Put a good word in up in Heaven that this election turns out for the GOOD of the United States of America!!!!!

Quite pesky isn’t it, having that 3rd branch of government to make sure that we actually follow the law?

Exactly which law was followed?

And spread the 400 or so terrorists from Gitmo to these communtiy jails. Let Kevin and his brothers have them in their midst and feed and clothe them. Generally make nice.

Are you kidding? They’d be lining up for conjugal visits!

Kevin has no clue what he’s talking about. You know he wouldnt even consider reading the dissents, or read the precedent that the court admitted it trampled. Kevin, like all liberals doesn’t give a rats ass about the constitution, the separation of powers, or even the terrorists. He simply is against whatever Bush is for.

Well, if by “waste of time” you’re thinking of that scene from the Omen where Gregory Peck is taking his son to Sunday services for the first time, and when Damien gets one glimpse of the cross on top of the steeple he starts having spastic convulsions, while screaming and clawing Lee Remick’s face to bloody ribbons, then YES. I would consider that a “waste of time.”

Now, if I ever attend a wiccan-polytheistic-soy-frozen-milk-ANTI-SOCIAL-Ouija-ritual, then I can’t think of a more enchanting companion than Kevin. I’m no FOOL. I wouldn’t DREAM of summoning the dark forces and/or joining their hellish crusade without Kevin being there. Without Kevin and his handcrafted voodoo marionettes and gasoline-soaked effigies, well…the party has no where to go but down. You know I’m right.

Oh, nos! Soldiers shouting in joy over the destruction of the enemy! No. No. No. Our men in uniform are supposed to be anguished or at least conflicted by it so they can come home, get on mental health disability, and join Iraq Veterans Against War! The modern feminized soldier doesn’t shout when Mr. Jihadi meets Mr. JDAM, he’s supposed to strike his best Alan Alda pose and sigh, “This isn’t a war, it’s a murder!”

Not to mention all those horrible greenhouse gases a burning jihadi gives off. Who knows how many friendly, cuddly polar bears would be drowned by burning off Murat Kunaz’s beard! Think of the polar bears! Think of the polar bears!

/lefty twit

So I guess inviting Kevin to our church ice cream social might be a waste of time?

http://michellemalkin.com/2008/05/27/not-the-sharpest-scimitar-in-allahs-scabbard/

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=13c_1194146606

This is probably my fav

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=f0b_1201663566

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=322_1213457415

Kevin for Librarian of Congress and Official Panda Bamboo Shoot Feeder!!!

Kevin, you’re filthy liar. You don’t believe terrorists should be brought to justice in the least, and certainly not those that have been released from Gitmo. If you wanted any Muslim terrorist on Earth punished for anything, you wouldn’t be so cavalier about the Bush Administration “having only itself to blame” if, because of the “muddy waters” they “created,” terrorists were actually released. Easy come, easy go, right?

Lord knows, I’ve certainly wasted time trying to educate blithering, treasonous idiots like Kevin on this issue in particular, but it is a TRULY pointless exercise because even if they LOSE on the guilty/innocent argument, they have a backup—even when Gitmo detainees turn out to be guilty, THEY’RE STILL INNOCENT.

I first witnessed this obscene approach to arguing about Gitmo when I read a column on Huffpost (I know, I asked for it) and the ridiculous comments posted below it. It described a truly VILE argument on this issue, one that I have no doubt Kevin would take up without hesitation.

The column was about a terrorist who was released from Gitmo and later, along with two other suicide bombers, murdered 7 members of the Iraqi security forces. Here’s the title of the column:

Identification of Ex-Guantanamo Suicide Bomber Unleashes Pentagon Propaganda
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/andy-worthington/identification-of-ex-guan_b_101190.html

The Pentagon’s “propaganda” was actually having the temerity to suggest that not ALL of the Gitmo detainees were necessarily poor, innocent victims, just looking for a publisher for their works of poetry, as the Left had depicted them.

It gets worse. Read this paragraph:

“The question remains, therefore, whether al-Ajmi was lying in Guantánamo — which is, of course, a possibility — or whether the abuse he suffered for four years in US custody radicalized him and led to his final manifestation as a suicide bomber. The clues provide mixed messages. In Guantánamo, the authorities certainly regarded him as a threat, noting that his behavior had been so ‘aggressive and non-compliant’ that he had ‘resided in the disciplinary blocks throughout his detention,’ but there appears to be no way of knowing if he was ‘aggressive and non-compliant’ because he was a sworn militant or because he was profoundly angered by his experiences in US custody.”

So, was al-Ajmi a violent jihadist all along? Or was he angrily radicalized due to his confinement by U.S. forces—in fact, DRIVEN to his “final manifestation as a suicide bomber” by America?

You guessed it. It’s all our fault. He was a peace-loving poet/shepherd until he went to Gitmo. Then he was suddenly transformed into a violent, suicidal jihadist. Thus, the columnist concluded, the story was not only insufficient justification for U.S. policy and particularly Gitmo, but more evidence of it being a dismal failure that had caused more unnecessary and innocent deaths.

The author (and the band of idiots that commented on his column) chalked it up to embittered retaliation against the evil U.S. (even though Americans weren’t targeted). WORSE, the fact that al-Ajmi’s “retaliation” against America was committed as a SUICIDE ATTACK was just flatly ignored. Of course, outside the MSM, suicide attacks are the quickest way to martyrdom for violent Muslim terrorists which would (DUH!) suggest al-Ajmi held these extremist views ALL ALONG. But the fact that al-Ajmi KILLED HIMSELF while lashing out against “America” (and by “America,” I mean “Iraqi security forces”), was considered completely insignificant in the analysis.

What all of this reveals is that liberals like Kevin are not upset that the Gitmo detainees are (or, were…) denied the presumption of innocence applicable to defendants in American courts. They are upset because they believe an entirely different standard should apply to the detainees: innocent until proven guilty; and innocent AFTER proven guilty.

It’s utterly pointless to argue issues of guilt or innocence at Gitmo with people like Kevin (seriously….I mean, c’mon….it’s KEVIN!) because there are NO CIRCUMSTANCES under which an anti-American, moral relativist like Kevin would ever hold a violent Muslim terrorist singularly accountable for his actions before blaming the U.S. FIRST.

So when you hear people like Kevin say things like, “Should terrorists who’ve committed heinous acts be brought to justice? of course they… blahblahbullshitbullshitbullshitblahblahblah…,” it’s easy to tell that they’re lying, because in the next sentence, they start using one of their favorite expressions: “WITCH HUNT.” See, the whole terrorism thing? They don’t believe in it. “Terrorists” are just a bunch of “witches” that conservatives made up to put that evil plan fueled by “fear-mongering” into action. It’s all “hysteria and lies” as far as Kevin is concerned, so it’s not possible for any terrorists inside or outside of Gitmo to ever be guilty of ANYTHING.

President Abraham Lincoln actually had a couple of Supreme Court justices arrested for high treason and removed from the bench during the Civil War because they basically tried to screw him from preserving the Union by declaring Southerners as “non-enemy-combatants.” Would you have the same problem with that today if it were GWB?

Or better yet, snObama?

(Crickets chirping)

Checkmate.

Regards,
Peter H.

By the way, if you borrow Kevin’s Illustrated Lord of the Rings, you’ll find all the pages with Gimli on them stick together.

Even though fully innocent of any terrorist or terrorist related activities…..

was….

tortured in several ways

and….

the Bush administrators and its supporters at all levels of government have only themselves to blame for muddying these waters with hysteria and lies

while Murat Kurnaz had….

5 years of his life lost and not one drop of proof of any connections with terrorists whatsoever.

Oh, Kevin, you really do drink the Kool-Aid. For openers, what tribunal of law found Murat Kurnaz “FULLY INNOCENT of any terrorist or terrorist related activities?

Where is the documentary evidence that Murat Kurnaz was “tortured in several ways” and what definition of “torture” are we using here?

Three examples of Bush administration “hysteria” and three examples of Bush administration “lies” please. Or just one each, if you prefer.

“Not one drop of proof of ANY connections with terrorists WHATSOEVER.” Will you bet your life on that? You should, because you leave no wiggle room in your statement.

the Chancellor of German requested to Bush directly that he be released

Other Gitmo prisoners have been released to England, France, Spain, etc. at the request of their governments. It is part of Diplomatic Courtesy. The Chancellor of Germany had best hope that Murat Kurnaz keeps his nose clean, because Murat Kurnaz is officially the ward of the German state.

Hey, do you think they are watching him? After all, he is “fully innocent of any terrorist of terrorist related activities” and there is “not on drop of proof of any connections with terrorists whatsoever.”

Kevin for Director of CIA!

That’s pretty f—ed up.