<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Of Blogs &amp; Debunking Rumors About Ideological Adversaries</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/08/21/of-blogs-debunking-rumors-about-ideological-adversaries/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/08/21/of-blogs-debunking-rumors-about-ideological-adversaries/</link>
	<description>The Internet home for American gay conservatives.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:32:12 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: rightwingprof</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/08/21/of-blogs-debunking-rumors-about-ideological-adversaries/comment-page-1/#comment-296690</link>
		<dc:creator>rightwingprof</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 16:10:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=3468#comment-296690</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s some of that going on on the right as well. Speculation over who McCain is going to pick for VP is great, but it&#039;s not hard to find people who are foaming at the mouth furious about a VP pick that hasn&#039;t happened yet, based on nothing more than speculation.

That&#039;s not rational. That&#039;s insane.

I&#039;ve taken a break from reading the Corner until after next Friday, just because every other day, KLo is having another conniption fit over a pick that hasn&#039;t happened yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s some of that going on on the right as well. Speculation over who McCain is going to pick for VP is great, but it&#8217;s not hard to find people who are foaming at the mouth furious about a VP pick that hasn&#8217;t happened yet, based on nothing more than speculation.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s not rational. That&#8217;s insane.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve taken a break from reading the Corner until after next Friday, just because every other day, KLo is having another conniption fit over a pick that hasn&#8217;t happened yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leah</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/08/21/of-blogs-debunking-rumors-about-ideological-adversaries/comment-page-1/#comment-296673</link>
		<dc:creator>Leah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 15:52:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=3468#comment-296673</guid>
		<description>Mitchell,  right on. In America a person can choose to leave a religion - even if the religion feels it owns you for life. 
You second comment was spot on as well, I don&#039;t think Obama is a true member of any religious group. He chose the most radical liberation theology church he could find. It was all done for political purposes. 

If he were really a Christian who was unaware for 20 years about the nature of his Church, you&#039;d think that upon leaving that Church, he&#039;s choose another.

Haven&#039;t heard anything yet about his newest religious home. Because he doesn&#039;t have any. I know he&#039;s busy running for president, he doesn&#039;t have the time.  Though truth be told, it is meaningless to him. The whole religious belief issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mitchell,  right on. In America a person can choose to leave a religion &#8211; even if the religion feels it owns you for life.<br />
You second comment was spot on as well, I don&#8217;t think Obama is a true member of any religious group. He chose the most radical liberation theology church he could find. It was all done for political purposes. </p>
<p>If he were really a Christian who was unaware for 20 years about the nature of his Church, you&#8217;d think that upon leaving that Church, he&#8217;s choose another.</p>
<p>Haven&#8217;t heard anything yet about his newest religious home. Because he doesn&#8217;t have any. I know he&#8217;s busy running for president, he doesn&#8217;t have the time.  Though truth be told, it is meaningless to him. The whole religious belief issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ILoveCapitalism</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/08/21/of-blogs-debunking-rumors-about-ideological-adversaries/comment-page-1/#comment-296601</link>
		<dc:creator>ILoveCapitalism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 14:24:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=3468#comment-296601</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Religion shouldnâ€™t matter.... Religion is a personal belief, so it shouldnâ€™t be cast upon you just because of what religion your parents are&lt;/blockquote&gt;That is a very American attitude.  And thus, one I agree with heartily.

My #3 just states facts.  Approximately 1.X billion people in the world are going to view Obama as an apostate Muslim.  (Unless, of course, he buys their goodwill by appeasing them.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Religion shouldnâ€™t matter&#8230;. Religion is a personal belief, so it shouldnâ€™t be cast upon you just because of what religion your parents are</p></blockquote>
<p>That is a very American attitude.  And thus, one I agree with heartily.</p>
<p>My #3 just states facts.  Approximately 1.X billion people in the world are going to view Obama as an apostate Muslim.  (Unless, of course, he buys their goodwill by appeasing them.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mitchell Blatt</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/08/21/of-blogs-debunking-rumors-about-ideological-adversaries/comment-page-1/#comment-296539</link>
		<dc:creator>Mitchell Blatt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 13:23:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=3468#comment-296539</guid>
		<description>Religion is a personal belief, so it shouldn&#039;t be cast upon you just because of what religion your parents are, thereby granting you a religion you may or may not agree with.

As it is, Obama agrees with the radical belief of Black Seperatism.  Now, &lt;i&gt;that&#039;s&lt;/i&gt; an issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Religion is a personal belief, so it shouldn&#8217;t be cast upon you just because of what religion your parents are, thereby granting you a religion you may or may not agree with.</p>
<p>As it is, Obama agrees with the radical belief of Black Seperatism.  Now, <i>that&#8217;s</i> an issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mitchell Blatt</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/08/21/of-blogs-debunking-rumors-about-ideological-adversaries/comment-page-1/#comment-296536</link>
		<dc:creator>Mitchell Blatt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 13:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=3468#comment-296536</guid>
		<description>First off, IF Obama is a Muslim, who cares?  Religion shouldn&#039;t matter.

That said, we shouldn&#039;t be using Muslim law in America to define who is Muslim.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First off, IF Obama is a Muslim, who cares?  Religion shouldn&#8217;t matter.</p>
<p>That said, we shouldn&#8217;t be using Muslim law in America to define who is Muslim.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ILoveCapitalism</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/08/21/of-blogs-debunking-rumors-about-ideological-adversaries/comment-page-1/#comment-296187</link>
		<dc:creator>ILoveCapitalism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 06:24:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=3468#comment-296187</guid>
		<description>Slight apology - My eyes had read the GPW quote as &quot;DoubtLESS [Sullivan&#039;s] dishonest line of attack will cost him...&quot;  Just realized that GPW probably meant &quot;I doubt [Sullivan&#039;s] dishonest line of attack will cost him...&quot;, the opposite sense and the sense I would agree with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Slight apology &#8211; My eyes had read the GPW quote as &#8220;DoubtLESS [Sullivan's] dishonest line of attack will cost him&#8230;&#8221;  Just realized that GPW probably meant &#8220;I doubt [Sullivan's] dishonest line of attack will cost him&#8230;&#8221;, the opposite sense and the sense I would agree with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ILoveCapitalism</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/08/21/of-blogs-debunking-rumors-about-ideological-adversaries/comment-page-1/#comment-296186</link>
		<dc:creator>ILoveCapitalism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 06:21:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=3468#comment-296186</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Doubt [Sullivan&#039;s] dishonest line of attack will cost him many of his readers on the left.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Oh, please.  It won&#039;t.

And now a word about the allegedly &quot;false&quot;, allegedly &quot;debunked&quot;, Obama-Muslim &quot;rumors&quot;.

- Fact: Obama&#039;s father was a Muslim.
- Fact: Under Muslim law, if you father is a Muslim, so are you.  (Different from Jewish law which relies on the mother.)
- Fact: Under Muslim law, the worst thing you can be is a Muslim apostate: someone who has converted *away* from Islam.
- Fact: Obama converted (we are told over and over - Ahem) away from Islam.

Conclusion: Under Muslim law, and accepting Obama&#039;s account of his faith at face value, he is an awful creature, the most dangerous and offensive (to Muslims) President that we could elect.  Far more than Bush.

Don&#039;t believe me?  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/12/opinion/12luttwak.html?partner=rssnyt&amp;emc=rss&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;It was in the New York Times&lt;/a&gt;.  Obama *IS* a Muslim - that is, an apostate Muslim - *in the eyes of Muslims*.  That&#039;s the kernel of truth everyone keeps getting wrong, on both sides of the political spectrum.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Doubt [Sullivan's] dishonest line of attack will cost him many of his readers on the left.</p></blockquote>
<p>Oh, please.  It won&#8217;t.</p>
<p>And now a word about the allegedly &#8220;false&#8221;, allegedly &#8220;debunked&#8221;, Obama-Muslim &#8220;rumors&#8221;.</p>
<p>- Fact: Obama&#8217;s father was a Muslim.<br />
- Fact: Under Muslim law, if you father is a Muslim, so are you.  (Different from Jewish law which relies on the mother.)<br />
- Fact: Under Muslim law, the worst thing you can be is a Muslim apostate: someone who has converted *away* from Islam.<br />
- Fact: Obama converted (we are told over and over &#8211; Ahem) away from Islam.</p>
<p>Conclusion: Under Muslim law, and accepting Obama&#8217;s account of his faith at face value, he is an awful creature, the most dangerous and offensive (to Muslims) President that we could elect.  Far more than Bush.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t believe me?  <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/12/opinion/12luttwak.html?partner=rssnyt&amp;emc=rss" rel="nofollow">It was in the New York Times</a>.  Obama *IS* a Muslim &#8211; that is, an apostate Muslim &#8211; *in the eyes of Muslims*.  That&#8217;s the kernel of truth everyone keeps getting wrong, on both sides of the political spectrum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/08/21/of-blogs-debunking-rumors-about-ideological-adversaries/comment-page-1/#comment-296092</link>
		<dc:creator>michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 03:25:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=3468#comment-296092</guid>
		<description>it was a very good post. takes spin and exposes it for what it is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it was a very good post. takes spin and exposes it for what it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

