No, markiemark. An innuendo is a brand of Italian suppositories.

However, I would not recommend that you use them as it will cause irreversible brain damage.

Oh, wait – I forgot. You already seem to have that in abundance.

Never mind.

Regards,
Peter H.

show me the money. molest huh?? oh that’s right, just another lie to put out there avoid the real issue.

Saddam had that yellowcake before the Gulf War, and it was locked down after.

Suppose that Mitchelll Blatt has rock solid proof that both parts of this statement are 100% true.

Does that mean that Saddam did not pursue additional yellowcake after the Gulf War? Does that mean that Saddam would never have agreed to transfer the “locked down” yellowcake to another tyrant? Does that mean than a huge cache of yellowcake is benign, like a warehouse full of aluminum cans?

Yeah, Mitchell Blatt is pretty narrow-minded and contorted. I’ll agree with that.

the best you can do is innuendo to debunk ritter

Innuendo? is that the name of the little girl he molested?

And again, the Obama campaign lies and claims Ritter was never allowed to go to Baghdad.

Nope.

Then, in 2000, Ritter co-wrote and directed a documentary “In Shifting Sands: The Truth About UNSCOM and the Disarming of Iraq,” in which, despite his prior minatory rhetoric, he attempted to show that country was actually a “defanged tiger.” The film was financed by an Iraqi businessman named Shaker Al-Khafaji using pilfered money from the oil-for-food program.

Again, notice how the Obama campaign and the Democrat Party support making propaganda films to promote Saddam Hussein using money stolen from UN humanitarian programs.

But it gets better.

In 2002, during the lead-up to the war he fervently opposed, Ritter refused to elaborate for Time magazine on the “horrific” conditions of the children’s prison he inspected at the General Security Services headquarters in Iraq, fearing that the gruesome details would “be used by those who would want to promote war with Iraq, and right now I’m waging peace.”

So the Democrat Party and Barack Obama supported covering up Saddam Hussein’s brutality, including his imprisonment and torture of children, because doing so would undercut their attempts to protect Saddam Hussein and perpetuate his regime.

And now, the REAL fun.

In that same interview, he clearly contradicted himself and lied about his former position:

I have never given Iraq a clean bill of health! Never! Never! I’ve said that no one has backed up any allegations that Iraq has reconstituted WMD capability with anything that remotely resembles substantive fact.

So Ritter himself admitted that he didn’t think Iraq was free of WMDs.

Meanwhile, he is a sex offender. Court proceedings involving juveniles are ordinarily sealed to protect their privacy. The court ordered him to undergo sex-offender counseling and he did; hence, the court likely dismissed the charges, similar to using a diversion agreement including rehab for DUI.

But again, it’s no surprise that the Obama campaign supports and endorses someone who used stolen money from humanitarian programs to create propaganda films for Saddam Hussein, who himself admitted that he was covering up Saddam’s brutality to aid the Democrat Party’s attempt to keep Saddam in power, and who solicits underage children for sex.

http://www.truthalliance.net/News/Vault/tabid/67/articleType/ArticleView/articleId/416/Default.aspx

Why hasn’t Obama signed this guy on as an advisor?

In short, blame every stupid thing his sheep say on him, and watch as he throws them under the bus, shuts them up, and is forced to admit that what his sheep say is wrong.

I think they are the ones that need therapy to understand why they are so passive-aggressive in their distaste for America and for what she stands.

Where are those gay concentration camps when you need them?

Oh yeah – far back in the recesses of their collective imagination.

Regards,
Peter H.

AoSHQ had a great solution for trolls. Some regulars we ‘deputized’ and allowed to re-write comments posted by trolls to make them sound idiotic. That would not even work, here, as it is impossible to make some trolls’ comments any stupider than they already are.

I see the Obama campaign is lying again.

You see, we know when and from where Saddam Hussein purchased his uranium, and none of the locations are the United States.

And then markie finishes by quoting sex offender Scott Ritter, who has already been caught lying in regards to the Pelosi- and Obama-supported Syrian nuclear reactor.

Right.

All this talk of WMDs again (and marxist…er, markie’s contribution) has reminded me that of all the pointless discussions to have with idiot liberals, this one is the MOST pointless. If the “evidence” is that there are no WMDs, then the U.S. cannot take military action. Of course, the “evidence” consists of Saddam turning out his pants pockets and shaking his head back and forth. The mass-murdering dictator MUST be taken at his word. Any efforts by U.S. officials to verify Saddam’s claims will be condemned as ignorant and embarrassing “cowboy diplomacy.” If there IS evidence of the plans, materials and facilities to build WMDs, then the U.S. CANNOT take military action. Just because they have common stuff like enriched yellowcake uranium (enough to build 142 nuclear weapons) doesn’t prove a thing. Besides, I read somewhere that Yellowcake is as “common as snot.” Practically grows in your vegetable garden. And if the evidence is that Saddam (or Iran) has 500 nuclear warheads pointed at the U.S., Israel and Western Europe, well…same answer, of course! If we attack now, Saddam is sure to use those weapons on us and then where will we be????!!! We can’t provoke him–he might launch those nukes! Better that we keep our heads down and try not to piss him off.

But really when you’re talking about people like Kevin and markie, the analysis above is particularly unhelpful because their position from the get-go is: who are we to tell another sovereign nation that they can’t have nukes but we can? Who are we to be so arrogant and judgmental? Just because instead of Nascar, Iranians enjoy an afternoon in the sun watching a gay hanging is no reason to assume their leaders would not have the good judgment to control a nuclear arsenal responsibly.

marxist markie just won’t admit that he’s a pacifist and that he will ALWAYS find some reason to conclude that invasion (or even the U.S. defending itself) is unacceptable.