<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gay Groups:  Ill-timed Lawsuits set fight for Marriage Back</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/06/10/gay-groups-ill-timed-lawsuits-set-fight-for-marriage-back/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/06/10/gay-groups-ill-timed-lawsuits-set-fight-for-marriage-back/</link>
	<description>The Internet home for American gay conservatives.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:41:47 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: GAYS DEFEND MARRIAGE &#187; Gay doublespeak on the Constitution</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/06/10/gay-groups-ill-timed-lawsuits-set-fight-for-marriage-back/comment-page-1/#comment-217676</link>
		<dc:creator>GAYS DEFEND MARRIAGE &#187; Gay doublespeak on the Constitution</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 00:23:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=3274#comment-217676</guid>
		<description>[...] Hat tip: GayPatriot. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hat tip: GayPatriot. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: North Dallas Thirty</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/06/10/gay-groups-ill-timed-lawsuits-set-fight-for-marriage-back/comment-page-1/#comment-216366</link>
		<dc:creator>North Dallas Thirty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 21:29:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=3274#comment-216366</guid>
		<description>But of course, the reason leftists don&#039;t want that is because they know that the vast majority of Americans do not support abortion on demand.

What they do support is abortion being allowed in the case of rape, incest, and imminent danger to the mother&#039;s life -- which, if they&#039;re lucky, constitutes roughly 15% of the million-plus abortions performed in the United States annually.

Or, put differently, given that the average cost for an abortion is around $450, $382 million dollars would immediately vanish from Planned Parenthood and other leftist abortion groups&#039; pockets -- and thus from the campaign funds of leftist Democrat politicians.

Realize that the reason Planned Parenthood and other groups push to promote teenage sex through &quot;sex education&quot; classes is simple; teenagers are notoriously bad at being responsible, and each time they fail to be, Planned Parenthood stands to profit from it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But of course, the reason leftists don&#8217;t want that is because they know that the vast majority of Americans do not support abortion on demand.</p>
<p>What they do support is abortion being allowed in the case of rape, incest, and imminent danger to the mother&#8217;s life &#8212; which, if they&#8217;re lucky, constitutes roughly 15% of the million-plus abortions performed in the United States annually.</p>
<p>Or, put differently, given that the average cost for an abortion is around $450, $382 million dollars would immediately vanish from Planned Parenthood and other leftist abortion groups&#8217; pockets &#8212; and thus from the campaign funds of leftist Democrat politicians.</p>
<p>Realize that the reason Planned Parenthood and other groups push to promote teenage sex through &#8220;sex education&#8221; classes is simple; teenagers are notoriously bad at being responsible, and each time they fail to be, Planned Parenthood stands to profit from it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Hughes</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/06/10/gay-groups-ill-timed-lawsuits-set-fight-for-marriage-back/comment-page-1/#comment-216047</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Hughes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 16:18:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=3274#comment-216047</guid>
		<description>All Roe v Wade did is to take what was formerly a state&#039;s jurisdiction and federalize it.  Anyone who wants to &quot;overturn&quot; Roe v Wade is simply asking for the law to be interpreted as it was before, without the 9th Amendment&#039;s &quot;penumbra&quot; clause (you know, it doesn&#039;t say abortion in the Constitution but per the 9th Amendment interp, it really does).

In other words, just like marriage, let the states determine abortion laws.  Plain and simple.  It does not mean having women resort to back-alley abortions.

Or as Joan Crawford would have yelled:  &quot;NO WIRE HANGERS!&quot;  ;-)

Regards,
Peter H.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All Roe v Wade did is to take what was formerly a state&#8217;s jurisdiction and federalize it.  Anyone who wants to &#8220;overturn&#8221; Roe v Wade is simply asking for the law to be interpreted as it was before, without the 9th Amendment&#8217;s &#8220;penumbra&#8221; clause (you know, it doesn&#8217;t say abortion in the Constitution but per the 9th Amendment interp, it really does).</p>
<p>In other words, just like marriage, let the states determine abortion laws.  Plain and simple.  It does not mean having women resort to back-alley abortions.</p>
<p>Or as Joan Crawford would have yelled:  &#8220;NO WIRE HANGERS!&#8221;  <img src='http://www.gaypatriot.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Peter H.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ThatGayConservative</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/06/10/gay-groups-ill-timed-lawsuits-set-fight-for-marriage-back/comment-page-1/#comment-215668</link>
		<dc:creator>ThatGayConservative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 08:58:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=3274#comment-215668</guid>
		<description>#2
I stand corrected (sorta).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#2<br />
I stand corrected (sorta).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vince P</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/06/10/gay-groups-ill-timed-lawsuits-set-fight-for-marriage-back/comment-page-1/#comment-215232</link>
		<dc:creator>Vince P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 01:02:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=3274#comment-215232</guid>
		<description>What about it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: American Elephant</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/06/10/gay-groups-ill-timed-lawsuits-set-fight-for-marriage-back/comment-page-1/#comment-215194</link>
		<dc:creator>American Elephant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 00:07:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=3274#comment-215194</guid>
		<description>How about Roe v Wade?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about Roe v Wade?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ThatGayConservative</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/06/10/gay-groups-ill-timed-lawsuits-set-fight-for-marriage-back/comment-page-1/#comment-215034</link>
		<dc:creator>ThatGayConservative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 19:56:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=3274#comment-215034</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve never understood why some folks are inclined to try to get what they want by pissing off everybody else. I can&#039;t think of an example where that has worked. Just as laws forcing people to like you aren&#039;t going to accomplish that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve never understood why some folks are inclined to try to get what they want by pissing off everybody else. I can&#8217;t think of an example where that has worked. Just as laws forcing people to like you aren&#8217;t going to accomplish that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

