Comments on: “Compassionate Conservatism” Redux?

By: Robert

Robert — Thu, 05 Jun 2008 02:52:44 +0000

Amazing how our so-called leaders can always find “needs” that require more spending yet never, ever seem to find spending that’s no longer needed. More taxes to come.

And I just saw gas at $4.50 north of San Diego.

By: ThatGayConservative

ThatGayConservative — Wed, 04 Jun 2008 20:43:41 +0000

I am kinda confused on what programs of his are costing more,

How about his pushing for “global poverty” bill which would add $845 billion on top of the $300 billion in aid we already ship overseas?

By: Darkeyedresolve

Darkeyedresolve — Wed, 04 Jun 2008 19:22:36 +0000

Well well. wonder how many Republicans will stick for Obama when they see he plans to spend more than even Hillary was. I am kinda confused on what programs of his are costing more, when she has manadated health care and he’s isn’t.

Considering he will have expanded majorities in Congress, that might just be the more conversative estimate.

By: John

John — Wed, 04 Jun 2008 18:05:39 +0000

But you and I both know that a Democrat-controlled Congress will never budge on oil. No, McCain on spending so far is only better in comparison to his opponent – or perhaps even to Dubya.

By: North Dallas Thirty

North Dallas Thirty — Wed, 04 Jun 2008 15:49:57 +0000

The difference, though, is that I could see Federal revenues growing annually by $68.5 billion or more per year, especially if we were to open up more oil leases and receive royalties.

Over $300 billion? Forget it. The fact that Obama and Clinton are promising that is a sign that Democrats are lying through their teeth on “pay as you go”.