<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Republicans Against 8 Meeting this Sat. 08/16 in LA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/08/14/republicans-against-8-meeting-this-sat-0816-in-la/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/08/14/republicans-against-8-meeting-this-sat-0816-in-la/</link>
	<description>The Internet home for American gay conservatives.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:03:18 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Q</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/08/14/republicans-against-8-meeting-this-sat-0816-in-la/comment-page-1/#comment-294400</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Q</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 08:25:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=3455#comment-294400</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m curious.  Do you claim to believe that the CA Supreme Court ruling that created a right to SSM in CA was legitimate?  IOW, do you believe that at some point in the past CA&#039;s voters actually had added a Consitutional Right to SSM?

If you do, well, then you&#039;re so dishonest that you&#039;re not worth discussing anything with.

If you don&#039;t, how do you justify putting yourself on the same side as those dishonest judges?

It would be one thing to oppose the Proposition if the Court had ruled honestly, which is to say if they hadn&#039;t created a &quot;right&quot; to SSM..  But how do you justify fighting to protect a clearly illegitimate assault on democracy?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m curious.  Do you claim to believe that the CA Supreme Court ruling that created a right to SSM in CA was legitimate?  IOW, do you believe that at some point in the past CA&#8217;s voters actually had added a Consitutional Right to SSM?</p>
<p>If you do, well, then you&#8217;re so dishonest that you&#8217;re not worth discussing anything with.</p>
<p>If you don&#8217;t, how do you justify putting yourself on the same side as those dishonest judges?</p>
<p>It would be one thing to oppose the Proposition if the Court had ruled honestly, which is to say if they hadn&#8217;t created a &#8220;right&#8221; to SSM..  But how do you justify fighting to protect a clearly illegitimate assault on democracy?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Get conservatives to help&#8230; (Um, I could have told you that) &#171; Reid&#8217;s Rhetoric</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/08/14/republicans-against-8-meeting-this-sat-0816-in-la/comment-page-1/#comment-293757</link>
		<dc:creator>Get conservatives to help&#8230; (Um, I could have told you that) &#171; Reid&#8217;s Rhetoric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 15:23:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=3455#comment-293757</guid>
		<description>[...] returned from the Republicans Against 8 meeting. While I canâ€™t disclose everything that was discussed there, I can put forward an idea that came [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] returned from the Republicans Against 8 meeting. While I canâ€™t disclose everything that was discussed there, I can put forward an idea that came [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GayPatriot &#187; Get Ward Connerly to Speak Out Against Prop. 8</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/08/14/republicans-against-8-meeting-this-sat-0816-in-la/comment-page-1/#comment-291676</link>
		<dc:creator>GayPatriot &#187; Get Ward Connerly to Speak Out Against Prop. 8</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 22:01:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=3455#comment-291676</guid>
		<description>[...] Republicans Against 8 Meeting this Sat. 08/16 in LA [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Republicans Against 8 Meeting this Sat. 08/16 in LA [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GMRinSAN</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/08/14/republicans-against-8-meeting-this-sat-0816-in-la/comment-page-1/#comment-290808</link>
		<dc:creator>GMRinSAN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 18:17:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=3455#comment-290808</guid>
		<description>Bravo Dan - great information. I&#039;m very glad to see this. I completely agree that socially-moderate Republicans and independents may well be the deciding voters on this. I wish I were closer to the L.A. area to attend myself. 

It will be very helpful to coalesce around some positive, conservative reasons for opposing Prop. 8. Arguments that might even work on my very conservative parents! ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bravo Dan &#8211; great information. I&#8217;m very glad to see this. I completely agree that socially-moderate Republicans and independents may well be the deciding voters on this. I wish I were closer to the L.A. area to attend myself. </p>
<p>It will be very helpful to coalesce around some positive, conservative reasons for opposing Prop. 8. Arguments that might even work on my very conservative parents! <img src='http://www.gaypatriot.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

