Comments on: Hillary Best when Behind?

By: ILoveCapitalism

ILoveCapitalism — Tue, 20 May 2008 18:04:47 +0000

I don’t know if Hillary is best when behind… but I am sure that, for most straight guys, she is best *from* behind. (Sorry, couldn’t resist)

By: Sean A

Sean A — Sun, 18 May 2008 17:27:10 +0000

No surprise here. Rubin is no different from every other arrogantly partisan liberal journalist–virtually every story is a new opportunity to destroy some Republican’s reputation. They are perfectly willing to accept these credibility-targeted missions, even when it’s a suicide mission.

By: Jeremayakovka

Jeremayakovka — Sun, 18 May 2008 17:19:31 +0000

What I love about the Clintons – and I do mean “love” – is how much one can learn about the art of politics by studying them. I sure have.

Barring a major upheaval in Democratic politics, or in national or world affairs, Old Cackles won’t get the nomination this year.

This summer’s convention will be a little like ’68: she being Humphrey, and Obama a reincarnated RFK.

By: GayPatriotWest

GayPatriotWest — Sun, 18 May 2008 16:03:25 +0000

Amazing that the guy wouldn’t guy an inch when he’s clearly wrong. Wish I had seen that because I was planning a followup.

First of all, the term McCain used was “deal with,” a far more ambiguous term than meet with without preconditions. And subsequent comments made that very same time put that comment into context.

If Rubin were a decent man, he would retract his editorial and apologize. But, he’s just a narrow partisan, trying to use anything and everything to destroy a Republican, while accusing that Republican of dirty campaign tactics.

By: The Wizard, fkap

The Wizard, fkap — Sun, 18 May 2008 15:06:45 +0000

Daniel, I’m in nearly total agreement with you. Hillary now impresses the heck out of me. As the campaign has progressed she has become both tougher and a heck of a lot more human. Frankly, I want a real fighter in the White House.

Meanwhile, I’m less impressed with Obama and have begun to fear him more. It really frightens me that the public will hang on to a meaningless phrase like “Change You Can Believe In” and propel a cnadidate to the nomination. He has said so very little.

Meanwhile the campaign has already gotten very ugly and we have 6 months to go. The James P. Rubin bull**** you dissect so very well in your next post is a classic example. I saw him on television last night and he not only wouldn’t give an inch, he accused the Republicans of distorting his video and “shooting the messenger.”

Change we can believe in?