Just a week ago, I wondered if Hillary had picked up her mendacity in the course of her relationship with Bill, but if this story proves to be true, it seems her deception goes back as far as one of her first jobs in politics.
According to Jerry Zeifman, lifelong Democrat and former general counsel and chief of staff of the House Judiciary Committee where he “supervised Hillary when she worked on the Watergate investigation,” the then-young attorney “wrote a fraudulent legal brief, and confiscated public documents to hide her deception.” She claimed there was no right to counsel during impeachment proceedings despite precedent for such counsel.
When Zeifman told her that there were documents helping establish this precedent, she removed the relevant files from an office where they were publicly accessible to offices where they were not. This so she could claim there was “no precedent for the right to representation by counsel during an impeachment proceeding.”
Hmm. . . does that removal remind you of something?
There’s more to the story than this. So check out Ed Morrissey’s source. If true, we would see that Hillary learned the types of behavior that came to define her family’s tenure in the White House long before she got to the White House, before even her sojourn in Arkansas.
Hillary: Longtime Liar?
"I can’t recall. Go Yankees!"
I have been shocked ……….. shocked! ……… I tell you …….. ever since this topic became public. Hillary has always been open and above board in her dealings. She even sent that fellow ……. what’s his name?……. Socks Haliburton …….. or something ………. to the national archives to call attention to important Clinton papers during the 9-11 commission period. This whole implication of impropriety strikes me as a desperate attempt to splatter mud on her coronation robes. And if she actually did do this thing, she did it for the children. Some people smear her as an empty vessel. I, on the other hand, am convinced she is full of it.
So let me get this straight…Bill learned how to be slick from Hillary?
This explains what Bill saw in Hillary. An accomplice in his goals, who would further his career the only way he knew how – with lies and underhanded tactics.
I could see why Hill fell for Bill, apparently he has this magnetic appeal for women. (being the oddball, to me he simply seemed sleezy – not God’s gift to women).
I always wondered what he saw in her, she had to bring something powerful to the table – otherwise why choose her and stay with him all these years?
Two peas in a pod.
And I agree, Dan Calabrese’s column is worth reading in full. He puts things in context. The problem is not that Hillary recommended a President be tried without counsel. People, especially young people, have bad ideas or make bad representations all the time. The problem is that she was (1) angling in a particularly partisan way, as Calabrese makes clear, and (2) willing to lie and to *hide records owned by the American public*, to achieve her scheme.
Generally speaking, show me a politician that isn’t a longtime liar, and I’ll show you a prime example of self-delusion.
#7
I was wondering how long it would take for someone to make excuses.
I know exactly why women fall for Bill. He has that BS quality that a lot of women find so attractive. Schmooze, bs, whatever. Â
Ever notice how all those years on the Wal-Mart Board of Directors and at the Rose Law Firm never enter into her public resume?
Zeifman is a genuine historical figure and the subject non-titillating. This means the Zeifman problem is not amenable to the usual Clinton counterstrategy of ignore and smear. "They all do it" is bunkum. Certainly all politicians are mortal with more than the average weight of neurosis but they do NOT all, or even mostly, sink to Hillaroid levels as revealed here for one good reason: they are quite apt to get caught. That does not apply to Clintons of course, or it didn’t until they happened to simultaneously grasp at the same apple as a privileged group happens to hunger for. Whatever else the outcome, Barack has scraped the hull of the Ship of State and cast off our most corpulent barnacles. Thanks Barry!
Given that Zelfman appears legit, I wonder why the MSM is not picking up on this.
A leopard never changes her spots. That being said, I go back to this telling story. It’s about Mr. Zeifman firing Hillary. As you may know, Jerry Zeifman fired Hillary for unethical practices during the Watergate Investigation. Why exactly was Hillary fired? “Because she was a liar,†Zeifman said in a recent interview. “She was an unethical, dishonest lawyer. She conspired to violate the Constitution, the rules of the House, the rules of the committee and the rules of confidentiality.†Zeifman’s story is important. Not only does it go to character, it goes to a lifelong pattern of lying and obfuscation. And, it took Zeifman twelve years to get it aired. After Watergate, Zeifman could not recommend Hillary for any subsequent position of public or private trust, nor furnish her with a letter of recommendation. Again, Hillary Clinton is a bold-faced liar, who will stop at nothing to get what she wants. Should anyone doubt Mr. Zeifman’s veracity regarding the Clintons: http://theseedsof9-11.com      The Clintons corrupted the soul of the Democratic Party. -Henry Ruth, lead Watergate courtroom prosecutor.   Â