<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: McCain Blogger Conference Call</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/05/15/mccain-blogger-conference-call/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/05/15/mccain-blogger-conference-call/</link>
	<description>The Internet home for American gay conservatives.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 02:30:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: GayPatriot &#187; On Differing from my Gay Peers on Marriage Ruling</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/05/15/mccain-blogger-conference-call/#comment-182291</link>
		<dc:creator>GayPatriot &#187; On Differing from my Gay Peers on Marriage Ruling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 23:16:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=3175#comment-182291</guid>
		<description>[...] McCain Blogger Conference Call [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] McCain Blogger Conference Call [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: V the K</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/05/15/mccain-blogger-conference-call/#comment-181970</link>
		<dc:creator>V the K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 14:47:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=3175#comment-181970</guid>
		<description>Not to mention the Al Gore position on Global Warming.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to mention the Al Gore position on Global Warming.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: V the K</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/05/15/mccain-blogger-conference-call/#comment-181969</link>
		<dc:creator>V the K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 14:47:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=3175#comment-181969</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;McCain ... does show respect for conservative leaders and understanding of our ideas&lt;/i&gt;

I really wish I could believe that. But it is impossible to reconcile that assertion with McCain-Feingold, McCain-Kennedy, McCain-Lieberman, or the Gang of 14, which denied good qualified justices an up or down vote for the sake of preserving the privilege liberal Democrats have to block qualified conservative judges. The McCain that takes the La Raza position on immigration, the ACLU position on interrogating terrorists, and the Harry Reid position on blocking conservative judges. 

He can talk the talk, but he doesn't walk the walk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>McCain &#8230; does show respect for conservative leaders and understanding of our ideas</i></p>
<p>I really wish I could believe that. But it is impossible to reconcile that assertion with McCain-Feingold, McCain-Kennedy, McCain-Lieberman, or the Gang of 14, which denied good qualified justices an up or down vote for the sake of preserving the privilege liberal Democrats have to block qualified conservative judges. The McCain that takes the La Raza position on immigration, the ACLU position on interrogating terrorists, and the Harry Reid position on blocking conservative judges. </p>
<p>He can talk the talk, but he doesn&#8217;t walk the walk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/05/15/mccain-blogger-conference-call/#comment-181695</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 03:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=3175#comment-181695</guid>
		<description>Good work under the gun Dan.  Unfortunately not everyone in California is thinking as clearly as you are.  The Page Seven definition and the dignity discussion are disturbingly shallow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good work under the gun Dan.  Unfortunately not everyone in California is thinking as clearly as you are.  The Page Seven definition and the dignity discussion are disturbingly shallow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: American Elephant</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/05/15/mccain-blogger-conference-call/#comment-181652</link>
		<dc:creator>American Elephant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 01:56:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=3175#comment-181652</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;While many conservatives may be skeptical of John McCain, he does show respect for conservative leaders and understanding of our ideas.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Well, at least when he's talking &lt;i&gt;to&lt;/i&gt; conservatives. When he's talking to the press and everyone else &lt;i&gt;about&lt;/i&gt; conservatives, we're greedy, corrupt xenophobes who don't care about the environment (for disagreeing with his economic, electoral, immigration and environmental policies respectively)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>While many conservatives may be skeptical of John McCain, he does show respect for conservative leaders and understanding of our ideas.</p></blockquote>
<p>Well, at least when he&#8217;s talking <i>to</i> conservatives. When he&#8217;s talking to the press and everyone else <i>about</i> conservatives, we&#8217;re greedy, corrupt xenophobes who don&#8217;t care about the environment (for disagreeing with his economic, electoral, immigration and environmental policies respectively)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ILoveCapitalism</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/05/15/mccain-blogger-conference-call/#comment-181473</link>
		<dc:creator>ILoveCapitalism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 20:42:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=3175#comment-181473</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;McCain looked forward to having conversations with former House Speaker Newt Gingrich and commended him for ideas, particularly the Contract with America, observing that the ideas in that contract were similar to those of the Gipper.&lt;/blockquote&gt;What a distance we have come from the days of Reagan!  (And not in a good way.)

Would Reagan have ever supported McCain-Feingold, McCain-Kennedy (after seeing the collapse of Simpson-Mazzoli which Reagan did support), or McCain's "cap and trade" massive intervention into the economy to deal with a greatly exaggerated threat?  I say no, no and no.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>McCain looked forward to having conversations with former House Speaker Newt Gingrich and commended him for ideas, particularly the Contract with America, observing that the ideas in that contract were similar to those of the Gipper.</p></blockquote>
<p>What a distance we have come from the days of Reagan!  (And not in a good way.)</p>
<p>Would Reagan have ever supported McCain-Feingold, McCain-Kennedy (after seeing the collapse of Simpson-Mazzoli which Reagan did support), or McCain&#8217;s &#8220;cap and trade&#8221; massive intervention into the economy to deal with a greatly exaggerated threat?  I say no, no and no.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
