Teaching kids that masturbation should be done in private?!?! It’s like Obama murdered Matthew Shepherd all over again.

Your comment reminds me, I need to get a pair of sh*t kickers.

SEXUAL BEHAVIOR

* Touching and rubbing one’s own genitals to feel good is called masturbation.
* Some boys and girls masturbate and others do not.
* Masturbation should be done in a private place.

So you fully endorse other people taking children to sex fairs, dressed as sexual slaves, where naked and half-naked adults masturbate and perform sexual acts in front of them, because opposing it would be imposing your beliefs on others.

Why do you tolerate gays sexually abusing children and claim that gay people who are opposed to that are “homophobes”, nick? Why do you claim that people who don’t support gays like yourself taking children to sex fairs are “self-loathing”?

Nick, just STFU, you liar. The text of the bill that Obama voted for is public record and was an attempt to expand comprehensive sex education from 6-12 graders to K-12. The language of the proposed law stated that the instruction SHALL include information on the prevention of STDs, including HIV, and specifically required the discussion of SEXUAL ACTIVITY AND BEHAVIOR. Intellectual dishonesty is what you are engaging in by trying to paint the bill as an effort to protect children from sexual predators.

Obama’s record (if you can call it a “record”) is totally indefensible, both for the positions he HAS taken and his efforts to lie about those positions in this election. Nick, if you’re so concerned about intellectual honesty, I’d love to hear your opinion on Obama’s unwavering support for infanticide. Care to weigh in?

It’s fascinating that you are so busy trying to boost Sarah Palin but refuse to be honest and criticize her for her faults. Where’s the intellectual honesty in that?

This investigation began prior to her being the vice presidential nominee. Attempts to make it a non-scandal make it seem like a cover up. Someone who labels herself as a reformer should not have a problem appearing before an inquiry.

Bill Clinton perjured himself. He deservedly received punishment for his actions. Lie under oath is a crime.

What are your thoughts about Palin and her staff using personal email accounts to skirt sunshine laws that require that email in use for state business is part of the public record? Doesn’t that sound dishonest and sneaky?

I’ve never like David Brooks or Richard Cohen, two conservative writers for the NY Times and the Washington Post, respectively. But both of them have reviewed Palin’s background and given her a negative review, judging her unready to for the task.

Similarly, Cohen, who has spent the last year pounding Barack Obama, expresses his deep disappointment in McCain’s lies.

My question to you, Mr. Patriot, is why haven’t you taken a public stand against blatant lies? Do you think it is appropriate to lie viciously against your opponents to win?

Let’s take the terrible smear that tries to trick voters to believe that Obama’s support of legislation to help teach children how to protect themselves from predators is “sex education.”

Are you against protecting children from perverts? (Cheap shot, but used t demonstrate situation.)

On this blog, one of your regular commenters, ND40, lied and said Obama supported gays taking their kids to an S&M street fair. A lie that I easily disproved. But what did ND40 (North Dallas 40) say about his own belief about gays in general with that lie? How is that not internalized hatred for gays? Equating support for gays to linking gays and S&M? Sounds like something a homophobe would say. Not a well-adjusted gay man.

Frankly, I would never take a kid to an S&M show or to an R-rated movie or let them watch Family Guy. But those decisions about my beliefs in right and wrong, which have nothing to do with my thoughts on people’s sexuality.

Where is the intellectual honesty? What moral stance drives you? Do you believe that destroying the reputation of an innocent man is correct?

What about the phony use of sexism to deflect legitimate questioning? Charging sexism because Saturday Night Live spoofs you? I seem to recall SNL ripping both Obama and Clinton to shreds last year. Neither side cried racism or sexism.

Is that what it means to be a “conservative” in your book?

Are you a Christian? If so, is that how Christians are supposed to act?

Instead of repeating talking points, why not flex your intellectual muscle?

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/15/AR2008091502406.html