<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bloggers v. MSM:  We, at least, Acknowledge Our Bias</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/06/02/bloggers-v-msm-we-at-least-acknowledge-our-bias/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/06/02/bloggers-v-msm-we-at-least-acknowledge-our-bias/</link>
	<description>The Internet home for American gay conservatives.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 00:41:48 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ThatGayConservative</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/06/02/bloggers-v-msm-we-at-least-acknowledge-our-bias/comment-page-1/#comment-203353</link>
		<dc:creator>ThatGayConservative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 01:17:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=3241#comment-203353</guid>
		<description>#1

Liberals never want people to know who they really are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#1</p>
<p>Liberals never want people to know who they really are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Hughes</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/06/02/bloggers-v-msm-we-at-least-acknowledge-our-bias/comment-page-1/#comment-202926</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Hughes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 20:03:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=3241#comment-202926</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve always said that the US media should do as their European counterparts and exercise the prerogative of the &quot;partisan press.&quot;  For example, conservatives in Great Britain read The Times, while the wacky leftists read The Telegraph or Evening Standard.  They all get the same news, but presented in different perspectives.

Yet for whatever reason, the mainstream US media has refused to identify their partisanship and as Dan correctly points out, they are selling the American public a bill of goods.  And note how the AP never identifies any Democrat officials with a (D) when there is any adverse news, but always ID&#039;s a Republican in the first line of the story.

And for those seagulls here who calls Fox News &quot;the RNC propaganda channel,&quot; they have obviously not watched any of the NBC affiliates.  Or more likely, they agree with NBC/CNBC/PMSNBC&#039;s slant.  They are all in the tank for snObama.

Bias? What obvious liberal media bias?

Regards,
Peter H.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve always said that the US media should do as their European counterparts and exercise the prerogative of the &#8220;partisan press.&#8221;  For example, conservatives in Great Britain read The Times, while the wacky leftists read The Telegraph or Evening Standard.  They all get the same news, but presented in different perspectives.</p>
<p>Yet for whatever reason, the mainstream US media has refused to identify their partisanship and as Dan correctly points out, they are selling the American public a bill of goods.  And note how the AP never identifies any Democrat officials with a (D) when there is any adverse news, but always ID&#8217;s a Republican in the first line of the story.</p>
<p>And for those seagulls here who calls Fox News &#8220;the RNC propaganda channel,&#8221; they have obviously not watched any of the NBC affiliates.  Or more likely, they agree with NBC/CNBC/PMSNBC&#8217;s slant.  They are all in the tank for snObama.</p>
<p>Bias? What obvious liberal media bias?</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Peter H.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
