<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gay Conservative Blogging as Window Into Liberal Intolerance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/04/18/gay-conservative-blogging-as-window-into-liberal-intolerance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/04/18/gay-conservative-blogging-as-window-into-liberal-intolerance/</link>
	<description>The Internet home for American gay conservatives.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 22:26:51 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Vince P</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/04/18/gay-conservative-blogging-as-window-into-liberal-intolerance/comment-page-1/#comment-139611</link>
		<dc:creator>Vince P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 01:51:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=3030#comment-139611</guid>
		<description>Good luck getting an answer David.

All day so far I&#039;ve asked folks with the contrary opinion to explain or justify their statement, and as usual, they never do.

Leftists have this childish need to make sure everyone knows they stated their cliched opinion yet never freel they have to actually defend themselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good luck getting an answer David.</p>
<p>All day so far I&#8217;ve asked folks with the contrary opinion to explain or justify their statement, and as usual, they never do.</p>
<p>Leftists have this childish need to make sure everyone knows they stated their cliched opinion yet never freel they have to actually defend themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/04/18/gay-conservative-blogging-as-window-into-liberal-intolerance/comment-page-1/#comment-139593</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 01:28:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=3030#comment-139593</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;As a straight white male, I am always stunned by gay and feminist groups who are against doing anything about hard line Islamic groups and countries.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

The problem, Rob, is you assume that left-wingers are logical. &lt;strong&gt;Big mistake.&lt;/strong&gt;

TBogg&#039;s behavior is truly disgusting. He should be ashamed of himself, but I know that&#039;s asking far too much.

So Bruce&#039;s  support for freedom, fairness, and free speech is all a lie because he doesn&#039;t agree with Carter that ex-presidents are &lt;a href=&quot;http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/babylonbeyond/2008/04/egypt-carter-me.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&quot;immune&quot;&lt;/a&gt; from restrictions on negotiating with terrorists, eh TBogg? Bullsh*t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>As a straight white male, I am always stunned by gay and feminist groups who are against doing anything about hard line Islamic groups and countries.</p></blockquote>
<p>The problem, Rob, is you assume that left-wingers are logical. <strong>Big mistake.</strong></p>
<p>TBogg&#8217;s behavior is truly disgusting. He should be ashamed of himself, but I know that&#8217;s asking far too much.</p>
<p>So Bruce&#8217;s  support for freedom, fairness, and free speech is all a lie because he doesn&#8217;t agree with Carter that ex-presidents are <a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/babylonbeyond/2008/04/egypt-carter-me.html" rel="nofollow">&#8220;immune&#8221;</a> from restrictions on negotiating with terrorists, eh TBogg? Bullsh*t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ThatGayConservative</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/04/18/gay-conservative-blogging-as-window-into-liberal-intolerance/comment-page-1/#comment-138776</link>
		<dc:creator>ThatGayConservative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 04:31:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=3030#comment-138776</guid>
		<description>#3
But if liberals paid attention to the homophobia and sexism over there, people would discover that the U.S. isn&#039;t really as bad as we&#039;re supposed to believe. They can&#039;t have that, so they have to paint us as the worst in the world lest they never get anywhere with their agenda.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#3<br />
But if liberals paid attention to the homophobia and sexism over there, people would discover that the U.S. isn&#8217;t really as bad as we&#8217;re supposed to believe. They can&#8217;t have that, so they have to paint us as the worst in the world lest they never get anywhere with their agenda.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Howell</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/04/18/gay-conservative-blogging-as-window-into-liberal-intolerance/comment-page-1/#comment-138112</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Howell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 04:05:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=3030#comment-138112</guid>
		<description>As a straight white male, I am always stunned by gay and feminist groups who are against doing anything about hard line Islamic groups and countries. If I were either female or gay, I&#039;d be doing everything I could to make sure that America&#039;s military.

But, hey, that&#039;s just me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a straight white male, I am always stunned by gay and feminist groups who are against doing anything about hard line Islamic groups and countries. If I were either female or gay, I&#8217;d be doing everything I could to make sure that America&#8217;s military.</p>
<p>But, hey, that&#8217;s just me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vince P</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/04/18/gay-conservative-blogging-as-window-into-liberal-intolerance/comment-page-1/#comment-138095</link>
		<dc:creator>Vince P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 02:55:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=3030#comment-138095</guid>
		<description>Before any of you Leftists throw the &quot;self-loathing&quot; label at us.. look at what your buddies in Amsterdam are doing... they&#039;re leaving the Left.  Why?  Because the Left is leading the Netherlands to destruction.

It&#039;s the Self-Loathing Leftists who are harming the Gays in the Netherlands, so in their own interest, gays are now moving to the Right.

http://www.nisnews.nl/public/180408_1.htm


Dutch Gays Prefer Conservative to Leftwing Parties 

If only homosexuals were to vote, Proud of the Netherlands (TON) would be the biggest party in the Lower House. Conservative parties are more favoured among them than progressive ones, a poll by TV programme NOVA reveals.

NOVA carried out the survey in cooperation with gay publications Gaykrant and Gay.nl. TON pulled in the votes of 19 percent of the readers of Gaykrant. From Gay.nl, the party of Rita Verdonk won as much as 33 percent. Among all of the Dutch, 13 percent would vote for TON, according to NOVA.
- - - - - - - - -

The centre-left D66 party scored best with Gaykrant readers: 22 percent. With Gay.nl, it scored 14 percent. Together, this makes D66 the second party for homosexuals. Among all of the Dutch, only 3 percent would vote D66.

NOVA said this was the first time a survey has been carried out on such a large scale of the gay vote. It did say that compared with a Gaykrant survey from 1997, leftwing parties have dropped out of favour. TON and the Party for Freedom (PVV) of anti-Islam champion Geert Wilders have prompted strong growth towards the right.

In 2007, the Socialist Party (SP), Labour (PvdA) and the leftwing Greens (GroenLinks) together captured 40 percent of the gay vote, compared with just 25 percent now. Together with TON and PVV, the conservatives (VVD) and Christian democrats (CDA) would now win a combined 45 percent, up from 35 percent in 1997. TONâ€™s Verdonk and Wildersâ€™ PVV have emerged from the VVD.

In the NOVA poll, PvdA scores 7 percent on average among the gays. GroenLinks does better with 10 percent, while the SP gets 7 percent of the gay vote. The VVD would win 9 percent of the votes and PVV, 8 percent. CDA, the biggest Lower House party, traditionally has a very low score among homosexuals (4 percent).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Before any of you Leftists throw the &#8220;self-loathing&#8221; label at us.. look at what your buddies in Amsterdam are doing&#8230; they&#8217;re leaving the Left.  Why?  Because the Left is leading the Netherlands to destruction.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s the Self-Loathing Leftists who are harming the Gays in the Netherlands, so in their own interest, gays are now moving to the Right.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nisnews.nl/public/180408_1.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.nisnews.nl/public/180408_1.htm</a></p>
<p>Dutch Gays Prefer Conservative to Leftwing Parties </p>
<p>If only homosexuals were to vote, Proud of the Netherlands (TON) would be the biggest party in the Lower House. Conservative parties are more favoured among them than progressive ones, a poll by TV programme NOVA reveals.</p>
<p>NOVA carried out the survey in cooperation with gay publications Gaykrant and Gay.nl. TON pulled in the votes of 19 percent of the readers of Gaykrant. From Gay.nl, the party of Rita Verdonk won as much as 33 percent. Among all of the Dutch, 13 percent would vote for TON, according to NOVA.<br />
- &#8211; - &#8211; - &#8211; - &#8211; -</p>
<p>The centre-left D66 party scored best with Gaykrant readers: 22 percent. With Gay.nl, it scored 14 percent. Together, this makes D66 the second party for homosexuals. Among all of the Dutch, only 3 percent would vote D66.</p>
<p>NOVA said this was the first time a survey has been carried out on such a large scale of the gay vote. It did say that compared with a Gaykrant survey from 1997, leftwing parties have dropped out of favour. TON and the Party for Freedom (PVV) of anti-Islam champion Geert Wilders have prompted strong growth towards the right.</p>
<p>In 2007, the Socialist Party (SP), Labour (PvdA) and the leftwing Greens (GroenLinks) together captured 40 percent of the gay vote, compared with just 25 percent now. Together with TON and PVV, the conservatives (VVD) and Christian democrats (CDA) would now win a combined 45 percent, up from 35 percent in 1997. TONâ€™s Verdonk and Wildersâ€™ PVV have emerged from the VVD.</p>
<p>In the NOVA poll, PvdA scores 7 percent on average among the gays. GroenLinks does better with 10 percent, while the SP gets 7 percent of the gay vote. The VVD would win 9 percent of the votes and PVV, 8 percent. CDA, the biggest Lower House party, traditionally has a very low score among homosexuals (4 percent).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vince P</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/04/18/gay-conservative-blogging-as-window-into-liberal-intolerance/comment-page-1/#comment-138070</link>
		<dc:creator>Vince P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 02:22:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=3030#comment-138070</guid>
		<description>My favorite kind of angry hateful Leftist is the one who thinks that he is telling us/me something that no one has ever said to us/me in the history of the world.

Which is funny because I would *love* it if the Left would get some new material , I&#039;m so bored with the talking points from 1968.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My favorite kind of angry hateful Leftist is the one who thinks that he is telling us/me something that no one has ever said to us/me in the history of the world.</p>
<p>Which is funny because I would *love* it if the Left would get some new material , I&#8217;m so bored with the talking points from 1968.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
