.  When a lib is self-destructing, the best move is to stand back and watch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ThatGayConservative</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/03/11/why-hillary-is-silent-on-spitzer/comment-page-1/#comment-104544</link>
		<dc:creator>ThatGayConservative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 09:08:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/03/11/why-hillary-is-silent-on-spitzer/#comment-104544</guid>
		<description>Almost forgot:

&lt;em&gt;Itâ€™s a might too easy to play this back and forth whoâ€™s Â broken the law pissing matches.

&lt;/em&gt;You pissed first, sweet cheeks. Don&#039;t get mad at us for pissing in your Cheerios.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Almost forgot:</p>
<p><em>Itâ€™s a might too easy to play this back and forth whoâ€™s Â broken the law pissing matches.</p>
<p></em>You pissed first, sweet cheeks. Don&#8217;t get mad at us for pissing in your Cheerios.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ThatGayConservative</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/03/11/why-hillary-is-silent-on-spitzer/comment-page-1/#comment-104543</link>
		<dc:creator>ThatGayConservative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 09:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/03/11/why-hillary-is-silent-on-spitzer/#comment-104543</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Iâ€™m well aware Gingrich did not hold his post at the time Clinton was impeached, but he was sure all over the place condemning Clinton for having an affair

&lt;/em&gt;So what? He was a private citizen.

&lt;em&gt;I personally wouldnâ€™t know who wouldÂ perjureÂ themselves about extramarital affairs because I frankly could care less about the personal lives of most politicians, as long as they arenâ€™t breaking laws.


&lt;/em&gt;And yet back in #22 you said:

&lt;em&gt;If people have been so high and might about lying under oath about extra marital affairs, then perhaps all our elected officials should undergo such questioning and then letâ€™s see how many of them are truthful.

&lt;/em&gt;So do you want to know who&#039;s committed perjury or not? Which is it?

And you &lt;em&gt;still&lt;/em&gt; have yet to produce any evidence of wrongdoing on the part of Cheney. You just keep throwing it out there based only on the seriousness of the charge and not on any actual wrongdoing. I say put up or STFU.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Iâ€™m well aware Gingrich did not hold his post at the time Clinton was impeached, but he was sure all over the place condemning Clinton for having an affair</p>
<p></em>So what? He was a private citizen.</p>
<p><em>I personally wouldnâ€™t know who wouldÂ perjureÂ themselves about extramarital affairs because I frankly could care less about the personal lives of most politicians, as long as they arenâ€™t breaking laws.</p>
<p></em>And yet back in #22 you said:</p>
<p><em>If people have been so high and might about lying under oath about extra marital affairs, then perhaps all our elected officials should undergo such questioning and then letâ€™s see how many of them are truthful.</p>
<p></em>So do you want to know who&#8217;s committed perjury or not? Which is it?</p>
<p>And you <em>still</em> have yet to produce any evidence of wrongdoing on the part of Cheney. You just keep throwing it out there based only on the seriousness of the charge and not on any actual wrongdoing. I say put up or STFU.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ThatGayConservative</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/03/11/why-hillary-is-silent-on-spitzer/comment-page-1/#comment-104371</link>
		<dc:creator>ThatGayConservative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 02:17:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/03/11/why-hillary-is-silent-on-spitzer/#comment-104371</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Iâ€™d appreciate that you hold your tongue as far as the name calling goes, unless of course youâ€™d like to provide your email address, phone number and home address so I can respond in person. Â (OK site moderator, where are you and rules for using this site??)

&lt;/em&gt;That wouldn&#039;t be a threat, would it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Iâ€™d appreciate that you hold your tongue as far as the name calling goes, unless of course youâ€™d like to provide your email address, phone number and home address so I can respond in person. Â (OK site moderator, where are you and rules for using this site??)</p>
<p></em>That wouldn&#8217;t be a threat, would it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gene in Pennsylvania</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/03/11/why-hillary-is-silent-on-spitzer/comment-page-1/#comment-104343</link>
		<dc:creator>Gene in Pennsylvania</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 01:35:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/03/11/why-hillary-is-silent-on-spitzer/#comment-104343</guid>
		<description>Hey Kevin did you know the Clintons were invested in a sweatshop in Brazil? 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sungazette.com/page/content.detail/id/42039.html?isap=1&amp;nav=5022&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.sungazette.com/page/content.detail/id/42039.html?isap=1&amp;nav=5022&lt;/a&gt;
Illegal and corrupt... stinks huh? Their workers are cold and hungry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Kevin did you know the Clintons were invested in a sweatshop in Brazil?<br />
<a href="http://www.sungazette.com/page/content.detail/id/42039.html?isap=1&amp;nav=5022" rel="nofollow">http://www.sungazette.com/page/content.detail/id/42039.html?isap=1&amp;nav=5022</a><br />
Illegal and corrupt&#8230; stinks huh? Their workers are cold and hungry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leah</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/03/11/why-hillary-is-silent-on-spitzer/comment-page-1/#comment-103953</link>
		<dc:creator>Leah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 16:25:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/03/11/why-hillary-is-silent-on-spitzer/#comment-103953</guid>
		<description>33. You are right, that from Hillary&#039;s point of view, the less she says the better. But this is big news and should be discussed. 

If this is only a private matter, why did the scumbag drag his wife out in public and humiliate her before the whole world?? In Judaism, public humiliation is a much more serious crime than a man&#039;s adultery. Though I wouldn&#039;t want to claim this guy as a model Jew.

He wasn&#039;t simply having an affair on the side, he was breaking many laws - at the same time he was prosecuting others who are involved in the same activity. That is the real definition of hypocrisy. Hypocrisy isn&#039;t illegal - but his activities are.

Â </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>33. You are right, that from Hillary&#8217;s point of view, the less she says the better. But this is big news and should be discussed. </p>
<p>If this is only a private matter, why did the scumbag drag his wife out in public and humiliate her before the whole world?? In Judaism, public humiliation is a much more serious crime than a man&#8217;s adultery. Though I wouldn&#8217;t want to claim this guy as a model Jew.</p>
<p>He wasn&#8217;t simply having an affair on the side, he was breaking many laws &#8211; at the same time he was prosecuting others who are involved in the same activity. That is the real definition of hypocrisy. Hypocrisy isn&#8217;t illegal &#8211; but his activities are.</p>
<p>Â </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darkeyedresolve</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/03/11/why-hillary-is-silent-on-spitzer/comment-page-1/#comment-103943</link>
		<dc:creator>Darkeyedresolve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 16:05:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/03/11/why-hillary-is-silent-on-spitzer/#comment-103943</guid>
		<description>The less Hillary says the better, this story will fade and she doesn&#039;t need to concern herself with it. My mom made a good point, this is just another distraction from the bigger issues going on. Instead of focusing on the Wars going on, energy issues with gas prices, or the economy...the media is all over this story about a man and a call girl. It just seems silly to give it so much attention in light of fact that he didn&#039;t abuse his power or use state money, it is his own personal hell he should be dealing with. 

I probably wouldn&#039;t be surprised if past leaders have done similar things, it just went unreported. JFK&#039;s activities come to mind...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The less Hillary says the better, this story will fade and she doesn&#8217;t need to concern herself with it. My mom made a good point, this is just another distraction from the bigger issues going on. Instead of focusing on the Wars going on, energy issues with gas prices, or the economy&#8230;the media is all over this story about a man and a call girl. It just seems silly to give it so much attention in light of fact that he didn&#8217;t abuse his power or use state money, it is his own personal hell he should be dealing with. </p>
<p>I probably wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if past leaders have done similar things, it just went unreported. JFK&#8217;s activities come to mind&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: heliotrope</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/03/11/why-hillary-is-silent-on-spitzer/comment-page-1/#comment-103882</link>
		<dc:creator>heliotrope</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 14:05:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/03/11/why-hillary-is-silent-on-spitzer/#comment-103882</guid>
		<description>Haliburton was the love child of Lyndon Baines Johnson. (He was a Democrat.) Every single POTUS has used them as they are unique in what they do.

Since the POTUS can be blackmailed by their extra curricular sex partners, it only makes sense that they be registered with the secret service, sign disclosure papers, have a medical clearance and be on call for the sudden presidential urge. Maybe Haliburton could manage the service.

Â </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haliburton was the love child of Lyndon Baines Johnson. (He was a Democrat.) Every single POTUS has used them as they are unique in what they do.</p>
<p>Since the POTUS can be blackmailed by their extra curricular sex partners, it only makes sense that they be registered with the secret service, sign disclosure papers, have a medical clearance and be on call for the sudden presidential urge. Maybe Haliburton could manage the service.</p>
<p>Â </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: American Elephant</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/03/11/why-hillary-is-silent-on-spitzer/comment-page-1/#comment-103694</link>
		<dc:creator>American Elephant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 08:03:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/03/11/why-hillary-is-silent-on-spitzer/#comment-103694</guid>
		<description>Oh and the list of corrupt Democrats isnt even CLOSE to comprehensive. Thats only part of what I could remember off the top of my head. 

  Shall I go on? I guarantee you the list of corrupt and criminal Democrats is exponentially longer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh and the list of corrupt Democrats isnt even CLOSE to comprehensive. Thats only part of what I could remember off the top of my head. </p>
<p>  Shall I go on? I guarantee you the list of corrupt and criminal Democrats is exponentially longer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: American Elephant</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/03/11/why-hillary-is-silent-on-spitzer/comment-page-1/#comment-103688</link>
		<dc:creator>American Elephant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 07:58:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/03/11/why-hillary-is-silent-on-spitzer/#comment-103688</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Nope, not a Republican in office who funneled no-bid contracts to companies in which they had involvement (cough-cheney-cough).&lt;/blockquote&gt;You&#039;re trying to claim Cheney is corrupt for giving no-bid contracts to the only corporation capable of doing a  job because he USED to work for them and now has no ties to them whatsoever?

  Sorry, thats just pathetic.

  Meanwhile, where is your indignation for Dianne Feinstein who personally profited millions by funneling billions in contracts to companies her husband was and still is currently profiting from?

  Funny how you prove my point about Democrats.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Nope, not a Republican in office who funneled no-bid contracts to companies in which they had involvement (cough-cheney-cough).</p></blockquote>
<p>You&#8217;re trying to claim Cheney is corrupt for giving no-bid contracts to the only corporation capable of doing a  job because he USED to work for them and now has no ties to them whatsoever?</p>
<p>  Sorry, thats just pathetic.</p>
<p>  Meanwhile, where is your indignation for Dianne Feinstein who personally profited millions by funneling billions in contracts to companies her husband was and still is currently profiting from?</p>
<p>  Funny how you prove my point about Democrats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/03/11/why-hillary-is-silent-on-spitzer/comment-page-1/#comment-103578</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 04:56:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/03/11/why-hillary-is-silent-on-spitzer/#comment-103578</guid>
		<description>27: Â I&#039;d appreciate that you hold your tongue as far as the name calling goes, unless of course you&#039;d like to provide your email address, phone number and home address so I can respond in person. Â (OK site moderator, where are you and rules for using this site??)
I&#039;m well aware Gingrich did not hold his post at the time Clinton was impeached, but he was sure all over the place condemning Clinton for having an affair while he himself was having an extramarital affair at the exact same time. Â I personally wouldn&#039;t know who wouldÂ perjureÂ themselves about extramarital affairs because I frankly could care less about the personal lives of most politicians, as long as they aren&#039;t breaking laws.
Haliburton was right for the job? Â Of course they were, when the VP of the US (former head of Haliburton) arranged their no bid contract. Â Then again, Haliburton was found to have committed fraud against the US Government by overbilling/falsifying its billing for services in Iraq. Â a little oopsy-my-bad in their accounting practices?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>27: Â I&#8217;d appreciate that you hold your tongue as far as the name calling goes, unless of course you&#8217;d like to provide your email address, phone number and home address so I can respond in person. Â (OK site moderator, where are you and rules for using this site??)<br />
I&#8217;m well aware Gingrich did not hold his post at the time Clinton was impeached, but he was sure all over the place condemning Clinton for having an affair while he himself was having an extramarital affair at the exact same time. Â I personally wouldn&#8217;t know who wouldÂ perjureÂ themselves about extramarital affairs because I frankly could care less about the personal lives of most politicians, as long as they aren&#8217;t breaking laws.<br />
Haliburton was right for the job? Â Of course they were, when the VP of the US (former head of Haliburton) arranged their no bid contract. Â Then again, Haliburton was found to have committed fraud against the US Government by overbilling/falsifying its billing for services in Iraq. Â a little oopsy-my-bad in their accounting practices?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ThatGayConservative</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/03/11/why-hillary-is-silent-on-spitzer/comment-page-1/#comment-103561</link>
		<dc:creator>ThatGayConservative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 04:24:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/03/11/why-hillary-is-silent-on-spitzer/#comment-103561</guid>
		<description>Holy Jesus, Kevin! Are you really an ignorant dipshit or do you just play one on the internet. I pray that you&#039;re just playing devil&#039;s advocate and popping off whatever bullshit comes to mind just to get a rise out of people. To whit:

&lt;em&gt;If people have been so high and might about lying under oath about extra marital affairs, then perhaps all our elected officials should undergo such questioning and then letâ€™s see how many of them are truthful.

&lt;/em&gt;How many do you suppose have perjured themselves about extramarital affairs? Further, how many of them do you suppose have obstructed justice as POTUS???? I eagerly await your answer.

&lt;em&gt;*and* leading the charge against President Clinton.

&lt;/em&gt;That wasn&#039;t Gingrich. He&#039;d resigned by then. As I understand it, it was Tom DeLay. Remember him? Liberal douchebags took him out with a indictment and &lt;strong&gt;STILL&lt;/strong&gt; has not had his day in court.

&lt;em&gt;Nope, not a Republican in office who funneled no-bid contracts to companies in which they had involvement (cough-cheney-cough).

&lt;/em&gt;In the first place, it&#039;s not illegal. If it were, your Billy boy should be charged after the fact. Secondly, Halliburton has been working for the government about &lt;strong&gt;50 years&lt;/strong&gt; and is best suited for the job. Who would you rather have? Schlumberger (the French)? Who would have been able to do the job better? 

I will give you credit that you at least didn&#039;t spout the lie that Gingrich divorced his wife while in the hospital. Other than that, you&#039;re an idiot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Holy Jesus, Kevin! Are you really an ignorant dipshit or do you just play one on the internet. I pray that you&#8217;re just playing devil&#8217;s advocate and popping off whatever bullshit comes to mind just to get a rise out of people. To whit:</p>
<p><em>If people have been so high and might about lying under oath about extra marital affairs, then perhaps all our elected officials should undergo such questioning and then letâ€™s see how many of them are truthful.</p>
<p></em>How many do you suppose have perjured themselves about extramarital affairs? Further, how many of them do you suppose have obstructed justice as POTUS???? I eagerly await your answer.</p>
<p><em>*and* leading the charge against President Clinton.</p>
<p></em>That wasn&#8217;t Gingrich. He&#8217;d resigned by then. As I understand it, it was Tom DeLay. Remember him? Liberal douchebags took him out with a indictment and <strong>STILL</strong> has not had his day in court.</p>
<p><em>Nope, not a Republican in office who funneled no-bid contracts to companies in which they had involvement (cough-cheney-cough).</p>
<p></em>In the first place, it&#8217;s not illegal. If it were, your Billy boy should be charged after the fact. Secondly, Halliburton has been working for the government about <strong>50 years</strong> and is best suited for the job. Who would you rather have? Schlumberger (the French)? Who would have been able to do the job better? </p>
<p>I will give you credit that you at least didn&#8217;t spout the lie that Gingrich divorced his wife while in the hospital. Other than that, you&#8217;re an idiot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan King</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/03/11/why-hillary-is-silent-on-spitzer/comment-page-1/#comment-103480</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 02:14:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/03/11/why-hillary-is-silent-on-spitzer/#comment-103480</guid>
		<description>A book about prostitution is &lt;em&gt;Naked in Haiti: A Sexy Morality Tale About Tourists, Prostitutes &amp; Politicians.&lt;/em&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dankingbooks.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;www.dankingbooks.com&lt;/a&gt; will get you there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A book about prostitution is <em>Naked in Haiti: A Sexy Morality Tale About Tourists, Prostitutes &amp; Politicians.</em> <a href="http://www.dankingbooks.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.dankingbooks.com</a> will get you there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gene in Pennsylvania</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/03/11/why-hillary-is-silent-on-spitzer/comment-page-1/#comment-103474</link>
		<dc:creator>Gene in Pennsylvania</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 02:07:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/03/11/why-hillary-is-silent-on-spitzer/#comment-103474</guid>
		<description>I am glad a lot of the old ClintonÂ  crap is being brought out again by this latest Democrat scandal. One of the most interesting parts of the past was when the missing FBI files &quot;appeared in the White House and were left on a table&quot;.Â  The Clinton White House. Now how does that happen? Our memories are fleeting. I hope America doesn&#039;t return to the days of deceit and corruption.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am glad a lot of the old ClintonÂ  crap is being brought out again by this latest Democrat scandal. One of the most interesting parts of the past was when the missing FBI files &quot;appeared in the White House and were left on a table&quot;.Â  The Clinton White House. Now how does that happen? Our memories are fleeting. I hope America doesn&#8217;t return to the days of deceit and corruption.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gene in Pennsylvania</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/03/11/why-hillary-is-silent-on-spitzer/comment-page-1/#comment-103444</link>
		<dc:creator>Gene in Pennsylvania</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 01:04:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/03/11/why-hillary-is-silent-on-spitzer/#comment-103444</guid>
		<description>Kevin the difference between Republican and Democrats caught in any of these scandals is the Republican electorate usually won&#039;t stand for the wrongdoing and our guys and gals know it. If they don&#039;t resign, or aren&#039;t forced out...the voters don&#039;t re elect them. In liberal states, the Democrats view some of this stuff as a badge of courage. Examples,Â  Ted Kennedy, Frank, Jefferson, Kirkpatrick, and on and on. Their voters aren&#039;t comfortable making moral choices so when it comes to illegalities, even then they don&#039;t like being &quot;judgemental&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kevin the difference between Republican and Democrats caught in any of these scandals is the Republican electorate usually won&#8217;t stand for the wrongdoing and our guys and gals know it. If they don&#8217;t resign, or aren&#8217;t forced out&#8230;the voters don&#8217;t re elect them. In liberal states, the Democrats view some of this stuff as a badge of courage. Examples,Â  Ted Kennedy, Frank, Jefferson, Kirkpatrick, and on and on. Their voters aren&#8217;t comfortable making moral choices so when it comes to illegalities, even then they don&#8217;t like being &quot;judgemental&quot;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/03/11/why-hillary-is-silent-on-spitzer/comment-page-1/#comment-103427</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 00:46:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/03/11/why-hillary-is-silent-on-spitzer/#comment-103427</guid>
		<description>19: Â Whew....thanks for that extensive, comprehensive list. Â I&#039;m glad you&#039;ve cleared up the misconception that Republicans might have ever, ever, ever committed crimes while in public office. Â Nope, not a Republican in office who funneled no-bid contracts to companies in which they had involvement (cough-cheney-cough). Â It&#039;s a might too easy to play this back and forth who&#039;s Â broken the law pissing matches.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>19: Â Whew&#8230;.thanks for that extensive, comprehensive list. Â I&#8217;m glad you&#8217;ve cleared up the misconception that Republicans might have ever, ever, ever committed crimes while in public office. Â Nope, not a Republican in office who funneled no-bid contracts to companies in which they had involvement (cough-cheney-cough). Â It&#8217;s a might too easy to play this back and forth who&#8217;s Â broken the law pissing matches.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: American Elephant</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/03/11/why-hillary-is-silent-on-spitzer/comment-page-1/#comment-103425</link>
		<dc:creator>American Elephant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 00:45:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/03/11/why-hillary-is-silent-on-spitzer/#comment-103425</guid>
		<description>#21 &lt;blockquote&gt;Just pointing out that breaking the law isnâ€™t the pervue of one political party and one doesnâ€™t party doesnâ€™t have the upper-hand on it. &lt;/blockquote&gt;The hell they don&#039;t. See #19 above. &lt;blockquote&gt;Clinton was impeached on perjury about his testimony regarding Lewinsky; a topic that *never* should have been asked in the first place&lt;/blockquote&gt;Wrong. During an investigation instigated by Janet Reno Bill Clinton was credibly accused of rape. An accusation he later paid big money to make go away. By the end of the investigation he stood accused of rape/sexual abuse by I think seven credible women. The line of questioning was absolutely germaine. &lt;blockquote&gt;Donâ€™t forget, that investigation started with Whitewater and ended with vindictive cow, Linda Tripp.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&quot;vindictive cow&quot; because she was right? Good point to point out how the Clintons unleashed their war rooms to do everything possible to destroy Monica Lewinsky, Linda Tripp, Kathleen Wiley, Paula Jones and all the other women who got in their way. &lt;blockquote&gt;Since the Whitewater investigation never came up with anything&lt;/blockquote&gt;The whitewater investigation landed something like 12-17 Clinton associates in prison, including a sitting Democrat governor. It also yielded pardons for those that remained loyal to the Clintons.

The idea that the Clintons are not guilty because they couldnt be proven guilty is laughable. Hillary was caught redhanded with files she claimed she knew nothing about in her personal residence. Merely the fact that she had them in the White House residence is a violation of the law in and of itself. Yet she was never prosecuted for political reasons. I dont doubt for a second that they were guilty of everything they were accused of. But unfortunately, being guilty and being prosecuted are two very different things when youre a Democrat politician.

And not only was Bill impeached for being caught lying, prosecutors are on the record saying Hillary gave false and misleading testimony. 

These sleaze are now the first-couple of the Democrat party.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#21<br />
<blockquote>Just pointing out that breaking the law isnâ€™t the pervue of one political party and one doesnâ€™t party doesnâ€™t have the upper-hand on it. </p></blockquote>
<p>The hell they don&#8217;t. See #19 above.<br />
<blockquote>Clinton was impeached on perjury about his testimony regarding Lewinsky; a topic that *never* should have been asked in the first place</p></blockquote>
<p>Wrong. During an investigation instigated by Janet Reno Bill Clinton was credibly accused of rape. An accusation he later paid big money to make go away. By the end of the investigation he stood accused of rape/sexual abuse by I think seven credible women. The line of questioning was absolutely germaine.<br />
<blockquote>Donâ€™t forget, that investigation started with Whitewater and ended with vindictive cow, Linda Tripp.</p></blockquote>
<p>&quot;vindictive cow&quot; because she was right? Good point to point out how the Clintons unleashed their war rooms to do everything possible to destroy Monica Lewinsky, Linda Tripp, Kathleen Wiley, Paula Jones and all the other women who got in their way.<br />
<blockquote>Since the Whitewater investigation never came up with anything</p></blockquote>
<p>The whitewater investigation landed something like 12-17 Clinton associates in prison, including a sitting Democrat governor. It also yielded pardons for those that remained loyal to the Clintons.</p>
<p>The idea that the Clintons are not guilty because they couldnt be proven guilty is laughable. Hillary was caught redhanded with files she claimed she knew nothing about in her personal residence. Merely the fact that she had them in the White House residence is a violation of the law in and of itself. Yet she was never prosecuted for political reasons. I dont doubt for a second that they were guilty of everything they were accused of. But unfortunately, being guilty and being prosecuted are two very different things when youre a Democrat politician.</p>
<p>And not only was Bill impeached for being caught lying, prosecutors are on the record saying Hillary gave false and misleading testimony. </p>
<p>These sleaze are now the first-couple of the Democrat party.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/03/11/why-hillary-is-silent-on-spitzer/comment-page-1/#comment-103411</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 00:21:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/03/11/why-hillary-is-silent-on-spitzer/#comment-103411</guid>
		<description>15: Â Just pointing out that breaking the law isn&#039;t the pervue of one political party and one doesn&#039;t party doesn&#039;t have the upper-hand on it. Â Clinton was impeached on perjury about his testimony regarding Lewinsky; a topic that *never* should have been asked in the first place. Â Don&#039;t forget, that investigation started with Whitewater and ended with vindictive cow, Linda Tripp. Â  Since the Whitewater investigation never came up with anything, then Mr. Starr had to find some way to justify his years-long job. Â If people have been so high and might about lying under oath about extra marital affairs, then perhaps all our elected officials should undergo such questioning and then let&#039;s see how many of them are truthful. Â How about, say, Mr. Gingrich who was carrying on an affair with his not-yet third wife while he was still married to his second wife *and* leading the charge against President Clinton.
Spitzer, on the other hand, is under investigation for breaking a number of laws. Â He&#039;s trying to perform a pre-emptive strike, similar to the way that slimeball McGreevy did a few years back (yikes, a gay democrat who *doesn&#039;t* support McGreevy and his noble coming out? Â can it be?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>15: Â Just pointing out that breaking the law isn&#8217;t the pervue of one political party and one doesn&#8217;t party doesn&#8217;t have the upper-hand on it. Â Clinton was impeached on perjury about his testimony regarding Lewinsky; a topic that *never* should have been asked in the first place. Â Don&#8217;t forget, that investigation started with Whitewater and ended with vindictive cow, Linda Tripp. Â  Since the Whitewater investigation never came up with anything, then Mr. Starr had to find some way to justify his years-long job. Â If people have been so high and might about lying under oath about extra marital affairs, then perhaps all our elected officials should undergo such questioning and then let&#8217;s see how many of them are truthful. Â How about, say, Mr. Gingrich who was carrying on an affair with his not-yet third wife while he was still married to his second wife *and* leading the charge against President Clinton.<br />
Spitzer, on the other hand, is under investigation for breaking a number of laws. Â He&#8217;s trying to perform a pre-emptive strike, similar to the way that slimeball McGreevy did a few years back (yikes, a gay democrat who *doesn&#8217;t* support McGreevy and his noble coming out? Â can it be?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Maguire</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/03/11/why-hillary-is-silent-on-spitzer/comment-page-1/#comment-103410</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Maguire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 00:18:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/03/11/why-hillary-is-silent-on-spitzer/#comment-103410</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;(Larry Craig, Mark Foley, David Vitter, Jack Ryan spring to mind)&lt;/i&gt;

Let&#039;s see, Sen. Craig pled guilty to a misdemeanor;Â  Mark Foley resigned but was never charged ( as far as I can recall and research); David Vitter was never charged or arrested, but the obvious charge would have been solicitation. which is normally a misdemeanor; and Jack Ryan was caught up in a messy divorce by a wife who wanted a payday settlement (folks who remember that case recall that Jeri Ryan explained that she gad had affairs with two other men because, in the aftermath of her hubby&#039;s suggestion that they go to a sex club, she was repulsed by him and had to seek satisfaction elsewhere.Â  No, that doesn&#039;t sound like her lawyer&#039;s advice...).

Anyway, Vitter would be in the weakest case, since it may be that his madame was associated with organized crime.Â  But Spitzer is alleged to have been caught up in &quot;structuring&quot;, i.e., trying to disguise cash transactions and move money under the Feds radar, in this case for illegal purposes and quite possibly to organized crime associates.Â  Daft.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&lt;i&gt;(Larry Craig, Mark Foley, David Vitter, Jack Ryan spring to mind)&lt;/i&gt;</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s see, Sen. Craig pled guilty to a misdemeanor;Â  Mark Foley resigned but was never charged ( as far as I can recall and research); David Vitter was never charged or arrested, but the obvious charge would have been solicitation. which is normally a misdemeanor; and Jack Ryan was caught up in a messy divorce by a wife who wanted a payday settlement (folks who remember that case recall that Jeri Ryan explained that she gad had affairs with two other men because, in the aftermath of her hubby&#8217;s suggestion that they go to a sex club, she was repulsed by him and had to seek satisfaction elsewhere.Â  No, that doesn&#8217;t sound like her lawyer&#8217;s advice&#8230;).</p>
<p>Anyway, Vitter would be in the weakest case, since it may be that his madame was associated with organized crime.Â  But Spitzer is alleged to have been caught up in &quot;structuring&quot;, i.e., trying to disguise cash transactions and move money under the Feds radar, in this case for illegal purposes and quite possibly to organized crime associates.Â  Daft.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: American Elephant</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/03/11/why-hillary-is-silent-on-spitzer/comment-page-1/#comment-103407</link>
		<dc:creator>American Elephant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 00:14:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/03/11/why-hillary-is-silent-on-spitzer/#comment-103407</guid>
		<description>ugh, about Reid that should obviously read Senate Majority leader.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ugh, about Reid that should obviously read Senate Majority leader.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
