Oh, by the way, where are those oceans of oil this war was supposed to be for? Gas is $3.35 out where I am, and it can only be because the demand exceeds supply.

Right Kevin? you fucking idiot.

How about “War in Iraq was not the answer when we abandoned trying to capture Osama Bin Laden in Afghanistan”. That’s more to the point in the current situation.

Well sure if you’re a dishonest, military trashing dick.

or how about “War in Iraq is not the answer when we don’t bother finding out basic information about he people, like the difference between Sunnis and Shiites.”

How about knowing the difference before becoming House Intelligence Committee Chair??? One should have an inkling after serving as senior member of the Armed Services and Select Intelligence Committees, no?

I’ll remind you of Rep. Silvestre Reyes:

“Al Qaeda, they have both,” he answered, adding: “Predominantly probably Shi’ite.”

Jeff Stein, a reporter for Congressional Quarterly, then put a similar question about Hezbollah, the Lebanese Shia group. “Hezbollah. Uh, Hezbollah . . .” replied Mr Reyes. “Why do you ask me these questions at five o’clock? Can I answer in Spanish? Do you speak Spanish?” Go ahead, said Stein. “Well, I, uh . . .” said the congressman.

Not to mention that he stated that he thought we should “ramp up” the number of soldiers in Iraq “by twenty or thirty thousand, then when Bush proposed sending 21,500, he said

“we don’t have the capability to escalate even to this minimal level.”

You just love stepping in it, doncha Kevin?

The question was how do we remove Saddam and his regime from power. And it was first proposed by Bill Clinton who failed to do anything about it.

And no one has abandoned trying to capture Bin Laden, well, except Clinton who was offered Bin Laden on a silver platter many times.

Its just president Bush, Republicans, Joe Lieberman and a good many Democrats aren’t so blitheringly stupid as to suggest we should attack our fragile ally Pakistan almost certainly delivering it into the hands of extremists the way your ridiculously ignorant presumptive presidential nominee has.

The stupidity of the left really is mind boggling. “War in Iraq is BAD! Attack Pakistan!!!” Thats liberal policy for you, DONT attack enemies, and DO attack one friend while abandoning the other.

Thank God the adults are still in charge.

How do you know this.

Rather than turning-the-other-cheek; he who raises his hand against me will get his hand broken. If he then raises his other hand, he just might lose that second-hand entirely.

– Neville Chamberlain

OK, so maybe he really didn’t say it, but he easily could have.

Cheers,
Julie the Jarhead

[My point exactly. --Dan]

What liberals naively believe is that there is always a better alternative. And of course that’s retarded. Virtually no one wants to go to war. But sometimes it’s the only answer left.

But that is what happens when you base your ideology on emotions instead of on reason, you end up with an ignorant, naive, bumper-sticker mentality.

Seriously… Of course war isn’t the answer. You only do it if, and because, your alternatives are even worse. (Handing Iraq over to al Qaeda and Iran, with resulting genocide + U.S. re-intervention = worse than the current war)

But, some people don’t understand that. In their stupidity and lack of understanding, they think it’s others who must be stupid. In their failure to understand that some wars are forced upon the United States, they imagine – bizarrely – that those who support the fight must somehow like it, and must be told not to.