Comments on: Does Log Cabin’s Endorsement Matter in 2008?

By: Vince P

Vince P — Sat, 12 Apr 2008 15:41:04 +0000

and since the overwhelming majority of Republicans in every poll taken on the issue, believe that homosexuality itself should be ILLEGAL,

BWAHAHAHAH. You guys kill me.

By: Tom

Tom — Sat, 12 Apr 2008 11:21:50 +0000

Does your endorsement matter? LOL, no. For one thing, no one really cares about your organization. Secondly, the only effect it would have would be on the Republican Party, and since the overwhelming majority of Republicans in every poll taken on the issue, believe that homosexuality itself, and not merely homosexual marriage, should be ILLEGAL, I think it’s safe to say that an endorsement by a bunch of gays isn’t going to influence much in the GOP.

By: GayPatriot » Liveblogging Log Cabin Townhall Meeting

GayPatriot » Liveblogging Log Cabin Townhall Meeting — Fri, 11 Apr 2008 22:12:52 +0000

[...] Does Log Cabin’s Endorsement Matter in 2008? [...]

By: Mark Mead

Mark Mead — Fri, 11 Apr 2008 19:27:38 +0000

The numbers don’t lie. After the election if a significant increase in gay turnout is for McCain LCR can take some credit – Mc Cain should take some too of course. If it remains the same then it is pretty clear the gay GOP’ers are gonna vote how they want without heading calls from Washington D.C. The numbers will tell the tale.

Endorsements move people or money to candidates.

In November if LCR PAC has made significant increases to candidates and successfully bundled $ for McCain then they will be successful. It does not matter if you support LCR and its mission or not.

An increase in voters and/or money means they have influence in the GOP. A decrease means they do not. The numbers are bi partisan! We will know soon enough.

One question on the endorsement….What if Mc Cain picks Romney for his VEEP? That might be a deal breaker for me. Not sure how Patrick and the board would handle that situation. Lets hope he picks Condi or Portman.

By: ILoveCapitalism

ILoveCapitalism — Fri, 11 Apr 2008 12:15:34 +0000

(P.S. to be clear: LCR National didn’t run “Kerry for President” ads. Just mushy ads about “fear” or something whose message was unclear, but, if you were to torture one out, it could only be that President Bush is a monster. As I said, ads against him.)

By: ILoveCapitalism

ILoveCapitalism — Fri, 11 Apr 2008 12:11:39 +0000

In 2004, LCR National didn’t just not endorse Bush; they produced and ran ads against him (with source of money unclear).

And they didn’t accomplish a thing. Except to show the world what craven fools worth ignoring are LCR National.

By: American Elephant

American Elephant — Fri, 11 Apr 2008 11:12:16 +0000

Perhaps it would be better if they didn't