Gay Patriot Header Image

The Reagan Tribute

Posted by GayPatriotWest at 10:05 pm - September 2, 2008.
Filed under: RNC Convention,Ronald Reagan

They’re running the film now.  I’m tearing up.

Share

11 Comments

  1. Dan, it’s just the dust and the musty smell of the convention hall that you’re responding to. :)

    Comment by Commentator from LA — September 2, 2008 @ 11:03 pm - September 2, 2008

  2. I cried on and off for three days when Reagan died.

    Comment by Vince P — September 2, 2008 @ 11:34 pm - September 2, 2008

  3. #2 – Ditto. And I too teared up during the Reagan video, as well as the one for Navy SEAL Mansoour.

    Regards,
    Peter H.

    Comment by Peter Hughes — September 2, 2008 @ 11:52 pm - September 2, 2008

  4. Barf! and you folks sarcastically call Obama “the one”?! you display sick idol worship at it’s worst. Big H strikes again

    Comment by Dave — September 3, 2008 @ 11:27 am - September 3, 2008

  5. We hold President Reagan in resepect for the content of his character, not the colour of his-

    Never mind, you wouldn’t understand.

    Comment by The Livewire — September 3, 2008 @ 1:20 pm - September 3, 2008

  6. #4 – Dave, if you can’t tell the difference between respect for a fallen President and frenzied idol worship for a no-experience JCL, then I pity you. Deeply.

    Regards,
    Peter H.

    Comment by Peter Hughes — September 3, 2008 @ 2:48 pm - September 3, 2008

  7. FYI – “JCL” stands for “Johnny Come Lately,” for those of you in Rio Linda.

    Regards,
    Peter H.

    Comment by Peter Hughes — September 3, 2008 @ 8:03 pm - September 3, 2008

  8. 5. Wow. how often are people going to keep spewing the idea that the single reason why people will vote for Obama is because he’s black? Other black candidates came along who weren’t embraced by democrats simply because they were black (Jesse Jackson most notably). With these non-sensical attacks, then perhaps people could nonsensically lob back that you only support McCain because he’s white?

    Comment by Kevin — September 3, 2008 @ 8:23 pm - September 3, 2008

  9. Peter, if you can’t tell the difference between people supporting a candidate who is not a puppet of the sadochristian right, who are excited by the slight hope that this country may take a step towards freedom again and idol worship then I am scared for you. You will continue to lick the boots of the party who officially denounces you and calls you a threat.

    BTW, Reagan isn’t “fallen”, soldiers who die in battle are fallen. Respect is fine, worship is demeaning.

    Comment by Dave — September 3, 2008 @ 10:16 pm - September 3, 2008

  10. #8 – Because, Kevvie, as The Snob’s veep pick points out, he’s a “clean, articulate black man,” which leads one to believe that it is not the same as with the others you named.

    According to the libtard left, The Snob is non-threatening to white men and women, and he can help assuage white liberal guilt and allow them to atone for sins which they never even committed.

    And don’t get me started on The Snob’s 99% black voter approval rate.

    Next question.

    Regards,
    Peter H.

    Comment by Peter Hughes — September 4, 2008 @ 12:03 am - September 4, 2008

  11. You Log Cabin guys puzzle me. Reagan waited 5 years to say the word AIDS and you want to worship him? Wake up. Reaching all the way to Alaska to find a Republican without an indictment on them didn’t take a maverick. It took plain old-fashioned no-common-sense and a fat ego. Having Sara Palin a heartbeat away from the oval office is a pretty dismal prospect with a cancer survivor looking as pale and frail as McCain and shows just how poor John McCain’s judgment is. So Ann Coulter wasn’t interested in the job? After the last 8 years of nothing but death, debt and slander, there she was onstage offering more of the same bile and mocking to the hungry mob. More WWF than GOP. Not very American. I said to my friends after 911 that Bush would wave and ride the flag all the way to the bottom. He eventually did. Even to the unparalleled low as to off-stage without an invite this week. Here we are at a critical crossroads and we debate a 17 year old unwed kid used as political roadkill and diversion from the real issues. Where’s Dan Quayle armed with moral wisdom when we need him? Rome is burning and I don’t want to listen to John and Sara fiddle. CHANGE. YES WE CAN.

    Comment by Paul F. — September 4, 2008 @ 5:12 am - September 4, 2008

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.