Oh, and repeating the same thing doesn’t make it any less a lie.

But Henry, it’s your favorite technique! (As seen in this thread.) LOL

Clearly, you unable to come up with a response.

Already discussed / explained at #65. **Explained for the grownups, that is. Not for you. I admit I’ve left you without little basis to understand** why the attention I’m giving you is cursory! Why I’m not down there in the trenches, spending SO much time with you! Such things are difficult to explain to people who argue like six year olds.

Straight bath houses – Bah! That’s what truck stops are for!!!!

So, everyone at Folsom brings children and masterbates in front of them. I didn’t know, as I’ve never been. I’ll have to defer to your personal knowledge.

If that’s true, then I am all for shutting it down.

It’s sad that in your mind, you can not keep these two things separate.

That’s because people are dressing up two-year-olds as sexual slaves and taking them to “show off” for an “educational experience” at an event full of naked and semi-naked adults masturbating and having public sex in front of them — which happens to be the Folsom Street Fair.

But for you to interfere with that would be “legislating your morality”, so you won’t and don’t.

ILC: No it wasn’t. Oh, and repeating the same thing doesn’t make it any less a lie. Clearly, you unable to come up with a response. Which is fine, and not that surprising.

Not a response.

Already discussed / explained at #65. *Explained for the grownups, that is. Not for you. I admit I’ve left you without little basis to understand* why the attention I’m giving you is cursory! Why I’m not down there in the trenches, spending SO much time with you! Such things are difficult to explain to people who argue like six year olds.

Two, clearly, is not enough.

You have to admire such an unwillingness to change your opinion even when
Confronted with independent evidence to the contrary.

VtK: I’m in a 10 year monogamous relationship. I think that’s personal responsibility, isn’t it?

Oh, and ILC, 258: Not a response.

And as usual, instead of taking personal responsibility, Henry stamps his tiny little foot and points that other people do it.

You’re right, V. We’ve come full circle to the “straights do it too” type of lame rationalizations that Henry began with at #5.

Dismissed without explanation

Already discussed / explained at #65. **Explained for the grownups, that is. Not for you. I admit I’ve left you without little basis to understand** why the attention I’m giving you is cursory! Why I’m not down there in the trenches, spending SO much time with you! Such things are difficult to explain to people who argue like six year olds.

Never mind that straight people don’t have their community advocating for their ‘civil right’ to engage in public indecency, or sponsoring street festivals devoted to glorifying depravity.

But, if Henry is too dense to have gotten that not-very-subtle distinction by now… he is hopelessly obtuse.

250: so flawed that it is virtually as bad

Very nice. Dismissed without explanation, yet your “Wild Guess” is fine proof.

Here’s another, older than the first one I posted. From the NE Journal of Medicine.

Of heterosexually active adults in the general population, about 20 percent of men have had 1 sexual partner during their lives, 55 percent have had up to 20 partners, and about 25 percent have had 20 or more partners11.

Some older studies conducted before the epidemic of the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) indicated that homosexual men were more likely than heterosexual men to have had a very large number of sexual partners14. More recent population-based studies have found this to be relatively uncommon. For instance, Fay et al.10 found that of men who had homosexual contact after the age of 20, almost all had 20 or fewer homosexual partners in their lifetimes. Of 1450 men in the sample, only 2 were reported to have had 100 or more same-sex partners10.

The inconsistency in the data on the number of sexual partners of homosexual men probably reflects flaws in the sampling techniques of the earlier studies (e.g., recruiting subjects in gay bars) and their completion before the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) epidemic

Not a response.

Already discussed / explained at #65. **Explained for the grownups, that is. Not for you. I admit I’ve left you without little basis to understand** why the attention I’m giving you is cursory! Why I’m not down there in the trenches, spending SO much time with you! Such things are difficult to explain to people who argue like six year olds.

Not a response.

249. Opposing the sexual molestation of young children is an easy call

Apparently not, as NDT seems convinced that I am supportive of it, my statements to the contrary not withstanding.

Public indecency? Public sex? Promiscuity in general? Who has the moral guts to take a stand?,

This is easy. I think all are a bad idea. I also think all are practiced by both gay and straight people.

Not a response.

Already discussed / explained at #65. ***Explained for the grownups, that is. Not for you. I admit I’ve left you without little basis to understand*** why the attention I’m giving you is cursory! Why I’m not down there in the trenches, spending SO much time with you! Such things are difficult to explain to people who argue like six year olds.

248. Explained for the grownups

Again, look at the quote. It explained nothing. It called me a child and apoligzed to the group for going off topic.

Not a response.

As opposed to your scientific “I’ll pick 70/30″ method, you mean?

No. Rather, so flawed that it is virtually as bad as my “wild guess” (that was how I characterized / presented it, Mr. 6 Year Old) 70-30 method.