V the K, totally agree with you there. Some colleges have also eliminated men’s programs, to make participation equal. The NCAA keeps on saying that’s not what the law was intended to do, and urges colleges to not cut men’s programs to abide by Title IX, but college’s find that eliminating programs is the easiest way to do that.

You know, 400,000 people attend Folsom Street Fair. Wouldn’t you think somebody would have said, “Hey, get those kids outta here!”

Excellent point. First of all, who knows how many of these attendants actually encountered kids there. And the ones that did see kids, I have to wonder what they did do?

“Which means, as I pointed out,” that you are making assumptions not based on what I wrote but on what you want it to say.

“That makes it obvious that you” are unable to deal with reality and have to ease your conscience by fabricating the thoughts of others.

#49 TGC – saying the USA can be better is not saying America Sucks. Hard concept for you, I know, but if Obama is saying America Sucks, then so is every other candidate who promises to make things better including those we make you wet every time you think of them.

Which means, as I pointed out, that you’re condemning us rather than the liberals and LGBT people who actually carried out the actions.

That makes it obvious that you are more interested in protecting and defending child sexual abusers and sexualizers than you are stopping them.

Title IX, for example, was intended only to provide equal access of females to athletics. But the strident bureaucrats who implemented it insisted on equality of participation, which has resulted in the scaling back of athletic opportunities for boys.

The legislation doesn’t say “…grades K-12… courses shall include instruction” on STDs and condom use. But rather, age-appropriate instruction. “Age-appropriate” is the weasel factor. It makes it a matter of interpretation. You and I know that age-appropriate instruction for a kindergartner is to say nothing. But the language puts the bureaucrats in charge. It basically *lets* them (not requires them to) teach age-inappropriate things while hiding behind a claim that they sincerely believe it is age-appropriate.

“Whenever such courses of instruction are provided in any of grades K-12, then such courses also shall include age-appropriate instruction on the prevention of sexually transmitted infections.”

Obama specifically demanded the legislation be changed from 6-12 to K-12 and the legislation required (that word “shall” in the quote above) teaching about STD’s and condom use.

V, I’ve never once tried to defend sexualizing children and I would be happy to join anyone in the fight against it. When you stop fighting liberals and start addressing the true problems, let me know.

The words you’re looking for are “the truth”.

One would think, Dave, that if you were truly opposed to all of these things, you’d be attacking the gay parents, gay public-sex pushers, and liberals who support the sexualization of children — rather than the people like us who are pointing them out and condemning it as wrong.

Instead, you’re condemning us for condemning them.

This thread has some of the most ignorant and sickening comments I have ever read on here. Lie after lie after lie about what Obama believes about sex education. Lie after lie after lie about what liberals believe about sex education. Livewire’s buggery statement is so far beyond offensive that I cannot even come up with the words to describe it. Some of you have truly sick minds and all you can do is attempt to attribute to others what is going on in your head. Such displays of ignorance are common on CWFA, FRC, AFTAH and the like websites, to see the same diseased attitude here is appalling. Fighting the over sexualization of children, the violence in the entertainment field and the general disregard for human life that permeates the world is an excellent cause. These comments have NOTHING to do with that, they are pure hate and can only contribute to the problem. If you can’t base what you say on the truth, then STFUP and get the mental health therapy that you so clearly need.

Well, then maybe Obama should stop making personal attacks, and stop using empty-headed platitudes about ‘hope and change’ instead of talking about the issues, if McCain’s campaign depends on BO continuing to attack and distract.

Because the right to bugger Children is in the shadows and penumbras of the constitution, and Kevin and jody hope to get 5 people in black robes to agree with them and state there’s a consensus, even when there’s not.

D’Oh! You found me out! Can’t talk now though. I hear the school bus pulling into the shadows. No time to waist. There are children to bugger!

Other question: if Obama knew all these children that were being sexually abused, why was his first response to demand sex education in schools — versus having the parents he knew were sexually abusing their children arrested?

That’ll be non-sequiturs for $200, Alex. We’ll hit the Daily Double here pretty soon.

Comment by ILoveCapitalism — September 11, 2008 @ 1:20 am – September 11, 2008