How old are you moron?

It never surprises me what a bunch of cry-babies gay Republicans are. You’re so desperate for acceptance from Democrats and can only throw tantrums because they won’t accept your politics.

Ann Coulter, Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity and other Republicans like you trash liberals as traitors and fiends, why the hell should liberals, gay or straight be nice to you?

Get a life, you whiner! Your party used homophobia to win votes in 2004. Why would any sane gay person dismiss that from his/her reasoning?

… and, Ann Coulter invites ridicule – she is one of the most vile and hateful characters around along with that Malkin creature and the pathetic, closeted, Weiner guy.

P.S. If I am attacking it will be obvious.

Part Two:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Eneq0jcMlTw

LOL

It is when people “role-play” (so that any rejection is to the role being played, rather than themselves,) that the people they meet have the perception of being rejected first; they will act accordingly.

You will find that most people you meet have no problem with a covenant between two people of the same sex–with all of the legal ramifications being exactly the same. The matter of contention is the name of the covenant. Do not hijack the religious-based “name” for the covenant. To use the word “Marriage” for a civil covenant between members of the same sex–even though it is a traditional use of the word for a civil/legal covenant–is equivalent to a state-mandated change in religious doctrine.

Regardless of intention, it is the establishment of a “State Religion”–a really big no-no.

I honestly believe that a legal covenant between two people of the same sex would win by a landslide in each and every State. If one wishes to be “fair”: Remove the word “Marriage” from all of the documents involving the legal covenant between two people regardless of sex and place the word “Marriage” back in the religious bodies where it belongs.

Of course, maybe I’m a bit off.

I also wish it was not necessary for people to have living wills and trusts–and paperwork in their wallet and/or medic-alert bracelet with contact information in case of emergency. I do not want to be harangued (on my deathbed) by Christopher Hitchins for my beliefs, nor do I want to be tortured by a religious zealot because I may be insufficiently “saved” in their eyes. Or have vultures hovering about for monies which I may have. I don’t consider those evil things to be specific to any group of people.

It is terrible when anything keeps comforting people/loved ones apart. (Twisted families, weird people, and weird nurses have screwed it up for everybody.)

I had an acquaintance who was “the step-brother” of his love in the hospital to get around a twisted nurse. Other staff at the hospital weren’t a problem, nor in his case, were his family.

Dan,

Belated thanks from the Ohio Hermit. It was very enjoyable having your POV from the floor and the rafters.

http://www.americablog.com/2008/09/triump-at-gop-convention.html

Socially I don’t agree with the GOP but always vote that way because of my desire to have employment in the future. I hope that someday soon the GOP can break away from the religious communities that have attached themselves to the party. Not that I feel that religious people shouldn’t have representation but many of their beliefs aren’t supported by their congregations let alone people outside of it. I find it odd that many democratic politicians can attend christian churches but don’t have to reflect those beliefs in the politics.

Not all republicans are bible thumping anti-gays. I for one fully support the gay community and find that sexual orientation should not matter when meeting and working with new people. Saying you can’t befriend someone because of sexual orientation is like saying you can’t befriend someone with blue eyes, completely ridiculous.

I hope that sometime in the very near future the GOP will start supporting gay marriage. I feel that it is something that is long over due in this country. Denying a gay couple the same rights a straight couple has through marriage is crime and a severe inequality. As for the critics who use religion as a opposition of gay marriage, their is a little thing called separation of church and state. Legally being married wouldn’t make their crazy church have to marry anyone or recognize any union before their God. And soon most republicans will, if they already don’t, see this as well.

And for the more socially conservative republicans who find sexual orientation to be a social issue that needs resolving, I hope they rethink what they believe. The U.S. has the highest divorce rate in the world. I think that is a true social issue. And so any couple who can get married and stay that way regardless of sexual orientation should have the support of society and will have mine.

I can only encourage members of the gay community to become more involved in the GOP. The more they see your support, the sooner they will show their support for you. I’m sure you already have support from many republicans, they just might not have said it yet.

Sorry. That first paragraph in my post should have been italicized; it’s a quote from Dave.

Lucky dog.

Regards,
Peter H.

Too bad I didn’t get to meet any of the bloggers that were there…maybe I need to be more out!?

Jeff (with emphasis on the -AMERICAN)

NDT, Define hostile.

Except when gay Democrats do it, of course, at which point it’s “pro-gay” and “gay-supportive”.